[Skin engineering for severe burns]

EGFL7 affects the migration of epidermal stem cells in refractory diabetic wounds by regulating Notch signaling pathway

Aim: This study aimed to explore the role of EGFL7 in the healing process of refractory diabetic wounds. Methods: Epidermal stem cells (ESCs) were isolated from healthy mice and diabetic mice, identified by immunofluorescence, transfected with EGFL7 overexpression and silencing lentiviral vectors, and treated with Notch pathway inhibitor (DAPT). Results: SiEGFL7 significantly inhibited the proliferation, invasion and migration of ESCs of healthy mice. DAPT prominently inhibited the expressions of Notch1, Notch2, Hes1 and Jag1 in ESCs of healthy mice induced by overexpressed EGFL7. Overexpressed EGFL7 promoted wound healing in diabetic mice with refractory wounds. Conclusion: EGFL7 affects the proliferation and migration of ESCs in refractory diabetic wounds by regulating the Notch signaling pathway.

Infiltration of the Hoffa's fat pad in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee-Results after one year of follow-up

Objectives

Cell therapy using multipotential stromal cells (MSCs) is being used in a variety of clinical settings to induce tissue regeneration. Promising results have also been achieved in the therapy of osteoarthritis. MSCs have been demonstrated to be safe (Borakati et al., 2018). They can be used in a one step procedure as minimally manipulated mesenchymal stem cells or after in vitro expansion. The in vitro step allows for the selection of a more homogeneous cell population, meeting the standard criteria for MSC identification (Lv et al., 2014). In vitro expansion of MSCs is cost intensive, time consuming and furthermore associated with gradual accumulation of senescent cells (Wagner et al., 2008), telomere erosion (Baxter et al., 2004), and changing phenotypes (Jones et al., 2010; Halfon et al., 2011). These disadvantages could be surpassed by the use of “minimally manipulated mesenchymal stem cells” from bone marrow or adipose tissue (Di Matteo et al., 2019) such as the adipogenic stromal-vascular fraction (SVF).

The study investigates whether infiltration of the Hoffa fat pad with autologous SVF is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with gonarthrosis. Furthermore, the number and vitality of the injected cells as well as the clinical efficacy will be evaluated.

Materials and methods

We conduct a prospective study. Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee receive infiltration of SVF into the Hoffa fat pad. The number and vitality of the cells are measured with a cell counter. The clinical outcome is checked using VAS, KOOS and SF12 questionnaires with a follow-up period of 1 year.

Results

A total of 33 patients and 36 knees were included in this Study. An average of 45 million cells were injected with a standard deviation of 2,5 million Cells. After 6 months a significant improvement of the VAS and the respective subscales of the KOOS could be observed compared to the baseline. After one year of follow-up, a significant improvement in all KOOS subscales compared to baseline was still observed. A significant correlation between reduced knee pain on the VAS and the number of injected cells could be observed as well. Thus, patients injected with a higher number of cells seem to have a better outcome. The average viability of the cells was 64,4% with a standard deviation of 15,9%. A correlation between higher cell viability and better outcome on the QOL subscale of the KOOS was observed. There were no major complications or side effects.

Discussion

These initial results indicate that treatment with SVF is a safe therapeutic option that has the potential to relieve joint pain and significantly improved function. The cell number and vitality of the injected cells appear to be important factors influencing the success of the therapy.

Regenerative Capacity of Adipose Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs), Comparison with Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

Adipose tissue is now on the top one of stem cell sources regarding its accessibility, abundance, and less painful collection procedure when compared to other sources. The adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) that it contains can be maintained and expanded in culture for long periods of time without losing their differentiation capacity, leading to large cell quantities being increasingly used in cell therapy purposes. Many reports showed that ADSCs-based cell therapy products demonstrated optimal efficacy and efficiency in some clinical indications for both autologous and allogeneic purposes, hence becoming considered as potential tools for replacing, repairing, and regenerating dead or damaged cells. In this review, we analyzed the therapeutic advancement of ADSCs in comparison to bone marrow (BM) and umbilical cord (UC)-mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and designed the specific requirements to their best clinical practices and safety. Our analysis was focused on the ADSCs, rather than the whole stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cell populations, to facilitate characterization that is related to their source of origins. Clinical outcomes improvement suggested that these cells hold great promise in stem cell-based therapies in neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, and auto-immunes diseases.

Regenerative Capacity of Adipose Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs), Comparison with Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

Adipose tissue is now on the top one of stem cell sources regarding its accessibility, abundance, and less painful collection procedure when compared to other sources. The adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) that it contains can be maintained and expanded in culture for long periods of time without losing their differentiation capacity, leading to large cell quantities being increasingly used in cell therapy purposes. Many reports showed that ADSCs-based cell therapy products demonstrated optimal efficacy and efficiency in some clinical indications for both autologous and allogeneic purposes, hence becoming considered as potential tools for replacing, repairing, and regenerating dead or damaged cells. In this review, we analyzed the therapeutic advancement of ADSCs in comparison to bone marrow (BM) and umbilical cord (UC)-mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and designed the specific requirements to their best clinical practices and safety. Our analysis was focused on the ADSCs, rather than the whole stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cell populations, to facilitate characterization that is related to their source of origins. Clinical outcomes improvement suggested that these cells hold great promise in stem cell-based therapies in neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, and auto-immunes diseases.

Tissue Engineered Skin Substitutes

The fundamental skin role is to supply a supportive barrier to protect body against harmful agents and injuries. Three layers of skin including epidermis, dermis and hypodermis form a sophisticated tissue composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) mainly made of collagens and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) as a scaffold, different cell types such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts and functional cells embedded in the ECM. When the skin is injured, depends on its severity, the majority of mentioned components are recruited to wound regeneration. Additionally, different growth factors like fibroblast growth factor (FGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are needed to orchestrated wound healing process. In case of large surface area wounds, natural wound repair seems inefficient. Inspired by nature, scientists in tissue engineering field attempt to engineered constructs mimicking natural healing process to promote skin restoration in untreatable injuries. There are three main types of commercially available engineered skin substitutes including epidermal, dermal, and dermoepidermal. Each of them could be composed of scaffold, desired cell types or growth factors. These substitutes could have autologous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic origin. Moreover, they may be cellular or acellular. They are used to accelerate wound healing and recover normal skin functions with pain relief. Although there are a wide variety of commercially available skin substitutes, almost none of them considered as an ideal equivalents required for proper wound healing.