1
|
Ramisch D, Rumbo C, Echevarria C, Moulin L, Niveyro S, Orce G, Crivelli A, Martinez MI, Chavez L, Paez MA, Trentadue J, Klein F, Fernández A, Solar H, Gondolesi GE. Long-Term Outcomes of Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation at a Single Center in Argentina. Transplant Proc 2017; 48:457-62. [PMID: 27109978 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal failure (IF) patients received parenteral nutrition (PN) as the only available therapy until intestinal transplantation (ITx) evolved as an accepted treatment. The aim of this article is to report the long-term outcomes of a series of ITx performed in pediatric and adult patients at a single center 9 years after its creation. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of the ITx performed between May 2006 and January 2015. Diagnoses, pre-ITx mean time on PN, indications for ITx, time on the waiting list for types of ITx, mean total ischemia time, and warm ischemia time, time until PN discontinuation, incidence of acute and chronic rejection, and 5-year actuarial patient survival are reported. RESULTS A total of 42 patients received ITx; 80% had short gut syndrome (SG); the mean time on PN was 1620 days. The main indication for ITx was lack of central venous access followed by intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) and catheter-related infectious complications. The mean time on the waiting list was 188 days (standard deviation, ±183 days). ITx were performed in 26 children and 14 adults. In all, 32 procedures were isolated ITx (IITX); 10 were multiorgan Tx (MOT; 3 combined, 7 multivisceral Tx (MVTx), 1 modified MVTx and 2 with kidney); 2 (4.7 %) were retransplantations: 1 IITx, 1 MVTx, and 5 including the right colon. Thirteen patients (31%) received abdominal rectus fascia. All procedures were performed by the same surgical team. Total ischemia time was 7:53 ± 2:04 hours, and warm ischemia time was 40.2 ± 10.5 minutes. The mean length of implanted intestine was 325 ± 63 cm. Bishop-Koop ileostomy was performed in 67% of cases. In all, 16 of 42 Tx required early reoperations. The overall mean follow-up time was 41 ± 35.6 months. The mean time to PN discontinuation after Tx was 68 days (P = .001). The total number of acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes until the last follow-up was 83; the total number of grafts lost due to ACR was 4; and the total graft lost due to chronic rejection was 3. At the time of writing, the overall 5-year patient survival is 55% (65% for IITx vs 22% for MOT; P = .0001); 60% for pediatric recipients vs 47% for adults (P = NS); 64% when the indication for ITx was SG vs 25% for non-SG (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS At this center, candidates with SG, in the absence of IFALD requiring IITx, showed the best long-term outcomes, independent of recipient age. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for the care of intestinal failure patients, to sustain a rehabilitation and transplantation program over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ramisch
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - C Rumbo
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - C Echevarria
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - L Moulin
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - S Niveyro
- Anesthesia Department, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - G Orce
- Anesthesia Department, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - A Crivelli
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - M I Martinez
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - L Chavez
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - M A Paez
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - J Trentadue
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - F Klein
- Adult Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - A Fernández
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - H Solar
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina
| | - G E Gondolesi
- Instituto de Trasplante Multiorgánico, Unidad de Insuficiencia Intestinal, Rehabilitación y Trasplante de Intestino, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pécora RAA, David AI, Lee AD, Galvão FH, Cruz-Junior RJ, D'Albuquerque LAC. Small bowel transplantation. ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA 2014; 26:223-9. [PMID: 24190382 DOI: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000300013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2012] [Accepted: 02/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small bowel transplantation evolution, because of its complexity, was slower than other solid organs. Several advances have enabled its clinical application. AIM To review intestinal transplantation evolution and its current status. METHOD Search in MEDLINE and ScIELO literature. The terms used as descriptors were: intestinal failure, intestinal transplantation, small bowel transplantation, multivisceral transplantation. Were analyzed data on historical evolution, centers experience, indications, types of grafts, selection and organ procurement, postoperative management, complications and results. CONCLUSION Despite a slower evolution, intestinal transplantation is currently the standard therapy for patients with intestinal failure and life-threatening parenteral nutrition complications. It involves some modalities: small bowel transplantation, liver-intestinal transplantation, multivisceral transplantation and modified multivisceral transplantation. Currently, survival rate is similar to other solid organs. Most of the patients become free of parenteral nutrition.
Collapse
|