Successful case of adult ABO-incompatible liver transplantation: beneficial effects of intrahepatic artery infusion therapy: a case report

High Number of Plasma Exchanges Increases the Risk of Bacterial Infection in ABO-incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are major complications that cause significant mortality and morbidity in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The risk of bacterial infection has not been studied in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) recipients with a desensitization protocol in relation to the number of plasma exchanges (PEs). Therefore, we aimed to analyze the risk of bacterial infection in ABOi LDLT recipients with a high number of PEs compared with recipients with a low number of PEs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed with 681 adult LDLT recipients, of whom 171 ABOi LDLT recipients were categorized into the high (n = 52) or low (n = 119) PE groups based on a cutoff value of 6 PE sessions. We compared bacterial infections and postoperative bacteremia within 6 mo after liver transplantation with the ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT group (n = 510) as a control group.

RESULTS

The high PE group showed a bacterial infection rate of 49.9% and a postoperative bacteremia rate of 28.8%, which were significantly higher than those of the low PE group (31.1%, 17.8%) and the ABOc group (26.7%, 18.0%). In multivariate analysis, the high PE group was found to have a 2.4-fold higher risk of bacterial infection ( P  = 0.008). This group presented a lower 5-y survival rate of 58.6% compared with the other 2 groups (81.5% and 78.5%; P  = 0.030 and 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high number of preoperative PEs increases bacterial infection rate and postoperative bacteremia in ABOi LDLT.

Strategies for ABO Incompatible Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a definitive treatment for the decompensated liver cirrhosis and fulminant liver failure. With limited availability of cadaveric liver allograft, ABO incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) plays an important part in further expansion of donor pool. Over the years, with the introduction of Rituximab and improving desensitisation protocol, outcomes of ABOi LDLT are on par with ABO compatible LT. However, ABOi LDLT protocol varies markedly from centre to centre. Intravenous Rituximab followed by plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption effectively reduce ABO isoagglutinins titre before transplant, thereby reducing the risk of antibody mediated rejection in the post-transplant period. Local infusion therapy and splenectomy are not used routinely at most of the centres in Rituximab era. Post-transplant immunosuppression usually consists of standard triple drug regime, and tacrolimus trough levels are targeted at higher level compared to ABO compatible LT. Introduction of newer therapies like Belatacept and Obinutuzumab hold promise to further improve outcomes and reduce the risk of antibody mediated rejection related complications. ABOi LT in emergency situations like acute liver failure and deceased donor LT is challenging due to limited time period for desensitisation protocol before transplant, and available evidence are still limited but encouraging.

Excellent outcome following emergency deceased donor ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using rituximab and antigen specific immunoadsorption

BACKGROUND

The acceptance of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) liver grafts will expand the donor pool for a patient in urgent need for a liver transplantation (LT). Here we report our results with emergency ABOi DD (deceased donor) LT using rituximab and antigen specific immunoadsorption.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

2009 to 2019 we performed 20 ABOi DD LTs (adults n = 17, children n = 3) for patients in urgent need for a LT. Immunosuppression consisted of rituximab (n = 20) and basiliximab (n = 15) or anti-thymocyte globuline (n = 4), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; n = 6), tacrolimus, prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil. Fifteen patients were treated with IA (n = 14) or both IA and plasmapheresis (PP; n = 1) pre-transplant and 18 patients were treated with IA (n = 15) or both IA and PP (n = 3) post-transplant. The median pre-transplant MELD- score was 40 (range 18-40). Patient and graft survival and complications were compared to a 1:4 case matched control group of ABO-identical or compatible (ABOid/c) DDLT.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 85, 85 and 78% for the ABOi recipients and not significantly different compared to ABOid/c controls. Only one ABOi patient developed antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSION

Patient and graft survival after emergency ABOi DDLT using rituximab and immunoadorption was equal to ABOid/DDLT. ABOi DD LT was a successful approach to expand the donor pool for patients in urgent need for a liver graft.

Anaesthetic implications and transfusion practices in ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation: Case series

ABO incompatible liver transplants (ABOi LT) are considered as a life-saving option when compatible donor grafts are unavailable. Fourteen adults (right lobe graft) and three children (left lateral segment/lobe) who underwent ABOi LT from living donors between 2011 and 20 period were analysed for transfusions and desensitisation protocols. All recipients received packed red blood cells (PRBC) of their own group. AB plasma that does not contain any antibody was transfused in eight patients and donor group plasma in others. None of the patients developed transfusion related complications. Plasmapheresis and rituximab/bortezumab desensitisation was practised in 11 patients, only rituximab in four, only plasmapheresis in one, and no treatment in a 1 year child. Rejection was manifest in three patients while nine patients developed infections and sepsis. A working knowledge of the blood and product transfusions in ABOi LT is crucial for the anaesthesiologist. Perioperative management and impact of desensitisation protocol are discussed.

ABO-Incompatible Liver Transplantation - A Review of the Historical Background and Results

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT) using conventional immunosuppression has been considered a contraindication due to the high risk for antibody-mediated complications potentially resulting in graft loss. However, organ shortage has led to the development of anti-A/B antibody reducing immunosuppressive protocols which have made the outcome after living donor (LD) ABOi LT equivalent to that achieved with LD ABO-compatible (ABOc). The experience of deceased donor (DD) ABOi LT is however still limited. In this article, we discuss the historical background and the results after ABOi LT, in the setting of both LD and DD transplantation. We also discuss the remaining hurdles and future strategies in the breaching of the ABO barrier for LT.

Outcomes after liver transplantation in accordance with ABO compatibility: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the differences in outcomes between ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) liver transplantation (LT) and ABO-compatible (ABO-C) LT.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching eligible articles published before No-vember 28, 2016 on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints were graft survival, patient survival, and ABO-I-related complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-one retrospective observational studies with a total of 8247 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results of patient survival for ABO-I LT were comparable to those for ABO-C LT. However, ABO-I LT showed a poorer graft survival than ABO-C LT (1-year: OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.57-0.76, P < 0.001; 3-year: OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.85, P < 0.001; 5-yearr: OR =0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.86, P < 0.001). Furthermore, ABO-I LT was associated with more incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (OR = 74.21, 95%CI: 16.32- 337.45, P < 0.001), chronic rejection (OR =2.28, 95%CI: 1.00-5.22, P = 0.05), cytomegalovirus infection (OR = 2.64, 95%CI: 1.63-4.29, P < 0.001), overall biliary complication (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.01-2.28, P = 0.04), and hepatic artery complication (OR = 4.17, 95%CI: 2.26-7.67, P < 0.001) than ABO-C LT. In subgroup analyses, ABO-I LT and ABO-C LT showed a comparable graft survival in pediatric patients and those using rituximab, and ABO-I LT showed an increased acute cellular rejection in cases involving deceased donor grafts.

CONCLUSION

Although patient survival in ABO-I LT was comparable to that in ABO-C LT, ABO-I LT was inferior to ABO-C LT in graft survival and several complications. Graft survival of ABO-I LT could be comparable to that of ABO-C LT in pediatric patients and those using rituximab.

Single-Center Experience of ABO-Incompatible Living-Donor Liver Transplantation With a New Simplified Intravenous Immunoglobulin Protocol: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

The outcomes of patients who undergo ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have markedly improved as strategies have become more innovative and advanced. Here, we describe 25 cases of ABO-I LDLT with a simplified protocol and compare the outcomes to those of ABO-compatible LDLT. We analyzed outcomes via a retrospective review of 182 adult LDLT cases including 25 ABO-I LDLTs from January 2011 to December 2014. Propensity scoring was used to compare the groups. The desensitization protocol included plasma exchange, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin without local infusion therapy. The triple immunosuppression protocol consisted of tacrolimus and steroids with mycophenolate mofetil; a splenectomy was not routinely performed. The median age of recipients was 51 years (range, 35-66 years), and the median mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-37). The initial ranges of isoagglutinin IgM and IgG titers were 1:1 to 1:256 and 1:4 to 1:2048, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient demographics or perioperative variables between the groups. Although significant rebound elevation in anti-ABO antibody during the postoperative period was observed in 3 cases, neither C4d staining nor clinical signs of antibody-mediated rejection was apparent in these cases. No diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture was encountered in any ABO-I LDLT patient within a mean follow-up of 22.6 ± 17.2 months. Moreover, no significant difference in overall or graft survival was observed between the groups. ABO-I LDLT can be performed safely under this new simplified protocol and may be proposed when ABO-compatible donors are unavailable.

Risk factor for ischemic-type biliary lesion after ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

AIM: To evaluate the risk factors for ischemic-type biliary lesion (ITBL) after ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT).

METHODS: Among 141 ALDLTs performed in our hospital between 2008 and 2014, 27 (19%) were ABO-I ALDLT and 114 were ABO-identical/compatible ALDLT. In this study, we extensively analyzed the clinico-pathological data of the 27 ABO-I recipients to determine the risk factors for ITBL after ABO-I ALDLT. All ABO-I ALDLT recipients underwent an identical B-cell depletion protocol with preoperative rituximab, plasma exchange (PE), and operative splenectomy. The median follow-up period after transplantation was 26 mo. The clinical outcomes of the 27 ABO-I ALDLT recipients were compared with those of 114 ABO-identical/compatible ALDLT recipients.

RESULTS: ITBL occurred in four recipients (14.8%) between 45 and 112 d after ABO-I ALDLT. The overall survival rates were not different between ABO-I ALDLT and ABO-identical/compatible ALDLT (P = 0.303). Among the ABO-I ALDLT recipients, there was no difference between patients with ITBL and those without ITBL in terms of B-cell and T-cell count, serum isoagglutinin titers, number of PEs, operative time and transfusion, use of graft infusion therapy, or number of remnant B-cell follicles and plasma cells in the spleen. However, the perioperative NK cell counts in the blood of patients with ITBL were significantly higher than those in the patients without ITBL (P < 0.05). Preoperative NK cell count > 150/μL and postoperative NK cell count > 120/μL were associated with greater relative risks (RR) for development of ITBL (RR = 20 and 14.3, respectively, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: High NK cell counts in a transplant recipient’s blood are associated with ITBL after ABO-I ALDLT. Further research is needed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of NK cell involvement in the development of ITBL.

Results of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using a simplified protocol at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Because of the development of various desensitization strategies, ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become a feasible option for patients with end-stage liver disease. However, there has been no united desensitization protocol for ABOi LDLT. We analyzed the outcomes after establishment of simplified protocol without splenectomy, intravenous immunoglobulin, and local infusion therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed 19 ABOi LDLT cases that had been performed between January 2012 and December 2013, without splenectomy and local infusion. We used a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) 10 days before transplantation and several series of plasma exchange according to the recipients' iso-agglutinin titer-to-target titer ratio of 1:32.

RESULTS

Nineteen recipients received ABOi LTs from living donors. The mean initial immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG anti-ABO titers were 76.63 ± 78.81 (range, 8∼256) and 162.53 ± 464.1 (0∼2048). We performed preoperative plasma exchange to 16 recipients (mean number of sessions, 3.58; range, 1-10). After surgery, 9 patients received plasma exchange (mean, 1.84; range 1∼14). One death occurred as the result of pneumonia (5.3%). There were 4 cases of acute rejections (21.1%), and all of them were treated successfully with steroid pulse or thymoglobulin. Antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure did not occur. Six cases of postoperative complications (31.6%) occurred, including 3 cases of infections. There were 2 cases of biliary anastomotic stricture (10.5%) and 1 case of portal vein stenosis (5.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

ABOi LDLT with the use of simplified protocol can be safely performed without increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection and other complications.

Treatment Experience of Severe Abdominal Infection after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

This study aims to investigate the causes and treatment experience of severe abdominal infection after orthotopic liver transplantation. Clinical data were retrospectively analysed in perioperative severe abdominal infection of 186 orthotopic liver transplantation cases from March 2004 to November 2011. Among the 186 patients, 16 cases had severe abdominal infection: five cases had bile duct anastomotic leakage-inducing massive hydrops and infection under liver interstice, 10 cases had extensive bleeding of surgical wound leading to massive haematocele and infection around the liver, and one case had postoperative lower oesophageal fistula leakage causing massive hydrops and infection under the left diaphragm. After definite diagnosis, 12 cases underwent surgery within three days, with no death. Among the four cases that underwent surgery three days after diagnosis, one case died of multiple-organ failure five days after abdominal cavity exploration, which was performed 21 days after liver transplantation. Severe abdominal infections after liver transplantation were the most common causes of death in perioperative liver transplantation. Comprehensive treatment with efficacious antibiotics, multiple-organ support, controlled surgical removal of the lesion, and adequate drainage establishment was the key to the entire treatment.

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation for severe hepatitis B patients

Effect of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation on patients with severe hepatitis B (SHB) remains unclear. Herein, we summarized 22 cases with SHB in whom were performed emergency liver transplantation from ABO-incompatible donors. The immunosuppressive protocol consisted basiliximab, tacrolimus, steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. The mean MELD score was 35.2 ± 7.1. Major complications included rejection, infections, biliary complications, hepatic artery thrombosis or stenosis and portal vein thrombosis. Patient survival rates were 40.9%, 78.9% and 82.3% in 1 year, 29.2%, 66.8% and 72.9% in 3 years, and 21.9%, 60.1% and 62.5% in 5 years for ABO-incompatible, ABO-compatible and ABO-identical groups. Graft survival rates were 39%, 78.9% and 82.3% in 1 year, 27.8%, 66.4% and 71.1% in 3 years, and 20.9%, 57.9% and 61.0% in 5 years for incompatible, compatible and identical ABO graft-recipient match. The 1-, 3-, 5-year graft and patient survival rates of ABO-incompatible were distinctly lower than that of ABO-compatible group (P < 0.05). Our results suggested that ABO-incompatible liver transplantation might be a life-saving procedure for patients with SHB as a promising alternative operation when ABO-compatible donors are not available and at least bridges the second opportunity for liver retransplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) continues to evolve, generating interesting issues on the applicability and safety of new techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Specific selection criteria and standardized surgical techniques with high ethical and medical standards are needed to minimize donor risk. In this aspect, minimally invasive donor hepatectomy has caused controversies. The reproducibility and safety of pure laparoscopic major hepatectomy in LDLT remains uncertain. Therefore, a stepwise approach is needed to avoid unnecessary donor risk. To expand the living donor pool, dual graft and ABO-incompatible LDLT have emerged as well tolerated and effective methods. The extended selection criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma in LDLT appear acceptable to balance donor risk and recipient outcome. However, these criteria should be validated based on the risk-benefit ratio. Despite technical advances, technical challenges persist such as Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. To address these issues, several innovative surgical techniques have been proposed and have shown promising results.

SUMMARY

LDLT is associated with donor safety concerns, technical complexity, and small-for-size issues. Nonetheless, accumulated experience and technical know-how from large-volume Asian LDLT centers have led to progress in LDLT. Further technical refinement and investigation to overcome the disadvantages of partial grafts will broaden the applicability of LDLT.

Section 13. Short-course pretransplant antiviral therapy is a feasible and effective strategy to prevent hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation in genotype 2 patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in recipients who are viremic at time of liver transplantation (LT) is universal and carries poor prognosis. Pretransplant antiviral therapy to eradicate HCV reduces recurrence, but withdrawal rate is high. We conducted a short-course (4 weeks) of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (Peg-IFN-α2a) plus ribavirin (RBV) to prevent of HCV recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 2009 to December 2011, eighty-eight consecutive HCV patients for living donor LT with potential living donor at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were included. Patients were divided into treatment and nontreatment group depending on presence of HCV-RNA. Fixed dosage of Peg-IFN-α2a (135 μg/week) plus RBV (10 mg/kg per day) were given for 4 weeks to treatment group who passed the 4-week waiting time according to clinical safety assessment.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with genotypes 1, 2, and 3 (n=29/18/1) were treated with IFN and RBV combination for 4 (range, 1-9) weeks. Serum HCV RNA became undetectable at transplantation in 26 (54%) patients. No difference between genotypes 1 (n= 14, 48%) and 2/3(n=12, 63%, P=0.25) was observed. Most patients experienced cytopenia during treatment, but no mortality was noted. In the treatment group, 13 patients remained free of HCV infection 6 months after transplant. Virologic response at transplantation (48% vs. 100%, P=0.015) and genotype 2/3 (50% vs. 84%, P=0.01) are strong predictors of lower HCV recurrence rate. Multivariate analysis showed that genotype 2/3 was the only independent predictive factor affecting HCV RNA negativity 6 months after liver transplantation (OR:11.25; P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term pretransplant antiviral therapy is a feasible strategy in preventing HCV recurrence after LDLT especially in genotypes 2 and 3 recipients.

Successful experiences of ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation in a single institute: no immunological failure in 10 consecutive cases

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is a feasible therapeutic option for countries with a scarcity of deceased donors. This report presents our initial experiences in ABOi ALDLT in 10 patients between December 2008 and September 2009. The mean age of recipients was 48.5 ± 5.7 years (range, 40-54 years). The mean Model for End-stage Liver-Disease score was 13.9 ± 4.0 (range, 9-22). All patients were administered preoperative rituximab once and plasma exchanges according to the hemagglutinin titer. The spleen was preserved in all cases. For local infusion therapy, hepatic arterial infusion was performed in 9 patients and portal vein infusion in 1 subject. The 10 patients experienced no in-hospital mortality. At a mean follow-up period of 31.8 ± 2.9 months (range, 4.1-34.9 months), 1 patient has died (postoperative month 4 due to sepsis following a biliary stricture. The 3-month patient and graft survivals were 100%, and 1- and 2-year survivals, 90.0%. There was no episode of antibody-mediated rejection. The promising results of our initial experience may have been due to the use of preoperative rituximab and the good preoperative conditions of the patients.

Management of ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation: past and present trends

Based on the concept that the liver is a "privileged organ," which resists acute rejection, Thomas Starzl introduced liver transplantation across the ABO blood group. However, with improved survival after liver transplantation came reports of an increased incidence of acute rejection, biliary and vascular complications, and decreased survival after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. As a result, ABO-incompatible liver transplantations are performed only in emergencies when ABO-compatible grafts are unavailable. In living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), donors are restricted to family members; therefore, breaking ABO blood group barriers becomes inevitable. This inevitable situation has forced liver transplant surgeons to exploit many innovative techniques to overcome the challenges of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. This review looks at the history and current practices of ABO-incompatible LDLT to provide insight so that the protocol can be improved further.

Establishment of a rat model of extrahepatic biliary ischemic stenosis

AIM: To develop a rat model of extrahepatic biliary ischemic stenosis.

METHODS: Forty-eight Sprague-Dawley rats were divided randomly and equally into four groups: rats undergoing sham operation and those subjected to clamping of the common bile duct with a clip for 60, 120, or 180 min. After scheduled clamping, the clip was removed to recover blood supply. The animals were killed 4 and 8 wk after operation. The survival, liver function, and histopathological changes were observed in rats of each group.

RESULTS: The survival rate was 100% in rats undergoing sham operation and those undergoing clamping for 60 or 120min, and 75% in those undergoing clamping for 180 min. At week 4, the body weight of rats undergoing clamping for 60, 120 or 180 min was lower than that of rats undergoing sham operation (240.4 g ± 11.5 g, 212.7 g ± 13.6 g, 200.6 g ± 11.8 g vs 260.6 g ± 15.7 g, all P < 0.05). Liver function parameters were higher in rats undergoing clamping for 60, 120 or 180 min than in those undergoing sham operation (ALT: 55.3 IU/L ± 5.3 IU/L, 215.6 IU/L ± 26.8 IU/L, 245.5 IU/L ± 38.5 IU/L vs 45.5 IU/L ± 3.9 IU/L, all P < 0.05; AST: 161.3 IU/L ± 15.9 IU/L, 645.3 IU/L ± 50.5 IU/L, 698.8 IU/L ± 46.7 IU/L vs 140.3 IU/L ± 6.1 IU/L, all P < 0.05; TILB: 8.5 μmol/L ± 1.2 μmol/L, 72.6 μmol/L ± 11.0 μmol/L, 78.7 μmol/L ± 12.2 μmol/L vs 6.1 μmol/L ± 1.2 μmol/L, all P < 0.05; ALP: 202.4 IU/L ± 20.7 IU/L, 815.4 IU/L ± 68.1 IU/L, 902.9 IU/L ± 96.6 IU/L vs 158.5 IU/L ± 23.6 IU/L, all P < 0.05; GGT: 10.6 IU/L ± 2.7 IU/L, 52.3 IU/L ± 8.6 IU/L, 57.4 IU/L ± 11.3 IU/L vs 7.6 IU/L ± 1.4 IU/L, all P < 0.05). Histopathological examination showed that biliary stenosis was not apparent and wall fibrosis was milder in rats undergoing sham operation and those undergoing clamping for 60 min, while severe biliary stenosis and wall fibrosis were observed in those undergoing clamping for 120 or 180 min. At week 8, these lesions could not regress spontaneously.

CONCLUSION: An animal model of extrahepatic biliary ischemic stenosis is successfully established with the clamping method in rats, which provides a useful tool for basic and clinical research of the etiology, development and prophylaxis of extrahepatic biliary ischemic stenosis after liver transplantation.

Recipient outcomes after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

ABO-incompatible live transplantation (ILT) is not occasionally performed due to a relative high risk of graft failure. Knowledge of both graft and patient survival rate after ILT is essential for donor selection and therapeutic strategy. We systematically reviewed studies containing outcomes after ILT compared to that after ABO-compatible liver transplantation (CLT).

Methodology/Principal Findings

We carried out a comprehensive search strategy on MEDLINE (1966–July 2010), EMBASE (1980–July 2010), Biosis Preview (1969–July 2010), Science Citation Index (1981–July 2010), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library, issue 7, 2010) and the National Institute of Health (July 2010). Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of each study and abstracted outcome data. Fourteen eligible studies were included which came from various medical centers all over the world. Meta-analysis results showed that no significantly statistical difference was found in pediatric graft survival rate, pediatric and adult patient survival rate between ILT and CLT group. In adult subgroup, the graft survival rate after ILT was significantly lower than that after CLT. The value of totally pooled OR was 0.64 (0.55, 0.74), 0.92 (0.62, 1.38) for graft survival rate and patient survival rate respectively. The whole complication incidence (including acute rejection and biliary complication) after ILT was higher than that after CLT, as the value of totally pooled OR was 3.02 (1.33, 6.85). Similarly, in acute rejection subgroup, the value of OR was 2.02 (1.01, 4.02). However, it was 4.08 (0.90, 18.51) in biliary complication subgroup.

Conclusions/Significance

In our view, pediatric ILT has not been a contraindication anymore due to a similar graft and patient survival rate between ILT and CLT group. Though adult graft survival rate is not so satisfactory, ILT is undoubtedly life-saving under exigent condition. Most studies included in our analysis are observational researches. Larger scale of researches and Randomized-Control Studies are still needed.

Liver Transplantation in Asia: Past, Present and Future

With the technical advances and improvements in perioperative management and immunosuppressants, liver transplantation is the standard treatment for patients with end-stage liver diseases. In Asia, a shortage of deceased donor liver grafts is the universal problem to be faced with in all transplant centres. Many surgical innovations are then driven to counteract this problem. This review focuses on 3 issues that denote the development of liver transplantation in Asian countries. These include living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), split liver transplantation (SLT) and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Minimal graft weight, types of liver graft to donate and the inclusion of the middle hepatic vein with the graft are the main issues to be established in LDLT. The rapid growth and wide dissemination of LDLT has certainly alleviated the supply-and-demand problem of liver grafts in Asia. SLT is another attractive approach. Technical expertise, donor selection and graft allocation are the main determinants for its success. Liver transplantation plays a key role in the management of HCC in Asia. LDLT would be the main strategy in this aspect. The issue of extending the selection criteria for HCC patients for LDLT is still controversial. On the whole, future developments to increase the donor pool for the expanding recipient need in Asia would involve transplantation from non-heart beating donor and ABO incompatible transplantation.

Adult living-donor liver transplantation with ABO-incompatible grafts

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation using ABO-incompatible grafts is rarely performed because the reported outcome is poorer than with compatible grafts. We report our positive experience with adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) using ABO-incompatible grafts.

METHODS

The immunosuppressive protocol consisted of plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin infusion before LDLT followed by thymoglobulin induction and splenectomy, maintenance with tacrolimus/cyclosporine (FK/CSA), mycophenolate mofetil, and a rapid steroid taper. Plasmapheresis was planned for up to 3 months after LDLT aiming at maintaining the anti-ABO titers level below 1:16. Liver biopsies were routinely stained for humoral rejection with complement 4d (C4d) and for biliary damage with cytokeratin 7.

RESULTS

Between January 2003 and September 2004, five patients, mean age 59 years, received an ABO-incompatible LDLT. Patient and graft survival was 80% at mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 34-54) for the four surviving patients. One patient died 4 months after LDLT. Humoral rejection occurred in one patient whereas acute cellular rejection was diagnosed in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO-incompatible LDLT can be performed with patient and graft survival similar to compatible LDLT. Minimization of immunosuppression is possible, and chronic biliary damage is not the norm. Better tools than complement 4d staining must be researched to diagnose the features of immunologic damage to the graft. If these results will be confirmed in a greater number of patients, ABO-incompatible LDLT may be proposed when ABO-compatible donors are not available or when the ABO-incompatible donor is the better candidate.

Bridging hyperacute liver failure by ABO-incompatible auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation

Uncontrollable intracranial pressure elevation in hyperacute liver failure often proves fatal if no suitable liver for transplantation is found in due time. Both ABO-compatible and auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation have been described to control such scenario. However, each method is associated with downsides in terms of immunobiology, organ availability and effects on the overall waiting list.

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation for critically ill adult patients

ABO incompatible (ABO-In) liver transplant remains a controversial solution to acute liver failure in adults. Adult liver recipients with acute liver failure or severely decompensated end-stage disease, intubated and/or in the intensive care unit, were grouped as ABO-In (n = 14), ABO-compatible (n = 29, ABO-C) and ABO-identical (n = 65, ABO-Id). ABO-In received quadruple immunosuppression with antibody-depleting induction agents (except two), calcineurin inhibitors, antimetabolites and steroids. No significant difference of patient and graft survivals was observed among ABO-In, ABO-C and ABO-Id: graft survivals were 64%, 62% and 67%, respectively, in 1 year and 56%, 54% and 60%, respectively, in 5 years; patient survivals 86%, 69% and 67%, respectively, in 1 year and 77%, 61% and 62%, respectively, in 5 years. Three ABO-In grafts were lost (one hyper-acute rejection and two hepatic artery thrombosis). Surgical and infectious complications were similarly distributed between groups, except the hepatic artery thrombosis, more frequent in ABO-In (2, 14%) than ABO-I (1, 1.5%, P < 0.05). In contrast to previous studies, no significant difference of patient and graft survivals could be observed among all ABO-compatibility settings. Our results suggest that ABO-incompatible transplants should be viewed as an important therapeutic option in adult patients with acute liver failure awaiting an emergency procedure.

Current trends in live liver donation

The introduction of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been one of the most remarkable steps in the field of liver transplantation (LT), able to significantly expand the scarce donor pool in countries in which the growing demands of organs are not met by the shortage of available cadaveric grafts. Although the benefits of this procedure are enormous, the physical and psychological sacrifice of the donors is immense, and the expectations for a good outcome for themselves, as well as for the recipients, are high. We report a current overview of the latest trends in live liver donation in its different aspects (i.e. donor's selection, evaluation, operation, morbidity, mortality, ethics and psychology). This review is based on our center's personal experience with almost 200 LDLTs and a detailed analysis of the international literature of the last 7 years about this topic. Knowing in detail how to approach to the different aspects of living liver donation may be helpful in further improve donor's safety and even recipient's outcome.

Living-donor liver transplantation: present status and future perspective

About 15 years have passed since the first liver transplant from a living donor (living donor liver transplantation: LDLT), and the status of the procedure has since been established as a standard cure for end-stage liver disease in Japan where liver transplantation (LTx) from deceased donors has not yet been accepted. However, the following problems are surfacing with the increase in the number of LDLTs between adults: graft size mismatching, an ABO blood-type incompatible transplantation, the expansion of LDLT indication to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the relapse of hepatitis C after LDLT, marginal donors, and the freedom from immunosuppressive treatment. In this article we outline the present conditions of these problems and the future view of the LDLT.