Daratumumab: Therapeutic asset, biological trap!

Is drug interference still an issue for pretransfusion testing of patients on anti CD38 and other monoclonal antibody therapies?

Certain therapies that target CD markers on some blood cells can affect pretransfusion testing. Key examples are anti-CD38, CD47 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies such as daratumumab (DARA) and magrolimab, which have presented a challenge for transfusion medicine laboratories around the globe. Scientists have been faced with not only introducing a protocol to provide safe blood to patients but also investigating the most effective method to remove the pretransfusion pan-agglutinating interference caused. A number of papers in the last 5 years have reported on various methods to remove pretransfusion interference; however, most of these studies have been conducted only in a few countries. Most recent reviews on this topic have focused on techniques and reagents to remove pretransfusion interference, and dithiothreitol is currently the gold standard for removing DARA interference. However, it was clear from this review that while many laboratories have developed processes for addressing interference in pretransfusion testing, and DARA interference may not be a major issue, there are still laboratories around the world, that may not have adequately addressed this issue. In addition, the impact of mAb interference on widely used techniques such as flow cytometry is unclear.

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody interference with blood compatibility testing: Differentiating isatuximab and daratumumab via functional epitope mapping

BACKGROUND

There are two FDA-approved anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies for treatment of multiple myeloma: isatuximab and daratumumab. Owing to expression of CD38 on reagent red blood cells (RBCs), these antibodies interfere with indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs). We sought to understand differences in such interference by performing binding experiments.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In vitro experiments to compare the binding to RBCs of isatuximab and daratumumab alone or in the presence of a mouse anti-human CD38 antibody (HB-7 or AT13/5) or a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-analog CD38 inhibitor were performed and quantified by flow cytometry, imaging, mass spectrometry, surface plasmon resonance, and LigandTracer technologies. Serologic testing was performed on plasma samples spiked with isatuximab or daratumumab.

RESULTS

CD38 expressed on RBCs can be directly bound by daratumumab, whereas isatuximab requires a co-factor, such as HB-7, AT13/5, or a CD38 inhibitor, suggesting that the isatuximab epitope on RBCs is masked in vitro. Daratumumab samples more frequently showed interference and had stronger reactions than isatuximab samples. Dithiothreitol treatment was equally effective in mitigating the interference caused by either drug.

DISCUSSION

Both isatuximab and daratumumab interfere with IATs but at different magnitudes, reflecting distinct binding to CD38 on RBCs. From the binding studies, we conclude that the isatuximab epitope on RBCs is masked in vitro and binding requires a certain CD38 conformation or co-factor. This circumstance may explain why interference is seen only in a subset of patients receiving isatuximab when compared with interference seen in most patients on daratumumab therapy.

Alloimmunisation rate of patients on Daratumumab: A retrospective cohort study of patients in England

OBJECTIVE

Whilst small-scale studies on rates of alloimmunisation of patients on Daratumumab have been undertaken, no large-scale study has been performed to date on this cohort of patients.

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who are relapsed or refractory to standard treatment are treated with the anti-CD38 therapeutic monoclonal antibody, Daratumumab. Due to the complexity of pre-transfusion compatibility testing, many MM patients in England are referred to Red Cell Immunohaematology (RCI) laboratories for investigation and provision of Red Blood Cell (RBC) components.

METHODS

Over a 4-month period, patients due to commence, or currently on anti-CD38 therapy were identified and flagged on the RCI Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). Data was identified and extracted for further analysis. Interrogation of data was performed independently by two subject matter experts, with discrepancies resolved through further enquiry.

RESULTS

Of 734 English MM patients, we report an alloimmunisation rate of 0.4% whilst on an anti-CD38 TMAb. This is in line with other smaller cohort studies.

CONCLUSION

Given the low rate of RBC alloimmunisation, consideration should be given to revising the pre-transfusion testing regimen in this cohort. This may improve testing costs, turn-around times and evidence-based patient care.

Do cytomegalovirus infections affect the daratumumab treatment course in multiple myeloma patients? - Literature review

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma is a progressive and incurable hematological disease characterized by disordered and clonal multiplication of plasmacytes in the bone marrow. The main clinical manifestations are caused by the presence of neoplastic cells in bone tissue, as well as the excessive production of immunoglobulins and normal humoral immunity suppression. Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that has promising results in managing the multiple myeloma disease.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the scientific evidence concerning the impact of the cytomegalovirus infections in the daratumumab treatment course in extensively pretreated multiple myeloma patients.

METHOD

To this end, an integrative literature review was performed in different databases, comprising a 5-year period.

RESULTS

The studies analysis revealed that the cytomegalovirus infection reactivation can occur during the use of daratumumab in multiple myeloma patients previously treated, which led to treatment discontinuation, compromised the drug efficacy and favored the disease progression. Moreover, it was observed that even with prophylactic antiviral therapy there was an infection reactivation in some cases, as well as deaths, in more severe situations.

CONCLUSION

Thus, even considering that few reports on such a topic are available in the scientific literature, the present review showed that cytomegalovirus reactivation can impair daratumumab therapy, mainly in multiple myeloma patients heavily pretreated. In addition, this study could contribute as a tool for the clinical decision and management of adverse effects in medical practices, demonstrating the importance of patient monitoring for the possibility of cytomegalovirus reactivation in heavily pretreated myeloma patients.

Impact of new myeloma agents on the transfusion laboratory

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy targeting CD38 and CD47 antigens expressed on cancer cells has transformed therapy options for patients with multiple myeloma as well as other haematological and non-haematological malignancies. While the on target effects of these new drugs highlight the promise of precision cancer therapeutics, the unintended, off target binding of drugs to red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets has required transfusion service laboratories (TSL) and immunohaematology reference laboratories (IRL) to innovate and rapidly set up processes and testing protocols to overcome the significant interference in routine pre-transfusion tests caused by these agents. Binding of anti-CD38 and anti-CD47 drugs to reagent RBCs leads to false positive pan-agglutination during the antihuman globulin phase of testing, making it difficult to rule out underlying alloantibodies, and leading to delays in setting up compatible units for RBC transfusion. Anti-CD47 agents can also interfere with ABO/Rh typing studies. Several methods to successfully mitigate interference have been described, such as treatment of reagent RBCs with reducing agents or enzymes, allogeneic RBC adsorption studies and drug specific neutralisation assays; all methods have limitations. TSLs should select an approach that best fits their workflow and expertise and takes into consideration their level of access to specialised outside testing, local blood supplier capabilities, and the type of patient population served. For platelet refractory patients, samples should be tested by platelet antibody assays that are known to be unaffected by drug therapy. RBC transfusion support for multiple myeloma patients receiving anti-CD38 or anti-CD47 drugs can be optimised by establishing good communication between the clinical teams and TSLs, building electronic notification processes, and ensuring timely completion of baseline pre-transfusion testing and RBC phenotype/genotype prior to starting therapy. Staff education, standardisation of laboratory mitigation measures, and implementation of testing algorithms that consider mAb-induced interference when working up a pan-agglutinin help to significantly decrease delays that would otherwise result if standard methods were employed to complete antibody identification studies.

Review of current transfusion therapy and blood banking practices

Transfusion Medicine is a dynamically evolving field. Recent high-quality research has reshaped the paradigms guiding blood transfusion. As increasing evidence supports the benefit of limiting transfusion, guidelines have been developed and disseminated into clinical practice governing optimal transfusion of red cells, platelets, plasma and cryoprecipitate. Concepts ranging from transfusion thresholds to prophylactic use to maximal storage time are addressed in guidelines. Patient blood management programs have developed to implement principles of patient safety through limiting transfusion in clinical practice. Data from National Hemovigilance Surveys showing dramatic declines in blood utilization over the past decade demonstrate the practical uptake of current principles guiding patient safety. In parallel with decreasing use of traditional blood products, the development of new technologies for blood transfusion such as freeze drying and cold storage has accelerated. Approaches to policy decision making to augment blood safety have also changed. Drivers of these changes include a deeper understanding of emerging threats and adverse events based on hemovigilance, and an increasing healthcare system expectation to align blood safety decision making with approaches used in other healthcare disciplines.

Impact of Novel Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics on Blood Bank Pretransfusion Testing

Novel monoclonal antibody therapies are increasing in number and clinical significance as their role in oncologic formularies expands. Anti-CD38 and anti-CD47/SIRPα agents commonly interfere with pretransfusion compatibility testing. Anti-CD38 interference is mitigated by dithiothreitol, which disrupts CD38 antigen on reagent red cells; however, this modification limits rule-out of all clinically significant antibodies. Several anti-CD47 agents are in clinical trials and demonstrate wide variability in pretransfusion testing interference. Modifications to pretransfusion testing can limit interference by anti-CD47 agents. Rapid dissemination of knowledge of these monoclonal antibody agents to the broader transfusion medicine community is paramount for continued patient transfusion safety.

Blood Transfusion Management for Patients Treated With Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies

Daratumumab has proven to be highly efficacious for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) and has recently been approved in the frontline setting for MM patients ineligible for transplantation. In the future, expanded indications are possible for daratumumab and other anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in development. For several years, it has been recognized that these therapies interfere with blood bank testing by binding to CD38 on red blood cells and causing panagglutination on the Indirect Antiglobulin Test. This can lead to redundant testing and significant delays in patient care. Given the anticipated increase in utilization of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, as well as the transfusion needs of MM patients, it is critical to understand the nature of this interference with blood bank testing and to optimize clinical and laboratory procedures. In this review, we summarize the pathophysiology of this phenomenon, examine the clinical data reported to date, describe currently available methods to resolve this issue, and lastly provide a guide to clinical management of blood transfusions for patients receiving anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies.