Are We Ready to Utilize Non–Heart-Beating Donors for Clinical Allotransplantation in China?

Cultural sensitivity in brain death determination: a necessity in end-of-life decisions in Japan

Background

In an increasingly globalized world, legal protocols related to health care that are both effective and culturally sensitive are paramount in providing excellent quality of care as well as protection for physicians tasked with decision making. Here, we analyze the current medicolegal status of brain death diagnosis with regard to end-of-life care in Japan, China, and South Korea from the perspectives of front-line health care workers.

Main body

Japan has legally wrestled with the concept of brain death for decades. An inability to declare brain death without consent from family coupled with cultural expectations of family involvement in medical care is mirrored in other Confucian-based cultures (China and South Korea) and may complicate care for patients from these countries when traveling or working overseas. Within Japan, China, and South Korea, medicolegal shortcomings in the diagnosis of brain death (and organ donation) act as a great source of stress for physicians and expose them to potential public and legal scorn. Here, we detail the medicolegal status of brain death diagnosis within Japan and compare it to China and South Korea to find common ground and elucidate the impact of legal ambiguity on health care workers.

Conclusion

The Confucian cultural foundation of multiple Asian countries raises common issues of family involvement with diagnosis and cultural considerations that must be met. Leveraging public education systems may increase awareness of brain death issues and lead to evolving laws that clarify such end-of-life issues while protecting physicians from sociocultural backlash.

Introducing of the First DCD Kidney Transplantation Program in Poland

In many countries, including Poland, the main problem with transplantation is the insufficiency of organ donors in relation to the demand for organs. Hence, the common aim globally is to increase the pool of donors. The prolonged survival of patients after transplantation, with respect to the survival time of patients on dialysis, makes the search much more intense. After the recourse of expanded criteria donors (ECD), the next step was obtaining kidneys from donors after irreversible cardiac death (DCD). Therefore, based on Dutch, British, and Spanish experience, it can be hypothesized that the introduction of DCD procedures in countries that have not launched these programs and the improvement of DCD procedures may shorten the waiting time for organ transplantation globally. The legal basis for the procurement of organs after irreversible cardiac arrest came into existence in Poland in 2010. Previously, such organ procurements were not in practice. Since 1984, when Poland published irreversible cardiac arrest as a criterion of brain death, it became the only way to determine death prior to the procurement of organs. The aim of this report was to evaluate the results of the first 19 transplantation cases involving harvested kidneys from donors after cardiac arrest, which was irreversible and clinically confirmed, without any doubt as per the ethical protocol of DCD. Understanding, support, and public perception are essential for this program's initiation and maintenance.

Impact of ex vivo administration of mesenchymal stem cells on the function of kidney grafts from cardiac death donors in rat

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been applied to the treatment of various diseases, and MSC administration in marginal donor grafts may help avoid the ischemia-reperfusion injury associated with solid organ transplants. Given the reports of side effects after intravenous MSC administration, local MSC administration to the target organ might be a better approach. We administered adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) ex vivo to donor rat kidneys obtained after cardiac death (CD).

METHODS

Using male Lewis rats (8-10 weeks), and a marginal transplant model of 1hr CD plus 1hr sub-normothermic ET-Kyoto solution preservation were conducted. AT-MSCs obtained from double-reporter (luciferase-LacZ) transgenic Lewis rats were injected either systemically (1.0 × 10(6) cells/0.5 mL) to bilaterally nephrectomized recipient rats that had received a marginal kidney graft (n = 6), or locally via the renal artery (500 μL ET-Kyoto solution containing the same number of AT-MSCs) to marginal kidney grafts, which were then preserved (1 hour; 22°C) before being transplanted into bilaterally nephrectomized recipient rats (n = 8). Serum was collected to assess the therapeutic effects of AT-MSC administration, and the recipients of rats surviving to Day 14 were separately evaluated histopathologically. Follow-up was by in vivo imaging and histological LacZ staining, and tumor formation was evaluated in MSC-injected rats at 3 months.

RESULTS

Systemic injection of MSC did not improve recipient survival. In vivo imaging showed MSCs trapped in the lung that later became undetectable. Ex vivo injection of MSCs did show a benefit without adverse effects. At Day 14 after RTx, 75% of the rats in the AT-MSC-injected group (MSC[+]) had survived, whereas 50% of the rats in the AT-MSC-non-injected group (MSC[-]) had died. Renal function in the MSC(+) group was improved compared with that in the MSC(-) group at Day 4. LacZ staining revealed AT-MSCs attached to the renal tubules at 24 hours after RTx that later became undetectable. Histopathologic examination showed little difference in fibrosis between the groups at Day 14. No teratomas or other abnormalities were seen at 3 months.

Kidney transplantation from a donor following cardiac death supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

To expand the donor pool, organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) has emerged. However, kidneys from DCD donors have a period of long warm ischemia between cardiac arrest and the harvesting of the organs. Recently, we used extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to minimize ischemic injury during 'no touch' periods in a Maastricht category II DCD donor and performed two successful kidney transplantations. The kidneys were procured from a 49-yr-old male donor. The warm ischemia time was 31 min, and the time of maintained circulation using ECMO was 7 hr 55 min. The cold ischemia time was 9 hr 15 min. The kidneys were transplanted into two recipients and functioned immediately after reperfusion. The grafts showed excellent function at one and three months post-transplantation; serum creatinine (SCr) levels were 1.0 mg/dL and 0.8 mg/dL and the estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were 63 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 78 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the first recipient, and SCr levels were 1.1 mg/dL and 1.0 mg/dL and eGFR were 56 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 64 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the second recipient. In conclusion, it is suggested that kidney transplantation from a category II DCD donor assisted by ECMO is a reasonable modality for expanding donor pool.

Current situation of donation after circulatory death in European countries

The aim of the present study was to describe the current situation of donation after circulatory death (DCD) in the Council of Europe, through a dedicated survey. Of 27 participating countries, only 10 confirmed any DCD activity, the highest one being described in Belgium, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (mainly controlled) and France and Spain (mainly uncontrolled). During 2000-2009, as DCD increased, donation after brain death (DBD) decreased about 20% in the three countries with a predominant controlled DCD activity, while DBD had increased in the majority of European countries. The number of organs recovered and transplanted per DCD increased along time, although it remained substantially lower compared with DBD. During 2000-2008, 5004 organs were transplanted from DCD (4261 kidneys, 505 livers, 157 lungs and 81 pancreas). Short-term outcomes of 2343 kidney recipients from controlled versus 649 from uncontrolled DCD were analyzed: primary non function occurred in 5% vs. 6.4% (P = NS) and delayed graft function in 50.2% vs. 75.7% (P < 0.001). In spite of this, 1 year graft survival was 85.9% vs. 88.9% (P = 0.04), respectively. DCD is increasingly accepted in Europe but still limited to a few countries. Controlled DCD might negatively impact DBD activity. The degree of utilization of DCD is lower compared with DBD. Short-term results of DCD are promising with differences between kidney recipients transplanted from controlled versus uncontrolled DCD, an observation to be further analyzed.