Treatment of steroid-resistant acute liver transplant rejection with basiliximab

Rejection in Liver Transplantation Recipients

Rejection following liver transplantation continues to impact transplant recipients although rates have decreased over time with advances in immunosuppression management. The diagnosis of rejection remains challenging with liver biopsy remaining the reference standard for diagnosis. Proper classification of rejection type and severity is imperative as this guides management and ultimately graft preservation. Future areas of promise include non-invasive testing for detection of rejection to reduce the morbidity associated with invasive testing and further advances in immunosuppression management to reduce toxicities associated with immunosuppression while minimizing rejection related morbidity.

Immunosuppressive Drugs in Liver Transplant: An Insight

Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard of care for end-stage liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Over the years, immunosuppression regimens have improved, resulting in enhanced graft and patient survival. At present, the side effects of immunosuppressive agents are a significant threat to post-LT quality of life and long-term outcome. The role of personalized immunosuppression is to reach a delicate balance between optimal immunosuppression and minimal side effects. Today, immunosuppression in LT is more of an art than a science. There are no validated markers for overimmunosuppression and underimmunosuppression, only a few drugs have therapeutic drug monitoring and immunosuppression regimens vary from center to center. The immunosuppressive agents are broadly classified into biological agents and pharmacological agents. Most regimens use multiple agents with different modes of action to reduce the dosage and minimize the toxicities. The calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related toxicities are reduced by antibody induction or using mTOR inhibitor/antimetabolites as CNI sparing or CNI minimization strategies. Post-liver transplant immunosuppression has an intensive phase in the first three months when alloreactivity is high, followed by a maintenance phase when immunosuppression minimization protocols are implemented. Over time some patients achieve "tolerance," defined as the successful stopping of immunosuppression with good graft function and no indication of rejection. Cell-based therapy using immune cells with tolerogenic potential is the future and may permit complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive agents.

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab as initial immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A single center study

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist; basiliximab is used to allow delayed introduction of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) after liver transplantation and thus delay their renal insult. However, there is only little evidence for the safety and the efficacy of this regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of basiliximab induction in liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 89 patients who were classified into two groups: standard triple immunosuppression (IS) regimen of steroid, tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 47) and induction IS regimen of basiliximab, low dose steroids and MMF with delayed introduction of CNI (n = 42). All patients were followed after liver transplantation for at least six months or until death.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient survival, graft dysfunction, infection rate or type, or wound healing between both groups. The acute rejection rate was equivalent in both groups. Renal dysfunction in the first six months post-transplant was less in the basiliximab group in comparison to the other group (7.1% and 19.1% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab-induced IS protocol is a safe regimen that reduces medium-term renal dysfunction and achieves similar survival without increasing the acute rejection or infection rate in liver transplantation recipients.

Acute and Chronic Rejection After Liver Transplantation: What A Clinician Needs to Know

While antibody mediated hyper-acute vasculitic rejection is rare in liver transplant recipients, acute and chronic rejection have clinical significance. The liver allograft behaves differently to other solid organ transplants as acute rejection generally does not impair graft survival and chronic rejection (CR) is uncommon. The incidence of acute and chronic rejection has declined in current era due to improved immunosuppressive regimens. Acute rejection generally improves with steroid boluses and steroid resistant rejection is uncommon. CR may improve with escalation of immunosuppression or may result in irreversible loss of graft function leading to retransplantation or death. The current review discusses diagnosis and management of acute and chronic liver allograft rejection.

Management of Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation outcomes have significantly improved over the past few decades owing largely to the introduction of effective immunosuppression medications. Further comprehension of the unique immune microenvironment of the liver has led to the development of newer molecular targeted therapeutics. Understanding the mechanism of action and adverse effect profiles of these medications is crucial for appropriate management of posttransplant patients. In this review, the author describes the immunologic response elicited by liver transplantation, chronicles the various immunosuppressant drug classes, discusses the evidence behind their use, and evaluates the management of special subpopulations of posttransplantation patients.

Review on immunosuppression in liver transplantation

The optimal level of immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation, in particular for the liver, is a delicate balance between the benefit of preventing rejection and the adverse side effects of immunosuppression. There is uncertainty about when this level is achieved in any individual recipient. Immunosuppression regimens vary between individual centers and changes with time as new agents and data are available. Presently concerns about the adverse side effects of calcineurin inhibitor, the main class of immunosuppressive agents used in liver transplantation (LT), has led to consideration of the use of antibody induction therapies for patients at higher risk of developing adverse side effects. The longevity of the transplanted organ is potentially improved by better management of rejection episodes and special consideration for tailoring of immunosuppression to the individual with viral hepatitis C, hepatocellular carcinoma or pregnancy. This review provides an overview of the current strategies for post LT immunosuppression and discusses modifications to consider for special patient populations.

Steroid-resistant acute rejection after cadaveric liver transplantation: experience from one single center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Steroid-resistant acute rejection (SRAR) is an infrequent event under current immunosuppressant but still a risk factor leading to graft loss and patients' death after liver transplantation. There are several strategies for managing this complication according to current literatures, but none of the treatment seems convincing and widely accepted. Here we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of a cohort of patients to gain an insight into this complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 962 adult patients receiving whole liver grafts at a single center between January 2004 and December 2012 were studied. One hundred and forty-two recipients experienced 158 episodes of acute rejection after the operation, 14 recipients had no response to steroid bolus treatment. The clinical data was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Incidence rate of acute rejection after liver transplant in our single center was 14.7% (142/962), among them 8.8% (14/158) were steroid-resistant. These episodes occurred on 19days (6-72days) after the operation, 3 were controlled by anti-T3-receptor antibody (OKT3) treatment, 4 were reversed by IL-2 receptor inhibitors combining with MMF treatment, 2 were reversed by antithymocyte globulin (ATG) treatment. Five did not recover and 2 received retransplantation. Mortality associated with SRAR was 28.6% (4/14, 1 died from acute liver failure, 1 from chronic liver failure, 1 from renal failure after retransplantation and 1 from pulmonary infection after OKT3 treatment).

CONCLUSION

SRAR is a severe complication with high mortality after liver transplantation; ATG might serve as a potential treatment.

Anti-thymocyte globulin for the treatment of acute cellular rejection following liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) post-liver transplantation (LT) can usually be reversed with pulse dose steroids. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is used to treat steroid-resistant rejection (SRR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report 15 male and five female LT recipients with a median age of 48.3 (range 14.3-71.7) years, who received ATG for biopsy-proven steroid-resistant rejection (n =13), severe rejection (6), and severe rejection/recurrent autoimmune hepatitis (n = 1) median 42 (range 6-2,456) days following LT.

RESULTS

Underlying liver diseases included HCV (n = 7), alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 3), NASH (n = 2), HBV (n = 2), autoimmune hepatitis (n =1), PSC (n = 1), miscellaneous (n = 4) including three re LTs. All patients responded to treatment (median AST declined from 172 to 34U/l, median total bilirubin from 9.1 to 1.3 mg/dl; p < 0.001). Three patients developed recurrent ACR, and none chronic rejection. All HCV patients developed recurrence with significant rises in HCV RNA levels. Infections included pneumonia, sepsis, intraabdominal infection, chronic diarrhea, wound infection, EBV, and CMV disease. After a median follow-up of 65.5 (range 4.3-101.7) months post-ATG and median 67.7 (range 9.3-306.3) months post-LT, 17 patients are alive, two died from sepsis/multi-organ failure and one from HCV recurrence.

CONCLUSION

ATG effectively reversed severe and SSR; HCV recurrence and infections remain significant complications.