Génotypage de 21 000 donneurs de sang au Québec et analyse du RHD

Transfusing children with sickle cell disease using blood group genotyping when the pool of Black donors is limited

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell transfusion is an effective treatment for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Alloimmunization can occur after a single transfusion, limiting further usage of blood transfusion. It is recommended to match for the ABO, D, C, E, and K antigens to reduce risks of alloimmunization. However, availability of compatible blood units can be challenging for blood providers with a limited number of Black donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective cohort of 205 pediatric patients with SCD was genotyped for the RH and FY genes. Transfusion and alloimmunization history were collected. Our capacity to find RhCE-matched donors was evaluated using a database of genotyped donors.

RESULTS

Nearly 9.8% of patients carried a partial D variant and 5.9% were D-. Only 45.9% of RHCE alleles were normal, with the majority of variants affecting the RH5 (e) antigen. We found an alloimmunization prevalence of 20.7% and a Rh alloimmunization prevalence of 7.1%. Since Black donors represented only 1.40% of all blood donors in our province, D- Caucasian donors were mostly used to provide phenotype matched products. Compatible blood for patients with rare Rh variants was found only in Black donors. A donor with compatible RhCE could be identified for all patients.

CONCLUSION

Although Rh-compatible donors were identified, blood units might not be available when needed and/or the extended phenotype or ABO group might not match the patient. A greater effort has to be made for the recruitment of Black donors to accommodate patients with SCD.

The screening of rare blood donors in a highly admixed population: A new approach for Holley and Diego genotyping and impact of genomic and self-reported ancestry

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to develop strategies for genotyping DO*HY (Dombrock system) and DI*A/DI*B (Diego system) alleles and to evaluate the impact of genomic and self-declared ancestry on rare donor screening in admixed populations.

BACKGROUND

The antigens Hy and Di^b demonstrate clinical importance. The lack of antisera for the serological evaluation of these antigens makes it necessary to develop molecular methods. In addition, considering that some rare red blood cell phenotypes present differences in frequency between ethnic groups, it is important to assess the applicability of self-declared ancestry in the search for rare donors in admixed populations.

METHODS

DO*HY and DI*A/DI*B genotyping based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was standardised. A total of 457 blood donors clustered by self-defined skin colour/race categories were genotyped. Furthermore, individual genomic ancestry was used in the analyses.

RESULTS

The assays developed are reproducible and provide satisfactory results even at low concentrations of DNA, which make them useful in situations where the DNA is scarce, such as dried blood spots on filter paper, or when screening for pooled samples. No significant difference was observed in the frequencies of the DI*A, DI*B and DO*HY, comparing the self-declared White (branco) donors with those who are Black (preto) and Brown (pardo).

CONCLUSION

Real-time PCR, especially using pooled samples, is a promising strategy to screen rare blood donors. Although both self-reported race/colour and some blood group phenotypes are associated with ancestry, the results point to a greater complexity in the application of self-declared race/colour in the screening of rare donors in admixed populations.

Massively parallel and multiplex blood group genotyping using next-generation-sequencing

OBJECTIVES

Thirty-six blood group systems are listed by the International Society of Blood Transfusion, containing almost 350 antigens. Most of these result from a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Serology is the standard method for blood group typing. However, this technique has some limitations and cannot respond to the growing demand of blood product typing for a large number of antigens. Here we describe a blood group genotyping assay directly from whole blood samples using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), allowing the simultaneous identification of 15 SNPs associated with the blood group systems of 95 patients in a single run.

DESIGN AND METHOD

After an automated DNA extraction, targets are amplified by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCRm). Two panels addressing 9 groups have been developed (MNS, Lutheran, Kell, Duffy, Kidd, Diego, Yt, Dombrock, and Colton), one for 8 SNPs, the other for 7 SNPs. For each sample, both panels corresponding to 14 amplicons (1 amplicon containing 2 SNPs) are pooled. Then a dual-indexed library is generated from each pool by linking Illumina adaptors directly onto amplicons, followed by sequencing using the MiSeq platform (Illumina).

RESULTS

In a single experiment, 95 blood donor samples have been sequenced for the genes of interest. Among the 1425 targeted single nucleotide polymorphisms, 1420 were identified by sequencing, reflecting a coverage of 99.65%. The obtained data shows a good correlation (99% for all SNPs) with other blood group typing methods. Depending on the allele pairs analyzed, correlations vary between 97.12 and 100%.

CONCLUSION

Next-Generation sequencing would supplement serological and molecular techniques and, in the near future, could replace it with complete and fast results acquisition for pre-screening and identification of rare blood bags.

Integration of red cell genotyping into the blood supply chain: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

When problems with compatibility arise, transfusion services often use time-consuming serological tests to identify antigen-negative red cell units for safe transfusion. New methods have made red cell genotyping possible for all clinically relevant blood group antigens. We did mass-scale genotyping of donor blood and provided hospitals with access to a large red cell database to meet the demand for antigen-negative red cell units beyond ABO and Rh blood typing.

METHODS

We established a red cell genotype database at the BloodCenter of Wisconsin on July 17, 2010. All self-declared African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American blood donors were eligible irrespective of their ABO and Rh type or history of donation. Additionally, blood donors who were groups O, A, and B, irrespective of their Rh phenotype, were eligible for inclusion only if they had a history of at least three donations in the previous 3 years, with one donation in the previous 12 months at the BloodCenter of Wisconsin. We did red cell genotyping with a nanofluidic microarray system, using 32 single nucleotide polymorphisms to predict 42 blood group antigens. An additional 14 antigens were identified via serological phenotype. We monitored the ability of the red cell genotype database to meet demand for compatible blood during 3 years. In addition to the central database at the BloodCenter of Wisconsin, we gave seven hospitals online access to a web-based antigen query portal on May 1, 2013, to help them to locate antigen-negative red cell units in their own inventories.

FINDINGS

We analysed genotype data for 43,066 blood donors. Requests were filled for 5661 (99.8%) of 5672 patient encounters in which antigen-negative red cell units were needed. Red cell genotyping met the demand for antigen-negative blood in 5339 (94.1%) of 5672 patient encounters, and the remaining 333 (5.9%) requests were filled by use of serological data. Using the 42 antigens represented in our red cell genotype database, we were able to fill 14,357 (94.8%) of 15,140 requests for antigen-negative red cell units from hospitals served by the BloodCenter of Wisconsin. In the pilot phase, the seven hospitals identified 71 units from 52 antigen-negative red cell unit requests.

INTERPRETATION

Red cell genotyping has the potential to transform the way antigen-negative red cell units are provided. An antigen query portal could reduce the need for transportation of blood and serological screening. If this wealth of genotype data can be made easily accessible online, it will help with the supply of affordable antigen-negative red cell units to ensure patient safety.

FUNDING

BloodCenter of Wisconsin Diagnostic Laboratories Strategic Initiative and the NIH Clinical Center Intramural Research Program.

Evolution of technology for molecular genotyping in blood group systems

The molecular basis of the blood group antigens was identified first in the 1980s and 1990s. Since then the importance of molecular biology in transfusion medicine has been described extensively by several investigators. Molecular genotyping of blood group antigens is one of the important aspects and is successfully making its way into transfusion medicine. Low-, medium- and high-throughput techniques have been developed for this purpose. Depending on the requirement of the centre like screening for high- or low-prevalence antigens where antisera are not available, correct typing of multiple transfused patients, screening for antigen-negative donor units to reduce the rate of alloimmunization, etc. a suitable technique can be selected. The present review discusses the evolution of different techniques to detect molecular genotypes of blood group systems and how these approaches can be used in transfusion medicine where haemagglutination is of limited value. Currently, this technology is being used in only a few blood banks in India. Hence, there is a need for understanding this technology with all its variations.

Performance evaluation study of ID CORE XT, a high throughput blood group genotyping platform

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, red blood cell antigens have been identified using serological methods, but recent advances in molecular biology have made the implementation of methods for genetic testing of most blood group antigens possible. The goal of this study was to validate the performance of the ID CORE XT blood group typing assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One thousand independent samples from donors, patients and neonates were collected from three research institutes in Spain and the Netherlands. DNA was extracted from EDTA-anticoagulated blood. The data were processed with the ID CORE XT to obtain the genotypes and the predicted blood group phenotypes, and results were compared to those obtained with well-established serological and molecular methods. All 1,000 samples were typed for major blood group antigens (C, c, E, e, K) and 371-830 samples were typed for other antigens depending on the rarity and availability of serology comparators.

RESULTS

The incorrect call rate was 0%. Four "no calls" (rate: 0.014%) were resolved after repetition. The sensitivity of ID CORE XT for all phenotypes was 100% regarding serology. There was one discrepancy in E- antigen and 33 discrepancies in Fy^b- antigen. After bidirectional sequencing, all discrepancies were resolved in favour of ID CORE XT (100% specificity). ID CORE XT detected infrequent antigens of Caucasians in the sample as well as rare allelic variants.

DISCUSSION

In this evaluation performed in an extensive sample following the European Directive, the ID CORE XT blood genotyping assay performed as a reliable and accurate method for correctly predicting the genotype and phenotype of clinically relevant blood group antigens.

Development and Validation of a Fully Automated Platform for Extended Blood Group Genotyping

Thirty-five blood group systems, containing >300 antigens, are listed by the International Society of Blood Transfusion. Most of these antigens result from a single nucleotide polymorphism. Blood group typing is conventionally performed by serology. However, this technique has some limitations and cannot respond to the growing demand of blood products typed for a large number of antigens. The knowledge of the molecular basis of these red blood cell systems allowed the implementation of molecular biology methods in immunohematology laboratories. Here, we describe a blood group genotyping assay based on the use of TKL immobilization support and microarray-based HIFI technology that takes approximately 4 hours and 30 minutes from whole-blood samples to results analysis. Targets amplified by multiplex PCR were hybridized on the chip, and a revelation step allowed the simultaneous identification of up to 24 blood group antigens, leading to the determination of extended genotypes. Two panels of multiplex PCR were developed: Panel 1 (KEL1/2, KEL3/4; JK1/2; FY1/2; MNS1/2, MNS3/4, FY*Fy et FY*X) and Panel 2 (YT1/2; CO1/2; DO1/2, HY+, Jo(a+); LU1/2; DI1/2). We present the results of the evaluation of our platform on a panel of 583 and 190 blood donor samples for Panel 1 and 2, respectively. Good correlations (99% to 100%) with reference were obtained.

Dried blood spots of pooled samples for RHD gene screening in blood donors of mixed ancestry

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we present a strategy for RHD gene screening based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using dried blood spots of pooled samples.

BACKGROUND

Molecular analysis of blood donors may be used to detect RHD variants among the presumed D-negative individuals. RHD genotyping using pooled samples is a strategy to test a large number of samples at a more reasonable cost.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RHD gene detection based on real-time PCR using dried blood spots of pooled samples was standardised and used to evaluate 1550 Brazilian blood donors phenotyped as RhD-negative. Positive results were re-evaluated by retesting single samples using real-time PCR and conventional multiplex PCR to amplify five RHD-specific exons. PCR-sequence-specific primers was used to amplify RHDψ allele.

RESULTS

We devised a strategy for RHD gene screening using dried blood spots of five pooled samples. Among 1550 serologically D-negative blood donors, 58 (3.74%) had the RHD gene. The non-functional RHDψ allele was detected in 47 samples (3.02%).

CONCLUSION

The present method is a promising strategy to detect the RHD gene among presumed RhD-negative blood donors, particularly for populations with African ancestry.

Insights into RHCE Molecular Analysis in Samples with Partial D Variants: the Experience of Western France

BACKGROUND

Although systematic blood group genotyping of patients/donors is virtually possible, serological studies remain the gold standard to identify samples of clinical interest that may be further genotyped. In this context, we sought to identify variant D alleles that are likely to be clinically relevant in terms of other Rh antigens in a subset of population genotyped in Western France.

METHODS

Samples presenting with the RHD*weak D type 4.2.2 allele (n = 47) were selected for the study. RHCE exons 1-7 were directly sequenced, and expression of Rh antigens was predicted on the basis of the molecular data.

RESULTS

Of the 47 samples tested, 19 (40.4%) were predicted to be of potential clinical interest. Moreover, we could show that selecting the samples to be genotyped by the nature of their variant D allele (i.e., RHD*weak D type 4.2.2 allele) rather than by their Duffy-null status appears to increase significantly the likelihood of identifying clinically relevant individuals for Rh status.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our findings we suggest that all individuals genotyped as weak D type 4.2.2 should be systematically screened for RHCE variants by molecular analysis on a routine basis.

Implementing mass-scale red cell genotyping at a blood center

BACKGROUND

When problems with compatibility beyond ABO and D arise, currently transfusion services search their inventories and perform time-consuming serologic testing to locate antigen-negative blood. These clinically important blood group antigens can be detected reliably by red cell genotyping, which is a technology whereby DNA-based techniques are used to evaluate gene polymorphisms that determine the expression of blood group antigens. We introduced mass-scale genotyping and measured availability of genotyped blood.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

All non-Caucasian donors qualified for genotyping along with donors who had a history of repeat donation. Mass-scale red cell genotyping, performed on an electronic interfaced open array platform, was implemented to screen blood donors for 32 single-nucleotide polymorphisms that predicted 42 blood group antigens. Genotype screening results were confirmed by phenotyping, when needed for antigen-negative transfusion, before release of the red blood cell (RBC) unit.

RESULTS

Approximately 22,000 donors were red cell genotyped within 4 months and a total of 43,066 donors in 4 years. There were 463 discordances (0.52% of 89,596 genotypes with a phenotype). Among the 307 resolved discordances, approximate equal numbers represented historical serologic or genotyping discrepancies (n = 151 and n = 156, respectively). In the final year of the study, a mean of 29% of the daily inventory had a genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Red cell genotyping of blood donors using an electronic interface created a large and stable supply of RBC units with historical genotypes. The database served the needs of antigen-negative blood requests for a large regional blood center and allowed us to abandon screening by serology.

Next-generation sequencing is a credible strategy for blood group genotyping

Although several medium/high-throughput tools have been engineered for molecular analysis of blood group genes, they usually rely on the targeting of single nucleotide polymorphisms, while other variants remain unidentified. To circumvent this limitation a strategy for genotyping blood group genes by next-generation sequencing (NGS) was set up. Libraries consisting of exons, flanking introns and untranslated regions of 18 genes involved in 15 blood systems were generated by the Ion AmpliSeq(™) Library Kit 2.0 and by fragmenting polymerase chain reaction products, normalized by two different approaches, mixed and sequenced by the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM(™) ) Sequencer. In our conditions, defined to limit both intra- and inter-sample variability, sequences from mixed libraries were read in a single run for a total coverage of 86·03% of the coding DNA sequences, including all loci defining the most clinically relevant antigens in all genes, except ABO. Importantly, the challenging attempt to generate gene-specific data for the homologous genes was successful. This work, which combines two complementary approaches to generate libraries, defines technical conditions for genotyping blood group genes, illustrates that NGS is suitable for such an application and suggests that, after automation, this novel tool could be used for molecular typing at the laboratory level.

Applying molecular immunohaematology to regularly transfused thalassaemic patients in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell transfusion is the principal therapy in patients with severe thalassaemias and haemoglobinopathies, which are prevalent in Thailand. Serological red blood cell typing is confounded by chronic transfusion, because of circulating donor red blood cells. We evaluated the concordance of serological phenotypes between a routine and a reference laboratory and with red cell genotyping.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten consecutive Thai patients with β-thalassemia major who received regular transfusions were enrolled in Thailand. Phenotypes were tested serologically at Songklanagarind Hospital and at the National Institutes of Health. Red blood cell genotyping was performed with commercially available kits and a platform.

RESULTS

In only three patients was the red cell genotyping concordant with the serological phenotypes for five antithetical antigen pairs in four blood group systems at the two institutions. At the National Institutes of Health, 32 of the 100 serological tests yielded invalid or discrepant results. The positive predictive value of serology did not reach 1 for any blood group system at either of the two institutions in this set of ten patients.

DISCUSSION

Within this small study, numerous discrepancies were observed between serological phenotypes at the two institutes; red cell genotyping enabled determination of the blood group when serology failed due to transfused red blood cells. We question the utility of serological tests in regularly transfused paediatric patients and propose relying solely on red cell genotyping, which requires training for laboratory personnel and physicians. Red cell genotyping outperformed red cell serology by an order of magnitude in regularly transfused patients.

DNA biosensor/biochip for multiplex blood group genotyping

At present, 33 blood groups representing over 300 antigens are listed by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT). Most of them result from a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the corresponding DNA sequence, i.e. approx. 200 SNPs. In immunohematology laboratories, blood group determination is classically carried out by serological tests, but these have some limitations, mostly in term of multiplexing and throughput. Yet, there is a growing need of extended blood group typing to prevent alloimmunization in transfused patients and transfusion accidents. The knowledge of the molecular bases of blood groups allows the use of molecular biology methods within immunohematology laboratories. Numerous assays focused on blood group genotyping were developed and described during the last 10 years. Some of them were real biochips or biosensors while others were more characterized by the particular molecular biology techniques they used, but all were intending to produce multiplex analysis. PCR techniques are most of the time used followed by an analytical step involving a DNA biosensor, biochip or analysis system (capillary electrophoresis, mass spectrometry). According to the method used, the test can then be classified as low-, medium- or high-throughput. There are several companies which developed platforms dedicated to blood group genotyping able to analyze simultaneously various SNPs or variants associated with blood group systems. This review summarizes the characteristics of each molecular biology method and medium-/high-throughput platforms dedicated to the blood group genotyping.

Prospects for the provision of genotyped blood for transfusion

Blood group genotyping is gaining widespread adoption in blood centres and transfusion services. The current interest for a blood centre is its use as a screening tool to accurately predict donor phenotypes. However, not only is blood group genotyping used to screen for uncommon and rare types on a mass-scale, it can be used to optimize the inventory of multiple antigen-negative screened units. In addition, blood group genotyping provides blood types when antisera are not available, it can predict weak and variant antigens, and can aid in the resolution of ABO discrepancies. There are quality improvement benefits in blood group genotyping because it can screen for RHD alleles in Rh-negative blood donors and can be used to confirm that donors are suitable for reagent red cell production. It is possible that blood group genotyping information may be used as a donor recruitment tool. Given that genotyping can convey much more information about the expression of some complex antigens, e.g. hrB, Uvar, and Duffy, clinical trials are probably needed to show that genotyped or 'dry matched' transfusions are superior to phenotyped blood.

Routine use of DNA testing for red cell antigens in blood centres

During the last decade a number of blood establishments started using molecular methods for typing a subset of their blood donors for minor red cell antigens as a part of their routine work. It can be expected that this development will continue and that DNA testing will take a significant role in future. A sufficient number of antigen-typing in the donor-database allows for the efficient supply of red cell units for patients who carry irregular antibodies directed to red cell antigens. Therefore blood centres often operate antigen typing programs for a subset of their repeat donors. Large-scale donor typing programs are labour-intensive and costly. DNA testing is a feasible alternative to standard serological assays. The most important advantage is the easy access to a spectrum of hundreds of antigens independent of the availability of serological reagents. Besides, that there are both positive, but also less favourable aspects, which are related to the different particular methods and platforms available for molecular testing. Several of them enable medium- and high-throughput applications and some are more cost-efficient than serology.