Peripheral blood stem cell collection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Practical implications after 200 consequent transplants

Stem Cells Collection and Mobilization in Adult Autologous/Allogeneic Transplantation: Critical Points and Future Challenges

Achieving successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) relies on two fundamental pillars: effective mobilization and efficient collection through apheresis to attain the optimal graft dose. These cornerstones pave the way for enhanced patient outcomes. The primary challenges encountered by the clinical unit and collection facility within a transplant program encompass augmenting mobilization efficiency to optimize the harvest of target cell populations, implementing robust monitoring and predictive strategies for mobilization, streamlining the apheresis procedure to minimize collection duration while ensuring adequate yield, prioritizing patient comfort by reducing the overall collection time, guaranteeing the quality and purity of stem cell products to optimize graft function and transplant success, and facilitating seamless coordination between diverse entities involved in the HSCT process. In this review, we aim to address key questions and provide insights into the critical aspects of mobilizing and collecting hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation purposes.

Use of plerixafor to mobilize haematopoietic progenitor cells in healthy donors

Increased transplant activity calls for improved stem cell collection, especially when peripheral blood is the preferred source of haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). Plerixafor is a bicyclam molecule that mobilizes CD34+ cells by reversibly disrupting CXCR4-CXCL12-supported HPC retention. Plerixafor is given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to help harvest autologous CD34+ cells for transplantation when mobilization with G-CSF fails. Mobilization protocols with the same doses of plerixafor and G-CSF have been used off-label in healthy allogeneic donors, with equal success and scarce side effects, both in adult and paediatric patients. Plerixafor has also been used as a sole mobilization agent. Plerixafor alone or coupled with G-CSF might lead to harvesting distinct cellular populations conferring improved engraftment properties and increased survival. Those characteristics might make plerixafor an especially attractive mobilization agent, particularly for non-related donations. However, available data are limited, and long-term follow-up is needed to clarify the best scenario for using plerixafor with or without G-CSF in healthy donors. In this review, we will summarize the evidence supporting this practice, highlighting the practical aspects and providing clues for an expanded use of plerixafor.

The effects of selective beta-adrenergic blockade on bone marrow dysfunction following severe trauma and chronic stress

INTRODUCTION

Propranolol has been shown to improve erythroid progenitor cell growth and anemia following trauma and this study sought to investigate the mechanisms involved by evaluating the effects of selective beta blockade.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to lung contusion, hemorrhagic shock and chronic stress (LCHS/CS) ± daily selective beta-1, beta-2, or beta-3 blockade (B1B, B2B, B3B). Bone marrow cellularity and growth of erythroid progenitor colonies, hemoglobin, plasma granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization, and daily weight were assessed.

RESULTS

Selective beta-2 and beta-3 blockade improved bone marrow cellularity, erythroid progenitor colony growth and hemoglobin levels, while decreasing plasma G-CSF, progenitor cell mobilization and weight loss following LCHS/CS.

CONCLUSIONS

Attenuating the neuroendocrine stress response with the use of selective beta-2 and 3 adrenergic blockade may be an alternative to improve bone marrow erythroid function following trauma.

Systemic Regulation of Bone Marrow Stromal Cytokines After Severe Trauma

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury generates a prolonged hypercatecholamine state that is associated with reduced growth of bone marrow erythroid progenitors mediated by the bone marrow stroma. The bone marrow stroma is made up of many cells including fibroblasts, which respond to inflammatory stimuli and alter the cytokine profile. We hypothesized that trauma plasma would increase bone marrow stromal fibroblast expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), erythropoietin (EPO), stem cell factor (SCF), and activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells and correlate with injury severity and anemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma from 15 trauma patients was cultured with bone marrow fibroblast cells and compared with that from healthy volunteers. At 6, 24, and 48 h, the expression of IL-6, G-CSF, EPO, SCF, and the activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells were measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The influence of trauma plasma on cytokine expression was further stratified by injury severity score (ISS).

RESULTS

The average hemoglobin significantly decreased from admission to discharge (10.7 ± 2.5 to 9.2 ± 1.1 g/dL, P < 0.04). The discharge hemoglobin significantly decreased by 14% from the admission hemoglobin. After 48 h, trauma plasma significantly increased IL-6, G-CSF, and EPO bone marrow fibroblast expression when compared with normal plasma. When stratified by ISS, IL-6, G-CSF, and EPO, bone marrow fibroblast expression was highest in the trauma plasma ISS 27-41 group and was significantly elevated compared with normal plasma. When SCF expression was stratified by ISS, there was a significant increase in expression in ISS 27-41. Higher ISS was also associated with a larger decrease in hemoglobin despite no difference in total blood transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe trauma can systemically increase IL-6, G-CSF, and EPO expression in bone marrow stroma. Increased hematopoietic cytokine expression after traumatic injury correlated with a hypercatecholamine state, anemia, and injury severity.

Challenge to Predict Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells on the Fourth Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment in Healthy Donors: Predictive Value of Basal CD34+ Cell and Platelet Counts

A longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center cohort study on healthy donors was designed to identify predictors of CD34⁺ cell mobilization on day 4 after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration. As potential predictors of mobilization, age, sex, body weight, height, blood volume, WBC count, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cell count, platelet (Plt) count, and hematocrit and hemoglobin levels were considered. Two different evaluations of CD34⁺ cell counts were determined for each donor: baseline (before G-CSF administration) and in PB on day 4 after G-CSF administration. One hundred twenty-two consecutive healthy donors with a median age of 47.5 years were enrolled. The median value of CD34⁺ on day 4 was 43 cells/µL (interquartile range, 23 to 68), and 81.1% of donors had ≥20 cells/µL. Basal WBC count, Plt count, and CD34⁺ were significantly higher for the subjects with CD34⁺ levels over median values on day 4. A multivariate quartile regression analysis, adjusted by sex, age, basal CD34⁺, and basal Plt count, showed a progressively stronger relationship between baseline CD34⁺ and Plt levels and the CD34⁺ levels on day 4. The basal CD34⁺ cut-off level to predict the levels of CD34⁺ on day 4 was either ≤2 cells/μL or ≥3 cells/μL and that of basal Plt count was ≤229 × 10⁹/L or ≥230 × 10⁹/L, respectively, to determine whether mobilization therapy should or should not be attempted. PB stem cell mobilization with G-CSF was highly effective on day 4, and herein we describe a model for predicting the probability of performing PB stem cell collection after a short course of G-CSF.