Estimation of Abbreviated Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Early Posttransplant Period by Limited Sampling Strategy

A Systematic Review of Multiple Linear Regression-Based Limited Sampling Strategies for Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimation

Background and Objective

One approach of therapeutic drug monitoring in the case of mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a limited sampling strategy (LSS), which allows the evaluation of the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) based on few concentrations. The aim of this systematic review was to review the MPA LSSs and define the most frequent time points for MPA determination in patients with different indications for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) administration.

Methods

The literature was comprehensively searched in July 2021 using PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases. Original articles determining multiple linear regression (MLR)-based LSSs for MPA and its free form (fMPA) were included. Studies on enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium, previously established LSS, Bayesian estimator, and different than twice a day dosing were excluded. Data were analyzed separately for (1) adult renal transplant recipients, (2) adults with other than renal transplantation indication, and (3) for pediatric patients.

Results

A total of 27, 17, and 11 studies were found for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and 126 MLR-based LSS formulae (n = 120 for MPA, n = 6 for fMPA) were included in the review. Three time-point equations were the most frequent. Four MPA LSSs: 2.8401 + 5.7435 × C0 + 0.2655 × C0.5 + 1.1546 × C1 + 2.8971 × C4 for adult renal transplant recipients, 1.783 + 1.248 × C1 + 0.888 × C2 + 8.027 × C4 for adults after islet transplantation, 0.10 + 11.15 × C0 + 0.42 × C1 + 2.80 × C2 for adults after heart transplantation, and 8.217 + 3.163 × C0 + 0.994 × C1 + 1.334 × C2 + 4.183 × C4 for pediatric renal transplant recipients, plus one fMPA LSS, 34.2 + 1.12 × C1 + 1.29 × C2 + 2.28 × C4 + 3.95 × C6 for adult liver transplant recipients, seemed to be the most promising and should be validated in independent patient groups before introduction into clinical practice. The LSSs for pediatric patients were few and not fully characterized. There were only a few fMPA LSSs although fMPA is a pharmacologically active form of the drug.

Conclusions

The review includes updated MPA LSSs, e.g., for different MPA formulations (suspension, dispersible tablets), generic form, and intravenous administration for adult and pediatric patients, and emphasizes the need of individual therapeutic approaches according to MMF indication. Five MLR-based MPA LSSs might be implemented into clinical practice after evaluation in independent groups of patients. Further studies are required, e.g., to establish fMPA LSS in pediatric patients.

Nonlinear relationship between enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium dose and mycophenolic acid exposure in Han kidney transplantation recipients

The aim of the research was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) by quantification of the active metabolite of mycophenolic acid (MPA) after multiple escalating oral doses in Han kidney transplant recipients. A total of 28 Han postoperative kidney transplant recipients were given a multiple-dose of 540, 720 or 900 mg of EC-MPS two times a day in combination with tacrolimus for 6 days. Blood specimens were collected at each time point from 0 to 12 h after EC-MPS administration. MPA plasma concentrations were measured by UPLC—UV. The relationship between the EC-MPS dose and its PK parameters was assessed. In the range from 540 to 900 mg, C_max and AUC_0—12h did not increase with dose escalation. The AUC_0—12h, C_max, C₀ and T_max for the 540 720 and 900 mg doses were not significantly different, respectively (P >0.05). AUC_0—12 h and C_max were increased less than proportionally with increasing EC-MPS dose levels. Inter-individual variability in AUC_0—12h, C_max and C₀ were considerable. Nonlinear PK relationships were found from the doses of 540–900 mg of EC-MPS.

A prospective analysis of the effects of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil co-medicated with a proton pump inhibitor in kidney transplant recipients at a single institute in China

BACKGROUND

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), two prodrugs of mycophenolic acid (MPA), have been used in immunosuppressive regimens. After being taken orally, both of them transform to MPA to achieve immune suppression effects; however, the main site of absorption and metabolism of EC-MPS is different from that of MMF in vivo. Therefore, combined application with related drugs may result in different MPA levels and have different clinical effects in kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of EC-MPS compared with MMF in Chinese renal transplant patients comedicated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI).

METHODS

Our subjects were 88 patients who received renal transplants at the 309th Hospital of the Chinese PLA from May 2010 to April 2013. These were made up of two groups including 27 patients with EC-MPS and 61 with MMF. The immunosuppression regimen was EC-MPS/MMF + cyclosporine/tacrolimus + steroid hormone, comedicated with a PPI (omeprazole). The patients' levels of exposure of MPA within 1 week after operation were monitored. Clinical indicators such as incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection, the rate of change of serum creatinine hemoglobin, leucocytes, and neutrophils, as well as clinical adverse drug reactions and drug conversion were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The kidney function of patients recovered to normal in both the EC-MPS and MMF groups. The mean concentration to peak (Cmax), the mean half-life (t1/2), and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12) of MPA in the EC-MPS group were higher than those in the MMF group (P < .05). This indicated that the pharmacokinetic parameters for MPA when EC-MPS is co-administered with a PPI in kidney transplant patients in China is better than for comedication with MMF and a PPI. The MMF group had a higher incidence of drug withdrawal because of higher infection rates, leucocyte decrease, and more gastrointestinal side effects than the EC-MPS group (P < .05). No significant differences in the clinical effect on kidney transplant recipients were observed in the limited observation time.

Mycophenolic Acid pharmacokinetics early after kidney transplant

OBJECTIVES

To determine the mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic profile early after transplant in Iranian kidney graft recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed during 6 months in 31 patients who recently had kidney transplant and received fixed doses of mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/d). The plasma levels of mycophenolic acid were determined by high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The mean first mycophenolic acid peak level was 10 ± 5 mg/L. The mean mycophenolic acid area under the curve was 26 ± 19 mgh/L and apparent clearance was 57 ± 55 L/h. The mycophenolic acid area under the curve values of only 8 patients (26%) were within the therapeutic range (30-60 mgh/L). The first, second, and third mycophenolic acid peak levels correlated significantly with mycophenolic acid area under the curve (P < .05). Mycophenolic acid concentration at 10 hours had the highest correlation with mycophenolic acid area under the curve (r=0.962; P < .05). No statistically significant differences were evident in the mean mycophenolic acid area under the curve between men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high degree of variation between different patients in mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics early after kidney transplant.

Evalutation of mycophenolic acid systemic exposure by limited sampling strategy in kidney transplant recipients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are prodrugs of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Although many patients still receive MMF as an inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor, EC-MPS could be considered a reliable alternative to MMF in the immunosuppressive protocols of kidney transplant recipients. MPA shows high pharmacokinetic variability and consequently a 12-h area under the curve (AUC(0-12)) should be used to guide the therapeutic dosage. However, patient compliance and economic costs make MPA AUC(0-12) an unpractical approach. Limited sampling strategies or predictive systemic drug exposure equation models based on limited sampling times are available only for MMF but lack for EC-MPS.

METHODS

The present study enrolled 26 kidney transplant recipients receiving EC-MPS as part of their immunosuppressive therapy. Twenty-six full MPA AUC(0-12) were performed. By using multiple stepwise regression analysis, we obtained several predictive equations of MPA systemic exposure in this group of patients. The value of the selected equations was tested in a subsequently enrolled group of 26 kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

The best equations obtained in the first group of patients were the following: 22.906 + 3.880·C(0) + 1.117·C(1) + 7.527·C(8) (r = 0.901) and 35.064 +3.784·C(0) + 1.002·C(1) + 1.192·C(2) (r = 0.846). These equation models showed an optimal agreement between the full AUCs and estimated AUCs by using the validation group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited sampling strategies are useful for MPA AUC(0-12) estimation in patients receiving EC-MPS and cyclosporine. The choice of one or the other equation model depends on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the patients, in particular the potential presence of enterohepatic recirculation.

Limited sampling strategies for mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil, a widely used immunosuppressant. Numerous studies have developed limited sampling strategies (LSSs) to predict MPA AUC in solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and assess quality of literature pertaining to MPA LSSs, evaluate clinical implications and provide suggestions for future research.

METHODS

Literature searches of MEDLINE (1966 - May 2009) and EMBASE (1980 - May 2009) for English articles in solid organ transplantation, along with manual review of article references were conducted. Included articles were categorized according to criteria adapted from levels of evidence of the US Preventative Services Task Force.

RESULTS

Of a total of 29 studies identified, 20 were in kidney, 4 in heart, 4 in liver and 1 in lung transplantation and 7 were in pediatrics. A total of 14 studies were deemed to be Level I evidence studies, 3 were Level II-1, 1 was Level II-2 and 11 were Level III.

CONCLUSIONS

Although various LSSs that are well correlated to MPA AUC while being relatively unbiased and precise to predict MPA AUC have been developed, further research is needed to determine validity of these LSSs in a variety of patient populations and to determine if these LSSs improve patient outcomes.

Limited sampling strategies for predicting area under the concentration-time curve of mycophenolic acid in islet transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil is widely used in islet transplant recipients and its active metabolite, mycophenolic acid (MPA), exhibits wide pharmacokinetic variability. However, to our knowledge, no limited sampling strategy (LSS) exists for monitoring MPA in this subpopulation.

OBJECTIVE

To define optimal LSSs for MPA monitoring and to test their predictive performance in islet transplant recipients.

METHODS

After written informed consent was obtained and upon administration of a steady-state morning mycophenolate mofetil dose, blood samples were collected at 0, 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours from 16 stable islet transplant recipients. MPA concentrations were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection and pharmacokinetic parameters analyzed by noncompartmental modeling. All 16 patients' profiles were used to develop the LSSs via multiple regression analysis. Potential LSSs were restricted to ones having R(2) 0.90 or greater and 3 or fewer time points within the first 4 hours postdose. Resulting equations were validated for their predictive performance using the jackknife method, with acceptable criteria for bias and precision preset to within +/-15%. In addition, 14 published LSSs (in the renal transplant population) were tested in our islet transplant patients.

RESULTS

Five LSSs met preset criteria and had conventional sampling times: AUC = 1.783 + 1.248C1 + 0.888C2 + 8.027C4 (R2 = 0.98, bias = -3.09%, precision = 9.53%) AUC = 2.778 + 1.413C1 + 0.963C3 + 7.511C4 (R2 = 0.97, bias = -3.22%, precision = 11.02%) AUC = 1.448 + 1.239C1 + 0.271C1.5 + 9.108 C4 (R2 = 0.96, bias = -1.90%, precision = 11.46) AUC = 1.410 - 0.259C0 + 1.443C1 + 9.622C4 (R2 = 0.96, bias = -2.68%, precision = 11.53%) AUC = 1.547 + 1.417C1 + 9.448C4 (R2 = 0.96, bias = -2.46%, precision = 11.14%) where AUC = area under the concentration-time curve. None of the other published LSSs in the renal transplant population met the preset criteria for bias and precision.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, these are the first precise and accurate LSSs for predicting MPA AUC developed specifically for islet transplant recipients. The LSS that we recommend is the one utilizing 2 concentrations: AUC = 1.547 + 1.417C1 + 9.448C4. This equation is convenient and clinically feasible. Other islet transplant centers may wish to validate our equation in their population or use our template as a guide to develop accurate and precise LSSs specific to their patient population.