Renal transplantation with iliac vein transposition

Efficacy of lengthening right renal veins using accompanying gonadal veins in living donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Short harvested right renal veins (RV) are quite common in living donor kidney transplantation (KT). This technical difficulty might interfere implanting and increase warm ischemic time. Several techniques to overcome this problem have been applied, including iliac vein transposition, inverted transplant, synthetic graft, saphenous vein… Application of accompanying gonadal vein (GV), which is easily approachable and less time-consuming, has been recently published. This study aims to evaluate its effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

Retrospective study on KT using the gonadal vein to lengthen the short right renal vein at Viet Duc University Hospital from April 2019 to April 2022. The following data were gathered: baseline characteristics, vascular imaging in CT scan/after nephrectomy and after reconstruction (mm), reconstruction and surgical time, hospitalization days. The outcomes were determined by kidney function after transplantation (plasma creatinine, creatinine clearance) and related complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases with procured right kidney with short RV from the living donor which were reconstructed and lengthened by the accompanying GV were collected. The additional length of RV was 15.9 ± 2.4 mm. Average cold ischemic time, venoplasty time, warm ischemic time were 60.4 ± 8.2, 21.2 ± 5.3, and 38.1 ± 5.6 min, respectively. The average hospital stay was 15.3 ± 3.2 days. Average follow-up time was 31 ± 5.2 months, creatinine clearance was around 60 ml/min after 1 year, no vascular or urologic complications was observed.

CONCLUSION

Accompanying GV from a living donor to lengthen short right RV in KT is a feasible, safe, and effective technique.

Renal Vessel Extension With Cryopreserved Vascular Grafts: Overcoming Surgical Pitfalls in Living Donor Kidney Transplant

In LDKT, right kidneys and kidneys with anomalous vascularization are often deferred because of concerns on complications and vascular reconstructions. To date, only few reports have examined renal vessel extension with cryopreserved vascular grafts in LDKT. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of renal vessel extension on short-term outcomes and ischemia times in LDKT. From 2012 to 2020, recipients of LDKT with renal vessels extension were compared with standard LDKT recipients. Subset analysis of rights grafts and grafts with anomalous vascularization, with or without renal vessel extension, was performed. Recipients of LDKT with (n = 54) and without (n = 91) vascular extension experienced similar hospital stays, surgical complications and DGF rates. For grafts with multiple vessels, renal vessel extension granted a faster implantation time (44±5 vs. 72±14 min), which resulted comparable to that of standard anatomy grafts. Right kidney grafts with vascular extension had a faster implantation time compared to right kidney grafts without vascular lengthening (43±5 vs. 58±9 min), and a comparable implantation time to left kidney grafts. Renal vessel extension with cryopreserved vascular grafts allows faster implantation time in right kidney grafts or grafts with anomalous vascularization, maintaining similar surgical and functional outcomes.

Effective Technique for Pancreas Transplantation by Iliac Vascular Transposition, Without Heparin-Based Anticoagulation Therapy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate patients undergoing a new procedure, iliac vascular transposition, in pancreas transplantation regarding the risk of thrombosis and graft survival without heparin-based anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS

Iliac vascular transposition (IVT) involves changing the positions of the external iliac artery and vein relative to each other. In this study, this technique was evaluated in patients undergoing the procedure compared with patients not undergoing the procedure (iliac vascular parallel (IVP) group).

RESULTS

No patients received prophylactic heparin therapy. Two patients in the IVP group (n = 26) developed complete thrombosis and six developed partial thrombosis, compared with no patients with complete thrombosis and one with partial thrombosis in the IVT group (n = 29). The cumulative incidence of thrombosis was significantly higher in the IVP group (p < 0.01). Cox regression revealed that not receiving iliac vascular transposition was the only significant risk factor for thrombosis (odds ratio: 10.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-81.2; p = 0.03). One-year graft survival was significantly better in the IVT group vs IVP group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

IVT in pancreas transplantation is a simple technique that results in a lower thrombosis risk and better graft survival rates without heparin-based anticoagulation therapy.

Techniques of orthotopic renal transplantation in pigs. One donor to two recipients via inverted grafting

PURPOSE

Although transplanting two kidneys from a single donor to two recipients has some advantages, the right and left kidneys are not anatomically identical; thus, a surgical procedure considering the anatomical features of the donor kidneys is needed when transplanting them into the opposite renal fossae. Based on vast experience, the surgical details of pig orthotopic kidney transplantation from one donor to two recipients was reported.

METHODS

When the right kidney was transplanted to the left renal fossa, the graft was inverted upside down, not backwards, thus ensuring that the anteroposterior relationship of the renal vessels was maintained and anatomically natural vascular anastomosis could be performed.

RESULTS

Using this technique, we could have developed a pig experimental model that is safe and has a high success rate, even for researchers in the middle of their training. This technique of inverting the graft upside down was reported in human kidney transplantation to make vascular anastomosis easier.

CONCLUSIONS

In pig orthotopic kidney transplantation from one donor to two recipients, an anatomically natural vascular anastomosis could be performed via inverted grafting when the right kidney was transplanted into the left renal fossa.

[Elongation of the right renal vein in 120 consecutive transplant patients. A comparative analysis]

OBJECTIVES

Shorter length of the right renal vein (RRV) may represent an additional difficulty for transplant. This paper has aimed to present our experience with RRV elongation in the kidney from a cadaveric donor and to compare the results with the rest of kidneys transplanted in the same period of time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed 377 kidneys transplants within the last 11 years. Of these, in 120, the RRV was elongated with the vena cava. The surgical technique is described and the results compared with the remaining transplants of the series. Renal function, graft survival and complications were assessed at 1, 3 and 12 months. Data were obtained retrospectively from the database of the Urology Department and Hospital medical records.

RESULTS

In the 377 transplants, there were 4 (1%) venous thrombosis, 2 (1.6%) of which concerned kidneys with elongation of the RRV and 2 (0.7%) in the rest of transplanted kidneys. There was no difference in postoperative bleeding, 11 (9.1%) occurred in kidneys with elongated RRV and 22 (8.5%) in the remaining kidney. In no case was the bleeding related to the elongated segment. Graft survival and renal function were similar for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Elongation of the RRV with the vena cava is a feasible, fast, and effective procedure that does not increase morbidity or affect renal function or graft viability. It facilitates vascular anastomosis and places the kidney in a less forced position, shortens the warm ischemia time and avoids the risk of kinking of the renal artery because it is equal to the length of the vein artery.