Laboratory assessment of Activated Protein C Resistance/Factor V-Leiden and performance characteristics of a new quantitative assay

Thrombophilia Screening: Not So Straightforward

Although inherited thrombophilias are lifelong risk factors for a first thrombotic episode, progression to thrombosis is multifactorial and not all individuals with inherited thrombophilia develop thrombosis in their lifetimes. Consequently, indiscriminate screening in patients with idiopathic thrombosis is not recommended, since presence of a thrombophilia does not necessarily predict recurrence or influence management, and testing should be selective. It follows that a decision to undertake laboratory detection of thrombophilia should be aligned with a concerted effort to identify any significant abnormalities, because it will inform patient management. Deficiencies of antithrombin and protein C are rare and usually determined using phenotypic assays assessing biological activities, whereas protein S deficiency (also rare) is commonly detected with antigenic assays for the free form of protein S since available activity assays are considered to lack specificity. In each case, no single phenotypic assay is capable of detecting every deficiency, because the various mutations express different molecular characteristics, rendering thrombophilia screening repertoires employing one assay per potential deficiency, of limited effectiveness. Activated protein C resistance (APCR) is more common than discrete deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S and also often detected initially with phenotypic assays; however, some centres perform only genetic analysis for factor V Leiden, as this is responsible for most cases of hereditary APCR, accepting that acquired APCR and rare F5 mutations conferring APCR will go undetected if only factor V Leiden is evaluated. All phenotypic assays have interferences and limitations, which must be factored into decisions about if, and when, to test, and be given consideration in the laboratory during assay performance and interpretation. This review looks in detail at performance and limitations of routine phenotypic thrombophilia assays.

A case-control study on factor V Leiden: an independent, gender-dependent risk factor for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Activated protein C resistance (APCR) due to factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation (R506Q) is a major risk factor in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The present study investigated the clinical manifestations and the risk of venous thromboembolism regarding multiple clinical, laboratory, and demographic properties in FVL patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted on a total of 288 FVL patients with VTE according to APCR. In addition, 288 VET control samples, without FVL mutation, were also randomly selected. Demographic information, clinical manifestations, family and treatment history were recorded, and specific tests including t-test, chi-square and uni- and multi-variable regression tests applied.

RESULTS

APCR was found to be 2.3 times significantly more likely in men (OR: 2.1, p < 0.05) than women. The risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in APCR patients was 4.5 and 3.2 times more than the control group, respectively (p < 0.05). However, APCR could not be an independent risk factor for arterial thrombosis (AT) and pregnancy complications. Moreover, patients were evaluated for thrombophilia panel tests and showed significantly lower protein C and S than the control group and patients without DVT (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

FVL mutation and APCR abnormality are noticeable risk factors for VTE. Screening strategies for FVL mutation in patients undergoing surgery, oral contraceptive medication, and pregnancy cannot be recommended, but a phenotypic test for activated protein C resistance should be endorsed in patients with VTE.

Limitations of a calibrated, quantitative APC-R assay under routine conditions

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Hemoclot Quanti. V-L assay in various clinical conditions.

METHODS

We compared the Hemoclot Quanti.V-L assay with DNA testing and with the Pefakit assay in 60 normal (no mutation) vs carriers of the factor V (FV) Leiden mutation (56 heterozygous and three homozygous). We further investigated the interference of lupus anticoagulant on test results in normal and heterozygous individuals and of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) at trough and peak levels. Additionally, DOAC-Remove was tested in samples containing DOACs at peak levels. We further evaluated the influence of FV deficiency on this quantitative assay.

RESULTS

There was a 100% agreement between the Quant. V-L assay and DNA testing in 60 normal individuals. However, 1.85% of heterozygous and 33% of homozygous samples were falsely classified with the quantitative assay, and no misclassification was observed with the Pefakit assay. Lupus anticoagulant did not influence the test results of the quantitative assay. DOACs also interfered with test results in heterozygous patients, but this effect was prevented with the DOAC-Remove procedure. Even mild FV deficiency affected the test results of the quantitative assay in heterozygous patients leading either to misclassification or the need for subsequent PCR testing.

CONCLUSION

The quantitative FV-L assay has several limitations, especially FV deficiency and the presence of DOACs have to be ruled out before running this quantitative assay.

Revisiting antithrombin in health and disease, congenital deficiencies and genetic variants, and laboratory studies on α and β forms

Antithrombin [AT] is the main inhibitor for activated plasma coagulation serine esterases, inhibiting thrombin, Factors Xa and IXa, but also Factors XIIa, XIa, VIIa, kallicrein, and plasmin. Its activity is highly enhanced by heparin, through binding to the pentasaccharide sequences, for inhibition of all coagulation proteases, except thrombin, which inhibition requires its additional binding to the heparin polysaccharide chain. However, AT is the major inhibitor of thrombin in the blood circulation. Congenital or acquired deficiencies of AT expose affected patients to an increased risk of developing unprovoked and recurrent thrombo-embolic diseases. Antithrombin can be measured with various laboratory techniques, by either immunological or functional methods. Earlier, a radial immunodiffusion immunoassay allowed measurement of the protein antigenic content. Functional assays are mainly designed with Anti-Thrombin or Anti-Factor Xa chromogenic methods and are useful for detecting genetic molecular mutations with decreased inhibitory activity and contributed to study the conformational changes of antithrombin and its variants, which potentially regulate the activity of this serine protease inhibitor. These assays are not equivalent in terms of diagnosing protein abnormalities, associated with increased thrombotic incidence, and they have variable performance for reflecting impaired antithrombin binding capacity for heparin, reduced progressive inhibition of serine proteases, or accelerated switch rates to the latent and less active forms. A small proportion of AT (<10%) is present in blood in the β-form, with a lower oligosaccharide content, a lower Molecular Weight, a higher binding rate to endothelial glycosaminoglycans, and a higher anticoagulant activity, hence requiring specific laboratory methods for its measurement. The β-AT form is then of critical importance for controlling blood activation by tissue injury and preventing development of thrombo-embolic diseases. This article reviews the performance characteristics of the currently available assays, and their usefulness for monitoring the use of AT concentrates in intensive care units, disseminated intravascular coagulation or severe infections, to restore the anticoagulant protective effect of heparin by supplementing the requested AT concentration. The issues of automation, harmonization and standardization are also revisited and discussed.