Correlation between neoral 2 hours post-dose levels and histologic findings on surveillance biopsies

Cyclosporine A C1.5 monitoring reflects the area under the curve in children with nephrotic syndrome: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The currently used single-monitoring method for drug-blood-level evaluation in cyclosporine A (CsA) treatment for nephrotic syndrome (NS) was established through hourly measurements based on adult organ transplantation. However, the pharmacokinetics may differ due to different concomitant medications, age, and conditions. This study was conducted to determine the measurement timing that best reflects the CsA area under the curve (AUC) in pediatric NS.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children aged 2-14 years who were started on CsA treatment for idiopathic NS during 2013-2020. AUC_0-4 was calculated from 7 points, before and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 h after administration. Mean values at each timing were compared with age-dependent different drug forms. Correlation between AUC_0-4 and measurement timing was analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 13 patients (11 boys) whose median age during testing was 7.3 years, and the total number of measurements was 94. The highest timing of CsA concentrations was found in C₁ 59.6%. The content liquid used at younger ages had a faster absorption time to peak value and lower blood concentration than those of capsules. Among the significant correlations observed, AUC_0-4 and C_1.5 showed the strongest significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.93, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In pediatric NS, CsA metabolism may be faster than that in previous organ transplantation. Compared with C₂, C_1.5 monitoring may result in better disease control as it can best reflect the AUC_0-4 and peak values associated with side effects, which are indicators of therapeutic efficacy.

Monitoring of nuclear factor of activated T-cell-regulated gene expression in de novo and long-term liver transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine a

Pharmacodynamic drug monitoring might allow an improved use of immunosuppressive medication in transplant recipients. We assessed whether drug concentrations reflect the effect of cyclosporine (CsA) on expression of nuclear factor of activated T-cells-regulated cytokines. CsA drug concentrations and expression of interleukin-2, interferon-γ, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in stimulated blood lymphocytes were determined predose (C0) and 2 hours after (C2) CsA intake in 20 de novo (less than 3 months) and 20 long-term (3 months to 10 years) liver transplant patients. The residual cytokine expression at C2 relative to C0 was calculated. Mean CsA C0 and C2 concentrations were 236 and 776 μg/L in de novo and 100 and 573 μg/L in long-term liver transplant patients, respectively. Two hours after CsA intake, the residual cytokine expression for all cytokines was comparable in both groups (de novo patients mean 16%; long-term patients mean 17%). CsA C2 concentrations showed a significant (P < 0.01) correlation with the residual cytokine expression of interleukin-2, interferon-γ, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in both de novo and long-term patients, whereas CsA C0 concentrations did not. The data suggest that CsA C2 concentrations, but not C0 concentrations, reflect the effect of CsA on downregulation of cytokine expression in both de novo and long-term liver transplant patients.

Cyclosporine Trough (C0) and 2-Hour Postdose (C2) Levels: Which One Is a Predictor of Graft Loss?

BACKGROUND

Compared with conventionally measured trough level (C0), cyclosporine 2-hour postdose (C2) concentrations show a better correlation with the area under the curve and acute graft rejection.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the relationships of C0 and C2 with long-term graft survival among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

In a case-control design, we selected 215 adult kidney recipients. Inclusion criteria were more than 18 years of age at transplantation and at least 6 months of follow-up. The case group consisted of patients with graft loss (n=17) and a control group, patients with functioning grafts (n=198). The C0 and C2 levels for the first 6 months posttransplantation, along with demographic and clinical data, were compared between the two groups using univariate analysis. P<.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

The mean age at transplantation was 40.5 +/- 16.5 years. The mean follow-up duration was 18 +/- 14 months. The mean C0 values for the case and control groups were 257.8 +/- 126.5 and 248.5 +/- 104.4 mumol/L, respectively (P>.05). The values for C2 were 712.7 +/- 273.2 and 886.2 +/- 266.9 mumol/L, respectively (P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that C2, but not C0, in the first 6 months posttransplantation were a predictor of long-term graft survival. The findings here in supported the results of other studies that have proposed cyclosporine concentration monitoring by C2 rather than C0 measurements.

Cyclosporine short infusion and C2 monitoring in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Blood concentrations of cyclosporine A (CsA) >or=800 microg/l measured 2 h post-dosing, the C2 concentration, is necessary to obtain a maximal pharmacological effect and correlates well with transplant-related complications such as transplant rejection and toxicity. In an open crossover study CsA blood levels were measured during 24 h to generate a pharmacokinetic profile on days 1, 8 and 15 after starting CsA infusion in 21 haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients who were receiving intravenously CsA 3 mg/kg/day either by continuous infusion or by 2 h infusion given every 12 h. C2 levels after the 2 h infusion correlated better than C1 or C3 levels with the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 h (r2=0.62). C2 levels >or=800 microg/l were also achieved for 20 out of 24 (83%) of cases after the 2 h infusion of CsA without any increase of CsA-related toxicity but for only three of the 23 patients (13%) after continuous infusion. Therefore, we recommend CsA infusions in 2 h during transplant and perform C2 monitoring to obtain therapeutic C2 levels >or=800 microg/l.