Combined multimodal ctDNA analysis and radiological imaging for tumor surveillance in Non-small cell lung cancer

A blood test measuring DNA methylation of BCAT1 and IKZF1 for detection of lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Colorectal (CRC) and lung adenocarcinoma share many genetic and pathological similarities. A circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test for CRC may also be useful for detection of lung adenocarcinoma. This study determined if a methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 ctDNA test for CRC can be used for detection of lung adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Circulating cell free DNA (ccfDNA) was extracted from plasma collected prospectively from healthy controls, patients in remission from CRC, patients with lung adenocarcinoma, and patients with isolated metastatic CRC lung lesions. Plasma ccfDNA was bisulfite converted and assessed for methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 by quantitative real-time PCR. Comparisons between the different patient groups for a positive ctDNA test (BCAT1 and/or IKZF1) and ctDNA levels (% of total ccfDNA), as well as any associations with clinicopathological and demographic features, were assessed.

RESULTS

Methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 ctDNA was detected in 18/39 (46.2 %) patients with lung adenocarcinoma, which was significantly (p < 0.001) higher compared to healthy controls (49/606; 8.1 %) and patients in remission from CRC (22/171, 12.9 %). Patients with stage III/IV lung adenocarcinoma had higher BCAT1/IKZF1 ctDNA positivity compared to stage I/II cases (68.2 % vs 17.7 %, p < 0.01), where a significantly higher proportion tested positive for methylated IKZF1 ctDNA alone (54.6 % vs 5.9 %, p < 0.001). There was no difference in BCAT1/IKZF1 ctDNA test positivity between patients with stage IV primary lung adenocarcinoma (n = 17) compared to lung-metastasising CRC cases (n = 17; 70.6 % v 64.3 %).

CONCLUSION

A ctDNA test measuring methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 can sensitively detect lung adenocarcinoma and may be a promising aid for detection of advanced disease.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, www.anzctr.org.au, ACTRN12616001138471, ACTRN12611000318987.

Circulating tumour DNA analysis for early detection of lung cancer: a systematic review

Background

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has been applied in cancer diagnostics including lung cancer. Specifically for the early detection purpose, various modalities of ctDNA analysis have demonstrated their potentials. Such analyses have showed diverse performance across different studies.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of original studies published before 1 January 2023. Studies that evaluated ctDNA alone and in combination with other biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer were included.

Results

The systematic review analysis included 56 original studies that were aimed for early detection of lung cancer. There were 39 studies for lung cancer only and 17 for pan-cancer early detection. Cancer and control cases included were heterogenous across studies. Different molecular features of ctDNA have been evaluated, including 7 studies on cell-free DNA concentration, 17 on mutation, 29 on methylation, 5 on hydroxymethylation and 8 on fragmentation patterns. Among these 56 studies, 17 have utilised different combinations of the above-mentioned ctDNA features and/or circulation protein markers. For all the modalities, lower sensitivities were reported for the detection of early-stage cancer.

Conclusions

The systematic review suggested the clinical utility of ctDNA analysis for early detection of lung cancer, alone or in combination with other biomarkers. Future validation with standardised testing protocols would help integration into clinical care.

Circulating tumor DNA mutation analysis: advances in its application for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and therapeutic efficacy monitoring

In recent years, the detection and analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have emerged as a new focus in the field of cancer research, particularly in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy. ctDNA, which refers to cell-free DNA fragments released into the bloodstream from tumor cells upon cell death or shedding, carries tumor-specific genetic and epigenetic alterations, thereby providing a non-invasive approach for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. The concentration of ctDNA in the blood is higher compared to that in healthy individuals or other liquid biopsies from early-stage cancers, which is closely associated with the early diagnosis and comprehensive sequencing studies of HCC. Recent studies have indicated that sequential ctDNA analysis in patients receiving primary or adjuvant therapy for HCC can detect treatment resistance and recurrence before visible morphological changes in the tumor, making it a valuable basis for rapid adjustment of treatment strategies. However, this technology is continuously being optimized and improved. Challenges such as enhancing the accuracy of ctDNA sequencing tests, reducing the burden of high-throughput sequencing on a large number of samples, and controlling variables in the assessment of the relationship between ctDNA concentration and tumor burden, need to be addressed. Overall, despite the existing challenges, the examination and analysis of ctDNA have opened up new avenues for early diagnosis and therapeutic efficacy monitoring in hepatocellular carcinoma, expanding the horizons of this field.

Methylation‑sensitive restriction enzyme‑droplet digital PCR assay for the one‑step highly sensitive analysis of DNA methylation hotspots

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that plays a key role in several cellular processes mediating the fine regulation of gene expression. Aberrant DNA methylation is observed in a wide range of pathologies, including cancer. Since these DNA modifications are transferred to the cell progenies and are stable over the time, the analysis of DNA methylation status has been proposed for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in cancer. Currently, DNA bisulfite conversion is the gold standard method for the high‑throughput analysis of DNA methylation alterations. However, bisulfite treatment induces DNA fragmentation affecting its quality for the downstream analyses. In this field, it is mandatory to identify novel methods to overcome the limits of conventional approaches. In the present study, the Methylation‑Sensitive Restriction Enzyme‑droplet digital PCR (MSRE‑ddPCR) assay was developed as a novel sensitive method for the analysis of DNA methylation of short genomic regions, combining the MSRE assay with the high‑sensitivity ddPCR and using an exogenous methylation sequence as control. Setup and validation experiments were performed analyzing a methylation hotspot of the Solute Carrier Family 22 Member 17 in DNA samples derived from melanoma cell lines as well as from tissues and serum samples obtained from patients with melanoma and healthy controls. Compared with the standard MSRE approaches, the MSRE‑ddPCR assay is more appropriate for the analysis of DNA methylation (methDNA) in samples with low amounts of DNA (up to 0.651 ng) showing a greater sensitivity. These findings suggested the potential clinical application of MSRE‑ddPCR paving the way to the analysis of other methDNA hotspots in different tumors.

A comparative study on ctDNA and tumor DNA mutations in lung cancer and benign cases with a high number of CTCs and CTECs

BACKGROUND

Liquid biopsy provides a non-invasive approach that enables detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using blood specimens and theoretically benefits early finding primary tumor or monitoring treatment response as well as tumor recurrence. Despite many studies on these novel biomarkers, their clinical relevance remains controversial. This study aims to investigate the correlation between ctDNA, CTCs, and circulating tumor-derived endothelial cells (CTECs)  while also evaluating whether mutation profiling in ctDNA is consistent with that in tumor tissue from lung cancer patients. These findings will help the evaluation and utilization of these approaches in clinical practice.

METHODS

104 participants (49 with lung cancer and 31 with benign lesions) underwent CTCs and CTECs detection using integrating subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH) strategy. The circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration was measured and the mutational profiles of ctDNA were examined by Roche AVENIO ctDNA Expanded Kit (targeted total of 77 genes) by next generation sequencing (NGS) in 28 patients (20 with lung cancer and 8 with benign lesions) with highest numbers of CTCs and CTECs. Mutation validation in matched tumor tissue DNA was then performed in 9 patients with ctDNA mutations using a customized xGen pan-solid tumor kit (targeted total of 474 genes) by NGS.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of total number of CTCs and CTECs for the diagnosis of NSCLC were 67.3% and 77.6% [AUC (95%CI): 0.815 (0.722-0.907)], 83.9% and 77.4% [AUC (95%CI): 0.739 (0.618-0.860)]. The concentration of cfDNA in plasma was statistically correlated with the size of the primary tumor (r = 0.430, P = 0.022) and CYFRA 21-1 (r = 0.411, P = 0.041), but not with the numbers of CTCs and CTECs. In this study, mutations were found to be poorly consistent between ctDNA and tumor DNA (tDNA) in patients, even when numerous CTCs and CTECs were present.

CONCLUSION

Detection of CTCs and CTECs could be the potential adjunct tool for the early finding of lung cancer. The cfDNA levels are associated with the tumor burden, rather than the CTCs or CTECs counts. Moreover, the poorly consistent mutations between ctDNA and tDNA require further exploration.

Cell-Free Methylated PTGER4 and SHOX2 Plasma DNA as a Biomarker for Therapy Monitoring and Prognosis in Advanced Stage NSCLC Patients

Notwithstanding some improvement in the earlier detection of patients with lung cancer, most of them still present with a late-stage disease at the time of diagnosis. Next to the most frequently utilized factors affecting the prognosis of lung cancer patients (stage, performance, and age), the recent application of biomarkers obtained by liquid profiling has gained more acceptance. In our study, we aimed to answer these questions: (i) Is the quantification of free-circulating methylated PTGER4 and SHOX2 plasma DNA a useful method for therapy monitoring, and is this also possible for patients treated with different therapy regimens? (ii) Is this approach possible when blood-drawing tubes, which allow for a delayed processing of blood samples, are utilized? Baseline values for mPTGER4 and mSHOX2 do not allow for clear discrimination between different response groups. In contrast, the combination of the methylation values for both genes shows a clear difference between responders vs. non-responders at the time of re-staging. Furthermore, blood drawing into tubes stabilizing the sample allows researchers more flexibility.

Plasma ctDNA increases tissue NGS-based detection of therapeutically targetable mutations in lung cancers

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been becoming a novel convenient and noninvasive method for dynamically monitoring landscape of genomic information to guild personalized cancer treatment. In this study we comprehensively evaluated the additional value of plasma ctDNA to routine tissue next generation sequencing (NGS) of therapeutically targetable mutations in lung cancers.

METHODS

The tumor tissues and peripheral blood samples from 423 cases of patients with lung cancer were subjected to NGS of mutations in oncodrivers (EGFR, ERBB2, ALK, ROS1, C-MET, KRAS, BRAF, RET, BRCA1 and BRCA2).

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-seven cases showed both plasma and tissue positive and 96 showed both negative. The concordance for tissue and blood detection was 69.27% (293/423). 83 (19.62%) cases showed positive by tissue NGS alone and 47 (11.11%) positive by plasma ctDNA alone. The sensitivity of tissue and plasma detection was 85.63%, and 74.62%, respectively. Plasma had lower detection and sensitivity than tissue, but plasma additionally detected some important mutations which were omitted by tissue NGS. Plasma plus tissue increased the detection rate of 66.19% by tissue alone to 77.30% as well as the sensitivity of 85.63-100%. Similar results were also observed when the cases were classified into subpopulations according to different stages (IV vs. III vs. I-II), grades (low vs. middle grade) and metastatic status (metastasis vs. no metastasis).

CONCLUSION

Plasma ctDNA shares a high concordance with tissue NGS, and plasma plus tissue enhances the detection rate and sensitivity by tissue alone, implying that the tissue and plasma detection should be mutually complementary in the clinical application.

The Role of Cell-Free DNA in Cancer Treatment Decision Making

The aim of this review is to evaluate the present status of the use of cell-free DNA and its fraction of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) because this year July 2022, an ESMO guideline was published regarding the application of ctDNA in patient care. This review is for clinical oncologists to explain the concept, the terms used, the pros and cons of ctDNA; thus, the technical aspects of the different platforms are not reviewed in detail, but we try to help in navigating the current knowledge in liquid biopsy. Since the validated and adequately sensitive ctDNA assays have utility in identifying actionable mutations to direct targeted therapy, ctDNA may be used for this soon in routine clinical practice and in other different areas as well. The cfDNA fragments can be obtained by liquid biopsy and can be used for diagnosis, prognosis, and selecting among treatment options in cancer patients. A great proportion of cfDNA comes from normal cells of the body or from food uptake. Only a small part (<1%) of it is related to tumors, originating from primary tumors, metastatic sites, or circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Soon the data obtained from ctDNA may routinely be used for finding minimal residual disease, detecting relapse, and determining the sites of metastases. It might also be used for deciding appropriate therapy, and/or emerging resistance to the therapy and the data analysis of ctDNA may be combined with imaging or other markers. However, to achieve this goal, further clinical validations are inevitable. As a result, clinicians should be aware of the limitations of the assays. Of course, several open questions are still under research and because of it cfDNA and ctDNA testing are not part of routine care yet.

The DKTK EXLIQUID consortium – exploiting liquid biopsies to advance cancer precision medicine for molecular tumor board patients

Testing for genetic alterations in tumor tissue allows clinicians to identify patients who most likely will benefit from molecular targeted treatment. EXLIQUID – exploiting liquid biopsies to advance cancer precision medicine – investigates the potential of additional non-invasive tools for guiding therapy decisions and monitoring of advanced cancer patients. The term “liquid biopsy” (LB) refers to non-invasive analysis of tumor-derived circulating material such as cell-free DNA in blood samples from cancer patients. Although recent technological advances allow sensitive and specific detection of LB biomarkers, only few LB assays have entered clinical routine to date. EXLIQUID is a German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-wide joint funding project that aims at establishing LBs as a minimally-invasive tool to analyze molecular changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Here, we present the structure, clinical aim, and methodical approach of the new DKTK EXLIQUID consortium. Within EXLIQUID, we will set up a multicenter repository of high-quality LB samples from patients participating in DKTK MASTER and local molecular tumor boards, which use molecular profiles of tumor tissues to guide targeted therapies. We will develop LB assays for monitoring of therapy efficacy by the analysis of tumor mutant variants and tumor-specific DNA methylation patterns in ctDNA from these patients. By bringing together LB experts from all DKTK partner sites and exploiting the diversity of their particular expertise, complementary skills and technologies, the EXLIQUID consortium addresses the challenges of translating LBs into the clinic. The DKTK structure provides EXLIQUID a unique position for the identification of liquid biomarkers even in less common tumor types, thereby extending the group of patients benefitting from non-invasive LB testing. Besides its scientific aims, EXLIQUID is building a valuable precision oncology cohort and LB platform which will be available for future collaborative research studies within the DKTK and beyond.

Detection and Quantification of ctDNA for Longitudinal Monitoring of Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Using a Universal Mutant Detection Assay by Denaturing Capillary Electrophoresis

Background: Observation of anticancer therapy effect by monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming an important tool in management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The approach is based on periodic detection and quantification of tumor-specific somatic DNA mutation in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) extracted from patient plasma. For such repetitive testing, complex liquid-biopsy techniques relying on ultra-deep NGS sequencing are impractical. There are other, cost-effective, methods for ctDNA analysis, typically based on quantitative PCR or digital PCR, which are applicable for detecting specific individual mutations in hotspots. While such methods are routinely used in NSCLC therapy prediction, however, extension to cover broader spectrum of mutations (e.g., in tumor suppressor genes) is required for universal longitudinal MRD monitoring.

Methods: For a set of tissue samples from 81 NSCLC patients we have applied a denaturing capillary electrophoresis (DCE) for initial detection of somatic mutations within 8 predesigned PCR amplicons covering oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Mutation-negative samples were then subjected to a large panel NGS sequencing. For each patient mutation found in tissue was then traced over time in ctDNA by DCE.

Results: In total we have detected a somatic mutation in tissue of 63 patients. For those we have then prospectively analyzed ctDNA from collected plasma samples over a period of up to 2 years. The dynamics of ctDNA during the initial chemotherapy therapy cycles as well as in the long-term follow-up matched the clinically observed response.

Conclusion: Detection and quantification of tumor-specific mutations in ctDNA represents a viable complement to MRD monitoring during therapy of NSCLC patients. The presented approach relying on initial tissue mutation detection by DCE combined with NGS and a subsequent ctDNA mutation testing by DCE only represents a cost-effective approach for its routine implementation.

Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology

Liquid biopsy is a promising technique for clinical management of oncological patients. The diversity of analytes circulating in the blood useable for liquid biopsy testing is enormous. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as blood cells and other soluble components in the plasma, were shown as liquid biopsy analytes. A few studies directly comparing two liquid biopsy analytes showed a benefit of one analyte over the other, while most authors concluded the benefit of the additional analyte. Only three years ago, the first studies to examine the value of a characterization of more than two liquid biopsy analytes from the same sample were conducted. We attempt to reflect on the recent development of multimodal liquid biopsy testing in this review. Although the analytes and clinical purposes of the published multimodal studies differed significantly, the additive value of the analytes was concluded in almost all projects. Thus, the blood components, as liquid biopsy reservoirs, are complementary rather than competitive, and orthogonal data sets were even shown to harbor synergistic effects. The unmistakable potential of multimodal liquid biopsy testing, however, is dampened by its clinical utility, which is yet to be proven, the lack of methodical standardization and insufficiently mature reimbursement, logistics and data handling.