The use of historical platelet counts from blood donors to program apheresis platelet donation: An Australian perspective

Assessing the performance of a plateletpheresis unit at a tertiary-care academic medical center in Mexico: A 6-year experience

BACKGROUND

Optimization of platelet (PLT) apheresis collection is a priority to satisfy the increasing demand of hemato-oncology patients. We assessed the performance of a plateletpheresis unit supporting hematology patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This descriptive retrospective study included 561 plateletpheresis collections from 2013 to 2018. For data analysis, descriptive statistics and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used. A 5-item satisfaction questionnaire was analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of the donors were males. The median plateletpheresis time was 89 minutes; its success rate was 92.5%; median donor PLT count was 232 × 10⁹ /L, women median PLT count was 247 × 10⁹ /L vs 231x10⁹ /L in men (P = .017). Seventy-seven percent donors were candidates for a double product and 24.5% were processed; 20.8% of these donors had a weight ≤75 and 79.2% >75 kg, P = .003, and 6.6% were women and 93.4% men, P = .161. Thirty-six of donors had ≥250 × 10⁹ /L and 16.8% was processed as a triple product. ROC analysis showed that with donor PLT counts ≥200 × 10⁹ /L the sensitivity for obtaining double products was 0.981 and specificity 0.714, with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.877. The adverse effect rate was 4.3%. Of the potential donors, 6.3% were rejected. The cost of processing single or double products was 430 USD. Comfort and time spent during plateletpheresis were areas for improvement.

CONCLUSION

Platelet count and donor weight predicted PLT yield and obtaining double products. Women had higher PLT counts, but no significant difference was found between donor gender and processed products. Assessment of the apheresis unit can help to improve its performance.