Kloskowski T, Uzarska M, Gurtowska N, Olkowska J, Joachimiak R, Bajek A, Gagat M, Grzanka A, Bodnar M, Marszałek A, Drewa T. How to isolate urothelial cells? Comparison of four different methods and literature review.
Hum Cell 2013;
27:85-93. [PMID:
24368576 DOI:
10.1007/s13577-013-0070-y]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2013] [Accepted: 06/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present the comparison of four different methods for urothelial cell isolation and culture and compare them to methods cited in the literature. Four different techniques were examined for urothelium isolation from rat bladders. Isolation effectiveness was calculated using trypan blue assay. Confirmation of isolated cell phenotype and comparison with native bladder tissue was confirmed using immunohistochemical (IHC), immunocytochemical (ICC) and immunofluorescence (IF) analysis. The method with bladder inversion and collagenase P digestion resulted in the highest number of isolated cells. These cells showed positive expression of cytokeratin 7, 8, 18, α6-integrin and p63. Our results and the literature review showed that the best method for urothelium bladder isolation is dissection of the epithelium layer from other bladder parts and digestion of mechanically prepared tissue in a collagenase solution.
Collapse