Role of Dietary Salt Intake in Posttransplant Hypertension With Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression

A holistic review of sodium intake in kidney transplant patients: More questions than answers

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment option for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Acute rejection rates have decreased drastically in recent years but chronic kidney allograft disease (CKAD) is still an important cause of allograft failure and return to dialysis. Thus, there is unmet need to identify and reverse the cause of CKAD. Additionally, cardiovascular events after KT are still leading causes of morbidity and mortality. One overlooked potential contributor to CKAD and adverse cardiovascular events is increased sodium/salt intake in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). In general population, the adverse effects of high sodium intake are well known but in KTRs, there is a paucity of evidence despite decades of experience with KT. Limited research showed that sodium intake is high in most KTRs. Moreover, excess sodium intake is associated with elevated blood pressure and albuminuria in some studies involving KTRs. There is also experimental evidence suggesting that increased sodium intake is associated with histologic graft damage. Critical knowledge gaps still remain, including the exact amount of sodium restriction needed in KTRs to optimize outcomes and allograft survival. Additionally, best methods to measure sodium intake and practices to follow-up are not clarified in KTRs. To meet these deficits, prospective long term studies are warranted in KTRs. Moreover, preventive measures must be determined and implemented both at individual and societal levels to achieve sodium restriction in KTRs.

Treatment of Hypertension Because of Immunosuppressive Therapy After Solid Organ Transplantation-Pharmacological Approach

ABSTRACT

Solid organs transplantation procedures have been performed for more than half a century. Growing knowledge of immune response and development of new immunosuppressive regimens guarantee more and more successful outcomes. However, many of the applied drugs lead to cardiovascular complications, the most frequent of which is hypertension. This article describes epidemiology, pathogenetic mechanisms, and treatment of hypertension induced by immunosuppressive medication. The main impact is focused on drugs belonging to the following groups: calcineurin inhibitors, the inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin, and glucocorticosteroids. We analyze the mechanism of action of the main hypertensive drugs and their influence on the reversing hypertonic action of the immunosuppressive agents. In the absence of current guidelines addressing this problem, this article is an attempt to fill the gap, helping clinicians to choose proper medication.

Diet adherence dynamics and physiological responses to a tomato product whole-food intervention in African-American men

Tomatoes may have beneficial effects on prostate health. Efficacy trials would require long-term adherence to high levels of tomato product (TP) consumption. Therefore, factors that affect adherence in men most at risk and whether increased consumption of TP negatively affects diet and health are important concerns. Cancer-free African–American (AA) men (n 36) with mean serum prostate-specific antigen of 7.4 SD 5.6) ng/ml were randomised to consume one serving of TP/d or a control diet for 3 months. Mean intervention group lycopene intake rose to 464%, with negligible control group increase. Plasma lycopene levels rose by 53 and 40% in the intervention group in months 1 and 3, respectively (P < 0.0001), with no control group change. The intervention group’s barriers to adherence score was inversely associated with both dietary (r -0.49, P = 0.02) and plasma lycopene concentration (r -0.37, P = 0.02). Their TP disadvantage score negatively correlated with the 3-month plasma lycopene concentrations (r -0.37, P = 0.008) and their weekly incentives and impediments were remarkably stable, ‘concern for prostate health’ being the most consistent over time. ‘Liking tomatoes’ and ‘study participation’ decreased in citation frequency at weeks 6 and 9, respectively. No major shifts occurred in dietary cholesterol or saturated fat, with no adverse effects on gastrointestinal complaints, serum total cholesterol, body weight or blood pressure. Lower socio-economic status AA men at higher prostate cancer risk can successfully achieve a whole food intervention goal with a corresponding rise in plasma lycopene concentrations, with no adverse effects on self-selected diet quality or health parameters.

Urinary and dietary sodium and potassium associated with blood pressure control in treated hypertensive kidney transplant recipients: an observational study

Background

In kidney transplant (Kt) recipients , hypertension is a major risk for cardiovascular complications but also for graft failure. Blood pressure (BP) control is therefore mandatory. Office BP (OBP) remains frequently used for clinical decisions, however home BP (HBP) have brought a significant improvement in the BP control. Sodium is a modifiable risk factor, many studies accounted for a decrease of BP with a sodium restricted diet. Increased potassium intake has been also recommended in hypertension management. Using an agreement between office and home BP, the present study investigated the relations between the BP control in Kt recipients and their urinary excretion and dietary consumption of sodium and potassium.

Methods

The BP control defined by OBP <140/90 mmHg and HBP <135/85 mmHg was tested in 70 Kt recipients (mean age 56 ± 11.5 years; mean graft survival 7 ± 6.6 years) treated with antihypertensive medications. OBP and HBP were measured with a validated oscillometric device (Omron M6®). The 24-hour urinary sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) excretions as well as dietary intakes were compared between controlled and uncontrolled (in office and at home) recipients. Non parametric Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney Test was used for between groups comparisons and Fisher's exact test for frequencies comparisons. Pearson correlation coefficients and paired t-test were used when sample size was >30.

Results

Using an agreement between OBP and HBP, we identified controlled (21%) and uncontrolled recipients (49%). Major confounding effects susceptible to interfere with the BP regulation did not differ between groups, the amounts of sodium excretion were similar (154 ± 93 vs 162 ± 88 mmol/24 h) but uncontrolled patients excreted less potassium (68 ± 14 vs 54 ± 20 mmol/24 h; P = 0.029) and had significantly lower potassium intakes (3279 ± 753 vs 2208 ± 720 mg/24 h; P = 0.009), associated with a higher urinary Na+/K + ratio. Systolic HBP was inversely and significantly correlated to urinary potassium (r = −0.48; P = 0.002), a positive but non significant relation was observed with urinary sodium (r = 0,30;P = 0.074).

Conclusions

Half of the treated hypertensive Kt recipients remained uncontrolled in office and at home. Restoring a well-balanced sodium/potassium ratio intakes could be a non pharmacological opportunity to improve blood pressure control.

Sodium intake and blood pressure in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is common among renal transplant recipients (RTR) and a risk factor for graft failure and mortality. Sodium intake is a well-established determinant of blood pressure (BP) in the general population. However, data in RTR are limited. International guidelines recommend a maximum daily sodium intake of 70 mmol. We investigated sodium intake in RTR as compared to healthy controls and its association with BP.

METHODS

We included 660 RTR (age 53 ± 13 years, 58% male) and 201 healthy controls (age 54 ± 11 years, 46% male). Sodium intake was assessed from 24-h urine collections. The morning after completion of urine collection, BP was measured according to a strict protocol.

RESULTS

Urinary sodium excretion was 156 ± 62 mmol/24 h in RTR and 195 ± 75 in controls (difference: P < 0.001), and 95% of RTR had a urinary sodium excretion >70 mmol/24 h. Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were 136 ± 18 and 82 ± 11 mmHg, respectively. Sodium intake was positively associated with SBP (β = 0.042 mmHg/mmol/24 h, P = 0.002) and DBP (β = 0.023 mmHg/mmol/24 h, P = 0.007), independent of potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RTR had a lower sodium intake than healthy controls, their intake still exceeded current guidelines. Reduction of sodium intake to recommended amounts could reduce SBP by 4-5 mmHg. Better control of sodium intake may help to prevent graft failure and mortality due to hypertension among RTR.

Hypertension in special populations: chronic kidney disease, organ transplant recipients, pregnancy, autonomic dysfunction, racial and ethnic populations

The benefits of appropriate blood pressure (BP) control include reductions in proteinuria and possibly a slowing of the progressive loss of kidney function. Overall, medication therapy to lower BP during pregnancy should be used mainly for maternal safety because of the lack of data to support an improvement in fetal outcome. The major goal of hypertension treatment in those with baroreceptor dysfunction is to avoid the precipitous, severe BP elevations that characteristically occur during emotional stimulation. The treatment of hypertension in African Americans optimally consists of comprehensive lifestyle modifications along with pharmacologic treatments, most often with combination, not single-drug, therapy.

Hypertension after pediatric cardiac transplantation: detection, etiology, implications and management

While it may rescue children with end-stage heart failure from impending catastrophe, cardiac transplantation leaves 50-70% of pediatric recipients with new-onset hypertension. Given the unique vulnerability of the heart and kidneys in these children, we can expect long-term uncontrolled hypertension to shorten both graft and patient survival. In this review we discuss the multi-factorial etiology of post-transplant hypertension, highlighting current uncertainties and emphasizing mechanisms specific to cardiac recipients. We consider the optimal means of monitoring BP and in particular, the advantages of 24 h-ABP over intermittent clinic measurements. We also review BP treatment after cardiac transplantation, drawing attention to specific cautions appropriate when prescribing antihypertensive agents in these circumstances.

Reducing the risks of cardiovascular disease in liver allograft recipients

Liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of death from cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease. We propose the following strategy of risk-reduction, based on currently available literature. Lifestyle: standard advice should be given (avoidance of smoking, excess alcohol and obesity, adequate exercise, reduction of excess sodium intake). Hypertension: target blood pressure should be 140/90 mmHg or lower, but for those with diabetes or renal disease, 130/80 mmHg or lower. For patients without proteinuria, antihypertensive therapy should be initiated with a calcium channel blocker and for those with proteinuria, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker. If monotherapy fails to achieve adequate response, calcium channel blockers and ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers should be combined. If hypertension remains uncontrolled, an alpha-blocker may be added. Consideration should be given to changing immunosuppression and avoiding use of calcineurin inhibitors. Diabetes: recipients should be regularly screened for diabetes. For patients with new-onset diabetes after transplant, stepwise therapy should be guided by HbA1c concentrations, as with type II diabetes mellitus. Hyperlipidemia: annual screening of lipid profile should be undertaken, with treatment thresholds and targets based on those advocated for the high risk general population. Dietary intervention is appropriate for all patients. A statin should be considered as the first line treatment to achieve specified targets. In patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor, Pravastatin should be commenced at a dose of 10 mg/day. In patients receiving other forms of immunosuppression, pravastatin may be commenced at a dose of 20 mg/day. Liver tests should be monitored and patients warned to report myalgia. If monotherapy is inadequate, ezetimibe or a fibrate may be added. Consideration may be given to change in immunosuppression if combination lipid-lowering therapy proves inadequate.