Orthotopic Liver Transplantation With Vena Cava Preservation in Cirrhotic Patients: Is Systematic Temporary Portacaval Anastomosis a Justified Procedure?

Temporary Portocaval Shunt Provides Superior Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Reduces Blood Loss and Duration of Surgery in Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, renal function, and duration of surgery with and without temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) in live donor liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Secondary objectives were postoperative early graft dysfunction, morbidity, mortality, total intensive care unit, and hospital stay.

BACKGROUND

Blood loss during recipient hepatectomy for LT remains a major concern. Routine use of TPCS during LT is not yet elucidated.

METHODS

This study is a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial. The sample size was calculated based on intraoperative blood loss. After exclusion, a total of 60 patients, 30 in each arm (TPCS vs no TPCS) were recruited in the trial.

RESULTS

The baseline recipient and donor characteristics were comparable between the groups. The median intraoperative blood loss ( P = 0.004) and blood product transfusions ( P < 0.05) were significantly less in the TPCS group. The TPCS group had significantly improved intraoperative hemodynamics in the anhepatic phase as compared with the no TPCS group ( P < 0.0001), requiring significantly less vasopressor support. This led to significantly better renal function as evidenced by higher intraoperative urine output in the TPCS group ( P = 0.002). Because of technical simplicity, the TPCS group had significantly fewer inferior vena cava injuries (3.3 vs 26.7%, P = 0.026) and substantially shorter hepatectomy time and total duration of surgery (529.4 ± 35.54 vs 606.83 ± 48.13 min, P < 0.0001). The time taken for normalization of lactate in the immediate postoperative period was significantly shorter in the TPCS group (median, 6 vs 13 h; P = 0.04). Although postoperative endotoxemia, major morbidity, 90-day mortality, total intensive care unit, and hospital stay were comparable between both groups, tolerance to enteral feed was earlier in the TPCS group.

CONCLUSIONS

In live donor LT, TPCS is a simple and effective technique that provides superior intraoperative hemodynamics and reduces blood loss and duration of surgery.

Which cava anastomotic techniques are optimal regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after liver transplantation: A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

It has long been debated whether cava anastomosis should be performed with the piggyback technique or cava replacement, with or without veno-venous bypass (VVB), with or without temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) in the setting of liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether different cava anastomotic techniques and other maneuvers benefit the recipient regarding short-term outcomes and to provide international expert panel recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel (CRD42021240979).

RESULTS

Of 3205 records screened, 307 publications underwent full-text assessment for eligibility and 47 were included in qualitative synthesis. Four studies were randomized control trials. Eighteen studies were comparative. The remaining 25 were single-center retrospective noncomparative studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on existing data and expert opinion, the panel cannot recommend one cava reconstruction technique over another, rather the surgical approach should be based on surgeon preference and center dependent, with special consideration toward patient circumstances (Quality of evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong). The panel recommends against routine use of vevo-venous bypass (Quality of evidence: Very Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) and against the routine use of temporary porto-caval shunt (Quality of evidence: Very Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).

Safety of Intraoperative Blood Salvage During Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective:

The effects of intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) on time to tumor recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing liver transplantation were assessed to evaluate the safety of IBS.

Background:

IBS is highly effective to reduce the use of allogeneic blood transfusion. However, the safety of IBS during liver transplantation for patients with HCC is questioned due to fear of disseminating malignant cells.

Methods:

Comprehensive searches through June 2021 were performed in 8 databases. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Robins-I tool. Meta-analysis with the generic inverse variance method was performed to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival, HCC recurrence and overall survival.

Results:

Nine studies were included (n=1997, IBS n=1200, no-IBS n=797). Use of IBS during liver transplantation was not associated with impaired disease-free survival [HR=0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.66–1.24, P=0.53, IBS n=394, no-IBS n=329], not associated with increased HCC recurrence (HR=0.83, 95% CI=0.57–1.23, P=0.36, IBS n=537, no-IBS n=382) and not associated with impaired overall survival (HR=1.04, 95% CI=0.79–1.37, P=0.76, IBS n=495, no-IBS n=356).

Conclusions:

Based on available observational data, use of IBS during liver transplantation in patients with HCC does not result in impaired disease-free survival, increased HCC recurrence or impaired overall survival. Therefore, use of IBS during liver transplantation for HCC patients is a safe procedure.

Safety of intra-operative blood salvage during liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, a propensity score-matched survival analysis

Intra-operative blood salvage (IBS) reduces the use of allogeneic blood transfusion. However, safety of IBS during liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is questioned due to fear for dissemination of circulating malignant cells. This study aims to assess safety of IBS. HCC patients who underwent LT from January 2006 through December 2019 were included. Patients in whom IBS was used were propensity score matched (1:1) to control patients. Disease-free survival and time to HCC recurrence were assessed with Cox regression models and competing risk models. IBS was used in 192/378 HCC LT recipients, and 127 patients were propensity score matched. Cumulative disease-free survival at 12 and 60 months was 85% and 63% for the IBS group versus 90% and 68% for the no-IBS group. Use of IBS was not associated with impaired disease-free survival (HR 1.07, 95%CI: 0.65-1.76, P = 0.800) nor with increased HCC recurrence (Cause-specific cox model: HR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.36-1.73, P = 0.549, Fine and Gray model: HR: 0.79, 95%CI 0.40-1.57, P = 0.50). In conclusion, IBS during LT did not increase the risk for HCC recurrence. IBS is a safe procedure in HCC LT recipients to reduce the need for allogenic blood transfusion.

Protective Role of the Portocaval Shunt in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Advances in medical management and surgical technique have resulted in stepwise improvements in early post-transplant survival rates. Modifications in the surgical technique, such as the realization of the portocaval shunt (PCS), could influence survival rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mortality rate for 12 months after liver transplantation, analyzing the causes and risk factors related to its development and assessing the impact that PCS could have on them.

METHODS

A total of 231 recipients were included in the retrospective, longitudinal, and nonrandomized study.

RESULTS

The overall survival of the transplant was 85.2% (197 patients). The most frequent cause of death was infection (38.2%), followed by the multiorgan failure of multiple etiology (23.5%). Most of the risk factors related to mortality correspond to variables of the postoperative period. The results of the multivariate analysis identified the main risk factors for death: the presence of surgical complications and the need for renal replacement therapy. In contrast, the performance of PCS exerted a protective effect, reducing the probability of death by 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the good results obtained in several studies, there is still debate regarding the benefit of its realization. In our study, PCS was a factor associated with a reduction in mortality, with a markedly lower probability of adverse events. However, we agree with other authors on the need for larger and randomized studies to adequately determine the validity of such results.

Impact of Temporary Portocaval Shunting and Initial Arterial Reperfusion in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

The use of a temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) as well as the order of reperfusion (initial arterial reperfusion [IAR] versus initial portal reperfusion) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is controversial and, therefore, still under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome for the 4 possible combinations (temporary portocaval shunt with initial arterial reperfusion [A+S+], temporary portocaval shunt with initial portal reperfusion, no temporary portocaval shunt with initial arterial reperfusion, and no temporary portocaval shunt with initial portal reperfusion) in a center-based cohort study, including liver transplantations (LTs) from both donation after brain death and donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. The primary outcome was the perioperative transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs), and the secondary outcomes were operative time and patient and graft survival. Between January 2005 and May 2017, all first OLTs performed in our institution were included in the 4 groups mentioned. With IAR and TPCS, a significantly lower perioperative transfusion of RBCs was seen (P < 0.001) as well as a higher number of recipients without any transfusion of RBCs (P < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (P < 0.001) and IAR (P = 0.01) to be independent determinants of the transfusion of RBCs. When comparing all groups, no statistical difference was seen in operative time or in 1-year patient and graft survival rates despite more LTs with a liver from a DCD donor in the A+S+ group (P = 0.005). In conclusion, next to a lower laboratory MELD score, the use of IAR leads to a significantly lower need for perioperative blood transfusion. There was no significant interaction between IAR and TPCS. Furthermore, the use of a TPCS and/or IAR does not lead to increased operative time and is therefore a reasonable alternative surgical strategy.

Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Expanded clinical and surgical techniques in liver transplantation can markedly improve patient and graft survival. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative portocaval shunts in liver transplantation.

Material/Methods

Searches were conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, and updated in January 2018. The following specific outcomes of interest were defined and evaluated separated using 2 different reviews and meta-analyses for 1) hemi-portocaval shunt (HPCS) and 2) temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS). Comparative studies were analyzed separately for both surgical portocaval shunt modalities.

Results

Only 1 well-designed randomized controlled trial was found. Most studies were retrospective or prospective. Initially, we found 1479 articles. Of those selected, 853 were from PubMed/MEDLINE, 32 were from Cochrane and 594 were from EMBASE. Our meta-analysis included a total of 3232 patients for all the included studies. Results found that 41 patients with HPCS experienced increased 1-year patient survival (OR 16.33; P=0.02) and increased 1-year graft survival (OR 17.67; P=0.01). The TPCS analysis with 1633 patients found patients had significantly shorter intensive care unit length of stay (days) (P=0.006) and hospital length of stay (P=0.02) and had decreased primary nonfunction (PNF) (OR 0.30, P=0.02) and mortality rates (OR 0.52, P=0.01).

Conclusions

Intraoperative surgical portosystemic shunt in relation to liver transplantation with TPCS was able to prevent PNF, decrease hospital length of stay and unit care length of stay. Furthermore, in analyzing data for patients with HPCS, we observed increases in the 1-year graft and patient survival rates. More prospective randomized trials are needed to arrive at a more precise conclusion.

Benefits of temporary portocaval shunt during orthotopic liver transplantation with vena cava preservation: A propensity score analysis

During orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), clamping of the portal vein induces splanchnic venous congestion and accumulation of noxious compounds. These adverse effects could increase ischemia/reperfusion injury and subsequently the risk of graft dysfunction, especially for grafts harvested from extended criteria donors (ECDs). Temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) could prevent these complications. Between 2002 and 2013, all OLTs performed in our center were retrospectively analyzed and a propensity score matching analysis was used to compare the effect of TPCS in 686 patients (343 in each group). Patients in the TPCS group required fewer intraoperative transfusions (median number of packed red blood cells-5 versus 6; P = 0.02; median number of fresh frozen plasma-5 versus 6; P = 0.02); had improvement of postoperative biological parameters (prothrombin time, Factor V, international normalized ratio, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels); and showed significant reduction of biliary complications (4.7% versus 10.2%; P = 0.006). Survival analysis revealed that TPCS improved 3-month graft survival (94.2% versus 88.6%; P = 0.01) as well as longterm survival of elderly (ie, age > 70 years) donor grafts (P = 0.02). In conclusion, the use of TPCS should be recommended especially when considering an ECD graft. Liver Transplantation 23 174-183 2017 AASLD.

Influence of preoperative propranolol on cardiac index during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation is the best therapeutic option for end-stage liver disease. Non-selective beta-blocker medications such as propranolol act directly on the cardiovascular system and are often used in the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding resulting from HP. The effects of propranolol on cardiovascular system of cirrhotic patients during liver transplantation are not known.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the influence of propranolol used preoperatively on cardiac index during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.

METHOD

101 adult patients (73 male [72.2%]) who underwent cadaveric donor orthotopic liver transplantation by piggyback technique with preservation of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava performed at Hospital das Clinicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais were evaluated. There was no difference in severity between groups by the MELD system, p=0.70. The preoperative use of propranolol and the cardiac index outcome were compared during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation in 5 groups (I: increased cardiac index, II: cardiac index reduction lower than 16%, III: cardiac index reduction equal to or greater than 16% and less than 31%, IV: cardiac index reduction equal to or greater than 31% and less than 46%, V: cardiac index reduction equal to or greater than 46%).

RESULTS

Patients in group I (46.4%) who received propranolol preoperatively were statistically similar to groups II (60%), III (72.7%), IV (50%) and V (30.8%), p=0.57.

CONCLUSION

The use of propranolol before transplantation as prophylaxis for gastrointestinal bleeding may be considered safe, as it was not associated with worsening of cardiac index in anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.

Impact of preoperative α-fetoprotein level on disease-free survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Preoperative α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels may have an influence on disease-free survival (DFS) of patients after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located on a cirrhotic liver.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2009, two groups were distinguished according to preoperative AFP level: normal-level group (<10 ng/ml) and increased-level group (>10 ng/ml). The increased-level group was further divided into three levels of preoperative AFP: 10-150, 150-500, and ≥ 500 ng/ml. DFS and recurrence rates were compared. All patients underwent transplantation using the preoperative 5/5 criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 122 patients in this study, 63 had normal and 59 had increased preoperative AFP. There were no differences between the two groups concerning perioperative or pathologic data. Those with an increased preoperative AFP level had a significantly shorter 5-year DFS, and their recurrence rate was higher than that of the normal AFP group. The 5-year DFS and recurrence rates were 71 and 4 %, respectively, for those with normal AFP; 57 and 10 %, respectively, for those with AFP 10-150 ng/ml; 46 and 24 %, respectively, for those with AFP 150-500 ng/ml; and 28 and 62 %, respectively, for those with AFP ≥ 500 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the prognostic value of preoperative AFP levels on DFS after a liver transplant for HCC in a population of patients undergoing transplantation with the same preoperative criteria.

The beneficial impact of temporary porto-caval shunt in orthotopic liver transplantation: a single center analysis

The use of temporary porto-caval shunt (TPCS) has been shown to improve hemodynamic stability and renal function in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We evaluated the impact of TPCS in OLT and analyzed the differences according to model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), donor risk index (DRI) and D-MELD. This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 148 consecutive OLT. Fifty-eight OLT were performed using TPCS and 90 without TPCS. Donor and recipient data with pre-OLT, intraoperative and postoperative variables were reviewed. Overall graft survival was 89.9% at 3 months and 81.7% at 1 year. Graft survival at 3 months and 1 year was 93.1% and 79.2%, respectively, in TPCS group versus 85.6% and 82.2%, respectively, in non-TPCS group (P = NS). Intraoperative packed red blood cells requirement was lower in TPCS group (7.5 ± 5.8 vs. 12.2 ± 14.2, P = 0.006) and non-TPCS group required higher intraoperative total dose of phenylephrine (16% vs. 28%, P = 0.04). TPCS group had lower 30-day postoperative mortality (1.7% vs. 10%, P = 0.04), no difference was observed at 90 days. Graft survival was lower in patients with high DRI; in this group graft loss was higher at 1 month (25% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.005) and 3 months (25% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.005) when TPCS was not used. TPCS improves perioperative outcome, this being more evident when high-risk grafts are placed into high-risk patients.

Postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation for cirrhosis: outcome and predictors

During orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), a marked decrease in blood pressure following unclamping of the portal vein and liver reperfusion is frequently observed and is termed postreperfusion syndrome (PRS). The predictive factors and clinical consequences of PRS are not fully understood. The goal of this study was to identify predictors of PRS and morbidity/mortality associated with its occurrence during OLT in patients with cirrhosis. During a 3-year period, all consecutive OLT procedures performed in patients with cirrhosis were studied. Exclusion criteria were OLT for acute liver failure, early retransplantation, combined liver/kidney transplantation, and living-donor related transplantation. PRS was defined as a decrease in the mean arterial pressure of more than 30% of the value observed in the anhepatic stage, for more than 1 minute during the first 5 minutes after reperfusion of the graft. Transplantation was performed with preservation of the inferior vena cava with or without temporary portocaval shunt. Associations between PRS and donor and recipient demographic data, recipient operative and postoperative outcomes were tested with bivariate statistics. Independent predictors of PRS were determined in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Of the 75 patients included in the study, 20 patients (25%) developed PRS. In a multivariable analysis, absence of a portocaval shunt [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 4.42 (1.18-17.6)] and duration of cold ischemia [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.34 (1.07-1.72)] were independent predictors of PRS. Patients who experienced PRS displayed more postoperative renal failure and lower early (<15 days after OLT) survival (80% versus 96%; P = 0.04). In conclusion, the absence of portocaval shunt and the duration of cold ischemia were independent predictors of intraoperative PRS. PRS was associated with significant adverse postoperative outcome. These results provide realistic clinical targets to improve patient outcome after OLT for cirrhosis.

Biological changes after liver transplantation according to the presence or not of graft steatosis

AIM

To assess the consequences of graft steatosis on postoperative liver function as compared with normal liver grafts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2007, liver transplant patients were prospectively included, excluding those who experienced arterial or biliary complications or presented acute rejection. All patients had a surgical biopsy after reperfusion. Patients were compared according to the rate of macrovacuolar steatosis: namely above or below 20%.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included: 10 in the steatosis group and 43 in the control group. No significant difference was observed in terms of morbidity, mortality, and primary non- or poor function. Nevertheless, biological changes after the procedure were significantly different during the first postoperative week. Prothrombin time, serum bilirubin, and transaminases were significantly increased among the steatosis group compared with the control group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

This case-controlled study including a small number of patients, described postoperative biological changes among liver transplantations with steatosis in the graft.

Temporary portocaval shunt in orthotopic liver transplantation: need for a standardized approach?

Maintenance of portal and systemic venous return during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation (LT) improves hemodynamic stability. With the piggyback technique, caval return is maintained; however, temporary clamping of the portal vein is still necessary. The use of a temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) has been proposed to minimize the effect of portal venous interruption. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is evidence to support the routine use of a TPCS in LT. An electronic search of the literature from 1963 to 2007 was performed. A total of 4386 articles were identified, of which 8 met all the criteria and were included in the study. Because of the variability in reporting and the small number of studies, statistical comparison was not possible; however, a trend toward a shorter operative time, less blood product transfusion, and maintenance of higher mean arterial pressures during portal vein clamping was seen in patients with a TPCS. In conclusion, the available evidence, albeit scarce, supports the use of a TPCS in patients undergoing LT. A prospective randomized study of patients most likely to benefit from a TPCS is necessary to substantiate these findings.

Transfusion Requirements During Liver Transplantation: Impact of a Temporary Portacaval Shunt

We evaluated the consumption of blood products during liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients association with the placement of a temporary portacaval shunt (TPCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively divided 349 cirrhotic patients transplanted in our unit between March 1997 and October 2005 into two groups: transplants without a TPCS (group I, 189 cases) and those with a TPCS (group II, 160 cases). In all cases, we preserved the inferior vena cava (piggyback). The dependent variables were consumption of blood-derived products (banked red cells, recovered red cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets), surgery time, kidney function, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Consumption of blood products was significantly lower among patients who received a TPCS. In group II, no platelet transfusion was required in 54% of the patients, and no banked red cells in 12% compared with 18% and 3%, respectively, among group I patients (P < .005). The mean overall transplant procedure time was 74 minutes shorter in group II (361 minutes) compared with group I (435 minutes) (P < .001). The overall hospital stay was shorter among patients transplanted after TPCS.

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation with a TPCS was accompanied by a reduction in the intraoperative use of blood-derived products, especially platelet transfusion. Among other advantages, this reduction resulted in a shorter posttransplant hospital stay.

Blood salvage autotransfusion during transplantation for hepatocarcinoma: does it increase the risk of neoplastic recurrence?

Impact of intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion (IBSA) on neoplastic recurrence. during liver transplantations for hepatocellular carcinoma (LT-HCC). Between January 1989 and February 2003, 16 patients received a LT-HCC without IBSA. This group was compared with 31 patients who received the same surgical procedure during the same period, but with IBSA. Data were prospectively collected. All patients had at least a 1-year postoperative follow up. Pairing was made according to the size of the largest nodule. The percentage of recurrence observed in the two groups was similar: 6.4% in the IBSA group vs. 6.3% in the group without IBSA. The median amount of transfused salvage blood was 1558 ml. The differences observed between the two groups concerned the Child score which was A in 58% patients of the IBSA group vs. 80% in the other group; the percentage of severe portal hypertension was 55% in the IBSA group vs. 31%; the median number of packed red blood cell units transfused intraoperatively was 7 in the IBSA group vs. 0, and the median number of frozen fresh plasma units transfused intraoperatively was 11 in the IBSA group vs. 4.5. It appears that IBSA, essentially used during the most haemorrhagic transplantations, could be used in the case of HCC because it does not modify the risk of neoplastic recurrence.