1
|
Bouchez C, Medraoui C, Cazes A, Khalil A, Jebrak G, Mal H, Mordant P, Castier Y, Montravers P, Debray MP, Zalcman G, Messika J, Gounant V. Prognosis of incidental lung cancer in lung transplant candidates. Respir Med Res 2024; 87:101146. [PMID: 39689665 DOI: 10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidental lung cancer, in the field of lung transplantation (LTx), is more often related to malignancies diagnosed in explants or transplanted organs. Little is known about cancer diagnosed during the medical evaluation of potential LTx candidates. What are the clinical, and prognostic differences between lung cancers diagnosed before or after transplantation in LTx candidates? METHODS We performed a retrospective, observational, single-center study to describe the characteristics of lung malignancies first discovered during the pre-transplant assessment and then identified in lung explants, over the same period. RESULTS From 1630 consecutive patients referred to Paris-Bichat Lung Transplant Program from 2006 to 2022, 288 were deemed not suitable for transplantation. The reason was lung malignancy in 20 patients (15 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) proved). The one-year survival rate was 55 %. Seven died from their respiratory insufficiency, and six died from lung cancer progression. Over the same period, 611 patients received LTx. NSCLC were identified in six explants (1 %). One-year survival was 66.7 % in these transplanted patients. CONCLUSIONS Lung cancer diagnosed during the medical evaluation of potential LTx candidates is rare. However, this represents a critical issue because it contraindicates LTx and leads to a non-optimal management of both lung cancer and of end-stage lung disease. We report an encouraging one-year survival rate in transplanted patients with a pathological lung malignancy diagnosis in lung explant, compared to their counterpart in whom lung cancer discovery contraindicated LTx. A multicenter observational study is mandatory in order to confirm such observation, as it might change current standard to deny LTx in patients with incidental localized NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémentine Bouchez
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Thoracic Oncology Department, CIC INSERM 1425, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Chahine Medraoui
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Pulmonology and lung transplant Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Aurélie Cazes
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Pathology Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Khalil
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Radiology Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Jebrak
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Pulmonology and lung transplant Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Hervé Mal
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Pulmonology and lung transplant Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mordant
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Thoracic, Vascular & Lung Transplant Surgery Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Yves Castier
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Thoracic, Vascular & Lung Transplant Surgery Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Montravers
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Anesthesiology Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, INSERM UMR 1152 PHERE, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Pierre Debray
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Radiology Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Gérard Zalcman
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Thoracic Oncology Department, CIC INSERM 1425, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Jonathan Messika
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Pulmonology and lung transplant Department, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Gounant
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Thoracic Oncology Department, CIC INSERM 1425, AP-HP.Nord, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Englum BR, Hartwig MG. The wait for the waitlist: The next challenge in the lung allocation system. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 36:250-252. [PMID: 28110831 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R Englum
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Matthew G Hartwig
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Analysis of patients referred to a lung transplantation unit. Transplant Proc 2014; 45:2351-6. [PMID: 23953549 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2012] [Revised: 01/09/2013] [Accepted: 02/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
This cross-sectional, concurrent and descriptive study presents the decisions regarding patients referred to our Lung Transplantation Unit (LTxU). Each patient is discussed in a multidisciplinary clinical session (phase I), rejecting some and accepting others for assessment in our LTxU (phase II) according to criteria of the National and International Guidelines for Transplantation. A protocol assessment in phase II, leads to a decision to reject, accept, or follow-up the candidate for LTx. Among 214 evaluation requests received in our unit from May 2008 to December 2011, 37 patients (17%) were rejected based on the information sent to our LTxU. Among the patients evaluated in phase II, 62 (28.9%) were put on the waiting list, 125 (58.4%) were rejected, and twenty-seven (12.6%) were postponed for future reconsideration, results that were similar to those described in the literature. The main disease referred for LTx was obstructive airflow (n = 98; 45.7%), followed by interstitial lung disease (ILD; n = 66; 30.8%), cystic fibrosis or bronchiectasis (n = 20; 9.3%), or primary pulmonary hypertension group 1 (n = 20; 9.3%). Ten patients (4.6%) were diagnosed with other respiratory diseases. Most patients (n = 165; 77.1%) lived in the region of our hospital (Madrid). The main reasons to reject patients for LTx were malnutrition, severe disease in other organs, toxic habits, and refusal of treatment. Finally, one out of four referred patients was accepted for LTx. In addition to serious comorbidities in various organs, a high percentage of patients who were not accepted for LTx because of these factors might have been of accepted had these conditions been corrected before patient referral.
Collapse
|