1
|
El Cheikh J, Terro K, El Warrak S, Ghaoui N, Sharrouf L, Timonian MA, Ismail F, Zahreddine A, Kreidieh N, Moukalled N, Abou Dalle I, Bazarbachi A. Plerixafor and granulocyte colony stimulating factor for poor mobilizers in patients undergoing autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Single institution study. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2023; 1:1017579. [PMID: 38994380 PMCID: PMC11235346 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2022.1017579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become the mainstay treatment for many hematological malignancies and solid tumors. An adequate number of stem cells must be collected for better ASCT outcomes, which is challenging in 5%-30% of patients. To improve mobilization, plerixafor is used along with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective single center study involving patients who received plerixafor pre-ASCTs between January 2013 and December 2020 at a tertiary care center in Lebanon. We identified a total of 84 consecutive adult patients. All patients identified were poor mobilizers and have eventually received plerixafor either as pre-emptive use before first apheresis in those with peripheral CD34 + of less than 20 cells/ul, or after failure of first apheresis in those with peripheral stem cells (PSC) >2.0 × 106 cells/Kg. Results The median age at ASCT was 52.7 years (22-74) with 61% male predominance. Multiple myeloma was the most prevalent disease 64% followed by Lymphoma 32%. The majority of patients were in complete remission 64% at the time of ASCT. Most patients received proteasome inhibitor-based induction therapy 67% and Melphalan-based conditioning therapy 68%. The median follow-up from ASCT was 9 months (1-59). It was noted that greater body mass index (BMI) is a significant factor for better PSC collection whether premobilization (P = 0.003), or post plerixafor mobilization (P = 0.024). Moreover, Multiple Myeloma patients showed better mobilization using Plerixafor (P = 0.049). Using Plerixafor along with G-CSF in poor mobilizers post G-CSF alone showed a statistically significant increase in the collected PSC mean from 0.67 × 106 cells/Kg to 4.90 × 106 cells/Kg (P < 0.001) with a failure rate only for 12 patients (15%). The infusion of PSC > 2.5 × 106 cells/Kg has shown 3 days decrease in time to platelet engraftment (P = 0.021) and a 36% decrease in progression/relapse rate (P = 0.025). Conclusion Plerixafor is effective in increasing the PSC yield in poor mobilizers. Low BMI and hematologic malignancies other than Multiple Myeloma are risk factors for poor mobilization. More studies should be performed to establish more risk factors, helping us to identify poor mobilizers more accurately and initiate plerixafor mobilization early on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean El Cheikh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Khodr Terro
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Samantha El Warrak
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nohra Ghaoui
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Layal Sharrouf
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Fatima Ismail
- Department of Pharmacy, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ammar Zahreddine
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- Nursing Administration, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nabila Kreidieh
- Stem Cell Processing Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nour Moukalled
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Iman Abou Dalle
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ali Bazarbachi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rafiee M, Abbasi M, Rafieemehr H, Mirzaeian A, Barzegar M, Amiri V, Shahsavan S, Mohammadi MH. A concise review on factors influencing the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation main outcomes. Health Sci Rep 2021; 4:e282. [PMID: 33977164 PMCID: PMC8103082 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS As a curative procedure, hematopoietic stemcell transplantation (HSCT) is an approved treatment for many malignant orbenign hematologic and non-hematologic diseases. There are different outcomes of HSCT, as well as several parameters influencing these outcomes. METHODS We had searched scientific sources like Web ofScience and PubMed with a combination of keywords such as HSCT, engraftment,survival, outcomes, etc. Totally, 80 articles were included. RESULTS Here we have reviewed the effective factors onmain outcomes of HSCT including engraftment, survival, graft versus hostdisease, and Mobilization. Also, the prediction of hematological reconstitutionand some novel suggestions leading to better outcomes are reviewed. CONCLUSION The study will be applicable for improvedmanagement of autologous and allogeneic HSCT process to increase the procedureefficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Rafiee
- Department of Hematology and Blood BankingSchool of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
- Department of Medical Laboratory SciencesSchool of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran
| | - Mohammad Abbasi
- Department of Internal MedicineHamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran
| | - Hassan Rafieemehr
- Department of Medical Laboratory SciencesSchool of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran
| | - Amin Mirzaeian
- Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation Research Center, Laboratory and Blood Banking Department, School of Allied Medical SciencesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mohieddin Barzegar
- Department of Hematology and Blood BankingSchool of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Vahid Amiri
- Department of Hematology and Blood BankingSchool of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | | | - Mohammad Hossein Mohammadi
- Department of Hematology and Blood BankingSchool of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
|
4
|
Chen H, Liu KY. [Advances in mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells]. ZHONGHUA XUE YE XUE ZA ZHI = ZHONGHUA XUEYEXUE ZAZHI 2019; 40:884-888. [PMID: 31775496 PMCID: PMC7364975 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institution of Hematology, National Clinical Reserarch Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing 100044, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Risk factors for poor mobilization in solid tumors: How effectively can we mobilize patients with solid tumors? Transfus Apher Sci 2017; 56:809-813. [PMID: 29162401 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the literature, risk factors for poor mobilization were tried to identify. However, most of the studies consisted heterogeneous group of patients including both hematologic and oncologic malignancies. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for poor mobilization in adults with solid tumors. METHODS We enrolled 49(47 men, 2 women) adult patients with solid tumor who were mobilized between September 2007 and February 2017. All the mobilization procedures were performed with G-CSF(10μg/kg/day) with chemotherapy. Mobilization insufficiency was defined as peripheral blood CD34+stem cell number less than 10/μl and/or total collected CD34+cells less than 2.5×10 6/kg. RESULTS The patients were divided into two groups, patients with successful mobilization at the first attempt(group 1, 36 patients,73.5%) and poor mobilizers (group 2, 13 patients 26.5%). Second and third mobilization attempt was needed in 11 and 2 patients, respectively. The median number of CD34+cells collected was 7,08×106/kg(0,6-19) with a median 4(1-6) apheresis. There was no statistical difference between two groups in terms of patient's and mobilization characteristics. Only number of CD 34+stem cells collected was statistically different (median 9,07×106/kg CD34+cells in group 1 versus 2,14×106/kg in group 2, p<0.05). The only possible risk factor that we could define was presence of organ metastasis. CONCLUSIONS Since several methods and new drugs are available for peripheral stem cell collecting, risk factors should be identified clearly in adult population with solid tumors. So multicenter studies should be constructed for resolving this problem.
Collapse
|
6
|
Duarte FB, Prado BDPA, Vieira GMM, Costa LJ. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for autologous transportation: consensus recommendations. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2016; 62 Suppl 1:10-15. [PMID: 27982316 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.62.suppl1.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Selected patients with certain hematological malignancies and solid tumors have the potential to achieve long-term survival with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant. The collection of these cells in peripheral blood avoids multiple bone marrow aspirations, results in faster engraftment and allows treatment of patients with infection, fibrosis, or bone marrow hypocellularity. However, for the procedure to be successful, it is essential to mobilize a sufficient number of progenitor cells from the bone marrow into the blood circulation. Therefore, a group of Brazilian experts met in order to develop recommendations for mobilization strategies adapted to the reality of the Brazilian national health system, which could help minimize the risk of failure, reduce toxicity and improve the allocation of financial resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Barroso Duarte
- Service of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil
| | | | | | - Luciano J Costa
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy Program, Department of Medicine and UAB-CCC, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu JT, Cheng SB, Yang Y, Chang KH, Hwang WL, Teng CLJ. Circulating hematopoietic progenitors and CD34(+) cells predicted successful hematopoietic stem cell harvest in myeloma and lymphoma patients: experiences from a single institution. J Blood Med 2016; 7:5-11. [PMID: 26917978 PMCID: PMC4751903 DOI: 10.2147/jbm.s95679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies have shown that the numbers of both circulating hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) and CD34+ cell are positively correlated with CD34+ cell harvest yield. However, the minimal numbers of both circulating HPCs and CD34+ cells required for performing an efficient hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) harvest in lymphoma and myeloma patients have not been defined in our institution. Patients and methods Medical records of 50 lymphoma and myeloma patients undergoing peripheral blood HSC harvest in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The minimal and optimal HSC harvest yield required for the treatment was considered to be ≥2×106 CD34+ cells/kg and ≥5×106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. Results The minimally required or optimal HSC yield obtained was not influenced by age (≥60 years), sex, underlying malignancies, disease status, multiple rounds of chemotherapy, or history of radiotherapy. The numbers of both circulating HPC and CD34+ cell were higher in patients with minimally required HSC yields (P=0.000 for HPC and P=0.000 for CD34+ cell) and also in patients with optimal HSC yields (P=0.011 for HPC and P=0.006 for CD34+ cell). The cell count cutoff for obtaining minimally required HSC harvest was determined to be 20/mm3 for HPCs and 10/mm3 for CD34+ cells. Furthermore, the cell count cutoff for obtaining optimal HSC harvest was determined to be 60/mm3 for HPCs and 35/mm3 for CD34+ cells. Conclusion A total of 60/mm3 of HPCs and 35/mm3 of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood predicted optimal HSC harvest in lymphoma and myeloma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jui-Ting Yu
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China; Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Shao-Bin Cheng
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Youngsen Yang
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Kuang-Hsi Chang
- Department of Medical Research and Education, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Wen-Li Hwang
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chieh-Lin Jerry Teng
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China; Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China; School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
[A retrospective analysis of autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilizations and collections in 149 multiple myeloma patients]. ZHONGHUA XUE YE XUE ZA ZHI = ZHONGHUA XUEYEXUE ZAZHI 2016; 36:367-71. [PMID: 26031520 PMCID: PMC7342593 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the results and influential factors of mobilization and harvesting of autologous peripheral blood stem cell in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS Retrospective analysis of peripheral blood stem cell collection data [CD34⁺ cells collected, successful mobilization rate (CD34⁺ cells≥2×10⁶/kg body weight), good mobilization rate (CD34⁺ cells≥5×10⁶/kg body weight)] of 149 multiple myeloma patients who were treated with cyclophosphamide (CTX) or E-CHOP (etoposide+ CTX+epirubicin+vindesine+prednisone) chemotherapy combined with G-CSF mobilization from January 1998 to March 2014. The relevance between gender, age, subtype, DS staging, ISS staging, treatment before mobilization, disease status at mobilization, regiment of mobilizationand the collection results was analyzed. RESULTS A total of 177 stem cell mobilizations were performed in 149 MM patients, the median CD34⁺ cells harvested were 3.20 (0.13-22.34)×10⁶/kg body weight (BW), successful mobilization rate and good mobilization rate were 74.5% and 27.5%, respectively. The single logistic regression analysis showed that gender, age (>60 ys vs ≤60 ys), subtype, DS staging (III vs II+I), ISS staging (III vs II+I) and regiment of mobilization (E-CHOP+G-CSF vs ID-CTX+G-CSF) were not correlated with the cell collection or successful mobilization rate (P>0.05). However, successful collection rate of single harvest in old patients (age>60 ys) was lower (P<0.05), andthe good mobilization rate in patients at ISS stage III was lower (P<0.05). The collection results of patients with fewer cycles of treatment (treatment before mobilization ≤6 cycles) and optimal disease status (disease status at mobilization ≥partial remission) were much better. Analysis of logistic factors revealed that treatment efficacy before mobilization affected success rate of collection (P=0.006). Risk of collection failure in patients who received more than 6 cycles of treatment before mobilization was high (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.45-8.78). CONCLUSION Gender, age, subtype, DS staging, ISS staging and mobilization regimen did not influence MM patients peripheral blood stem cell collection; but old patients may need twice mobilizations to collect sufficiently. Few cycles of treatment and stable disease status before mobilization is favorable to the mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells.
Collapse
|
9
|
High dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in septuagenarians with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Feasible, but for which patients? J Geriatr Oncol 2015; 6:344-5. [PMID: 26272671 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
10
|
Goker H, Etgul S, Buyukasik Y. Optimizing mobilization strategies in difficult-to-mobilize patients: The role of plerixafor. Transfus Apher Sci 2015; 53:23-9. [PMID: 26099666 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2015.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Peripheral blood stem cell collection is currently the most widely used source for hematopoietic autologous transplantation. Several factors such as advanced age, previous chemotherapy, disease and marrow infiltration at the time of mobilization influence the efficacy of CD34(+) progenitor cell mobilization. Despite the safety and efficiency of the standard mobilization protocols (G-CSF ± chemotherapy), there is still a significant amount of mobilization failure rate (10-40%), which necessitate novel agents for effective mobilization. Plerixafor, is a novel agent, has been recently approved for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). The combination of Plerixafor with G-CSF provides the collection of large numbers of stem cells in fewer apheresis sessions and can salvage those who fail with standard mobilization regimens. The development and optimization of practical algorithms for the use Plerixafor is crucial to make hematopoietic stem cell mobilization more efficient in a cost-effective way. This review is aimed at summarizing how to identify poor mobilizers, and define rational use of Plerixafor for planning mobilization in hard-to-mobilize patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Goker
- Hematology Department, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Sezgin Etgul
- Hematology Department, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yahya Buyukasik
- Hematology Department, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Musto P, Simeon V, Grossi A, Gay F, Bringhen S, Larocca A, Guariglia R, Pietrantuono G, Villani O, D'Arena G, Cuomo C, Musto C, Morabito F, Petrucci MT, Offidani M, Zamagni E, Tacchetti P, Conticello C, Milone G, Palumbo A, Cavo M, Boccadoro M. Predicting poor peripheral blood stem cell collection in patients with multiple myeloma receiving pre-transplant induction therapy with novel agents and mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor: results from a Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto Multiple Myeloma Working Party study. Stem Cell Res Ther 2015; 6:64. [PMID: 25889496 PMCID: PMC4425876 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-015-0033-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2014] [Revised: 12/23/2014] [Accepted: 03/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A still not well defined proportion of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (AuSCT) fails to mobilize CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) at all or to collect an adequate number for a safe procedure or sufficient for multiple transplants. These so-called "poor-mobilizers" are difficult to be predicted, due to marked difference across previous heterogeneous studies. METHODS We aimed to develop a method based on simple clinical parameters for predicting unsuccessful (<2×10(6)/kg) or sub-optimal (<5×10(6)/kg) collections of CD34+ PBSC in newly diagnosed MM patients eligible for AuSCT, treated with novel agents and receiving an homogeneous mobilizing therapy with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). To this purpose, 1,348 patients enrolled in five consecutive Italian clinical trials were retrospectively analysed. Age, baseline low peripheral blood cell counts, use of lenalidomide, and haematological toxicity developed during induction were taken into account as possible factors associated with poor mobilization. RESULTS Overall, 280 patients (20.8%) showed either sub-optimal (167 patients, 12.4%) or unsuccessful (113 patients, 8.4%) collections. All analysed parameters negatively influenced the procedure, but only age and haematological toxicity during induction maintained their significance at multivariate analysis. Based on ordinal logistic regression model, we constructed a risk heat-map where the four parameters were pooled and weighted according to their relevance as single or combined variables. This model was predictive for different probabilities of failure, suboptimal or optimal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We found that about one fifth of newly diagnosed MM fails to collect an adequate number of PBSC. Our model, based on a large group of patients treated frontline with novel agents and receiving the most popular mobilizing approach currently employed in Europe, is applicable in individual subjects and may contribute to the early identification of "poor mobilizer" phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pellegrino Musto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS, Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
| | - Vittorio Simeon
- Laboratory of Pre-clinical and Translational Research, IRCCS, Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
| | - Alberto Grossi
- Haematology, Centro Oncologico Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
| | - Francesca Gay
- Myeloma Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Sara Bringhen
- Myeloma Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | | | - Roberto Guariglia
- Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, IRCCS, Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Pietrantuono
- Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, IRCCS, Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
| | - Oreste Villani
- Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, IRCCS, Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
| | - Giovanni D'Arena
- Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, IRCCS, Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
| | - Carmela Cuomo
- Transfusional Medicine, IRCCS, Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
| | - Clelia Musto
- Transfusional Service, S. Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy.
| | | | | | | | - Elena Zamagni
- Seràgnoli Institute of Haematology, University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Paola Tacchetti
- Seràgnoli Institute of Haematology, University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Concetta Conticello
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Section of Haematology, University of Catania, Catania, CT, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Milone
- Hemopoietic Transplant Program, AOU Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy.
| | - Antonio Palumbo
- Myeloma Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Michele Cavo
- Seràgnoli Institute of Haematology, University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Myeloma Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|