1
|
Sadeghi F, Ramezani M, Beigee FS, Shadnia S, Moghaddam HH, Zamani N, Erfan Talab Evini P, Rahimi M. Organ Procurement From Poisoned Patients: A 14-Year Survey in 2 Academic Centers. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2021; 20:520-525. [PMID: 34546157 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2021.0259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Organ transplant from poisoned donors is an issue that has received much attention, especially over the past decade. Unfortunately, there are still opponents to this issue who emphasize that toxins and drugs affect the body's organs and do not consider organs from poisoned donors appropriate for transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cases of brain death due to poisoning were collected from 2 academic centers in Tehran, Iran during a period from 2006 to 2020. Donor information and recipient condition at 1 month and 12 months after transplant and the subsequent transplant success rates were investigated. RESULTS From 102 poisoned donors, most were 30 to 40 years old (33.4%) and most were men (55.9%). The most common causes of poisoning among donors were opioids (28.4%). Six candidate donors had been referred with cardiorespiratory arrest; these patients had organs that were in suitable condition, and transplant was successful. Acute kidney injury was seen in 30 donors, with emergency dialysis performed in 23 cases. For 51% of donors, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed. The most donated organs were the liver (81.4%), left kidney (81.4%), and right kidney (80.4%). Survival rate of recipients at 1 month and 12 months was 92.5% and 91.4%, respectively. Graft rejection rate at 1 month and 12 months after transplant was 0.7% and 2.21%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Organ donation from poisoning-related brain deaths is one of the best sources of organ supply for people in need. If the organ is in optimal condition before transplant, there are no exclusions for use of the graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farangis Sadeghi
- From the School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pesticide-Poisoned Patients: Can They Be Used as Potential Organ Donors? J Med Toxicol 2018; 14:278-282. [PMID: 29987646 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-018-0673-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 06/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The gap between the number of patients on transplant waiting lists and patients receiving transplants is growing. Use of organs from donors who have died following pesticide exposure remains controversial. This study reviews the literature related to transplantation from this group. METHODS A literature search was undertaken on PubMed using the following keywords: 'insecticide', 'pesticide', 'rodenticide', 'organophosphate', 'carbamate', 'paraquat', 'poisoning', 'toxicity', 'overdose', 'intoxication', 'ingestion', 'organ donation or procurement', 'transplant', 'allograft transplant', and 'expanded criteria organ donation'; 21 specific pesticides/insecticides were also added to the search; the indexes for EAPCCT/NACCT meeting abstracts 2008-2017 were also searched. Identified publications were reviewed and if described human donation/transplantation of ≥ 1 solid organ(s), the following was extracted: (i) compound(s) ingested; (ii) donor demographics; (iii) organ(s) transplanted; and (iv) graft function at follow-up. RESULTS Ten papers were identified describing 20 fatalities (1999-2017) related to the following pesticide exposures: organophosphate, 8 cases; aldicarb, 4; paraquat, 3; parathion, 1; malathion, 1; carbofuran/carbamate, 1; carbamate, 1; and brodifacoum, 1 and no further cases were identified from EAPCCT/NACCT abstracts. Donors were aged 12-50 (25.9 ± 11.9) years. Forty-four organs were transplanted: 28 kidneys, 7 livers, 6 corneas, and 3 hearts. Forty recipients had outcome reported: 3 (7.5%) patients died, 3 (7.5%) had graft failure/dysfunction and 34 (85.0%) had good graft function. Overall survival with good function was 96%, 71%, 83%, and 67% for kidneys, livers, corneas and hearts respectively. CONCLUSION Review of the published literature suggests that solid organ donation following exposure to a pesticide is associated with good short-to-medium-term graft organ function following transplantation, particularly for transplanted kidneys and corneas.
Collapse
|
3
|
Organ and tissue donation from poisoned patients in the emergency department: A Canadian emergency physician survey. CAN J EMERG MED 2018; 21:47-54. [PMID: 29631642 DOI: 10.1017/cem.2018.43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Screening for organ and tissue donation is an essential skill for emergency physicians. In 2015, 4,631 Canadians were on a waiting list for a transplant, and 262 died while waiting. Canada’s donation rates are less than half of comparable countries, so it is essential to explore strategies to improve the referral of donors. Poisoned patients may be one such underutilized source for donation. This study explores physician practices and perceptions regarding the referral of poisoned patients as donors. METHODS In this cross-sectional unidirectional survey, 1,471 physician members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians were invited to participate. Physicians were presented with 20 scenarios and asked whether they would refer the patient as a potential organ or tissue donor. Results were reported descriptively, and associations between demographics and referral patterns were assessed. RESULTS Physicians totalling 208 participated in the organ or tissue donation scenarios (14.1%); 75% of scenarios involving poisoning were referred for organ or tissue donation, compared with 92% in a non-poisoning scenario. Poisons associated with lower referrals included sedatives, acetaminophen, chemical exposure, and organophosphates. A total of 175 physicians completed the demographic survey (11.9%). Characteristics associated with increased referrals included previous referral experience, donation training, donation support, >10 years of service, urban practice, emergency medicine certification, and male gender. CONCLUSIONS Scenarios involving poisoning were referred less often when compared with an ideal scenario. Because poisoning is not a contraindication for referral, this represents a potential source of donors. Targeted training and referral support may help improve donation rates in this demographic.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sklienka P, Neiser J, Ševčík P, Dvořáček I, Samlík J, Jonszta T, Dedek V, Kubišová MM, Tomanová R, Streitová D. Successful Kidney Transplant from Methanol-Intoxicated Donors. Prog Transplant 2014; 24:199-205. [DOI: 10.7182/pit2014111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The well-described disparity between the need for and the supply of organs suitable for transplant is growing. Because of this disparity, mortality of patients listed for transplant is increasing. Donors who die of intoxication (including victims of methanol poisoning) represent less than 1% of suitable donors and might be used to increase the supply of organs. They are often not accepted as donors by transplant specialists, because of concerns about patients' outcomes with these grafts. Three cases of fatal methanol intoxication that resulted in transplants of 6 kidneys are evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Sklienka
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Jan Neiser
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Pavel Ševčík
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Igor Dvořáček
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Jiří Samlík
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Tomáš Jonszta
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Vladimír Dedek
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Michaela Matyskov Kubišová
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Radoslava Tomanová
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| | - Dana Streitová
- University Hospital Ostrava (PS, JN, PŠ, ID, JS, TJ, DS, RT), University of Ostrava (VD), Ostrava, Czech Republic, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (MMK)
| |
Collapse
|