1
|
Andrade-Sierra J, Cueto-Manzano AM, Rojas-Campos E, Cardona-Muñoz E, Cerrillos-Gutiérrez JI, González-Espinoza E, Evangelista-Carrillo LA, Medina-Pérez M, Jalomo-Martínez B, Nieves Hernández J, Pazarín-Villaseñor L, Mendoza-Cerpa CA, Gómez-Navarro B, Miranda-Díaz AG. Donor-specific antibodies development in renal living-donor receptors: Effect of a single cohort. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2021; 35:20587384211000545. [PMID: 33787382 PMCID: PMC8020398 DOI: 10.1177/20587384211000545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimization in immunosuppression could contribute to the appearance the donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and graft failure. The objective was to compare the incidence of DSA in renal transplantation (RT) in recipients with immunosuppression with and without steroids. A prospective cohort from March 1st, 2013 to March 1st, 2014 and follow-up (1 year), ended in March 2015, was performed in living donor renal transplant (LDRT) recipients with immunosuppression and early steroid withdrawal (ESW) and compared with a control cohort (CC) of patients with steroid-sustained immunosuppression. All patients were negative cross-matched and for DSA pre-transplant. The regression model was used to associate the development of DSA antibodies and acute rejection (AR) in subjects with immunosuppressive regimens with and without steroids. Seventy-seven patients were included (30 ESW and 47 CC). The positivity of DSA class I (13% vs 2%; P < 0.05) and class II (17% vs 4%, P = 0.06) antibodies were higher in ESW versus CC. The ESW tended to predict DSA class II (RR 5.7; CI (0.93–34.5, P = 0.06). T-cell mediated rejection presented in 80% of patients with DSA class I (P = 0.07), and 86% with DSA II (P = 0.03), and was associated with DSA class II, (RR 7.23; CI (1.2–44), P = 0.03). ESW could favor the positivity of DSA. A most strictly monitoring the DSA is necessary for the early stages of the transplant to clarify the relationship between T-cell mediated rejection and DSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Andrade-Sierra
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.,Department of Physiology, University Health Sciences Center, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Alfonso M Cueto-Manzano
- Medical Research Unit in Renal Diseases, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Enrique Rojas-Campos
- Medical Research Unit in Renal Diseases, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Ernesto Cardona-Muñoz
- Department of Physiology, University Health Sciences Center, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - José I Cerrillos-Gutiérrez
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Eduardo González-Espinoza
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Luis A Evangelista-Carrillo
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Miguel Medina-Pérez
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Basilio Jalomo-Martínez
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Juan Nieves Hernández
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Leonardo Pazarín-Villaseñor
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Claudia A Mendoza-Cerpa
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Benjamin Gómez-Navarro
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplant Unit, Specialties Hospital, National Western Medical Centre, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - Alejandra G Miranda-Díaz
- Department of Physiology, University Health Sciences Center, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Early Steroid Withdrawal in Recipients of a Kidney Transplant From a Living Donor: Experience of a Single Mexican Center. Transplant Proc 2016; 48:42-9. [PMID: 26915841 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Revised: 11/25/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) can improve lipid and hemodynamic profiles without severe acute rejection (AR) events in renal transplant patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of ESW on the frequency and severity of AR. METHODS A randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial was performed on renal transplant recipients with a follow-up of 12 months. In the ESW group, patients were selected for corticosteroid treatment withdrawal on the fifth day post transplantation. In the Control group, patients continued with steroid treatment. All patients were over 18 years of age with panel reactive antibody (PRA) class I and II HLA <20%. RESULTS In total, 71 patients, 37 in the ESW group (52.1%) and 34 in the Control group (47.9%), had comparable AR incidences at the end of the follow-up (16% vs 15%) (NS) (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.32-3.33). Although renal graft survival was similar between the ESW and Control groups (87% vs 94%), renal function was superior in the ESW group (85 vs 75 mL/min). Additionally, hypertension was less frequent in the ESW group (3% vs 35%), requiring the use of fewer antihypertensives (8% vs 50%). CONCLUSIONS ESW was also associated with better blood pressure control and similar AR risk. The ESW group exhibited stable renal function.
Collapse
|
3
|
Chon WJ, Desai A, Wing C, Arwindekar D, Tang IYS, Josephson MA, Akkina S. Impact of Maintenance Steroids versus Rapid Steroid Withdrawal in African-American Kidney Transplant Recipients: Comparison of Two Urban Centers. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 7:204-216. [PMID: 27088051 PMCID: PMC4829964 DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2016.73021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Rapid steroid withdrawal (RSW) is used increasingly in kidney transplantation but long-term outcomes in African-American (AA) recipients are not well known. We compared 1 and 5 year transplant outcomes in a large cohort of AA patients who were maintained on continued steroid therapy (CST) to those who underwent RSW. Methods Post-transplant courses of A as receiving kidney allografts from 2003–2011 at two urban transplant centers in Chicago were followed. Prior to outcome analysis, we used Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW) to match the two groups on a set of baseline risk factors. Graft and patient survival, GFR at 1 and 5 years, incidence and type of rejection, incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), delayed graft function, CMV and BK viremia were compared. Results There were 150 AA recipients in the CST analytic group and 157 in the RSW analytic group. Graft and patient survival was similar between the two groups. Rates of CMV viremia were higher in the RSW compared to the CST analytic group at 1 year. Biopsy-proven acute rejection and PTDM were similar between the RSW and CST groups. Conclusions In AA recipients, RSW has similar long-term outcomes to CST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W James Chon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amishi Desai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Coady Wing
- School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Divya Arwindekar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ignatius Y S Tang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michelle A Josephson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sanjeev Akkina
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burkhalter F, Oettl T, Descoeudres B, Bachmann A, Guerke L, Mihatsch MJ, Dickenmann M, Steiger J. High incidence of rejection episodes and poor tolerance of sirolimus in a protocol with early steroid withdrawal and calcineurin inhibitor-free maintenance therapy in renal transplantation: experiences of a randomized prospective single-center study. Transplant Proc 2013. [PMID: 23195006 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Immunosuppressive maintenance therapy after kidney transplantation leads to various undesired side effects such as calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-associated nephrotoxicity or elevated cardiovascular risk due to posttransplantation diabetes and hypertension. These effects show negative impacts on long-term allograft function as well as patient morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we used an immunosuppressive regimen with early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW), maintenance therapy containing tacrolimus, sirolimus (SRL), and mycophenolate sodium for 3 months followed by a prospective randomized trial comparing a CNI free versus a low-dose CNI therapy. The primary endpoint was 6-month graft function. Among 75 patients, ESW was performed after 4 days in 65 patients. Over the following 3 months before randomization to CNI-free maintenance therapy, we experienced a high number (25%) of SRL discontinuations due to adverse events, including leukopenia, anemia, arthritis, and pneumonitis. In addition there were significantly more allograft rejection episodes in the CNI-free group (P = .017) during the study period leading to a switch from SRL to a CNI. Despite the higher rate of rejection episodes in the CNI-free groups, glomerular filtration rates (GFR) at 6 months were comparable between the study groups (P = .25). After 1 year only 9.2% (6/65) of all patients treated with SRL remained on this drug. Conclusion, there was an unacceptably high rate of SRL intolerance using an ESW and CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen combined with a significantly higher rate of rejection episodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Burkhalter
- Clinic for Transplant Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martin ST, Roberts KL, Malek SK, Tullius SG, Vadivel N, De Serres S, Grafals M, Elsanjak A, Filkins BA, Chandraker A, Gabardi S. Induction treatment with rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplant recipients with planned early steroid withdrawal. Pharmacotherapy 2012; 31:566-73. [PMID: 21923440 DOI: 10.1592/phco.31.6.566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare the safety and efficacy of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) with basiliximab in renal transplant recipients for whom an early steroid withdrawal (ESW) regimen was planned. DESIGN Single-center, retrospective, cohort study. SETTING Tertiary care medical center, including inpatient hospital stays and outpatient nephrology clinics. PATIENTS Ninety-nine consecutive adult recipients of living- or deceased-donor renal transplants between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2007, in whom ESW was planned and who received either r-ATG or basiliximab; patients receiving an extended-criteria kidney donation or a donation after cardiac death were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS All patients received mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus as maintenance therapy with planned ESW. Induction therapy was either r-ATG 1.5 mg/kg/day for 4 days (68 patients) or basiliximab 20 mg on postoperative days 0 and 4 (31 patients). The primary composite end point of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, and death occurred in 6 patients (9%) and 9 patients (29%) in the r-ATG and basiliximab groups at 1 year after transplantation, respectively (p=0.01), with rates of 7% (5/68 patients) and 26% (8/31 patients) for BPAR (p=0.02), 0% and 3% (1/31 patients) for graft loss (p=0.31), and 2% (1/68 patients) and 0% for patient death (p>0.99). Average time to first BPAR was significantly longer in the r-ATG group (mean ± SD 151.4 ± 82.9 vs 53.6 ± 68.4 days, p<0.01). Kidney function at 12 months was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION Rabbit-ATG was associated with a lower frequency and delayed onset of BPAR compared with basiliximab in renal transplant recipients who received an ESW regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer T Martin
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pascual J, Zamora J, Galeano C, Royuela A, Quereda C. Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD005632. [PMID: 19160257 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005632.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted during the last two decades in order to avoid morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown significant increases in acute rejection and an increase in graft failure rates. Steroid avoidance in kidney transplantation is increasingly attempted and the possible benefits or harms have never been a subject of a systematic review. OBJECTIVES To assess the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal or avoidance in patients receiving a kidney transplant. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, references lists and abstracts from international transplantation society scientific meetings. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of steroid avoidance or withdrawal were included providing that one treatment arm consisted in steroid avoidance or withdrawal and intention-to-treat rates of acute rejection and graft failure were clearly established after steroid avoidance or use or withdrawal or continuation. Observational studies were tabulated. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS We included 30 RCTs (5949 participants). Steroid-sparing strategies showed no effect on mortality or graft loss including death. Patients on any steroid-sparing strategy showed a higher risk of graft loss excluding death than those with conventional steroid use (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.52), especially in those not receiving MMF/Myf or everolimus (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.90). Acute rejection was more frequent with a steroid-sparing strategy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.40) and more frequent after steroid withdrawal or avoidance when compared with standard steroid treatment when cyclosporin (CsA) was used. Steroid-sparing and withdrawal strategies showed benefits in reducing antihypertensive drug need, serum cholesterol, antihyperlipidaemic drug need, new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) requiring any treatment and cataracts. Steroid avoidance did not alter serum cholesterol, but was associated with less frequent NODAT requiring any treatment. Cardiovascular events were reduced with steroid avoidance. Reduced antihypertensive drug need and serum cholesterol were similar with CsA or tacrolimus (TAC). Reduced antihyperlipidaemic drug need was only evident with TAC, whereas the reduction in NODAT requiring any treatment was only evident with CsA. Infection was lower in steroid-sparing patients using CsA (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00). NODAT requiring any treatment was less frequent with steroid avoidance than with steroid withdrawal. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review confirms that steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal strategies in kidney transplantation are not associated with increased mortality or graft loss despite an increase in acute rejection. These immunosuppression strategies may allow safe steroid avoidance or elimination a few days after kidney transplantation if antibody induction treatment is prescribed or after three to six months if such induction is not used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio Pascual
- Servicio de Nefrologia, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar km 9,100, Madrid, Spain, 28034.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|