Impact of Recipient and Donor Ages on Patient and Graft Survival After Kidney Transplantation

Kidney Transplantation From Brain-Dead Donors: Initial Experience in China

BACKGROUND

Experience with kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors remains limited in China. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes of kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors (group 1), compared with those from living ones of the same age (group 2).

METHODS

Clinical data of kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors and living donors in the same age range (18-45 years) performed between May 2007 and December 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. Recipients were analyzed for posttransplantation serum creatinine, creatinine clearance (calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula), the number of acute rejection episodes and delayed graft function, and patient/graft survival.

RESULTS

Mean donor age was comparable between the 2 groups (31.9 ± 6.5 vs 32.8 ± 7.0 years; P = .268). The terminal serum creatinine level of donors was 125.5 ± 63.5 μmol/L in group 1 (n = 30) and 65.1 ± 13.7 μmol/L in group 2 (n = 110; P = .000). Recipient creatinine clearance was comparable between the 2 groups 1 month posttransplantation and thereafter. Acute rejection episodes were seen in 7 cases in recipients of group 1 (15.9%) and in 15 cases in recipients of group 2 (13.6%; P = .716). The incidence of delayed graft function was higher in recipients of group 1 (18.2%) than that of group 2 (3.6%; P = .002). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient/graft survival rate was comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors achieved acceptable graft function and patient/graft survival in the 5-year follow-up, encouraging the use of this approach.

A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors

BACKGROUND

During the past few years, there has been renewed interest in the use of expanded criteria donors (ECD) for kidney transplantation to increase the numbers of deceased donor kidneys available. More kidney transplants would result in shorter waiting times and limit the morbidity and mortality associated with long-term dialysis therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review of the literature.

SETTING & POPULATION

Kidney transplantation population.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Studies were identified by using a comprehensive search through MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials assessing kidney transplantation in adult recipients using ECDs.

PREDICTOR

A special focus was given to studies comparing the evolution of kidney transplantation between standard criteria donors (defined as a donor who does not meet criteria for donation after cardiac death or ECD) and ECDs (defined as any brain-dead donor aged > 60 years or a donor aged > 50 years with 2 of the following conditions: history of hypertension, terminal serum creatinine level >or= 1.5 mg/dL, or death resulting from a cerebrovascular accident).

OUTCOMES

Criteria used to define and select ECDs, practice patterns, long-term outcomes, early complications, and some patient issues, such as selection criteria and immunosuppressive management.

RESULTS

ECD kidneys have worse long-term survival than standard criteria donor kidneys. The optimal ECD kidney for donation depends on adequate glomerular filtration rate and acceptable donor kidney histological characteristics, albeit the usefulness of biopsy is debated.

LIMITATIONS

This review is based mainly on data from observational studies, and varying amounts of bias could be present. We did not attempt to quantitatively analyze the effect of ECD kidneys on kidney transplantation because of the huge heterogeneity found in study designs and definitions of ECD.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, we conclude that patients younger than 40 years or scheduled for kidney retransplantation should not receive an ECD kidney. Patients 40 years or older, especially with diabetic nephropathy or nondiabetic disease, but a long expected waiting time for kidney transplantation, show better survival receiving an ECD kidney than remaining on dialysis therapy.

CD28 downregulation on CD4+ T cells is associated with age of kidney transplant recipient

There is a growing body of evidence showing that the intensity of rejection is weaker in older kidney allograft recipients while chronic complications, but not rejection, are the main causes of graft loss. To investigate whether the age of the recipient is a factor affecting the expressions of the CD28, CTLA-4, and CD40L costimulatory molecules on CD4+ T cells. Their expression levels were determined in 78 kidney transplant recipients aged 17-68 years. The expression was assessed on unstimulated and anti-CD3 antibody + IL-2-stimulated CD4+ T cells. Median time after transplantation was 20 months and median serum creatinine was 1.5 mg/dl. Significant correlations between age and CD28 expression (r = -0.4, P = 0.0004) on CD4+ T cells and between age and CTLA-4 expression after stimulation (r = 0.34, P = 0.008) were found. CD40L expression on CD4+ T cells was not affected by recipient age. The decreased expression of CD28 and enhanced expression of CTLA-4 (after stimulation) associated with age may be helpful in transplant acceptance.