Prognostic Value of Absent End-Diastolic Flow Within the First Week Following Renal Transplantation

End-diastolic velocity mediates the relationship between renal resistive index and the risk of death

OBJECTIVE

Renal resistive index predicts the risk of death in many populations but the mechanism linking renal resistive index and death remains elusive. Renal resistive index is derived from end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and peak systolic velocity (PSV). However, the predictive value of EDV or PSV considered alone is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2362 consecutive patients who received a kidney transplant from 1985 to 2017. EDV and PSV were measured at 3 months after transplantation, renal resistive index was calculated, and the risk of death was assessed [median follow-up: 6.25 years (0.25-29.15); total observation period: 13 201 patient-years].

RESULTS

Doppler indices were available in 1721 of 2362 (78.9%) patients (exclusions: 113 who died or returned to dialysis before, 427 with no Doppler studies, 27 with renal artery stenosis, 74 missing values). Among them, 279 (16.4%) had diabetes before transplantation. Mean age was 51.5 ± 14.7, 1097 (63.7%) were male. During follow-up, 217 of 1721 (12.6%) patients died. Renal resistive index and EDV shared many determinants (notably systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure, recipient age and diabetes) unlike renal resistive index and PSV. EDV used as a binary [lowest tertile vs. higher values: (hazard ratio: 2.57 (1.96-3.36), P  < 0.001)] and as a continuous (the lower EDV, the greater the risk of death) variable was significantly associated with the risk of death. This finding was confirmed in multivariable analyses. Prediction of similar magnitude was found for renal resistive index. No association was found between PSV used as a binary or a continuous variable and the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Low EDV explains high renal resistive index, and the mechanism-linking renal resistive index to the risk of death is through low EDV.

Value and limitations of sonography in kidney transplant recipients with special attention to the resistive index - An update

Kidney transplantation has become the standard treatment for end-stage renal disease. Even though the success rates are high, early and late post-transplant complications remain a major clinical problem due to the risk of graft failure. Therefore, it is of highest interest to early diagnose post-transplant complications. Ultrasound with color coded Duplex analysis plays a crucial role in imaging mechanical and vascular complications. In this article, we give an update of the visualizable complications in kidney transplant recipients and discuss the value of resistive index (RI) measurement with its limitations in allograft rejection.

Shear wave elastography and Doppler ultrasound in kidney transplant recipients

Objective

To evaluate the association between shear wave elastography parameters and arterial resistance in kidney transplant recipients.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective cross-sectional study involving consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients. All patients underwent color Doppler to evaluate the resistive index (RI) and ultrasound shear wave elastography for the quantification of renal allograft stiffness.

Results

We evaluated 55 patients, of whom 9 (16.4%) had an RI defined as abnormal (≥ 0.79) and 46 (83.6%) had an RI defined as normal (< 0.79). The mean age was higher in the abnormal RI group than in the normal RI group (68.0 ± 8.6 years vs. 42.6 ± 14.1 years; p < 0.001), as was the mean shear wave velocity (2.6 ± 0.4 m/s vs. 2.2 ± 0.4 m/s; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis identified two independent predictors of arterial resistance: age (OR = 1.169; 95% CI: 1.056 to 1.294; p = 0.003) and shear wave velocity (OR = 17.1; 95% CI: 1.137 to 257.83; p = 0.040).

Conclusion

We observed an association between rigidity in the cortex of the transplanted kidney, as evaluated by shear wave elastography, and arterial resistance, as evaluated by color Doppler, in kidney transplant recipients.

The association between renal resistive index and premature mortality after kidney transplantation is modified by pre-transplant diabetes status: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Renal resistive index (RI) predicts mortality in renal transplant recipients, but we do not know whether this is true in diabetic patients. The objective of this study was to analyse the long-term predictive value of RI for death with a functioning graft (DWFG) in renal transplant recipients with or without pre-transplant diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in 1800 renal transplant recipients between 1985 and 2017 who were followed for up to 30 years (total observation period: 14 202 patient years). Donor and recipient characteristics at time of transplantation and at 3 months were reviewed. The long-term predictive value of RI for DWFG and the age-RI and arterial pressure-RI relationships were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 284/1800 (15.7%) patients had diabetes mellitus before transplantation. RI was <0.75 in 1327/1800 patients (73.7%). High RI was associated with a higher risk of DWFG in non-diabetic patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.39, 95% confidence interval 2.50-4.61; P < 0.001], but not in patients with pre-transplant diabetes (HR = 1.25, 0.70-2.19; P = 0.39), even after multiple adjustments. There was no interaction between diabetes and age. In contrast, there was an interaction between RI and pulse pressure.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that RI is not a predictor of DWFG in diabetic renal transplant recipients, in contrast to non-diabetic recipients. These findings could be due to a different age-RI or pulse pressure-RI relationship.

Impact on renal resistive index of diabetes in renal transplant donors and recipients: A retrospective analysis of 1827 kidney transplant recipients

High renal resistive index (RI) is observed in diabetes and is associated with poor patient survival, but whether it is primarily due to renal vascular resistance or systemic vascular alterations is unclear. The respective impact of kidney transplant from diabetic donors or to diabetic recipients on RI would shed some light on this issue. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of donor and recipient diabetes on RI in order to understand the respective impact of the kidney and the vascular environment. The authors conducted a retrospective study in 1827 renal transplant recipients who received a kidney between 1985 and 2017, and had Doppler measurements at 3 months after transplant. Donor and recipient characteristics at the time of transplant and at 3 months were reviewed. Both donor diabetes and recipient diabetes were associated with RI in univariate analysis, but only recipient diabetes remained significantly associated in stepwise multivariate analyses (effect estimate on RI: +0.03 ± 0.005, P < 0.001). These findings were confirmed when RI was expressed as a binary variable using a cutoff of 0.75 (OR = 2.50 [1.77, 3.54], P < 0.001). Other determinants of RI were recipient characteristics (age, sex, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and duration of dialysis). Donor characteristics were not associated with RI. Our results suggest that high RI observed in diabetic recipients shortly after transplant is primarily due to the new vascular environment, rather than to characteristics of the transplanted kidney. Therefore, RI reflects systemic rather than intra-renal changes.

Use of Intraoperative Duplex Ultrasound and Resistance Index Reduces Complications in Living Renal Donor Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The treatment of choice in end-stage renal disease is transplantation. Hemodynamic disturbances can evoke graft loss, while early ultrasound identification of vascular problems improves outcome. The aim of this study was to identify differences in postoperative complications with and without systematic intraoperative Doppler ultrasound use.

METHODS

The primary outcome was the postoperative rate of complications and the secondary aim was to find a predictive resistance index cut-off value, which would show where surgical reintervention was necessary. Over a 10-year period, 108 renal transplants were performed from living donors at our institution. In group 1 (n = 67), intraoperative duplex ultrasound and intraparenchymatous resistance index measurements assessed patients, while in group 2 (n = 41), no ultrasound was performed.

RESULTS

There were no intergroup differences in the overall postoperative complication rate or in benefit to graft or patient survival with Doppler use. However, significantly more vascular complications (10% vs 0%, P = .02) and more acute rejections (37% vs 10%) occurred in group 2 than in group 1. Therefore, an intraoperative cut-off value of the resistance index 0.5 was proposed to justify immediate surgical revision.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report demonstrating benefits of systematic intraoperative Doppler ultrasound on postoperative complications in renal transplantation from living donors. Our results support surgical revision with a resistance index <0.5.

[Experimental study with Doppler ultrasound in partial chronic obstructive uropathy]

INTRODUCTION

This study has aimed to assess the hemodynamic parameters, Renal Resistive Index (RI), Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV), End-Diastolic Velocity (EDV) and Blood Flow of the Renal Artery (FR) by Doppler Ultrasound for diagnosis and monitoring postsurgical partial chronic obstructive uropathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty pigs were used. The experiment was divided into three phases. Phase I consisted of a duplex-Doppler evaluation of the both kidneys to determine the parameters under study. The ratio of each index is calculated as the difference between the value of study kidney and the contralateral. After, a fluoroscopic examination was performed by compressive cystography, excretory urography and retrograde ureteropyelography. Finally, a model of partial right ureteral obstruction was created. After six weeks of the obstructive model, Phase II was begun with the diagnosis of the uropathy, by means of the aforementioned diagnostic methods and the endourological treatment was completed. Phase III is a follow-up performed at 6 months of treatment using the same methods as in the previous phases.

RESULTS

Of the parameters studied, the EDV and its ratio showed greater sensitivity and specificity as a diagnostic marker of obstructive uropathy. In the postoperative monitoring, it was observed that the RI and the EDV returned to baseline levels, with the baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

The ΔEDV and its ratio is the parameter that shows the greater efficacy for the diagnosis of chronic partial obstructive uropathy, however, it is insufficient to avoid conventional diagnostic techniques. All the parameters, mainly the EDV, have proven useful as complementary tests for monitoring after endourologic resolution of obstructive uropathy.

Renal resistive index as a new independent risk factor for new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation

Pulse pressure and urinary albumin excretion were recently identified as risk factors of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation (NODAT), suggesting that microvascular injury may be implicated in NODAT. However, the relationship between of microvascular injury and NODAT is unknown. In the present long-term (median follow-up: 5.7years; observation period: 4908 patient-years) retrospective study in 656 renal transplant recipients, the association between baseline renal resistance index (RI, used as a marker of widespread microvascular damage) and the incidence of NODAT was assessed. The incidence of NODAT was 11.2% and 14.6% at 5 and 10years, respectively, after transplantation. RI at 3months was a risk factor for NODAT [hazard ratio (HR) per 0.1: 2.19 (1.55-3.09), P<0.0001]. RI >0.75 (vs. 0≤0.75) was a potent a predictor of NODAT [HR: 3.29 (1.91-5.67), P<0.0001], even after adjustments [HR: 3.29 (1.50-7.24), P=0.0030] on age, weight, glucose, nephropathy, and arterial pressure. Similar results were observed when RI was measured at 1month [HR per 0.1:1.74 (1.33-2.27), P<0.0001] and 12months [HR per 0.1:1.74 (1.33-2.27), P<0.0001] after transplantation. High RI early after renal transplantation is a long-term risk factor for NODAT, and could be used to refine the individual risk of NODAT.