Late Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection: New Therapeutic Options?

Everolimus in different combinations as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in heart transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

We examined the experiences of heart transplant recipients receiving everolimus as maintenance therapy in different combinations over a long time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2009, forty patients (29 men, 11 women; mean age, 51.6 y) were switched from a routine immunosuppressive regimen to everolimus. Indications were other (2), renal insufficiency (17), cardiac allograft vasculopathy (14), and ongoing cellular rejection (7). Combinations were either along with cyclosporine (24), mycophenolate mofetil (14), or others (2). Indications for the introduction of everolimus including safety, efficacy, different combinations of everolimus, biopsy-proven acute rejections, renal function, and infections were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Five patients died, 4 of them were still on everolimus at the time of death; they died from intracerebral hemorrhage (1), embolism (1), cardiac arrest (2), and unknown (1). Everolimus was discontinued in 6 patients owing to severe adverse effects: Edema (2), gastrointestinal adverse effects (3), and dermal adverse effects (1). Mean everolimus trough levels were 5.8 μmol/L at 6 months and 4.9 at 60 months. Mean cyclosporine levels were 67.62 μmol/L at 6 months and 47.3 μmol/L at 60 months. Mean serum creatinine levels were stable (147.9 μmol/L after 60 months). Four life-threatening infections (all pneumonia) occurred but resulted in complete recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus is safe with different immunosuppressive combinations after receiving a heart transplant.

Recommendations for the use of everolimus (Certican) in heart transplantation: results from the second German-Austrian Certican Consensus Conference

Everolimus (Certican; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) represents the latest generation of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs). Everolimus is indicated for use as an immunosuppressive drug in renal and heart transplantation. This report reflects the recommendations of the second German-Austrian Certican Consensus Conference, held in January 2006, for the clinical use of everolimus.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression using everolimus (Certican) in maintenance heart transplant recipients: 6 months' follow-up

BACKGROUND

Everolimus is a proliferation signal-inhibitor recently introduced in heart transplant recipients. To date, little is known about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression using everolimus. This study reports the results of CNI-free immunosuppression using everolimus.

METHODS

During a continuous 9-month period, 60 heart transplant recipients were enrolled. Reasons for switching to everolimus were side effects associated with prior CNI immunosuppression. All patients underwent standardized switching protocols and completed 6 months of follow-up. Blood was obtained for lipid status, renal function, routine controls, and levels of immunosuppressive agents. Echocardiography and a physical examination were performed on Days 0, 14, 28, and then every 3 months.

RESULTS

After switching to everolimus, most patients recovered from the side effects associated with CNIs. Renal function improved significantly after 6 months (creatinine, 2.1 +/- 0.6 vs 1.5 +/- 0.9 mg/dl, p = 0.001; creatinine clearance, 42.2 +/- 21.6 vs 61.8 +/- 23.4 ml/[min x 1.73 m2], p = 0.018). Arterial hypertension improved after 3 months and remained decreased during the observation period. Tremor, peripheral edema, hirsutism, and gingival hyperplasia markedly improved. Adverse events occurred in 8 patients (13.3%), including interstitial pneumonia (n = 2), skin disorders (n = 2), reactivated hepatitis B (n = 1), and fever of unknown origin (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary data suggest that CNI-free immunosuppression using everolimus is safe, with excellent efficacy in maintenance heart transplant recipients. Arterial hypertension and renal function improved significantly. CNI-induced side effects such as tremor, peripheral edema, hirsutism, and gingival hyperplasia markedly improved in most patients.

New advances in antirejection therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevention and treatment of rejection have been the major focus of clinical and research studies since the inception of heart transplantation. Recent improvement in survival after transplant has been in large part due to continued advancement in antirejection therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The combination of steroids/cyclosporine/azathioprine has been widely used since the early 1980s. The last decade has seen the increasing use of the drugs mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. Newer agents such as target of rapamycin protein inhibitors and anti-interleukin-2 inhibitors have come under intense research recently, and may play a significant role in heart transplantation. Further study is required for agents such as rituximab. With the recent introduction of a new grading of cardiac allograft rejection, controversy remains over when rejection should be treated and which agents should be used.

SUMMARY

Use of newer proven antirejection drugs has reduced rejection and improved survival after heart transplantation. Rejection and side effects from these drugs are still major problems, however; therefore continued research in this area is required.