Risk Factors That Can Influence Kidney Transplant Outcome

Postkidney Transplant Delayed Graft Function Outcomes Are Not Worsened by Deceased Donor Type

INTRODUCTION

Kidney-delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors in comparison to donatation after brain death (DBD). We analyzed deceased kidney transplant recipients (DDKTR) at our center between 2005 and 2019, stratified by donor type (DBD vs. DCD).

METHODS

We assessed risk factors for DGF, acute rejection (AR), graft failure (GF), along with the death with functioning graft (DWFG), and the interaction between types of donors for those complications.

RESULTS

Among 2543 DDKTRs, 804 (32%) were from DCD donors. Older donor age, higher recipient body mass index, and receipt of a depleting induction agent were associated with increased risk for DGF in both DBD and DCD. In contrast, preemptive transplant and female recipient gender were associated with reduced risk. Additional risk factors in DBD, but not in DCD recipients, included higher donor terminal serum creatinine, higher kidney donor profile index, right donor kidney, and prolonged cold ischemia time. Female donors were associated with a reduced risk of DGF only among DCD donors. DGF was associated with higher AR and GF, with no significant differences across donor types, DBD vs. DCD (AR: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.22 vs. 2.37, p-interaction = 0.65; GF: 3.04 vs. 2.56; p-interaction = 0.47). DGF was associated with a higher risk for DWFG among DBD (aHR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.96-6.00, p < 0.001) but not with DCD (aHR: 1.90, 95% CI: 0.78-4.61, p = 0.16), with p-interaction of 0.15 CONCLUSION: Despite higher DGF rates in DCD, early adverse outcomes after DGF were similar between deceased donor types and should not deter the utilization of DCD kidneys.

Analysis of Pre-transplant Resuscitation Factors Influencing Immediate Graft Function After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The management of a deceased donor in the intensive care unit before organ transplantation is important for the outcome of the recipient. Herein, we analyze the pre-transplant resuscitation factors managed before procurement that could influence graft function immediately after deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT).

METHODS

A total of 271 DDKTs performed at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Korea, from January 2009 to March 2016 were reviewed. We divided the patients into a delayed graft function (DGF) group and a non-DGF group, and compared postoperative outcomes between the 2 groups. We also analyzed the predisposing factors of DGF using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 36 cases developed DGF while 235 patients did not, and the demographic characteristics of the recipients in the two groups had no significant difference. Of the pre-transplant resuscitation factors, preoperative polyuria, the maximal levels of serum sodium and BUN, and transfer times were significantly higher in the DGF group (P < .001). In a multivariable analysis, preoperative polyuria (odds ratio 4.835, P = .036), elevated preoperative level of sodium (odds ratio 1.227, P = .001), and extended transfer times (odds ratio 1.001, P < .001) were the independent risk factors of the donor in pre-transplant resuscitation management associated with DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

Polyuria, high levels of sodium before procurement, and prolonged transfer times are independent risk factors for DGF after a DDKT. Active intervention and early implementation of the intensivist can help in managing these factors effectively and thus ultimately improve graft function.

Multidrug resistance-related protein 2 genotype of the donor affects kidney graft function

OBJECTIVES

We tested the effect of kidney-specific multidrug resistance-related protein (MRP2, ABCC2) deficiency on renal organic solute disposition as well as on renal protein and gene expression. Furthermore, we investigated whether a particular kidney donor ABCC2 genotype is associated with delayed graft function in patients.

METHODS

A new MRP2-deficient rat strain was established. Renal cross-transplantations were performed between congenic MRP2-deficient and wild-type rats. Renal disposition of MRP2 substrates was investigated in native and transplanted rats. Proteomic analyses and transcriptional profiling were performed in rat kidney graft cortices. Ninety-eight human kidney donor-recipient pairs were genotyped for five ABCC2 polymorphisms. The relationship between delayed graft function and ABCC2 genetic variants in donors and recipients was analyzed by backward stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

In rats, the absence of renal MRP2 reduced renal bilirubin glucuronide excretion at pathologic plasma concentrations, modified renal p-aminohippurate excretion and did not affect renal morphine-6-glucuronide excretion. Renal MRP2 deficiency led to renal cortical protein or mRNA upregulation of glutathione transferase isoenzymes, glutaredoxin 2, and heme oxygenase-1. In patients, a particular donor ABCC2 genotype was associated with an increased incidence of delayed graft function.

CONCLUSION

Kidney graft-specific MRP2 deficiency has mild effects on the renal excretion of some organic solutes under experimental conditions and induces a protein and gene expression pattern indicative of activated antioxidant defense mechanisms. This suggests that MRP2 is a determinant of the redox status in tubular epithelial cells and thus of the susceptibility to renal damage under conditions of treatment with multiple drugs and increased oxygen radical formation.

Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of renal transplantation. The short-term consequences of DGF are well known, but the long-term relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival is controversial in the published literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to precisely estimate these relationships.

METHODS

We performed a literature search for original studies published through March 2007 pertaining to long-term (>6 months) outcomes of DGF. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes were patient survival, acute rejection and kidney function.

RESULTS

When compared to patients without DGF, patients with DGF had a 41% increased risk of graft loss (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.56) at 3.2 years of follow-up. There was no significant relationship between DGF and patient survival at 5 years (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94-1.39). The mean creatinine in the non-DGF group was 1.6 mg/dl. Patients with DGF had a higher mean serum creatinine (0.66 mg/dl, 95% CI 0.57-0.74) compared to patients without DGF at 3.5 years of follow-up. DGF was associated with a 38% relative increase in the risk of acute rejection (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.29-1.47).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis emphasize and quantify the long-term detrimental association between DGF and important graft outcomes like graft survival, acute rejection and renal function. Efforts to prevent and treat DGF should be aggressively investigated in order to improve graft survival given the deficit in the number of kidney donors.

Long-term renal outcomes after delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) describes dysfunction of the kidney allograft immediately after transplantation and is the most common complication in the immediate posttransplantation period. Although a standardized definition for DGF is lacking, it is most commonly defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplant. DGF is caused by a variety of factors related to the donor and recipient as well as organ procurement techniques. The occurrence of DGF affects both allograft and patient outcomes. In addition to prolonging hospital stay and increasing the costs associated with transplantation, DGF is associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection after transplantation and is associated with poorer long-term graft outcomes. Both immunologic and nonimmunologic mechanisms contribute to DGF. The risk factors for DGF that have been identified are reviewed as well as the impact of DGF on long-term outcomes.

Gene expression patterns in deceased donor kidneys developing delayed graft function after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation (KTx) ranges between 2% and 50%. The mechanisms leading to DGF deserve special interest because DGF exerts negative influences on long-term outcomes. We studied gene expression profiles in deceased donor kidney (DDK) biopsies with and without DGF.

METHODS

Gene expression profiling was performed on donor kidney tissues from 33 DDK with the use of microarrays. DDK were classified as grafts with immediate function (non-DGF; n=21) and grafts with DGF (n=12). DGF was defined as a dialysis requirement in the first week after transplantation. Demographic donor and recipient information was collected. The robust-multiarray average method was used to estimate probe set expression summaries. Logistic regression was used to identify genes significantly associated with DGF development.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for 3 months after KTx. Thirty-eight probe sets (n=36 genes) were univariably differentially expressed in DDK with DGF when compared with DDK with non-DGF (alpha=0.001). Sixty-nine probe sets (n=65 genes) were differentially expressed in DDK with DGF when compared with DDK with non-DGF after adjusting for cold ischemia time (alpha=0.001). Gene ontology terms classified the overexpressed genes in DDK with DGF as principally related to cell cycle/growth (e.g., IGFBP5, CSNK2A2), signal transduction (e.g., RASGRP3), immune response (e.g., CD83, BCL3, MX1), and metabolism (e.g., ENPP4, GBA3). TNFRSF1B was overexpressed in DDK with DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

Cold ischemia time was a predictor of DGF independently of the preservation method. We identified a set of 36 genes candidates of DGF in DDK, with genes involved in the inflammatory response being the more important.

Experience in renal and extrarenal transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors with selective use of extracorporeal support

BACKGROUND

Most reports of donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are exclusive to kidney transplantation and report high rates of delayed graft function (DGF).

STUDY DESIGN

From April 1, 2003, to October 3, 2007, we performed 53 kidney transplantations and 4 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations from DCD donors. All DCD donor kidneys were managed with pulsatile perfusion preservation, and all simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation donors were managed with extracorporeal support.

RESULTS

Of 53 DCD kidney transplantations, 44 (83%) were from standard criteria donors (SCD) and 9 (17%) from expanded criteria donors (ECD). With a mean followup of 12 months, actual patient and kidney graft survival rates were 94% and 87%, respectively. Patient and graft survival rates were 100% in the 4 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations. Incidence of DGF was 57% (60% without versus 20% with extracorporeal support, p = 0.036). Comparison of the 53 DCD donor kidney transplantations with 316 concurrent donation after brain death (DBD) donor adult kidney transplantations (178 SCD, 138 ECD) revealed no differences in demographics or outcomes, except that the DCD donor group had fewer ECDs (17% DCD versus 44% DBD; p = 0.0002), fewer 0-antigen mismatch kidney transplantations (7.5% DCD versus 19% DBD; p = 0.05), and more kidneys preserved with pulsatile perfusion (100% DCD versus 52% DBD; p < 0.0001). Incidences of DGF (57% DCD versus 19% DBD; p < 0.0001) and acute rejection (19% DCD versus 10% DBD; p = 0.10) were higher in the DCD donor group, which resulted in a longer initial length of stay (mean 11 days DCD versus 8.0 days DBD; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high incidence of DGF in the absence of extracorporeal support and greater initial resource use, comparable short-term results can be achieved with DCD and DBD donor kidney transplantations.