1
|
Pegoraro F, Santangelo D, Santangelo A, Pelosio L, Jamshidi A, Camera L, Imbriaco M, Mainolfi CG, Insabato L, Accarino R, Giuliano M, Carlomagno N, D'Alessandro V, Santangelo ML. R0 surgical resection of giant dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas in the COVID era with and without nephrectomy: A case report. Oncol Lett 2023; 26:410. [PMID: 37600332 PMCID: PMC10436160 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are rare findings that can grow into large masses without eliciting severe symptoms. At present, surgical resection is the only radical therapy, whenever it can be performed with the aim to achieve a complete removal of the tumor. The present report describes two consecutive cases of RPSs that resulted in dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPSs) and these patients underwent R0 surgical resection with and without a nephron-sparing procedure. The diagnostic workup, the surgical approach, the impact of late surgical management due to the COVID pandemic and the latest literature on the topic are discussed and analyzed. The patients, who refused to undergo any medical examination during the prior 2 years due to the COVID pandemic, were admitted to Federico II University Hospital (Naples, Italy) complaining about weight loss and general abdominal discomfort. In the first case, a primitive giant abdominal right neoplasm of retroperitoneal origin enveloping and medializing the right kidney was observed. The second patient had a similar primitive retroperitoneal giant left neoplasm, which did not affect the kidney. Given the characteristics of the masses and the absence of distant metastases, after a multidisciplinary discussion, radical surgical removal was carried out for both patients. The lesions appeared well-defined from the surrounding tissues, and markedly compressed all the adjacent organs, without signs of infiltration. In the first patient, the right kidney was surrounded and undetachable from the tumor and it was removed en bloc with the mass. The second patient benefited from a nephron-sparing resection, due to the existence of a clear cleavage plane. The postoperative courses were uneventful. Both the histological examinations were oriented towards a DDLPS and both patients benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, the treatment of giant RPS is still challenging and requires multidisciplinary treatment as well as, when possible, radical surgical removal. The lack of tissue infiltration and the avoidance of excision or reconstruction of major organs (including the kidney) could lead to an easier postoperative course and an improved prognosis. When possible, surgical management of recurrences or incompletely resected masses must be pursued. Since the COVID pandemic caused limited medicalization of a number of population groups and delayed diagnosis of other oncologic diseases, an increased number of DDLPSs could be expected in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Pegoraro
- Operative Unit of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Domenico Santangelo
- Department of Radiology, ‘Scientific Hospitalization and Treatment Institute’ San Raffaele Hospital, I-20132 Milano, Italy
| | - Alfonso Santangelo
- Department of General Surgery and Emergency Surgery, ‘Scientific Hospitalization and Treatment Institute’ San Raffaele Hospital, I-20132 Milano, Italy
| | - Luigi Pelosio
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Retroperitoneal Diseases, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Akbar Jamshidi
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Retroperitoneal Diseases, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Camera
- Operative Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Imbriaco
- Operative Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Ciro Gabriele Mainolfi
- Operative Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Insabato
- Operative Unit of Pathology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Rossella Accarino
- Operative Unit of Pathology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Giuliano
- Operative Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Carlomagno
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo D'Alessandro
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Retroperitoneal Diseases, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Michele L. Santangelo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, Federico II University Hospital, I-80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Calogero A, Sagnelli C, Peluso G, Sica A, Candida M, Campanile S, Minieri G, Incollingo P, Creta M, Pelosio L, Tammaro V, Scotti A, Jamshidi A, Caggiano M, Sagnelli E, Dodaro CA, Carlomagno N, Santangelo M. Physical activity in elderly kidney transplant patients with multiple renal arteries. Minerva Med 2020; 113:119-127. [PMID: 32338484 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4806.20.06573-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kidney transplantation (KT) is the gold standard for treatment of patients with end- stage-renal disease. To expand the donor reserve, it is necessary to use marginal/suboptimal kidneys. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the short/long-term outcome of 34 KT elderly patients who received allografts with vascular abnormalities (MRA group), in comparison with 34 KT patients who received a kidney with a single renal artery (SRA group) pair-matched by age, length of time on dialysis, comorbidity and donor age. RESULTS All participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire at KT, and then 4, 8, and 12 weeks after transplantation. Our data indicate that kidney with vascular anatomical variants may be successfully transplanted, since the overall rate of surgical complications was 20.6% in the SRA group and 17.6% in the MRA group and that the 5-year survival rate after KT was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The data also underline that individualized physical activity programs induced similar excellent results in both groups, improving physical capacities, arterial pressure, lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, quality of life and physical and mental status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armando Calogero
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Department of Nephrology, Urology, General Surgery and Kidney Transplants, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Caterina Sagnelli
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Gaia Peluso
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonello Sica
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Candida
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Campanile
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Minieri
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Incollingo
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, General Surgery and Kidney Transplants, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Pelosio
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tammaro
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scotti
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Akbar Jamshidi
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Caggiano
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Evangelista Sagnelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy -
| | - Concetta A Dodaro
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Department of Nephrology, Urology, General Surgery and Kidney Transplants, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Carlomagno
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Santangelo
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Department of Nephrology, Urology, General Surgery and Kidney Transplants, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peluso G, Incollingo P, Campanile S, Menkulazi M, Scotti A, Tammaro V, Calogero A, Dodaro C, Carlomagno N, Santangelo ML. Relation Between Wound Complication and Lymphocele After Kidney Transplantation: A Monocentric Study. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:1562-1565. [PMID: 32299707 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Wound complication frequently arises after kidney transplantation and its risk factors are well known. In a previous paper we analyzed these factors, and in this new retrospective study we evaluate the influence of lymphocele in the development of wound complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2000 to December 2018, 731 consecutive kidney transplants have been performed in our center. We have analyzed the incidence of wound complication and lymphocele and their risk factors. RESULTS Out of 731 kidney transplants, we have observed wound complications in 115 patients (15.7%) and lymphocele in 158 patients (21.7%). Of these, 70 patients developed both complications (9.5%), but 6 patients have been excluded because they were in therapy with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Twenty-nine patients (45.3%) presented a first level and 35 patients (54.7%) showed second level wound complications. Lymphocele was the only present factor in just 3 cases (4.6%). The other patients showed diabetes in 28 cases (43.7%), overweight/obesity in 38 (59.3%), delayed graft function in 17 (26.5%), and 60 years or more in 38 (57.8%). The association has been found in 30 out 64 patients treated with tacrolimus (46.8%) and in 34 with cyclosporine (53.1%); 40 patients did not receive muscular layer's reconstruction (62.5%). CONCLUSION Our experience shows that lymphocele alone is not a predisposing factor for wound dehiscence after kidney transplantation, and they often coexist because they share the same risk factors, the most important being obesity, diabetes and delayed graft function, older age, and surgical techniques. No relation has been observed with calcineurin inhibitor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaia Peluso
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Incollingo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Campanile
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - Marsela Menkulazi
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scotti
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tammaro
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Armando Calogero
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Concetta Dodaro
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Carlomagno
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele L Santangelo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation - Advanced Biomedical Science Department - University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Donor and Recipient Outcomes following Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 2019:1729138. [PMID: 31143770 PMCID: PMC6501265 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1729138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Aims We aimed to summarize available lines of evidence about intraoperative and postoperative donor outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN) as well as outcomes of graft and recipients. Methods A systematic review of PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases was performed in May 2018. The following search terms were combined: nephrectomy, robotic, and living donor. We included full papers that met the following criteria: original research; English language; human studies; enrolling patients undergoing RALDN. Results Eighteen studies involving 910 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean overall operative and warm ischemia times ranged from 139 to 306 minutes and from 1.5 to 5.8 minutes, respectively. Mean estimated blood loss varied from 30 to 146 mL and the incidence of intraoperative complications ranged from 0% to 6.7%. Conversion rate varied from 0% to 5%. The mean hospital length of stay varied from 1 to 5.8 days and incidence of early postoperative complications varied from 0% to 15.7%. No donor mortality was observed. The incidence of delayed graft function was reported in 7 cases. The one- and 10-year graft loss rates were 1% and 22%, respectively. Conclusions Based on preliminary data, RALDN appears as a safe and effective procedure.
Collapse
|
5
|
Armando C, Evangelista S, Massimiliano C, Silvia A, Gaia P, Paola I, Maria C, Gianluca M, Nicola C, Concetta Anna D, Massimo C, Caterina S. Eradication of HCV Infection with the Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Renal Allograft Recipients. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 2019:4674560. [PMID: 31179323 PMCID: PMC6507153 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4674560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection unfavorably affects the survival of both renal patients undergoing hemodialysis and renal transplant recipients. In this subset of patients, the effectiveness and safety of different combinations of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have been analyzed in several small studies. Despite fragmentary, the available data demonstrate that DAA treatment is safe and effective in eradicating HCV infection, with a sustained virologic response (SVR) rates nearly 95% and without an increased risk of allograft rejection. This review article analyzes the results of most published studies on this topic to favor more in-depth knowledge of the readers on the subject. We suggest, however, perseverating in this update as the optimal DAA regimen may not be proposed yet, because of the expected arrival of newer DAAs and of the lack of data from large multicenter randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calogero Armando
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sagnelli Evangelista
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Creta Massimiliano
- Department of Neurosciences, Human Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Angeletti Silvia
- Unit of Clinical Laboratory Science, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Peluso Gaia
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Incollingo Paola
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Candida Maria
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Minieri Gianluca
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlomagno Nicola
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Dodaro Concetta Anna
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ciccozzi Massimo
- Unit of Medical Statistic and Molecular Epidemiology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Sagnelli Caterina
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abdominal wall complications following renal transplantation in adult recipients - factors associated with interventional management in one unit. BMC Surg 2019; 19:10. [PMID: 30665387 PMCID: PMC6341541 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0468-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Abdominal wall surgical site complications following renal transplantation can be challenging to manage. A sub-group of these recipients will require operative management or advanced wound care such as negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). The aim of this study was to determine if there were any preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics in our recipients’ cohort which were associated with the requirement for such interventions. Methods A retrospective review of medical records was performed for all recipients who sustained abdominal wall complications following renal transplantation at our centre from 2006 to 2016. Results A total of 64/828 recipients (7.7%) had abdominal wall complications. The mean weight for these patients was 84.9 kg (±16.6 kg) and the mean body mass index was 30.2 (±5.1). Forty-five recipients (70%) had a superficial wound dehiscence while nine (14%) had a complete fascial dehiscence. Operative intervention was required in 13/64 patients (20%) and was more likely to be required in the presence of a fascial dehiscence (9/9, 100%) or a wound collection (10/31, 32%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.021). NPWT was used in 17/64 patients (27%) and was more commonly required in patients with diabetes mellitus (10/24, 42%), a complete fascial dehiscence (5/9, 56%) or evidence of infection (16/44, 36%) (p = 0.039, p = 0.034, p = 0.008). Conclusions The requirement for either operative management or the use of NPWT in the management of abdominal wall complications following renal transplantation in our experience was more common in recipients with diabetes mellitus, and in the setting of either complete fascial dehiscence, abdominal wall wound collections and/ or infection.
Collapse
|
7
|
Peluso G, Incollingo P, Carlomagno N, D'Alessandro V, Tammaro V, Caggiano M, Sandoval Sotelo ML, Rupealta N, Candida M, Mazzoni G, Campanile S, Chiacchio G, Scotti A, Santangelo ML. Our Timing to Remove Peritoneal Catheter Dialysis After Kidney Transplant. Transplant Proc 2018; 51:160-163. [PMID: 30655154 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.04.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients on peritoneal dialysis treatment represent 15% of the global dialysis population. The major complication of peritoneal dialysis is catheter and peritoneal infection. Peritoneal dialysis patients who receive kidney transplants are at increased risk of infection because of immunosuppressive therapy. AIM The purpose of this study is to show our ideal timing to remove peritoneal catheter after kidney transplant, which gives adequate security on renal function recovery and reduction of septic risk. METHOD OF STUDY We analyzed the outcomes of 65 patients on peritoneal dialysis who underwent kidney transplant between 2000 and 2016. RESULTS In 61 cases there was an immediate graft functional recovery. In 4 cases there was a delayed graft function (DGF), and we performed a hemodialysis with temporary placement of a venous catheter. In all patients we removed peritoneal dialysis catheter 30 to 45 days after transplant. There has been 1 case of catheter infection, which was treated with antibiotic therapy. DISCUSSION Our average time to remove the peritoneal dialysis catheter was shorter than times in previous studies, between the 30th and 45th postoperative day. In the 4 cases in which there has been a DGF, we performed hemodialysis treatment to avoid, in the immediate postoperative period, direct insults to the peritoneum by local dialysis procedures. CONCLUSION Our experience show that the 30th to 45th postoperative day is a good time frame, better yet a good watershed between the safe removal of peritoneal catheter when patients have a stabilized renal function and the possibility of leaving it in situ, to resume peritoneal dialysis in case of persistent DGF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Peluso
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - P Incollingo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - N Carlomagno
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - V D'Alessandro
- Kidney Transplantation Center and Retroperitoneal Surgery, University Hospital Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - V Tammaro
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - M Caggiano
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - M L Sandoval Sotelo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - N Rupealta
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - M Candida
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - G Mazzoni
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - S Campanile
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - G Chiacchio
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - A Scotti
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - M L Santangelo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Incollingo P, Peluso G, Pelosio L, Jamshidi AA, Montanaro V, Dodaro C, Vernillo A, Minieri G, Esposito A, Atontsa F, Capezzuoli L, Apostolico G, Menkulazi M, Paternoster M, Calogero A, Santangelo ML. Ethical Issues in the Use of Suboptimal Kidneys for Transplants: An Italian Point of View. Transplant Proc 2018; 51:106-110. [PMID: 30655131 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The shortage of organs leads to the need for utilizing suboptimal kidneys for transplantation. The distinction between optimal, marginal, and suboptimal kidneys leads surgeons to face not only technical problems but also ethical and legal issues related to clinical advantages offered by the transplant of a nonstandard kidney and the acquisition of consent. Between 1999 and 2015, we performed 658 transplants, 49 (7.5%) using suboptimal kidneys. All patients were alive and with vital graft throughout follow-up. We did not encounter any major surgical complications. From a technical point of view, our experience and literature review confirm that transplant of suboptimal kidney leads to good clinical results but exposes patients to a increased risks of surgical complications. Therefore, these interventions must take place in hospitals fully prepared for this type of surgery and performed by experienced transplant surgeons with proper matching between organ and recipient. Considering the insufficient resources available, from an ethical and legal point of view, doctors play an essential role in optimizing the use of these kidneys by avoiding wastage of organs, ensuring that transplants are done in suitable patients, and that patients are fully informed and aware of the risks and benefits associated with the specific suboptimal kidney being transplanted. We believe that, in highly specialized centers, the number of suboptimal kidney transplants should be increased, as their use has shown good clinical results and carries fewer ethical issues compared with marginal kidneys. Further, suboptimal kidneys may also be proposed for use in young patients with end-stage renal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Incollingo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - G Peluso
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - L Pelosio
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - A A Jamshidi
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - V Montanaro
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - C Dodaro
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - A Vernillo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - G Minieri
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - A Esposito
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - F Atontsa
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - L Capezzuoli
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - G Apostolico
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - M Menkulazi
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - M Paternoster
- Operative Unit of Forensic and Bioethical Medicine, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - A Calogero
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - M L Santangelo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Advanced Biomedical Science Department, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
La transplantation rénale et ses défis. Prog Urol 2016; 26:1001-1044. [PMID: 27720627 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.09.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
10
|
Küper MA, Trütschel S, Weinreich J, Königsrainer A, Beckert S. Growth hormone abolishes the negative effects of everolimus on intestinal wound healing. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:4321-4329. [PMID: 27158200 PMCID: PMC4853689 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i17.4321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Revised: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate whether the simultaneous treatment with human growth hormone (hGH) abolishes the negative effects of everolimus on anastomotic healing.
METHODS: Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley-rats were randomized to three groups of 16 animals each (I: vehicle; II: everolimus 3 mg/kg po; III: everolimus 3 mg/kg po + hGH 2.5 mg/kg sc). Animals were pre-treated with hGH and/or everolimus daily for seven days. Then a standard anastomosis was created in the descending colon and treatment was continued for another seven days. The anastomosis was resected in toto and the bursting pressure was assessed as a mechanical parameter of intestinal healing. Moreover, biochemical (Hydroxyproline, PCNA, MPO, MMP-2 and MMP-9) and histological (cell density, angiogenesis, amount of granulation tissue) parameters of intestinal healing were assessed.
RESULTS: Anastomotic bursting pressure was significantly reduced by everolimus and a simultaneous treatment with hGH resulted in considerably higher values (I: 134 ± 19 mmHg, II: 85 ± 25 mmHg, III: 114 ± 25 mmHg; P < 0.05, I vs II; P = 0.09, I vs III and II vs III) Hydroxyproline concentration was significantly increased by hGH compared to everolimus alone (I: 14.9 ± 2.5 μg/mg, II: 8.9 ± 3.6 μg/mg, III: 11.9 ± 2.8 μg/mg; P < 0.05, I vs II/III and II vs III). The number of MPO-positive cells was reduced significantly by hGH compared to everolimus alone (I: 10 ± 1 n/mm², II: 15 ± 3 n/mm², III: 9 ± 2 n/mm²; P < 0.05, I vs II and II vs III), while the number of PCNA-positive cells were increased by hGH (I: 28 ± 3 /mm², II: 12 ± 3 /mm², III: 26 ± 12 /mm²; P < 0.05, I vs II and II vs III). Corresponding to these biochemical findings, HE-histology revealed significantly increased amount of granulation tissue in hGH-treated animals.
CONCLUSION: Inhibition of intestinal wound healing by everolimus is partially neutralized by simultaeous treatment with hGH. Both inflammation as well as collagen deposition is influenced by hGH.
Collapse
|
11
|
Santangelo M, Clemente M, Spiezia S, Grassia S, Di Capua F, La Tessa C, Iovino MG, Vernillo A, Galeotalanza M. Wound complications after kidney transplantation in nondiabetic patients. Transplant Proc 2015; 41:1221-3. [PMID: 19460523 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.03.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Impaired wound healing represents a common operative complication after kidney transplantation. This problem seems to be affected by factors related to surgical technique, drugs, and patient/graft peculiarities. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2000 to December 2007, 350 consecutive kidney transplantations were performed in a population of nondiabetic patients. We evaluated the influence of various factors on impaired wound healing. RESULTS Among 350 kidney transplantation patients, we observed 54 cases (15.43%) of impaired healing of the surgical incision: 36 (10.29%) with first level and 18 (5.14%) with second level wound complications. Factors related to complications were overweight and delayed graft function. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus had similar effects. However, all patients developing second level complications showed more risk factors. In our experience, postoperative lymphocele did not occur as an unique factor but became a significant risk factor when associated with another one. Patients who did not have reconstruction of the muscle layers showed a greater incidence of incisional complications. CONCLUSION Impaired healing of the surgical incision more or less seriously influenced outcomes of transplanted patients. This complication was common and usually related to the presence of more than one risk factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Santangelo
- General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Department, O.U. of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Santangelo ML, Criscitiello C, Renda A, Federico S, Curigliano G, Dodaro C, Scotti A, Tammaro V, Calogero A, Riccio E, Pisani A, Carlomagno N. Immunosuppression and Multiple Primary Malignancies in Kidney-Transplanted Patients: A Single-Institute Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:183523. [PMID: 26185750 PMCID: PMC4491567 DOI: 10.1155/2015/183523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2014] [Revised: 08/21/2014] [Accepted: 09/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Immunodeficiency is associated with higher cancer incidence. However, it is unknown whether there is a link between immunodeficiency and development of multiple primary malignancies. In the present study we analyse this link focusing on kidney-transplanted patients, as they are at higher risk of developing cancer due to the chronic assumption of immunosuppressants. We followed up 1200 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1980 and 2012. A total of 77/1200 kidney-transplanted patients developed cancer and 24 of them developed multiple cancers. Most multiple cancers were synchronous with a nonsignificant association between cancer and rejection episodes. In the general cancer population, one-ninth of patients are at higher risk of developing a second tumor over a lifetime; hence it would be reasonable to conclude that, from a merely theoretical and statistical viewpoint, long-term transplanted patients potentially have a higher risk of developing MPMs. However, data did not confirm this assumption, probably because these patients die before a second primary malignancy appears. Despite many observations on the increased incidence of different tumor types in immunodeficient patients and despite immunosuppression certainly being a predisposing factor for the multicancer syndrome, data so far are not robust enough to justify a correlation between immunodeficiency and multiple primary malignancies in transplanted patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele L. Santangelo
- Department of Advanced BioMedical Sciences, Operative Unit of General Surgery & Transplants, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Renda
- Department of Advanced BioMedical Sciences, Operative Unit of General Surgery & Transplants, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Federico
- Department of Public Medicine, Operative Unit of Nephrology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Concetta Dodaro
- Department of Advanced BioMedical Sciences, Operative Unit of General Surgery & Transplants, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scotti
- Department of Advanced BioMedical Sciences, Operative Unit of General Surgery & Transplants, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tammaro
- Department of Advanced BioMedical Sciences, Operative Unit of General Surgery & Transplants, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Armando Calogero
- Department of Advanced BioMedical Sciences, Operative Unit of General Surgery & Transplants, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Eleonora Riccio
- Department of Public Medicine, Operative Unit of Nephrology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Pisani
- Department of Public Medicine, Operative Unit of Nephrology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Carlomagno
- Department of Advanced BioMedical Sciences, Operative Unit of General Surgery & Transplants, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kishore TA, Shetty A, Tharun BK, John EV, Bhat S. Renal transplantation through a modified non-muscle-cutting Pfannenstiel incision. Int Urol Nephrol 2013; 46:901-4. [DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0608-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2013] [Accepted: 11/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
14
|
Transplantation rénale et receveurs obèses : revue du comité de transplantation de l’Association française d’urologie. Prog Urol 2012; 22:678-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2012] [Revised: 03/15/2012] [Accepted: 04/30/2012] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
15
|
Røine E, Bjørk I, Øyen O. Targeting Risk Factors for Impaired Wound Healing and Wound Complications After Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2010; 42:2542-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2010] [Revised: 05/05/2010] [Accepted: 05/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
16
|
Küper MA, Schölzl N, Traub F, Mayer P, Weinreich J, Coerper S, Steurer W, Königsrainer A, Beckert S. Everolimus interferes with the inflammatory phase of healing in experimental colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res 2009; 167:158-65. [PMID: 19922952 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2009] [Revised: 06/03/2009] [Accepted: 07/08/2009] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed wound healing is a serious side effect of mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the mTOR inhibitor everolimus interferes with the inflammatory phase of healing in experimental colonic anastomoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats received a colonic anastomosis. Then, animals were randomized to three groups of daily treatment with either vehicle or everolimus in two different dosages (1.0mg/kg or 3.0mg/kg). After 7 d, rats were sacrificed, and mechanical, histologic, and biochemical parameters of intestinal healing were assessed. RESULTS Anastomotic bursting pressure was significantly decreased by everolimus in both dosages, whereas hydroxyproline content was reduced only by the high everolimus dosage. Everolimus diminished cellular proliferation and new vessel growth. Furthermore, both quantity as well as quality of newly synthesized collagen fibers in the anastomotic granulation tissue was reduced. On the other hand, myeloperoxidase-positive (MPO) cells and interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations were increased, as was the activity of matrix-metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9. CONCLUSION Everolimus interferes with the inflammatory phase of healing. However, it remains unclear whether this phenomenon is involved in everolimus impairment of experimental anastomotic repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus A Küper
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mehrabi A, Fonouni H, Wente M, Sadeghi M, Eisenbach C, Encke J, Schmied BM, Libicher M, Zeier M, Weitz J, Büchler MW, Schmidt J. Wound complications following kidney and liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2007; 20 Suppl 17:97-110. [PMID: 17100709 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00608.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression (IS) have led to an appreciable reduction in postoperative complications following transplantation. However, wound complications as probably the most common type of post-transplantation surgical complication can still limit these improved outcomes and result in prolonged hospitalization, hospital readmission, and reoperation, consequently increasing overall transplant cost. Our aim was to review the literature to delineate the evidence-based risk factors for wound complications following kidney and liver transplantation (KTx, LTx), and to present the preventive and therapeutic modalities for this bothersome morbidity. Generally, wound complications are categorized as superficial and deep wound dehiscences, perigraft fluid collections and seroma, superficial and deep wound infections, cellulitis, lymphocele and wound drainage. The results of several studies showed that the most important risk factors for wound complications are IS and obesity. Additionally, there are surgical and/or technical factors, including type of incision, reoperation, and surgeon's expertise, as well as comorbidities such as advanced age, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, and uremia. Preventive management of wound complications necessitates defining their etiological factors so that their detrimental effects on healing processes can be addressed and reduced. IS modalities and agents, especially sirolimus (SRL), and steroids (ST) should be adjusted according to the patient's co-existing risk factors. SRL should be administered three months after transplantation and ST should be tapered as soon as possible. A body mass index (BMI) lower than 30 kg/m2 is advisable for inclusion in a transplantation program, but higher BMIs do not exclude recipients. Surgical risk factors can be prevented by applying precise surgical techniques. Therapeutic modalities must focus on the most efficient and cost-effective medications and/or interventions to facilitate and improve wound healing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|