Combined epidural and general anesthesia for paediatric renal transplantation-a single center experience

Caudal extradural catheterization in pediatric renal transplant and its effect on perioperative hemodynamics and pain scoring: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

'Hockey stick incision' used in renal transplant is large enough to cause severe postoperative morbidity especially in pediatric recipients. Although epidural analgesia is known to be effective in pain control, the resulting sympathectomy might affect hemodynamics interfering with the transplant process. In our study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of inserting an epidural catheter to the thoracic level via the caudal route, and the effect of using epidural local anesthetics at low concentrations on hemodynamics.

METHODS

After approval from the ethical committee at Kasr Al Ainy University Hospital and consent from parents/legal guardians, sixty patients aged 3-12 years who were scheduled for renal transplant were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group I (epidural group) received continuous caudal epidural bupivacaine 0.125 % with fentanyl together with intravenous (IV) fentanyl and paracetamol. Group II (control group) received only IV fentanyl and paracetamol. Intraoperative data included heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP). Postoperative variables included HR, MAP, CVP, pain score and complications.

RESULTS

Threading failure via the caudal route occurred in 6.67 % of cases. Intraoperative differences in hemodynamics and CVP were not clinically significant between groups. Postoperative HR, MAP, and CVP were generally higher in the control group. Pain control was more satisfactory and postoperative complications were less in the epidural group.

CONCLUSION

Caudal epidural anesthesia in pediatric renal transplant is a valuable addition to general anesthesia as it provides stable perioperative hemodynamics, excellent postoperative analgesia and is associated with fewer complications than narcotic-dependent analgesia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02037802.

Kidney function in living donors undergoing nephrectomy by sevoflurane or desflurane anesthesia

PURPOSE

Although there is no clinical evidence of nephrotoxicity with the volatile anesthetics currently used in general anesthesia, a better agent should be needed in terms of preserving postoperative renal function in living kidney donors who have only single remaining kidney. The purpose of the current retrospective, single-center study was to evaluate and compare renal function of living kidney donors after nephrectomy under either sevoflurane or desflurane anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2006 through December 2011, a total of 228 donors undergoing video assisted minilaparotomy surgery nephrectomy for kidney donation were retrospectively enrolled in the current study. The donors were categorized into a sevoflurane group or desflurane group based on the type of volatile anesthetic used. We collected laboratory data from the patients preoperatively, immediately after the operation, on the first postoperative day and on the third postoperative day. We also compared renal function of the kidney donors after donor nephrectomy by comparing creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

RESULTS

The decrease in renal function after surgery in both groups was the most prominent on the first postoperative day. There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative changes of creatinine or eGFR.

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane and desflurane can be used safely as volatile anesthetics in donors undergoing nephrectomy.