Cost/efficacy clinical trial about the use of T-tube in cadaveric donor liver transplant: preliminary results

Are short-term complications associated with poor allograft and patient survival after liver transplantation? A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Maximizing patient and allograft survival after liver transplant (LT) is important from both a patient care and organ utilization perspective. Although individual studies have addressed the effects of short-term post-LT complications on a limited scale, there has not been a systematic review of the literature formally assessing the potential effects of early complications on long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether short-term complications after LT affect allograft and overall survival, to identify short-term complications of particular clinical interest and significance, and to provide recommendations to improve post-LT graft and patient survival.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel.

RESULTS

The literature review and analysis provided show that short-term complications have a large impact on allograft and patient survival after LT. The complications with the strongest effect on survival are acute kidney injury (AKI), biliary complications, and early allograft dysfunction (EAD).

CONCLUSION

This panel recommends taking measures to reduce the risk and incidence of short-term complications post-LT. Clinicians should pay particular attention to preventing or ameliorating AKI, biliary complications, and EAD (Quality of evidence; Moderate | Grade of Recommendation; Strong).

Management of Biliary Complications in Liver Transplant Recipients

Biliary complications are often referred to as the Achilles' heel of liver transplantation (LT). The most common of these complications include strictures, and leaks. Prompt diagnosis and management is key for preservation of the transplanted organ. Unfortunately, a number of factors can lead to delays in diagnosis and make adequate treatment a challenge. Innovations in advanced endoscopic techniques have increased non-surgical options for these complications and in many cases is the preferred approach.

Biliary Complications Following Adult Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors and Implications at a High-volume US Center

Biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures comprise the majority of biliary complications (BCs) following liver transplantation (LT). Currently, there are few large contemporary case series of BCs in adult deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients in the literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the pretransplant and intraoperative risk factors associated with BCs at a high-volume tertiary care center and determine the impact of these BCs on their posttransplant course and long-term transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients undergoing a DDLT from a donor after brain death (DBD) at Emory University between January 2015 and December 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 647 adult patients underwent DDLT from a DBD during the study period and were included in analyses. The median length of follow-up posttransplant was 2.5 y. There were a total of 27 bile leaks (4.2%) and 69 biliary strictures (10.7%). Recipient age and cold ischemic time were identified as risk factors for biliary leak, whereas alcoholic cirrhosis as transplant indication was a risk factor for biliary stricture. Placement of a biliary stent was associated with the development of both biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures. Posttransplant, biliary leaks were a significant risk factor for future episodes of acute rejection but did not impact overall survival. In contrast, biliary strictures were associated with a significantly reduced overall survival at 1- and 4-y post DDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

BCs are a major source of morbidity and mortality following DDLT, with strictures and leaks associated with distinct posttransplant complications.

T-tube vs no T-tube for biliary tract reconstruction in adult orthotopic liver transplantation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether to use a T-tube for biliary anastomosis during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains a debatable question. Some surgeons chose to use a T-tube because they believed that it reduces the incidence of biliary strictures. Advances in surgical techniques during the last decades have significantly decreased the overall incidence of postoperative biliary complications. Whether using a T-tube during OLT is still associated with the reduced incidence of biliary strictures needs to be re-evaluated.

AIM

To provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on using a T-tube during adult OLT.

METHODS

In the electronic databases MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trails Register, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, we identified 17 studies (eight randomized controlled trials and nine comparative studies) from January 1995 to October 2020. The data of the studies before and after 2010 were separately extracted. We chose the overall biliary complications, bile leaks or fistulas, biliary strictures (anastomotic or non-anastomotic), and cholangitis as outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to describe the results of the outcomes. Furthermore, the test for overall effect (Z) was used to test the difference between OR and 1, where P ≤ 0.05 indicated a significant difference between OR value and 1.

RESULTS

A total of 1053 subjects before 2010 and 1346 subjects after 2010 were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that using a T-tube reduced the incidence of postoperative biliary strictures in studies before 2010 (P = 0.012, OR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.42-0.90), while the same benefit was not seen in studies after 2010 (P = 0.60, OR = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.27-2.12). No significant difference in the incidence of overall biliary complications (P = 0.37, OR = 1.41, 95%CI: 0.66-2.98), bile leaks (P = 0.89, OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.63-1.70), and cholangitis (P = 0.27, OR = 2.00, 95%CI: 0.59-6.84) was observed between using and not using a T-tube before 2010. However, using a T-tube appeared to increase the incidence of overall biliary complications (P = 0.049, OR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.00-2.22), bile leaks (P = 0.048, OR = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.01-3.64), and cholangitis (P = 0.02, OR = 7.21, 95%CI: 1.37-38.00) after 2010. A random-effects model was used in biliary strictures (after 2010), overall biliary complications (before 2010), and cholangitis (before 2010) due to their heterogeneity (I² = 62.3%, 85.4%, and 53.6%, respectively). In the sensitivity analysis (only RCTs included), bile leak (P = 0.66) lost the significance after 2010 and a random-effects model was used in overall biliary complications (before 2010), cholangitis (before 2010), bile leaks (after 2010), and biliary strictures (after 2010) because of their heterogeneity (I² = 92.2%, 65.6%, 50.9%, and 80.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the evidence gathered in our updated meta-analysis showed that the studies published in the last decade did not provide enough evidence to support the routine use of T-tube in adults during OLT.

A Review on the Management of Biliary Complications after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinomas. Biliary complications are the most common complications seen after transplantation, with an incidence of 10-25%. These complications are seen both in deceased donor liver transplant and living donor liver transplant. Endoscopic treatment of biliary complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (commonly known as ERCP) has become a mainstay in the management post-transplantation. The success rate has reached 80% in an experienced endoscopist's hands. If unsuccessful with ERCP, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography can be an alternative therapy. Early recognition and treatment has been shown to improve morbidity and mortality in post-liver transplant patients. The focus of this review will be a learned discussion on the types, diagnosis, and treatment of biliary complications post-orthotopic liver transplantation.

T-tube Systematic Use in the Biliary Anastomosis: Comparison of Two Consecutive Series of Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to check the frequency of biliary complications with the use of a T-tube. In 2012, throughout the year, it was carried out systematically in all liver transplantations regardless of the characteristics of the bile duct. Despite the long experience, biliary complications remain a common cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study we compared complications in 23 consecutive transplantation cases using T-tube biliary anastomosis during the year 2012 with 23 consecutive transplantation cases without T-tube during the year 2013. We evaluated postoperative complications and long-term outcomes (for 2 years to 3 years).

RESULTS

Of the 23 patients with anastomosis with a T-tube, 2 patients (8.69%) had biliary stricture that required prosthesis by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, 1 of them (4.34%) was operated by incorrect placement of the T-tube, and in 4 patients (17.39%) bile leakage (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography prostheses in 3 cases and hepaticojejunostomy in 1). During follow-up at 3 years, only 2 patients had minimal bile duct dilatation without clinical relevance. In the patients who underwent transplantation without a T-tube, 18 (78.26%) had no complications, 3 (13.04%) showed stenosis (prosthesis placement), and 2 (8.69%) had bile leakage (hepaticojejunostomy and prosthesis). During follow-up at 2 years to 3 years, no patient had biliary dilatation or alteration of cholestatic parameters. In the comparative study of both groups we found no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

We have not seen an improvement in complications with the use of T-tube (69.56% vs. 78.23%) that encourage us to work systematically, although the small number of cases does not allow statistically significant conclusions.

Current diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation

Despite advances in surgical techniques, benign biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remain a significant biliary complication and play an important role in graft and patient survival. Benign biliary strictures after transplantation are classified into anastomotic or non-anastomotic strictures. These two types differ in presentation, outcome, and response to therapy. The leading causes of biliary strictures include impaired blood supply, technical errors during surgery, and biliary anomalies. Because patients usually have non-specific symptoms, a high index of suspicion should be maintained. Magnetic resonance cholangiography has gained widespread acceptance as a reliable noninvasive tool for detecting biliary complications. Endoscopy has played an increasingly prominent role in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary strictures after LDLT. Endoscopic management in LDLT recipients may be more challenging than in deceased donor liver transplantation patients because of the complex nature of the duct-to-duct reconstruction. Repeated aggressive endoscopic treatment with dilation and the placement of multiple plastic stents is considered the first-line treatment for biliary strictures. Percutaneous and surgical treatments are now reserved for patients for whom endoscopic management fails and for those with multiple, inaccessible intrahepatic strictures or Roux-en-Y anastomoses. Recent advances in enteroscopy enable treatment, even in these latter cases. Direct cholangioscopy, another advanced form of endoscopy, allows direct visualization of the inner wall of the biliary tree and is expected to facilitate stenting or stone extraction. Rendezvous techniques can be a good option when the endoscopic approach to the biliary stricture is unfeasible. These developments have resulted in almost all patients being managed by the endoscopic approach.

Biliary tract reconstruction with or without T-tube in orthotopic liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

At present whether to use T-tube or not during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in biliary tract reconstruction still remains controversial. Most transplant centers choose not to use T-tube because the T-tube can increase the incidence of cholangitis, but some centers still use T-tube because the T-tube can decrease the incidence of anastomotic strictures.

AIM

The purpose of this study is to compare biliary complications after biliary tract reconstruction with or without T-tube in OLT.

METHODS

systematic review and meta-analysis of a collection of 15 studies (six randomized control trails (RCTs) and nine comparative studies) to compare biliary complications after biliary tract reconstruction with or without T-tube in OLT.

RESULTS

The data showed that the biliary tract reconstruction with T-tube and without T-tube had equivalent outcomes for overall biliary complications (six RCTs p = 0.76; odd ratio [OR] = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.40, 3.58; all studies p = 0.14; OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 0.88, 2.57), bile leaks (six RCTs p = 0.61; OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.52; all studies p = 0.09; OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 0.95, 2.02), cholangitis (six RCTs p = 0.13; OR = 5.54; 95% CI: 0.62, 49.79; all studies p = 0.08; OR = 4.27; 95% CI: 0.86, 21.16), hepatic artery thrombosis (two RCTs p = 1.00; OR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.22, 4.49; all studies p = 0.75; OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.41, 3.44). However, in the group with T-tube there were better outcomes for biliary strictures (six RCTs p = 0.0003; OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.61; all studies p < 0.0001; OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.69).

DISCUSSION

Although most organizations choose not to use T-tube in OLT, we suggest that use of T-tube in biliary tract reconstruction during OLT for the recipients who possibly have high risks of biliary stricture is useful and necessary.

Response to endoscopic therapy for biliary anastomotic strictures in deceased versus living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic therapy has been successful in the management of biliary complications after both deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). LDLT is thought to be associated with higher rates of biliary complications, but there are few studies comparing the success of endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures between the two groups. This study aims to compare our experience in the endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures in DDLT versus LDLT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective database review of all liver transplant patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after liver transplantation. The frequency of anastomotic stricture and the time to develop and to resolve anastomotic stricture were compared between DDLT and LDLT. The response of anastomotic stricture to endoscopic therapy was also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 362 patients underwent liver transplantation between 2003 and 2011, with 125 requiring ERCP to manage biliary complications. Thirty-three (9.9%) cases of DDLT and 8 (27.6%) of LDLT (P=0.01) were found to have anastomotic stricture. When comparing DDLT and LDLT, there was no difference in the mean time to the development of anastomotic strictures (98+/-17 vs 172+/-65 days, P=0.11), likelihood of response to ERCP [22 (66.7%) vs 6 (75.0%), P=0.69], mean time to the resolution of anastomotic strictures (268+/-77 vs 125+/-37 days, P=0.34), and the number of ERCPs required to achieve resolution (3.9+/-0.4 vs 4.7+/-0.9, P=0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic therapy is effective in the majority of biliary complications relating to liver transplantation. Anastomotic strictures occur more frequently in LDLT compared with DDLT, with equivalent endoscopic treatment response and outcomes for both groups.

Radiologic assessment of hepatobiliary surgical complications

The complexity of hepatobiliary procedures continues to evolve at a rapid rate, with an increasing number of living donor liver transplants and extensive cancer resections being performed. The associated complications are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and are often complex injuries, involving both vascular and biliary structures. In this paper we describe the complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, liver transplant surgery, and hepatic resection. Focus is on the classical imaging appearances, imaging modality options, and varying management strategies for these injuries, to show how the radiologist's role is vital in ensuring the correct diagnosis is made and the appropriate treatment is instigated.

Intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion and its association with the incidence of biliary complications after liver transplantation--a retrospective cohort study

Background

Cryoprecipitate is largely used for acquired hypofibrinogenemia in the setting of massive hemorrhage in liver transplantation (LT). However, the influence of intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion on biliary complications (BC) after LT has not been studied in detail.

Study Design and Methods

In a series of 356 adult patients who received their first LT, the causes of BC were retrospectively studied by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The clinical relationship between intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion and BC occurrence was studied through a retrospective cohort study in patients. All patients received follow-ups for one year, and, during the follow-up period, the time of BC occurrence and liver biopsies were recorded.

Results

Intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion (RR = 3.46, 95% CI [1.72–6.97], P<0.001), cold ischemia time >8 h (RR = 4.24, 95% CI [2.28–7.92], P<0.01), and high-level Child-Pugh ( RR = 1.71, 95% CI [1.11–2.63], P = 0.014) are independent risk factors to predict BC after LT according to time-to-event analysis. One year BC-free survival probability of patients received intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusions was significantly lower when compared to the group that received no cryoprecipitate(P<0.001). Moreover, BC patients in the cryoprecipitate transfusion group owned different liver pathological feature, pathological micro-thrombus formation and cholestasis were seen more often (41.4% vs 0%, 62.1% vs 12.5%, respectively) than no cryoprecipitate transfusion group.

Conclusion

These findings suggested that intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion was associated with BC after LT. The mechanism of BC occurrence might involve micro-thrombus formation and immune rejection.

Value of T-tube in biliary tract reconstruction during orthotopic liver transplantation: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare biliary complications after biliary tract reconstruction with or without T-tube in orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODS

Randomized control trials (RCTs) and comparative studies were identified by a computerized literature search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966/1-2010/4), Scopus (1980/1-2010/4), ClinicalTrials.gov (2010/4), the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies and data were extracted and assessed independently. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Five RCTs and eight comparative studies with a total of 1 608 subjects were identified. The data showed that the operation with T-tube had better outcomes for duct stenosis (P=0.01, OR=0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.85). The operations with or without T-tube had equivalent outcomes as follows: overall biliary complications (P=0.85, OR=1.15, 95% CI 0.28-4.72), bile leaks (P=0.38, OR=0.75, 95% CI 0.39-1.42), and cholangitis (P=0.24, OR=4.64, 95% CI 0.36-60.62). These results were strengthened by the analysis of all thirteen non-randomized and randomized studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the insertion of a T-tube reduces the incidence of biliary stenosis without increasing the incidence of other biliary complications.

Biliary complications following liver transplantation

The aphorism that reconstruction of the biliary anastomosis is the "Achilles heel" of liver transplantation remains valid as biliary complications following liver transplantation remain a major source of morbidity with an incidence of 5-32%. Biliary complications include biliary strictures, biliary leaks, and stones. Biliary strictures can be divided into anastomotic and non-anastomotic. The management of biliary complications previously relied on surgical intervention. However, advances in endoscopic and radiological interventions have resulted in less-invasive options. The management of biliary complications post-liver transplantation requires a multidisciplinary approach and continues to evolve. Biliary complications also reflect the continued expansion of the donor pool with extended, live, and non-heart beating donors.

Biliary reconstruction using a side-to-side choledochocholedochostomy with or without T-tube in deceased donor liver transplantation: a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The biliary anastomosis is still one of the major causes for morbidity after orthotopic liver transplantation. The optimal method of reconstruction remains controversial. The aim of the study was to assess biliary complications after liver transplantation using a choledochocholedochostomy with or without a temporary T-tube.

BACKGROUND DATA

Several reports have suggested that biliary reconstruction without T-tube is a safer method with a lower rate of biliary complications compared with T-tube insertion.

METHODS

A total of 194 recipients of deceased donor liver grafts were randomized. In group 1 the biliary reconstruction was performed by side-to-side choledochocholedochostomy with (n = 99) and in group 2 (n = 95) without a T-tube. The T-tube was removed after 6 weeks.

RESULTS

The overall biliary complication rate was significantly increased in group 2 (P < 0.0005). Biliary leaks occurred in 5 patients in group 1 and in 9 patients in group 2 (5.05% vs. 9.47%; P = 0.2756 ns). Anastomotic strictures of the bile duct were seen in 7 patients in group 1 and in 8 patients in group 2 (7.07% vs. 8.42%; P = 0.7923 ns). Two of the patients in group 1 and 5 patients in group 2 developed an ischemic type biliary lesion (2.02% vs. 5.26%; P = 0.2716 ns). The rate of reoperations was comparable in both groups. The rate of invasive interventions was higher in the group without T-tubes (9% vs. 18%, P = ns), as was the rate of cholangitis (5% vs. 11%. P = ns) and pancreatitis (4% vs. 14%, P = 0.0218). No complications after removal of the T-tube were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study is a large prospective randomized trial to assess biliary complications that occur following liver transplantation, after anatomizing the bile duct with or without T-tubes. A significant increased rate of complications in the group without T-tube insertion was observed. In summary, our results indicate that the usage of T-tubes is safe and an excellent tool for the quality control of biliary anastomoses.

Endoscopic management of biliary strictures after liver transplantation

Bile duct strictures remain a major source of morbidity after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Biliary strictures are classified as anastomotic or non-anastomotic strictures according to location and are defined by distinct clinical behaviors. Anastomotic strictures are localized and short. The outcome of endoscopic treatment for anastomotic strictures is excellent. Non-anastomotic strictures often result from ischemic and immunological events, occur earlier and are usually multiple and longer. They are characterized by a far less favorable response to endoscopic management, higher recurrence rates, graft loss and need for retransplantation. Living donor OLT patients present a unique set of challenges arising from technical factors, and stricture risk for both recipients and donors. Endoscopic treatment of living donor OLT patients is less promising. Current endoscopic strategies for biliary strictures after OLT include repeated balloon dilations and placement of multiple side-by-side plastic stents. Lifelong surveillance is required in all types of strictures. Despite improvements in incidence and long term outcomes with endoscopic management, and a reduced need for surgical treatment, the impact of strictures on patients after OLT is significant. Future considerations include new endoscopic technologies and improved stents, which could potentially allow for a decreased number of interventions, increased intervals before retreatment, and decreased reliance on percutaneous and surgical modalities. This review focuses on the role of endoscopy in biliary strictures, one of the most common biliary complications after OLT.

Biliary strictures following liver transplantation: past, present and preventive strategies

Biliary complications are still the major source of morbidity for liver transplant recipients. The reported incidence of biliary strictures is 5%-15% after deceased donor liver transplantation and 28%-32% after right-lobe live donor surgery. Presentation is usually within the first year, but the incidence is known to increase with longer follow-up. The anastomotic variant is due to technical factors, whereas the nonanastomotic form is due to immunological and ischemic events, which later may lead to graft loss. Endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures achieves a success rate of 70%-100%; it drops to 50%-75% for nonanastomotic strictures with a higher recurrence rate. Results of endoscopic maneuvers are disappointing for biliary strictures after live donor liver transplantation, and the success rate is 60%-75% for anastomotic strictures and 25%-33% for the nonanastomotic variant. Preventive strategies in the cadaveric donor include the standardization of the type of anastomosis and maintenance of a vascularized ductal stump. In right-lobe live donor livers, donor liver duct harvesting also involves a major risk. The concept of high hilar intrahepatic Glissonian dissection, dissecting the artery and the duct as one unit, use of microsurgical techniques for smaller ducts, use of ductoplasty, and flexibility in the performance of double ductal anastomosis are the critical components of the preventive strategies in the recipient. In the case of live donors, judicious use of intraoperative cholangiograms, minimal dissection of the hilar plate, and perpendicular transection of the duct constitute the underlying principals for obtaining a vascularized duct.

Management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: The role of endoscopy

Biliary complications are significant causes of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The estimated incidence of biliary complications after OLT ranges between 10%-25%, however, these numbers continue to decline due to improvement in surgical techniques. The most common biliary complications are strictures (both anastomotic and non-anastomotic) and bile leaks. Most of these problems can be appropriately managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Other complications such as bile duct stones, bile casts, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and hemobilia, are less frequent and also can be managed with ERC. This article will review the risk factors, diagnosis, and endoscopic management of the most common biliary complications after OLT.

Management of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation

Biliary complications are a major cause of morbidity following orthotopic liver transplantation with an overall incidence between 11% and 25%. The most common complications are biliary leaks, strictures, and stones. These complications have an impact on graft survival, length of hospital stay, recovery, and overall cost of care. Therefore, knowledge of these complications and their management is important to the practicing gastroenterologist. Historically, biliary complications after liver transplantation have been managed surgically. However, with the growth of therapeutic endoscopic and percutaneous radiologic methods, most of these complications can now be managed less invasively. This article focuses on the incidence, timing, mechanism, and endoscopic management of biliary leak, strictures, stones, sludge, casts, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction following liver transplantation.

Impact of early biliary complications in liver transplantation in the presence or absence of a T-tube: a Chinese transplant centre experience

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications continue to be an important determinant of the recipient's survival rate after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of early biliary complications in OLT in the presence or absence of a T-tube.

METHODS

This retrospective study, based on inpatient data, focused on the relationship between T-tube placement and early biliary complications of 84 patients after OLT, from November 2002 to June 2005. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not a T-tube was used following bile duct reconstruction: T-tube group (group I, n = 33); non-T-tube group (group II, n = 51).

RESULTS

45.2% of OLT recipients had a malignant neoplasm. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics or operation data between the two groups. Overall, early biliary tract complications developed in 19.0% (16/84) of patients. The rate of early biliary complications was 30.3% (10/33) and 11.8% (6/51) in groups I II, respectively (p = 0.035). Biliary complications which were directly caused by T-tube placement occurred in 12.1% (4/33) of patients in group I. Overall, the percentage of malignant neoplasms, chronic viral cirrhosis, fulminant liver failure and other primary disease recipients with early biliary complications were 6.2%, 37.5%, 43.8% and 12.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the use of a T-tube in Chinese patients undergoing OLT causes a higher incidence of early biliary complications. Most of the early biliary complications occurred in chronic viral cirrhosis and fulminant liver failure recipients.

Biliary complications after deceased-donor orthotopic liver transplantation

A wide range of potential biliary complications can occur after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The most common biliary complications are bile leaks, anastomotic and intrahepatic strictures, stones, and ampullary dyfunction, which may occur in up to 20%-40% of OLT recipients. Leaks predominate in the early posttransplant period; stricture formation typically develops gradually over time. However, with the advent of new techniques, such as split-liver, reduced-size, and living-donor liver transplantation, the spectrum of biliary complications has changed. Risk factors for biliary complications comprise technical failure; T-tube or stent-related complications; hepatic artery thrombosis; bleeding; ischemia/reperfusion injury; and other immunological, nonimmunological, and infectious complications. Noninvasive diagnostic methods have been established and treatment modalities have been modified towards a primarily nonoperative, endoscopy-based strategy. Besides, the management of biliary complications after OLT requires a multidisciplinary approach, in which interventional and endoscopic treatment options have to be weighed up against surgical treatment options. The etiology and spectrum of bile duct complications, their diagnosis, and their treatment will be reviewed in this article.