Patients treated with therapeutic plasma exchange: a single center experience

Hemostatic effects of therapeutic plasma exchange: A concise review

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) alters the hemostatic balance. Contributing to TPE's hemostatic effects is the mechanical processing of blood in the extracorporeal circuit, circuit anticoagulant, type of replacement fluid, TPE schedule and number of procedures, TPE timing relative to invasive procedures, and removal of nontargeted components such as platelets, coagulation proteins, and cytokines. Although TPE's hemostatic effects are well established, how it impacts the bleeding risk is not clearly understood. In this concise review, we describe the effects of the above TPE-related factors on hemostatic balance, present data on the effects of TPE on blood hemostasis, including its effects on platelet counts and clotting assays, and review the literature on the impact of TPE-induced hemostatic changes on TPE-associated bleeding events. Finally, we discuss risk factors associated with bleeding during TPE and review the literature on TPE-associated hemostatic effects in the pediatric population.

Combination of plasma exchange and haemofiltration for treating thrombotic microangiopathy in children

Objective

To investigate the therapeutic effects of a combination of plasma exchange (PE) and haemofiltration (HF) for the treatment for paediatric patients with severe thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA).

Methods

This retrospective study analysed data from paediatric patients who were diagnosed with severe TMA and managed with either supportive therapy and additional PE and HF (PE + HF group) or supportive therapy alone (control group). Demographic and clinical characteristics, haemopurification and blood parameters and survival of the patients were compared between the two groups.

Results

This study enrolled 32 patients: PE + HF group (n = 15) and control group (n = 17). There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline, including specific features for differentiating the two categories of TMA. The median time between onset and recovery, defined by the markers of platelet count, lactate dehydrogenase, blood urine nitrogen and hospital stay, were all significantly longer in the control group compared with the PE + HF group. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated that the cumulative survival rate was significantly higher in the PE + HF group compared with the control group.

Conclusion

The combination of PE and HF could be considered as one of the treatment choices for TMA.

Effects of therapeutic plasma exchange on anticoagulants in patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation: a systematic review

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) removes coagulation proteins, but its impact on therapeutic anticoagulation is unknown. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the coagulation effects of TPE in patients receiving systemic anticoagulation. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science until June 2018 for studies combining controlled vocabulary and keywords related to therapeutic plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, anticoagulants, and therapy. The primary outcome was the effect of TPE on anti-Xa activity, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), or international normalized ratio (INR). The secondary outcome was reports of post-TPE bleeding or thrombosis. A total of 1830 references were screened and eight studies identified. Our selected studies (five case reports and three case series) involved 23 patients and evaluated the effects of seven anticoagulants. Six studies of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, and direct oral anticoagulants demonstrated an anti-Xa level decline. Two studies of unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins showed an aPTT increase. One study of warfarin showed a post-TPE INR increase. Reports of post-TPE bleeding occurred in two patients and thrombosis in one. In patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation, TPE is associated with anti-Xa activity decline and aPTT and INR increase. These coagulation changes do not appear to significantly increase bleeding or thrombotic risk. Our data suggest the need for prospective studies to investigate the true clinical impact of TPE on therapeutic anticoagulation.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Non-bioartificial liver support system for treating patients with severe hepatitis: Common problems and nursing countermeasures

Non-bioartificial liver support system, a common and effective therapy to salvage patients with severe hepatitis and a temporary substitution of the liver function, may "bridge" patients to liver transplantation or recovery. However, nurses play a pivotal role in the process of non-bioartificial liver support system, so it is key for successful treatment that they are able to timely identify and effectively manage adverse reactions during the process. Given all this, this review discusses common problems and nursing countermeasures encountered during treatment with the non-bioartificial liver support system in patients with severe hepatitis, aiming at improving their capacity of detecting and dealing with adverse reactions, and thus increasing the efficacy.