Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Oncogenic alterations in advanced NSCLC: a molecular super-highway

Lung cancer ranks among the most common cancers world-wide and is the first cancer-related cause of death. The classification of lung cancer has evolved tremendously over the past two decades. Today, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly lung adenocarcinoma, comprises a multitude of molecular oncogenic subsets that change both the prognosis and management of disease.Since the first targeted oncogenic alteration identified in 2004, with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), there has been unprecedented progress in identifying and targeting new molecular alterations. Almost two decades of experience have allowed scientists to elucidate the biological function of oncogenic drivers and understand and often overcome the molecular basis of acquired resistance mechanisms. Today, targetable molecular alterations are identified in approximately 60% of lung adenocarcinoma patients in Western populations and 80% among Asian populations. Oncogenic drivers are largely enriched among non-smokers, east Asians, and younger patients, though each alteration has its own patient phenotype.The current landscape of druggable molecular targets includes EGFR, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Kirstin rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2), c-MET proto-oncogene (MET), neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK), rearranged during transfection (RET), neuregulin 1 (NRG1). In addition to these known targets, others including Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) have garnered significant attention and are the subject of numerous ongoing trials.In this era of personalized, precision medicine, it is of paramount importance to identify known or potential oncogenic drivers in each patient. The development of targeted therapy is mirrored by diagnostic progress. Next generation sequencing offers high-throughput, speed and breadth to identify molecular alterations in entire genomes or targeted regions of DNA or RNA. It is the basis for the identification of the majority of current druggable alterations and offers a unique window into novel alterations, and de novo and acquired resistance mechanisms.In this review, we discuss the diagnostic approach in advanced NSCLC, focusing on current oncogenic driver alterations, through their pathophysiology, management, and future perspectives. We also explore the shortcomings and hurdles encountered in this rapidly evolving field.

Alternating Therapy With Osimertinib and Afatinib Blockades EGFR Secondary Mutation in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer: A Single-Arm Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

Resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has limited treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although osimertinib or afatinib alone induced drug-resistant clones with EGFR secondary mutation in a preclinical model, its combination prevented the appearance of these mutations. We investigated alternating-dose therapy of osimertinib and afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC in a single-arm Phase II trial.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with stage IV NSCLC harboring an activating EGFR mutation were enrolled. Alternating cycles of osimertinib (80 mg/day) followed by afatinib (20 mg/day) were administered every 8 weeks. Genomic analysis was performed using circulating tumor DNA obtained before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 46 enrolled patients, the median progression-free survival was 20.2 months. The overall response rate was 69.6%. The median overall survival was not reached. Among the 26 plasma samples obtained after the acquisition of resistance, 3 showed an increased MET gene copy number, and 1 showed BRAF mutation. Meanwhile, no EGFR secondary mutation was detected.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of our treatment was not significantly different from osimertinib alone, as reported previously in untreated advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. Although the sample size was limited, this treatment may prevent the emergence of EGFR secondary mutations that trigger drug resistance. Further studies are warranted to establish the significance of this treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs051180009.

Dynamic Assessment of Tissue and Plasma EGFR-Activating and T790M Mutations with Droplet Digital PCR Assays for Monitoring Response and Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Treated with EGFR-TKIs

Assessing tumor EGFR mutation status is necessary for the proper management of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the impact of dynamic analyses of the plasma and tissue EGFR mutation using ultra-sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays to manage NSCLC patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Paired tumor tissues and plasma samples from 137 EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients prior to the first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment (at baseline) and at disease progression were subjected to EGFR mutation analysis using ddPCR, together with the analyses of the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes. Patients with EGFR-activating mutations detected in baseline plasma were associated with bone metastasis (p = 0.002) and had shorter progression-free survival (12.9 vs. 17.7 months, p = 0.02) and overall survival (24.0 vs. 39.4 months, p = 0.02) compared to those without. Pre-treatment EGFR T790M mutation found in baseline tumor tissues of 28 patients (20.4%; 28/137) was significantly associated with brain metastasis (p = 0.005) and a shorter brain metastasis-free survival (p = 0.001). The presence of EGFR T790M mutations in baseline tumor tissues did not correlate with the emergence of acquired EGFR T790M mutations detected at progression. At disease progression, acquired EGFR T790M mutations were detected in 26.6% (21/79) of the plasma samples and 42.9% (15/35) of the rebiopsy tissues, with a concordance rate of 71.4% (25/35). The dynamic monitoring of tissue and plasma EGFR mutation status at baseline and progression using ddPCR has a clinical impact on the evaluation of EGFR-TKIs treatment efficacy and patient outcomes, as well as the emergence of resistance in NSCLC.

Optimizing Patient Outcomes Through Sequential EGFR TKI Treatment in Asian Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC

Patients from Asia with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often have mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. While an increasing number of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now available for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, most patients inevitably develop resistance to the treatment. Evidence from clinical studies suggests that treatment outcomes and resistance mechanisms vary depending on the choice of TKI therapy in the first-line setting. Hence, it is important to develop optimal treatment sequencing strategies that can provide maximum survival benefit for the patient. In this review we present clinical evidence in Asian patients with NSCLC for various EGFR TKIs, with the goal of supporting the optimization of treatment sequencing.

Comparison of T790M Acquisition After Treatment With First- and Second-Generation Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background

Lung adenocarcinoma is a common disease with a high mortality rate. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are found in adenocarcinomas, and oral EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) show good responses. EGFR-TKI therapy eventually results in resistance, with the most common being T790M. T790M is also a biomarker for predicting resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs and is sensitive to osimertinib. The prognosis was better for patients with acquired T790M who were treated with osimertinib than for those treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, T790M mutation is important for deciding further treatment and prognosis. Previous studies based on small sample sizes have reported very different T790 mutation rates. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the T790M mutation rate after EGFR-TKI treatment.

Methods

We systematic reviewed the electronic databases to evaluate the T790M mutation rate after treatment with first-generation (gefitinib, erlotinib, and icotinib) and second-generation (afatinib and dacomitinib) EGFR-TKIs. Random-effects network meta-analysis and single-arm meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the T790M mutation rate of the target EGFR-TKIs.

Results

A total of 518 studies were identified, of which 29 were included. Compared with afatinib, a higher odds ratio (OR) of the T790M mutation rate was observed after erlotinib [OR = 1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.09–2.00] and gefitinib (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.11–1.90) treatments. An even OR of the T790M mutation rate was noted after icotinib treatment (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.46–1.79) compared with that after afatinib. The T790M mutation rate was significantly lower with afatinib (33%) than that with gefitinib (49%) and erlotinib treatments (47%) (p < 0.001). The acquired T790M mutation rate in all participants was slightly lower in Asians (43%) than that in Caucasians (47%).

Conclusions

Erlotinib and gefitinib had a higher OR for the T790M mutation than afatinib. The T790M mutation rate was significantly lower in afatinib than in gefitinib and erlotinib. T790M is of great significance because osimertinib shows a good prognosis in patients with T790M mutation.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021257824.

Real-world implementation of sequential targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated lung cancer

Background:

Epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFR⁺) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients failing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) can benefit from next-line targeted therapies, but implementation is challenging.

Methods:

EGFR⁺ NSCLC patients treated with first/second-generation (1G/2G) TKI at our institution with a last follow-up after osimertinib approval (February 2016), were analyzed retrospectively, and the results compared with published data under osimertinib.

Results:

A total of 207 patients received erlotinib (37%), gefitinib (16%) or afatinib (47%). The median age was 66 years, with a predominance of female (70%), never/light-smokers (69%). T790M testing was performed in 174/202 progressive cases (86%), positive in 93/174 (53%), and followed by osimertinib in 87/93 (94%). Among the 135 deceased patients, 94 (70%) received subsequent systemic treatment (43% chemotherapy, 39% osimertinib), while 30% died without, either before (4%) or after progression, due to rapid clinical deterioration (22%), patient refusal of further therapy (2%), or severe competing illness (2%). Lack of subsequent treatment was significantly (4.5x, p < 0.001) associated with lack of T790M testing, whose most frequent cause (in approximately 50% of cases) was also rapid clinical decline. Among the 127 consecutive patients with failure of 1G/2G TKI started after November 2015, 47 (37%) received osimertinib, with a median overall survival of 36 months versus 24 and 21 months for patients with alternative and no subsequent therapies (p = 0.003).

Conclusion:

Osimertinib after 1G/2G TKI failure prolongs survival, but approximately 15% and 30% of patients forego molecular retesting and subsequent treatment, respectively, mainly due to rapid clinical deterioration. This is an important remediable obstacle to sequential TKI treatment for EGFR⁺ NSCLC. It pertains also to other actionable resistance mechanisms emerging under 1G/2G inhibitors or osimertinib, whose rate for lack of next-line therapy is similar (approximately 35% in the FLAURA/AURA3 trials), and highlights the need for closer monitoring alongside broader profiling of TKI-treated EGFR⁺ NSCLC in the future.

Resistance mechanisms of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Differences in the resistance mechanisms of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations are unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the differences in resistance mechanisms after treatment with various epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science on July 29, 2020, for relevant studies on acquired resistance mechanisms against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The primary outcome measure was differences in the resistance mechanism between individual or generations of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

RESULTS

In total, 33 trials involving 2418 individuals were included and analyzed. T790M was significantly less frequent after afatinib treatment (40.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.7%-48.7%) than after gefitinib and erlotinib treatments (52.5%, 95% CI: 48.7%-56.3%, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between Asian and non-Asian patients in the incidence of T790M after gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib treatments. Regarding epidermal growth factor receptor pathway-independent resistant mechanisms, the incidences of small cell lung cancer transformation (osimertinib: 7.9%, 95% CI: 3.6%-12.2%, others: 2.3%, 95% CI: 0.8%-3.8%) and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) viral oncogene homolog mutation (osimertinib: 4.6%, 95% CI: 1.5%-7.7%, others: 0.2%, 95% CI: 0.0%-1.7%) were significantly higher following osimertinib treatment than with others.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in the incidence of resistance mechanisms among epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors exist, which should be taken into consideration when choosing the treatment strategy.

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression level as a predictor of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study was to investigate the impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This study analyzed 108 patients with NSCLC who had received EGFR-TKI as first-line systemic treatment at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University Hospital between December 2012 and October 2018. The National Cancer Center Research Institute (NCCRI) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets were analyzed to investigate the mechanisms underlying EGFR-TKI-resistance in tumors with high PD-L1 expression.

RESULTS

Among the 108 patients, 55, 37, and 16 had negative (PD-L1 Tumor proportion score <1%), weak (1-49%), and strong (≥50%) PD-L1 expression, respectively. Patients with strong PD-L1 expression had significantly shorter median progression-free survival (PFS; 7.07 months) than patients with weak (14.73 months, P<0.001) or negative (12.70 months, P=0.001) PD-L1 expression. After adjustment for covariates by Cox regression, PD-L1 expression remained a significant indicator of adverse prognosis. In EGFR-TKI-refractory patients, the frequency of T790M mutation and the PFS following treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKI and PD-1 antibody were similar in the three groups. TCGA and NCCRI database analysis showed that high PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs correlated with IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling and high MUC16 mutation frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong PD-L1 expression in tumors might be a surrogate indicator of poor response to first-line EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, and may reflect a de novo resistance mechanism involving JAK-STAT signaling.

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy for EGFR driver, T790M mutation and EGFR amplification in plasma in patients with acquired resistance to afatinib

Background

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping in plasma using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (cobas) is the first liquid biopsy as a companion diagnosis to identify the EGFR T790M mutation (T790M) after the failure of treatment of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (1st generation, gefitinib [G] and erlotinib [E] and 2nd generation, afatinib [A]). This study investigated the clinical utility of a liquid biopsy for patients who acquired resistance to afatinib.

Methods

We prospectively collected plasma from 51 patients who had acquired resistance to afatinib between April 2015 and November 2016 to evaluate the frequency of T790M by cobas and digital droplet PCR (UMIN000025112). Additionally, we retrospectively reviewed 38 patients who tested by cobas in plasma after G/E failure to compare for T790M detection between A and with G/E.

Results

The detection rate of EGFR-driver and T790M in plasma in patients treated with A (A group) as a first-line EGFR-TKI was lower than with G/E followed by A (G/E→A group), although the differences were not significant (EGFR-driver: 41% [A] vs. 67% [G/E→A], P=0.1867; and T790M: 8% [A] vs. 17% [G/E→A], P=0.5798). In first-line setting, the detection rate for EGFR-driver and T790M in plasma by cobas was lower in A group than in G/E group, although there was no significant difference (EGFR-driver: 34% [A] vs. 52% [G/E], P=0.2072; and T790M: 10% [A] vs. 27% [G/E], P=0.1161).

Conclusion

The detection of EGFR-driver and T790M in plasma by cobas in patients treated with afatinib might be lower than with G/E in a real-world setting.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07777-2.

Efficacy and safety of afatinib for non-small-cell lung cancer: state-of-the-art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, acting as an irreversible and multitarget blocker of ErbB family members. Afatinib is currently approved for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common and uncommon sensitizing EGFR mutations and for squamous NSCLC patients progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the efficacy and safety profile of afatinib compared with chemotherapy and other EGFR TKIs, in order to evaluate its characteristics and potential role in the increasingly complex treatment landscape of EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Future perspectives and innovative drug combinations are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Afatinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy and quality of life compared with chemotherapy with a managed toxicity profile. However, in recent years, the increasing availability of different treatment options for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC has made the current treatment scenario more complicated, with an increasing need of new and deeper scientific data. In this light, the identification and validation of potential clinicopathological and/or molecular predictors of benefit, as well as the clarification of resistance mechanisms, may help to clarify the most appropriate treatment strategies and sequences for EGFR-mutant patients.

Clinical Factors Affecting the Response to Osimertinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with An Acquired Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M Mutation: A Long-Term Survival Analysis

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a standard therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with an acquired epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation; however, the exploration of clinical characteristics that may affect prognosis and long-term survival is still lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to provide long-term survival data and explore meaningful prognostic factors in patients treated with osimertinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 246 patients with acquired EGFR T790M mutation who were treated with osimertinib were included in this study. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival from osimertinib initiation (OS1), overall survival from diagnosis of advanced disease (OS), and possible prognostic clinical features were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median PFS, OS1, and OS values were 12.17, 24.33, and 47.86 months, respectively. The median PFS of patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions/T790M (19del/T790M) and those harboring EGFR 21 L858R/T790M were 13.27 and 9.77 months (p = 0.001), respectively, while the median OS1 values were 25.03 and 18.30 months (p = 0.023), respectively; however, no significant difference was found in median OS (p = 0.060). Cox regression analysis revealed that coexisting mutation type and extrathoracic metastasis affected survival (PFS, OS1). In addition, gene biopsy specimen type (tissue or blood sample) was related to PFS (p = 0.032), which implied that liquid biopsy may be an independent poor prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first reported survival analysis of osimertinib-treated Chinese patients, which indicates a median OS of 47.86 months. The EGFR T790M mutation is likely to coexist with 19del and indicate longer PFS and OS1 than EGFR 21 L858R/T790M. Additionally, the extrathoracic metastasis status and biopsy specimen type might also affect the survival of patients treated with osimertinib.

Comprehensive characterization and clinical impact of concomitant genomic alterations in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs treated with EGFR kinase inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

Although the majority of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), significant heterogeneity in clinical response is observed which might be attributed to the distinct sub-molecular characteristics. The present study aims to identify genetic alterations correlated with clinical outcomes and treatment response to different EGFR-TKI inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We integrated the genomic data and clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 179 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with EGFR-TKI as 1st line of treatment.

RESULTS

We found that EGFR-mutant patients harboring concomitant TP53 mutation (OS: 21 vs. 40 months, P = 0.05), ERBB2 amplification (PFS: 6.1 vs. 12.5 months, P = 0.01) or FGF19 amplification (OS: 11.2 vs. 27.1 months, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with a poorer clinical prognosis after treated with 1st generation EGFR-TKI. In contrast, the presence of TP53 mutation did not affect the PFS nor OS of patients treated with 2nd generation EGFR-TKI. Furthermore, EGFR-mutant and TP53-wild type (WT) patients benefited more from a combinatorial treatment consisting of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab comparing to EGFR-TKI as a single agent (PFS: 21.7 vs. 9.3 months, P < 0.01). Copy number variation (CNV) (PFS: 4.6 vs.9.4 months, p = 0.018) was identified as an unfavorable predictive factor to 3rd-generation TKI. We also revealed distinct resistance mechanisms associated with different EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the heterogeneity both in the primary molecular landscape and acquired alterations in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs, which might play a role in determining the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. We also revealed the differential prognostic role of TP53 mutation in patients treated with the 1st or 2nd generation of EGFR-TKI. Our study also suggests that EGFR-mutant and TP53-WT patients may benefit more from combinatorial treatment consisting of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab, highlighting the importance of further stratifying EGFR-mutant patients.

Incidence of T790M in Patients With NSCLC Progressed to Gefitinib, Erlotinib, and Afatinib: A Study on Circulating Cell-free DNA

BACKGROUND

Insights into the mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could provide important information for further patient management, including the choice of second-line treatment. The EGFR T790M mutation is the most common mechanism of resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. Owing to its biologic relevance in the response of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the selective pressure of treatment, the present study investigated whether the occurrence of T790M at progression differed among patients receiving gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present retrospective study included patients with NSCLC with an EGFR activating mutation, who had received gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib as first-line treatment. Plasma samples for the analysis of cell-free DNA were taken at disease progression and analyzed using a digital droplet polymerase chain reaction EGFR mutation assay.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were enrolled; 42 had received gefitinib or erlotinib and 41afatinib. The patient characteristics were comparable across the 2 groups. The median time to progression (TTP) was 14.4 months for the gefitinib and erlotinib group and 10.2 months for the afatinib group (P = .09). Of the 83 patients, 47 (56.6%) were positive for the T790M in plasma. A greater incidence of T790M was observed in patients with progression during gefitinib or erlotinib therapy compared with patients treated with afatinib (33 [79%] vs. 14 [34%], respectively; odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-18.5; P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib showed a comparable TTP in patients receiving first-line therapy, the incidence of T790M differed among them, as demonstrated by the present study, which could have implications for the choice of second-line treatment.