Immunoglobulin G levels during collection of large volume plasma for fractionation

Effect of apheresis plasma donation on plasma uric acid levels, the lipid profile, and major plasma proteins in plasma donors in China: A multicenter, prospective cohort study

Abnormal plasma uric acid (UA) levels, the lipid profile, and plasma proteins in blood are associated with a range of adverse health outcomes. This multicenter, prospective cohort study aimed to determine the possible effects of multiple apheresis plasma donations on plasma UA levels, the lipid profile, and major proteins in plasma donors. Participants were enrolled from 1 April 2021 to 31 August 2022. When their plasma UA (men: >420 µmol/L, women: >360 µmol/L) and/or lipid levels (total cholesterol [TC]: ≥6.2 mmol/L, triglycerides [TGs]: ≥2.3 mmol/L, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: ≥4.1 mmol/L, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]: <1.0 mmol/L) were abnormal at their first plasma donation, the enrolled participants were followed up until they had completed 10 plasma donations. A total of 11485 participants were enrolled, of whom 1861 met the inclusion criteria. During the study period, 320 donors completed 10 plasma donations. None of the participants took any corrective medicine for their abnormal index. The measured parameters were significantly different from the first to the tenth plasma donations (donors with asymptomatic hyperuricemia: UA, P < 0.001; donors with asymptomatic hyperlipidemia: HDL-C, P < 0.001; TC, P = 0.025; TGs, P < 0.001; apolipoprotein B, P = 0.025; all of the plasma donors, immunoglobulin G, P < 0.001). The levels of HDL-C, TC, and apolipoprotein B were increased, and the levels of UA, TGs, and immunoglobulin G were decreased over this time. However, immunoglobulin G levels were still in the normal range. Moreover, the changes in these parameters were closely associated with the frequency of plasma donation during the study period. Repeated apheresis plasma donations can reduce plasma UA and TG levels and increase HDL-C levels; and further evaluation of the clinical significance with a larger sample size is required.

A donor safety evidence literature review of the short- and long-term effects of plasmapheresis

Many blood establishments are expanding plasmapheresis collection capacity to achieve increasing plasma for fractionation volume targets, driven by immunoglobulin product demand. Some adverse events occur in both apheresis and whole blood collection, such as venepuncture-related trauma and vasovagal reactions. Others are specifically related to the apheresis procedure, such as citrate reactions, haemolysis, infiltration and air embolism. Whilst plasmapheresis procedures are generally well tolerated, theoretical longer term donor health considerations, such as the effects on donor plasma protein levels, bone mineral density, iron deficiency and malignancy also require consideration. An evidence-based framework that supports a safe and sustainable increase in the collection of plasma is essential. Our review demonstrates a lack of high-quality evidence on risks and outcomes specifically in plasmapheresis. Whilst conservative procedural controls and donor harm minimization policies will mitigate risk, high-quality evidence is needed to facilitate practice change that is safe and sustainable and maximizes the potential of individual donor differences.

Increasing the time-to-freezing for clinical apheresis plasma meets quality specifications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In Australia, the vast distances between blood collection centres and processing facilities make it challenging to align supply with demand. Increasing the time to freezing for clinical plasma beyond 6 h would alleviate supply issues. This study aimed to determine the quality of clinical apheresis plasma frozen within 12 h of collection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Apheresis plasma (n = 20) collected at donor centres was immediately transported to a blood processing facility, stored at 26°C and sampled aseptically at 6, 8 and 12 h post collection. Frozen samples were thawed, and coagulation factors (F) II, V, VII, VIII and XIII, von Willebrand factor (vWF) and fibrinogen were measured using a coagulation analyser.

RESULTS

FVIII concentrations declined in plasma frozen at 6, 8 and 12 h post collection (1.22 ± 0.27, 1.21 ± 0.25 and 1.16 ± 0.24 IU/mL, respectively) but not significantly (p = 0.3338). Importantly, all components met the FVIII specification (>0.7 IU/mL) for clinical plasma. Fibrinogen concentrations were stable from 6 to 12 h (p = 0.3100), as were vWF concentrations (p = 0.1281). Coagulation factors II, V, VII and XIII were not significantly different (p > 0.05 for all factors).

CONCLUSION

Clinical apheresis plasma can be frozen within 12 h of collection, allowing collections from donor centres further from processing centres and increasing supply.

Safety of Plasmapheresis in Donors with Low IgG Levels: Results of a Prospective, Controlled Multicentre Study

Background and Objectives

Although plasmapheresis is generally considered safe, there are still concerns about the long-term effects of plasma donation on immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels. The aim of the present study was to investigate if there is a need to permanently defer donors who donated three times with an IgG level below 6.0 g/L.

Study Design and Methods

From September 2007 to December 2017, adverse events (AEs) including infections were analysed from data of a prospective, controlled multicentre study of healthy volunteer donors, participating in an individualized plasmapheresis programme stratified by initial IgG level and body weight (individualized arm) or in standard plasmapheresis according to national guidelines (control arm). IgG was monitored at every fifth donation, and donors with IgG levels below the threshold were identified and followed up for possible AEs.

Results

In total, 97,540 donations in 1,462 donors in the control arm and 1,491,223 donations in 14,281 donors in the individualized arm were included. Donation-based incidences of at least severe AEs and any infections were 0.019% and 0.192% in the control arm, and 0.014% and 0.153% in the individualized arm. Three or more IgG-measurements below the threshold occurred in 38.2% of control arm donors and 20.9% of individualized arm donors. There were no increased incidence rates of at least severe AEs or any infections in donors with ≥3 IgG-measurements below the threshold in either donor's arm.

Conclusions

Our data show no signs of compromised donor safety in donors with ≥3 IgG-measurements below the threshold, indicating that plasmapheresis is feasible and safe in these donors.

Biochemical and cellular markers differentiate recovered, in-line filtered plasma, and plasma obtained by apheresis methods

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Assessment of plasma quality often focuses on the common safety tests for minimizing the risk of transmitting blood-borne pathogens. Little attention is paid to the possible quality attributes that ensure a consistent biochemical composition of plasma for fractionation. We therefore investigated the suitability of selected biochemical and haematological attributes that could be used as markers of plasma quality obtained by different separation and pre-treatment procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We characterized six plasma types, including source plasma, plasma recovered by classic means and in-line filtered plasma, by determining the analytical attributes protein content, coagulation factors and markers of coagulation, contact and complement activation. Residual cell content and cell-specific variables were also measured.

RESULTS

We found relevant differences between the plasma types in complement activation, as indicated by C3a measurements, while thrombin antithrombin complex values and, to a minor extent, activated factor XII concentrations indicated only moderate differences in activation levels of coagulation and contact systems. The most striking differences, however, were detected in residual cell content and concentrations of the platelet-associated proteins, platelet factor 4 and β-thromboglobulin. We showed that leucocyte reduction filters disrupt cells. This includes platelets, thereby releasing the platelet-associated proteins platelet factor 4 and β-thromboglobulin, and leucocytes as demonstrated by the release of elastase from polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Furthermore, the filtration processing of whole blood can lead to activation of the complement system.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that biochemical and cellular surrogate markers are valuable discriminators of plasma types.

How donor selection criteria can be evaluated with limited scientific evidence: lessons learned from the TRANSPOSE project

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Donor selection criteria (DSC) are a vital link in the chain of supply of Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) but are also subject to controversy and differences of opinion. Traditionally, DSC have been based on application of the precautionary principle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2017 to 2020, TRANSPOSE (TRANSfusion and transplantation PrOtection and SElection of donors), a European research project, aimed to identify discrepancies between current DSC by proposing a standardized risk assessment method for all SoHO (solid organs excluded) and all levels of evidence.

RESULTS

The current DSC were assessed using a modified risk assessment method based on the Alliance of Blood Operators' Risk-based decision-making framework for blood safety. It was found that with limited or diverging scientific evidence, it was difficult to reach consensus and an international standardized method for decision-making was lacking. Furthermore, participants found it hard to disregard their local guidelines when providing expert opinion, which resulted in substantial influence on the consensus-based decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS

While the field of donation-safety research is expanding rapidly, there is an urgent need to formalize the decision-making process regarding DSC. This includes the need for standardized methods to increase transparency in the international decision-making process and to ensure that this is performed consistently. Our framework provides an easy-to-implement approach for standardizing risk assessments, especially in the context of limited scientific evidence.

Targeting FcRn for immunomodulation: Benefits, risks, and practical considerations

The neonatal fragment crystallizable (Fc) receptor (FcRn) functions as a recycling mechanism to prevent degradation and extend the half-life of IgG and albumin in the circulation. Several FcRn inhibitors selectively targeting IgG recycling are now moving rapidly toward clinical practice in neurology and hematology. These molecules accelerate the destruction of IgG, reducing pathogenic IgG and IgG immune complexes, with no anticipated effects on IgA, IgM, IgE, complement, plasma cells, B cells, or other cells of the innate or adaptive immune systems. FcRn inhibitors have potential for future use in a much wider variety of antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases. Given the imminent clinical use, potential for broader utility, and novel mechanism of action of FcRn inhibitors, here we review data from 4 main sources: (a) currently available activity, safety, and mechanism-of-action data from clinical trials of FcRn inhibitors; (b) other procedures and treatments that also remove IgG (plasma donation, plasma exchange, immunoadsorption); (c) diseases resulting in loss of IgG; and (d) primary immunodeficiencies with potential mechanistic similarities to those induced by FcRn inhibitors. These data have been evaluated to provide practical considerations for the assessment, monitoring, and reduction of any potential infection risk associated with FcRn inhibition, in addition to highlighting areas for future research.

What can be learned in the snake antivenom field from the developments in human plasma derived products?

Human plasma-derived medicinal products and snake antivenom immunoglobulins are unique and complex therapeutic protein products. Human plasma products are obtained by fractionating large pools of plasma collected from blood plasma donors. They comprise a wide range of protein products, including polyvalent and hyperimmune immunoglobulins, coagulation factors, albumin, and various protease inhibitors that are transfused to patients affected by congenital or acquired protein deficiencies, immunological disorders, or metabolic diseases. Snake antivenoms are manufactured from pools of plasma collected from animals, typically horses, which have been immunized against snake venoms. Transfusing antivenoms is the cornerstone therapy to treat patients affected by snakebite envenoming. Over the last thirty years, much technical and regulatory evolution has been implemented to ensure that this class of biologicals meets modern quality requirements. The purpose of this review is to compare the main developments that took place in plasma production, protein fractionation, pathogen safety, quality control, preclinical and clinical studies, and regulations of these products. We also analyze whether both fields have been influencing and cross-fertilizing each other technically and in regulatory aspects to reach modern safety and efficacy standards at global levels, and how experience in the human plasma fractionation industry can further impact the manufacture of snake antivenom and that of other animal-derived antisera.

Anticoagulation, bleeding, and clotting at donor plasmapheresis

This article is based on a question of a colleague from North America how coagulation could be triggered between a donor's arm and a fistula needle during plasma donation (synonymous with donor plasmapheresis). The technique of venipuncture and citrate anticoagulation are described. Uncommon and rare problems such as prolonged bleeding, scarring, and thrombosis in plasma donors are discussed. If venous puncture and citrate: blood flow ratio at 1:16 are correctly performed, however, there will be no anticoagulation abnormalities due to plasma donation.