Sickle Cell Disease in the New Era: Advances in Drug Treatment

Sickle cell disease: combination new therapies vs. CRISPR-Cas9 potential and challenges - review article

In 2022, sickle cell disease (SCD) continues to affect the lives of millions of people, being one of the most frequently inherited blood disorders worldwide. Recently, several new therapies have been FDA approved for the treatment of SCD. The complexity of the pathophysiology of sickling has given opportunity to the evolution of several modalities of therapies. Nonetheless, the potential for complementary targeting of HbS polymerization, vasocclusion, and other inflammatory pathways remains controversial. None of these drugs can be considered a single curative line of treatment. With the advancement of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, autologous transplant of gene-edited hematopoietic stem cells could possibly provide a cure for most patients with SCD. The advantage of this approach over the conventional stem cell transplantation is that it decreases the need for immuno-suppressive drugs and the risk of graft-versus-host disease. In addition, recent technological advances can reduce the off-target effects, but long-term monitoring is needed to ensure the reliability of these methods in the clinical setting. This review explores the efficacy and safety of combination therapies and contrasting this alternative with the challenges that exist with sickle cell gene therapy using CRISPR.

Effect of nutritional supplementation on bone mineral density in children with sickle cell disease: protocol for an open-label, randomised controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Children with sickle cell disease show a significant decrease in bone mineral density, an increase in resting energy expenditure of more than 15%, a decrease in fat and lean mass as well as a significant increase in protein turnover, particularly in bone tissue. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an increase in food intake on bone mineral density and the clinical and biological complications of paediatric sickle cell disease.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is designed as an open-label randomised controlled clinical trial conducted in the Paediatrics Unit of the Orléans University Hospital Centre. Participants aged 3-16 years will be randomly divided into two groups: the intervention group will receive oral nutritional supplements (pharmacological nutritional hypercaloric products) while the control group will receive age-appropriate and gender-appropriate nutritional intake during 12 months. Total body less head bone mineral density will be measured at the beginning and the end of the trial. A rigorous nutritional follow-up by weekly 24 hours recall dietary assessment and planned contacts every 6 weeks will be carried out throughout the study. A school absenteeism questionnaire, intended to reflect the patient's school productivity, will be completed by participants and parents every 3 months. Blood samples of each patient of both groups will be stocked at the beginning and at the end of the trial, for future biological trial. Clinical and biological complications will be regularly monitored.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol has been approved by the French ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer 2, Toulouse; approval no: 2-20-092 id9534). Children and their parents will give informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals or international academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04754711.

Breaking genetic shackles: The advance of base editing in genetic disorder treatment

The rapid evolution of gene editing technology has markedly improved the outlook for treating genetic diseases. Base editing, recognized as an exceptionally precise genetic modification tool, is emerging as a focus in the realm of genetic disease therapy. We provide a comprehensive overview of the fundamental principles and delivery methods of cytosine base editors (CBE), adenine base editors (ABE), and RNA base editors, with a particular focus on their applications and recent research advances in the treatment of genetic diseases. We have also explored the potential challenges faced by base editing technology in treatment, including aspects such as targeting specificity, safety, and efficacy, and have enumerated a series of possible solutions to propel the clinical translation of base editing technology. In conclusion, this article not only underscores the present state of base editing technology but also envisions its tremendous potential in the future, providing a novel perspective on the treatment of genetic diseases. It underscores the vast potential of base editing technology in the realm of genetic medicine, providing support for the progression of gene medicine and the development of innovative approaches to genetic disease therapy.

Excellent outcome of stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease

Many sickle cell disease (SCD) patients lack matched family donors (MFD) or matched unrelated donors (MUD), implying haploidentical donors (MMFD) as a logical donor choice. We used a reduced toxicity protocol for all donor types. We included 31 patients (2-22 years) with MFD (n = 15), MMFD (10), or MUD (6) HSCT and conditioning with alemtuzumab/ATG, thiotepa, fludarabine and treosulfan, and post-transplant cyclophosphamide for MMFD. After the initial six patients, treosulfan was replaced by targeted busulfan (AUC 65-75 ng*h/ml). After a median follow-up of 26 months (6-123), all patients are alive and off immunosuppression. Two MMFD patients experienced secondary graft failure with recurrence of SCD, both after treosulfan conditioning. Neither acute GVHD ≥ °III nor moderate/severe chronic GVHD was observed. The disease-free, severe GVHD-free survival was 100%, 100%, and 80% in the MFD, MUD, and MMFD groups, respectively (p = 0.106). There was a higher rate of virus reactivation in MMFD (100%) and MUD (83%) compared to MFD (40%; p = 0.005), but not of viral disease (20% vs 33% vs 13%; p = 0.576). Six patients had treosulfan-based conditioning, two of whom experienced graft failure (33%), compared to 0/25 (0%) after busulfan-based conditioning (p = 0.032). Donor chimerism was ≥ 80% in 28/31 patients (90%) at last follow-up. Reduced toxicity myeloablative conditioning resulted in excellent overall survival, negligible GVHD, and low toxicity among all donor groups in pediatric and young adult patients with SCD.

Opportunity for pharmacogenetics testing in patients with sickle cell anemia

Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are exposed to numerous drugs over their lifespan, and many of these drugs have Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for personalized dosing. The authors' aim was to ascertain the number of drugs with CPIC guidelines prescribed to SCD patients. Materials & methods: A search of Indiana University Health affiliated hospitals' electronic medical record identified 957 patients with a diagnosis of SCD. Drugs or drug classes with CPIC actionable guidelines ordered as inpatient and outpatient prescriptions were collected from SCD patients. Results: During the 16-year period, 892 (93%) patients received at least one drug that could have been dosed according to CPIC guidelines. Conclusion: Preemptive pharmacogenetics testing should be considered in SCD patients in order to utilize these data throughout the patient's life.