Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions

A systematic review and meta-analysis of cold in situ perfusion and preservation for pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the most effective solution for in situ perfusion/preservation of the pancreas in donation after brain death donors, in addition to optimal in situ flush volume(s) and route(s) during pancreas procurement.

METHODS

Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were utilized (1980-2017). Articles comparing graft outcomes between two or more different perfusion/preservation fluids (University of Wisconsin (UW), histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and/or Celsior) were compared using random effects models where appropriate.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles were included (939 transplants). Confidence in available evidence was low. A higher serum peak lipase (standardized mean difference 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.71, I² = 0) was observed in pancreatic grafts perfused/preserved with HTK compared to UW, but there were no differences in one-month pancreas allograft survivals or early thrombotic graft loss rates. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the rates of graft pancreatitis, thrombosis and graft survival between UW and Celsior solutions, and between aortic-only and dual aorto-portal perfusion.

CONCLUSION

UW cold perfusion may reduce peak serum lipase, but no quality evidence suggested UW cold perfusion improves graft survival and reduces thrombosis rates. Further research is needed to establish longer-term graft outcomes, the comparative efficacy of Celsior, and ideal perfusion volumes.

Pancreas Preservation With Viaspan, Celsior, and Custodiol Solutions: An Initial Experience

BACKGROUND

There is still controversy about which preservation solution in pancreas transplantation could be the best. The aim of this study was to analyze our initial experience with Custodiol solution (CuS) compared with Viaspan solution (VS) and Celsior solution (CS) in pancreas transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 94 consecutive pancreatic transplants, from 2007 until 2015. We compared 3 groups, depending on preservation solution: Viaspan (n = 41), Celsior (n = 40), or Custodiol (n = 13). The primary end point was patient and pancreas survival at 1 year after pancreas transplantation.

RESULTS

The recipient and donor characteristics were similar except in cold ischemia time; it was higher with Celsior. No differences were found in postoperative complications and pancreas graft function at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year (glucose, HbA1c, C-peptide, creatinine). The pancreas and patient survival at 1 year was comparable (pancreas survival: VS, 80%; CS, 90%; CuS, 92%; log-rank, 0.875; and patient survival: VS, 92%; CS, 97%; CuS, 100%; log-rank, 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In our institution, the Custodiol solution in pancreas transplantation presented similar outcomes in terms of postoperative complications, pancreas graft function, and 1-year survival.

Preservation solutions used during abdominal transplantation: Current status and outcomes

Organ preservation remains an important contributing factor to graft and patient outcomes. During donor organ procurement and transportation, cellular injury is mitigated through the use of preservation solutions in conjunction with hypothermia. Various preservation solutions and protocols exist with widespread variability among transplant centers. In this review of abdominal organ preservation solutions, evolution of transplantation and graft preservation are discussed followed by classification of preservation solutions according to the composition of electrolytes, impermeants, buffers, antioxidants, and energy precursors. Lastly, pertinent clinical studies in the setting of hepatic, renal, pancreas, and intestinal transplantation are reviewed for patient and graft survival as well as financial considerations. In liver transplants there may be some benefit with the use of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) over University of Wisconsin solution in terms of biliary complications and potential cost savings. Renal grafts may experience increased initial graft dysfunction with the use of Euro-Collins thereby dissuading its use in support of HTK which can lead to substantial cost savings. University of Wisconsin solution and Celsior are favored in pancreas transplants given the concern for pancreatitis and graft thrombosis associated with HTK. No difference was observed with preservation solutions with respect to graft and patient survival in liver, renal, and pancreas transplants. Studies involving intestinal transplants are sparse but University of Wisconsin solution infused intraluminally in combination with an intra-vascular washout is a reasonable option until further evidence can be generated. Available literature can be used to ameliorate extensive variation across centers while potentially minimizing graft dysfunction and improving associated costs.

Influence of Preservation Solution on Human Islet Isolation Outcome

BACKGROUND

The influence of the preservation solution used for in situ perfusion of the donor and pancreas storage on islet isolation has received little attention.

METHODS

In this prospective controlled trial, we compared the outcome of human islet isolation from pancreata perfused with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution or Celsior, an alternative colloid-free extracellular solution.

RESULTS

At the 1-year interim analysis, the viability and insulin secretion of islets isolated from donors perfused with UW (n=19) or Celsior (n=5) were identical. However, total islet recovery (IEQ) and isolation yield (IEQ/g) were 1.8-fold and 2.1-fold inferior in the Celsior group (P<0.05 vs. UW). Overall, 13 (68%) of islet preparations were effectively transplanted from the UW group vs. none from the Celsior group (P=0.01). The clinical study was discontinued and the causes of these differences were further explored in the pig (n=14). In contrast to UW, Celsior induced cell swelling and pancreas edema after only four hours of cold storage. These abnormalities were delayed when the donor was perfused with Solution de Conservation d'Organes et de Tissus (SCOT), an extracellular solution containing polyethylene glycol.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that colloid-free preservation solutions might be suboptimal for pancreas perfusion and cold storage prior to islet isolation and transplantation. Because pancreata are now frequently recovered for islet transplantation, preliminary experimental and clinical data about islet isolation should be obtained prior to the routine implementation of new preservation solutions for abdominal perfusion during multiorgan recovery.