Intraabdominal pressure in liver transplant recipients: incidence and clinical significance

Perioperative care in acute liver failure: An anaesthesiologist perspective in the operating theatre

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a life-threatening condition characterized by rapid liver function deterioration, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach for optimal perioperative care. This comprehensive review focuses on the critical role of the anaesthesiologist throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases, addressing the unique challenges posed by ALF. The article begins with an exploration of ALF, underlining the urgency of timely referral to specialized hepatology centres. Liver transplantation emerges as a life-saving intervention, and the complex decision-making process is discussed, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary team to assess transplantation candidacy based on established prognostic criteria. In the preoperative phase, the review stresses the importance of early engagement with tertiary liver centres for timely referrals and identifies patients suitable for transplantation. Safe transport protocols are detailed, highlighting the meticulous planning required for the secure transfer of ALF patients between healthcare facilities. The intraoperative management section delves into the anaesthesiologist's key concerns, including neurological status, sepsis, acute kidney injury, body mass index, and preoperative fasting. Hemodynamic stability, fluid management, and coagulation balance during surgery are emphasized, with insights into anaesthesia techniques, vascular access, monitoring, and hemodynamic management tailored to the challenges posed by ALF patients. The postoperative care is thoroughly examined covering neurological, hemodynamic, metabolic, renal, and nutritional aspects. Management of ALF involves multidisciplinary team, including nephrology for continuous renal replacement therapy, transfusion medicine for plasma exchange, critical care for overall patient care, nutritionists for ensuring adequate nutrition, and hepatologists as the primary guides. In conclusion, the review recognizes the anaesthesiologist as a linchpin in the perioperative care of ALF patients. The integration of safe transport protocols and multidisciplinary approach is deemed crucial for navigating complexities of ALF, contributing to improved patient outcomes. This article serves as an invaluable resource for gastroenterologist and intensivists, enhancing their understanding of the anaesthesiologist's indispensable role in the holistic care of ALF patients in an ever-evolving healthcare landscape.

Abdominal intra-compartment syndrome - a non-hydraulic model of abdominal compartment syndrome due to post-hepatectomy hemorrhage in a man with a localized frozen abdomen due to extensive adhesions: a case report

BACKGROUND

Postoperative hemorrhage is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following liver resection. It typically presents early within the postoperative period, and conservative management is possible in the majority of cases. We present a case of late post-hepatectomy hemorrhage associated with overt abdominal compartment syndrome resulting from a localized functional compartment within the abdomen.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 68-year-old white man was readmitted with sudden onset of upper abdominal pain, vomiting, and hemodynamic instability 8 days after an uneventful hepatic resection for metachronous colon cancer metastasis. A frozen abdomen with adhesions due to complicated previous abdominal surgeries was encountered at the first intervention, but the surgery itself and initial recovery were otherwise unremarkable. Prompt response to fluid resuscitation at admission was followed by a computed tomography of his abdomen that revealed active arterial hemorrhage in the liver resection site and hemoperitoneum (estimated volume <2 L). Selective arteriography successfully identified and embolized a small bleeding branch of his right hepatic artery. He remained hemodynamically stable, but eventually developed overt abdominal compartment syndrome. Surgical exploration confirmed a small volume of ascites and blood clots (1.2 L) under significant pressure in his supramesocolic region, restricted by his frozen lower abdomen, which we evacuated. Dramatic improvement in his ventilatory pressure was immediate. His abdomen was left open and a negative pressure device was placed for temporary abdominal closure. The fascia was formally closed after 48 hours. He was discharged home at postoperative day 6.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-abdominal pressure and radiologic findings of intra-abdominal hemorrhage should be carefully interpreted in patients with extensive intra-abdominal adhesions. A high index of suspicion and detailed understanding of abdominal compartment mechanics are paramount for the timely diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome in these patients. Clinicians should be aware that abnormal anatomy (such as adhesions) coupled with localized pathophysiology (such as hemorrhage) can create a so-named abdominal intra-compartment syndrome requiring extra vigilance to diagnose.

[Intra-abdominal hypertension: effects on the splanchnic circulation. Preliminary study in a model of ascites]

INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal hypertension is defined as a rise in intra-abdominal pressure leading to progressive dysfunction of the abdominal organs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of intra-abdominal hypertension on the splanchnic circulation in a porcine animal model with a view to determining the diagnostic method of choice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 10 swine were divided into 2 groups: a control group and a group with an ascites pressure of 20mmHg. Transvesical and transperitoneal intra-abdominal pressures were registered, and the correlation between the measurements obtained was determined. Concentrations of lactic acid, alanine aminotransferase, glucose and gastric mucosal pH were also obtained. We registered the mean arterial and abdominal perfusion pressures, and the correlation of the latter with gastric mucosal pH and lactic acid concentrations. The parameters were registered for a total of 3hours.

RESULTS

We observed a high correlation between transvesical and transperitoneal measurements of intra-abdominal pressure (R(2)=0.98). In the 20mmHg pressure group, lactic acid concentrations increased significantly at 180min (p<0.011). Gastric mucosal pH differed significantly between the 2 groups from the beginning of the study (p=0.004) and significantly decreased from 120min onward. Mean arterial and abdominal perfusion pressures gradually decreased during the trial, with early significant changes in the abdominal perfusion pressure (p=0.001), and a good correlation with the remaining study parameters. There were no significant changes in hepatic indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe the transvesical approach to be the technique of choice to determine intra-abdominal pressure. Abdominal perfusion pressure is a sensitive marker of intra-abdominal hypertension, and gastric mucosal pH is the first parameter to be affected.

Staged abdominal closure after small bowel or multivisceral transplantation

Following paediatric SBMT, size discrepancy between the recipient's abdomen and the graft may lead to ACS, graft dysfunction, and death. We report our experience with SAC in these patients. Between 04/1993 and 03/2009, 57 children underwent 62 SBMTs. When abdominal wall tension seemed excessive for safe PAC, SAC was performed, using a Silastic® sheet and a vacuum occlusive dressing. Transplantations with SAC (23 combined liver and small bowel [CLB]) were compared with those with PAC [14 ISB and 25 CLB]. Indications for transplantation, preoperative status (after stratification for ISB/CLB transplants), age at transplantation, donor-to-recipient weight ratio, reduction in bowel and/or liver, and incidence of wound complications were not different in both groups. Post-operative intubation, stay in intensive care unit, and hospital stay were prolonged after SAC. Two deaths were related to ACS after PAC, none after SAC. Since 2000, one-yr patient survival is 73% after ISB transplantation and 57% vs. 75% after CLB transplantation with PAC vs. SAC, respectively (NS). SAC safely reduces severe ACS after paediatric SBMT and can be combined with graft reduction for transplantation of small recipients.

Abdominal compartment syndrome - Intra-abdominal hypertension: Defining, diagnosing, and managing

Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) are increasingly recognized as potential complications in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. ACS and IAH affect all body systems, most notably the cardiac, respiratory, renal, and neurologic systems. ACS/IAH affects blood flow to various organs and plays a significant role in the prognosis of the patients. Recognition of ACS/IAH, its risk factors and clinical signs can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated. Moreover, knowledge of the pathophysiology may help rationalize the therapeutic approach. We start this article with a brief historic review on ACS/IAH. Then, we present the definitions concerning parameters necessary in understanding ACS/IAH. Finally, pathophysiology aspects of both phenomena are presented, prior to exploring the various facets of ACS/IAH management.

Prospective study of intra-abdominal pressure following major elective abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Studies in emergency surgical patients have shown that raised intra-abdominal pressure may adversely affect organ function. The major aim of the present study was to establish the incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery. A secondary aim was to determine if the development of IAH was associated with poorer outcome.

METHODS

Patients undergoing major elective general surgical procedures were recruited to a prospective study in which intra-abdominal pressure was measured for 72 h postoperatively. Outcome data were collected on all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients with a median age of 63.5 years were studied. Five patients (12%) developed IAH, but this did not lead to a significant increase in the incidence of major organ dysfunction. There was no significant difference in the median length of hospital stay. However the development of IAH was associated with delayed return to oral diet (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-abdominal hypertension occurs in 12% of patients following major elective abdominal surgery and leads to a significantly delayed return to oral diet, but not to an increased length of hospital stay or increased incidence of major organ dysfunction.

Intra-abdominal hypertension: detecting and managing a lethal complication of critical illness

Intra-abdominal hypertension occurs in 50% of all patients admitted to the intensive care unit and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Intra-abdominal hypertension is defined as a sustained, pathologic rise in intra-abdominal pressure to 12 mm Hg or more. Patients with intra-abdominal hypertension may progress to abdominal compartment syndrome. Early identification and treatment of this condition will improve patient outcome. Patients at risk for intra-abdominal hypertension include those with major traumatic injury, major surgery, sepsis, burns, pancreatitis, ileus, and massive fluid resuscitation. Predisposing factors include decreased abdominal wall compliance, increased intraluminal contents, increased peritoneal cavity contents, and capillary leak/fluid resuscitation.

Postoperative Care of the Liver-Transplant Patient

Liver transplantation (LT) is performed to improve life expectancy and quality of life in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (CLD), and to save life in the context of acute liver failure (ALF). These two groups of patients differ significantly in terms of mean age, prior comorbidity, and degree of extra-hepatic organ dysfunction, requiring substantially different approaches to supportive care. Common aspects of care are those directed at the transplanted organ itself, with regard to monitoring and recognition of early dysfunction, initiation of immunosuppression, and management of surgical complications. Close liaison with the multidisciplinary team, which will include the intensivist, transplant surgeon, transplant hepatologist, anesthesiologist, and radiologist, is required.

Abdominal compartment syndrome

The abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) was first described in surgical patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, trauma, bleeding, or infection, but in recent years it has also been described in patients with other pathologies such as burn injury and sepsis and in medical patients. This F1000 Medicine Report is intended to provide critical care physicians a clear insight into the current state of knowledge regarding intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and ACS, and will focus primarily on the recent literature as well as on the definitions and recommendations published by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. The definitions regarding increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) will be listed, followed by a brief but comprehensive overview of the different mechanisms of organ dysfunction associated with IAH. The gold standard measurement technique for IAP as well as recommendations for organ function support in patients with IAH and options for medical and surgical treatment of IAH and ACS will be discussed.

Intra-abdominal hypertension: evolving concepts

This article focuses primarily on the recent literature on abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and the definitions and recommendations published by the World Society for the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. The definitions regarding increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) are listed and are followed by an overview of the different mechanisms of organ dysfunction associated with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). Measurement techniques for IAP are discussed, as are recommendations for organ function support and options for treatment in patients who have IAH. ACS was first described in surgical patients who had abdominal trauma, bleeding, or infection; but recently, ACS has been described in patients who have other pathologies. This article intends to provide critical care physicians with a clear insight into the current state of knowledge regarding IAH and ACS.

Definitive abdominal wall closure using a porcine intestinal submucosa biodegradable membrane in pediatric transplantation

Abdominal closure in children less than 10 kg following liver or kidney transplantation can be challenging. Excessive pressure attained from a tight closure can result in abdominal compartment syndrome, graft compromise and loss. Concerns over using prosthetic patches are that of infection and dehiscence. We report a series of definitive abdominal wall closure using a biodegradable membrane from porcine intestinal submucosa (Surgisis; Cook Biotech Incorporated, West Lafayette, IN, USA). A prospective collection and follow up of liver and kidney transplant patients weighing less than 10 kg who required abdominal wall augmentation with Surgisis in order to achieve satisfactory closure. There were 10 liver and two renal transplant patients. The average weight of the liver transplant patients was 6.6 kg (5.4-8.5 kg) and the renal 9.8 kg. The average area of Surgisis used was 71.2 cm(2) (25-160 cm(2)) and length of follow up was 15.3 months (1-27 months). Concomitant measures to aid abdominal closure included bilateral recipient nephrectomy for the renal patients and reduction by 33% of the lateral segmental grafts in two liver transplant patients. Delayed closure occurred in all patients except one and the average days to closure from the first surgery was 3.75 days (0-6 days). Following liver transplantation one patient died from multiple organ failure at one month secondary to hemophagocytosis from underlying combined immune deficiency syndrome and one patient with hepatic artery thrombosis was salvaged at re-exploration. There were two wound complications, one patient developed two small sinuses and some skin dehiscence which healed over four months and the second developed a skin sinus following trans-patch liver biopsy which healed in three wk. Both had positive microbial cultures but neither necessitated removal of the graft. There were no incisional hernias. Surgisis is a safe method for facilitating abdominal closure in pediatric transplant patients. It appears to have long-term durability with no incisional hernias on short- and medium-term follow up, and is fairly resistant to infection.

Current insights in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome

A compartment syndrome exists when increased pressure in a closed anatomic space threatens the viability of the tissue within the compartment. When this occurs in the abdominal cavity it threatens not only the function of the intra-abdominal organs, but it can have a devastating effect on distant organs as well. Recent animal and human data suggest that the adverse effects of elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) can occur at lower levels than previously thought and even before the development of clinically overt abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The ACS is not a disease but truly a syndrome, a spectrum of symptoms and signs that can and mostly does have multiple causes. It is only recently that this condition received a heightened awareness. This article reflects the current state of knowledge on intra-abdominal pressure regarding etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, IAP measurement, organ dysfunction, prevention and treatment.