Postrenal Transplant Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/Thrombotic Microangiopathy: Ahmedabad Experience

Adipose tissue macrophages and atherogenesis – a synergy with cholesterolaemia

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major obstacle to the long-term success in kidney transplantation. Diagnosis of ABMR is determined according to the internationally recognized Banff criteria. However, a significant proportion of patients does not meet all the defined criteria, and the outcome of such cases remains poorly understood. The histology of ABMR frequently lacks sensitivity and specificity. More importantly, mixed forms of ABMR and T cell-mediated rejection as well as findings of nonspecific injury are common in clinical settings. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are detectable only in half of the ABMR cases by histology. Prognostic role of non-HLA antibodies against various endothelial proteins has been discussed. Antibody independent NK cell activation reflecting killer-cells’ inhibitory receptor incompatibility is suggested in microvascular inflammation in DSA negative patients. Molecular assessment of ABMR has been prioritized to overcome high interobserver variability and improve diagnostics in mixed forms of rejections and in DSA negative cases. Finally, donor-derived cell-free DNA detected in a recipient’s peripheral blood sample has been proposed as a noninvasive marker for diagnosis of graft rejection, and thus might serve as a liquid biopsy in the near future. Despite all achievements, diagnosing ABMR in kidney allografts remains to be a challenge in a significant number of cases.

Thrombotic microangiopathy in a renal allograft: Single-center five-year experience

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is devastating for renal transplantation (RT) causing graft/ patient loss. We present 5-year experience of TMA in RT in retrospective study of indicated renal allograft biopsies with TMA. Patient-donor demographics and associated histological findings with respect to transplants under tolerance induction protocol (Group 1) were compared with patients transplanted under triple immunosuppression (Group 2). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20. Sixty-one (4.1%) of 1520 biopsies [Group 1:17 (1.9%)/882, Group 2:44 (6.9%)/638] revealed TMA. Tacrolimus trough levels were normal. There was no evidence of systemic involvement in any patient. Mean age was 36.8 years with 70.6% males, HLA-match, 2.6/6, and the most common original disease unknown (41.2%) in Group 1, and 35.9 years with 86.4% males, HLA-match, 2.1/6, and the most common original disease unknown (50%) in Group 2. Biopsies were performed at mean 5.1-year posttransplant in Group 1 and 2.3 years in Group 2. Acute TMA constituted 47% Group 1 and 43.2% Group 2 biopsies; of these, antibody-mediated rejections were observed in 58.8%, T-cell mediated rejections in 11.8%, tacrolimus toxicity in 76.5%, and other findings in 35.3% Group 1; and 61.4%, 25%, 50%, and 18.2%, respectively, in Group 2 biopsies. Higher rejection activity scores were more in Group 2. Postbiopsy 1- and 5- year patient survival was 94.1%, 86.9% in Group 1 and 92.1%, 88.3% in Group 2; 1- and 4-year graft survival was 52.9%, 15.9% in Group 1 and 20.3%, 5.4% in Group 2. TMA was poor prognosticator for RT, especially under triple immunosuppression. Antibody- mediated rejection and tacrolimus toxicity were more prone to TMA.

De Novo Thrombotic Microangiopathy Immediately After Kidney Transplant in Patients Without Apparent Risk Factors

Thrombotic microangiopathy refers to a spectrum of conditions that share a common underlying pathologic mechanism that result in endothelial damage and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. De novo thrombotic microangiopathy after kidney transplant is often triggered by immunosuppressive drugs, and studies most often implicate calcineurin inhibitors and/or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors; however, muromonab and alemtuzumab also reportedly cause thrombotic microangiopathy. In addition, thrombotic microangiopathy may be triggered by acute antibody-mediated rejection and infections like cytomegalovirus and parvovirus. Here, we present a case series of 3 patients without any apparent risk factors (eg, acute antibody-mediated rejection) who developed de novo thrombotic microangiopathy immediately following kidney transplant, but before the introduction of calcineurin inhibitors. Two of these 3 patients were successfully managed with plasma exchange, and calcineurin inhibitors were successfully introduced without the recurrence of thrombotic microangiopathy.

De novo thrombotic microangiopathy after kidney transplantation: clinical features, treatment, and long-term patient and graft survival

INTRODUCTION

Posttransplant thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)/hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) can occur as a recurrent or de novo disease.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center observational study was applied in order to examine the incidence and outcomes of de novo TMA/HUS among transplantations performed between 2000 and 2010. Recurrent HUS or antibody-mediated rejections were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventeen (1.1%) among 1549 kidney transplant recipients fulfilled criteria for de novo TMA. The mean follow-up was 572 days (range, 69-1769). Maintenance immunosuppression was prednisone, tacrolimus (TAC), and mycophenolic acid in 14 (82%) patients. Mean age at onset was 40 ± 15 years, and serum creatinine was 6.1 ± 4.1 mg/dL. TMA occurred at a median of 25 days (range, 1-1755) after transplantation. Nine (53%) patients developed TMA within 1 month of transplantation and only 12% after 1 year. Clinical features were anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) in 9 (53%) patients, thrombocytopenia in 7 (41%), and increased lactate dehydrogenase in 12 (70%). Decreased haptoglobin was observed in 64% and schistocytes in 35%. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal or reduction was the first step in the management of 10/15 (66%) patients, and 6 (35%) received fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and/or plasmapheresis. TAC was successfully reintroduced in six patients after a median of 17 days. Eight (47%) patients needed dialytic support after TMA diagnosis and 75% remained on dialysis. At 4 years of follow-up, death-censored graft survival was worse for TMA group (43.0% versus 85.6%, log-rank = 0.001; hazard ratio = 3.74) and there was no difference in patient survival (53.1% versus 82.2%, log-rank = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

De novo TMA after kidney transplantation is a rare but severe condition with poor graft outcomes. This syndrome may not be fully manifested, and clinical suspicion is essential for early diagnosis and treatment, based mainly in CNI withdrawal and FFP infusions and/or plasmapheresis.

Anemia and erythrocytosis in patients after kidney transplantation

Anemia is a highly prevalent disorder in recipients of renal allografts. Despite its frequent occurrence, there is still uncertainty with regard to treatment targets and treatment options. This includes questions on appropriate iron management, the choice and dosage of erythropoietin stimulating agents, criteria for the timing of treatment initiation and the targeted hemoglobin values. The review summarizes available data on recent therapeutic strategies for post transplant anemia, as well as for post transplant erythrocytosis, another hematological disorder, that has decreased in recent years.

Combination of everolimus with calcineurin inhibitor medication resulted in post-transplant haemolytic uraemic syndrome in lung transplant recipients--a case series

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) is a rare but serious disease with a high mortality rate, when left untreated. Immunosuppressive drugs like calcineurin inhibitors as well as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have been reported as causative agents for post-transplant HUS.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed in lung transplant recipients, who took part in an interventional study, in two centres. Haemoglobin, platelets, creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase levels were monitored during routine follow-up and patients with deteriorating kidney function were screened for post-transplant HUS. All cases of post-transplant HUS were identified by clinical and laboratory findings. Outcome was recorded until 6 months after diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 2188 visits in 512 lung transplant recipients (outpatients) were analysed. Out of those, 126 patients took part in an interventional study. In this study, 67 were switched to everolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors 4 weeks after transplantation, 59 patients remained on standard immunosuppression (calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone). Five cases of post-transplant HUS were identified in the everolimus group. None of the patients had evidence of gastrointestinal infection or preexisting renal disease. Post-transplant HUS was treated with therapeutic plasma exchange and methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Everolimus was discontinued in all five patients. This treatment regimen led to normalization of haemoglobin, platelets and improved renal function. Two patients developed end-stage renal failure and were maintained on haemodialysis. One patient died due to multiorgan failure. Improvement of renal function was seen in two patients. No further cases were recorded in patients without everolimus during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data should raise the awareness of post-transplant HUS in lung transplant recipients. Post-transplant HUS is a rare disease, but it is a serious cause of acute renal failure in lung transplant recipients treated with a combination of everolimus and calcineurin inhibitors.