Incidence of red-cell alloimmunization due to non-anti-D antibodies during pregnancy: An experience from Turkey

Reassessment of Critical Anti-D Antibody Titer in RhD Alloimmunized Antenatal Women

OBJECTIVE

In the setting of RhD-alloimmunized pregnancy, laboratory variations in critical titer (CT) of anti-D antibody may result in needless referrals or a compromised fetal outcome.

METHODS

RhD-alloimmunized pregnant women were included. Fetal outcome was categorized based on cord hemoglobin and interventions required. For 3 commonly used CTs of 8, 16, and 32, sensitivity and specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values were computed.

RESULTS

When compared with CTs of 16 and 32, we detected 6.9% and 19.4% more cases of moderate-severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn by using 8 as the CT. However, this leads to greater rate of unnecessary referral (12.1%, 10/82) than a CT of 16 (8.2%, 6/73) and 32 (4.9%, 3/61). A CT of 8 demonstrated 100% sensitivity, but 12.1% (10/82) of patients were referred needlessly.

CONCLUSION

Because of its 100% sensitivity, we advocate decreasing the CT to 8. However, this may lead to unwarranted referrals.

Title: Effect of multiple maternal red cell alloantibodies on the occurrence and severity of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn

INTRODUCTION

Antenatal antibody screening in India is focused on the detection of anti-D in RhD-negative mothers. HDFN outcome can also be affected by the presence of antibodies other than anti-D. We planned this study to find the impact of 'anti-D in combination with additional antibodies' on the development and severity of HDFN compared with 'anti-D alone'.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study performed at a referral center in northern India from October 2015 to March 2018. Antibody screening was performed on women with complicated obstetric history. Women with anti-D antibody were included in the study and categorized on the basis of presence of additional antibody (anti-D alone or in combination with other antibody). Various clinical, laboratory & interventional parameters were used to define HDFN and severe HDFN. Perinatal outcome was then compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 176 women with anti-D antibody were included in the study. Of these, 136 cases (77.3%) had anti-D alone while at least one additional antibody was present in 40 (22.7 %) cases. Most common additional antibodies were anti-C, anti-E and anti-c. After excluding 46 women for various reasons, 130 women were left for final analysis. Approximately 57% and 78% of cases were affected by severe HDFN amongst women with anti-D alone and in combination, respectively. Relative risk of developing severe HDFN was 1.7 times higher in women with additional antibody.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with combination antibodies were found to have more severe HDFN compared to the ones with anti-D alone.

The risk assessment study for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in a University Hospital in Turkey

Maternal red-cell alloimmunization occurs when a woman's immune system is sensitized to foreign red-blood cell surface antigens, leading to the production of alloantibodies. The resulting antibodies often cross the placenta during pregnancies in sensitized women and, if the fetus is positive for red-blood-cell surface antigens, this will lead to hemolysis of fetal red-blood cells and anemia. The most severe cases of hemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn baby are caused by anti-D, anti-c, anti-E and anti-K antibodies. There are limited data available on immunization rates in pregnant women from Turkey. The aim of the present study was to provide data on the frequency and nature of maternal RBC alloimmunization in pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the indirect antiglobulin test results of Rh-negative pregnant women performed in our Blood Bank between 2006 and 2012. Indirect antiglobulin test positive women also underwent confirmatory antibody screening and identification. During the study period, 4840 women admitted to our antenatal clinics. With regards to the major blood group systems (ABO and Rh), the most common phenotype was O positive (38.67%). There were 4097 D-antigen-positive women (84.65%) and 743 women with D-antigen-negative phenotype (15.35%). The prevalence of alloimmunization was found to be 8.74% in D-antigen negative group. Despite prophylactic use of Rh immunglobulins, anti-D is still a common antibody identified as the major cause of alloimmunization in our study (anti-D antibody 68.57%, non-D antibody 31.42%). While alloimmunization rate to D antigen was 6.46%, non-D alloimmunization rate was 2.69% among Rh-negative pregnant women. Moreover, detailed identification facilities for antibodies other than anti-D are not available in most of centers across Turkey. However, large-scale studies on pregnant women need to be done in order to collect sufficient evidence to formulate guidelines and to define indications for alloantibody screening and identification.