Basiliximab as an Alternative to Antithymocyte Globulin for Early Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus seroprevalence, infection, and disease in Chinese thoracic organ transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after transplantation. This study aimed to investigate CMV seroprevalence, infection, and disease in Chinese thoracic organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

The clinical data of the patients who underwent lung and/or heart transplantation between January 2015 and October 2020 were retrospectively collected from four transplantation centers in China.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients were analyzed. The CMV serostatus was donor positive (D⁺) recipient negative (R^-) in 19 (6.17%) patients, D⁺/R⁺ in 233 (75.65%), D^-/R⁺ in 36 (11.69%), and D^-/R^- in 20 (6.50%). CMV DNAemia was detected in 52.3% of the patients and tissue-invasive CMV disease was diagnosed in 16.2% of the patients. Only 31.8% of the patients adhered to the postdischarge valganciclovir therapy. The D⁺/R^- serostatus (odds ratio [OR]: 18.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.80-188.68), no valganciclovir prophylaxis (OR: 2.64; 95% CI: 1.05-6.64), and higher doses of rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin (> 2 mg/kg) (OR: 4.25; 95% CI: 1.92-9.42) were risk factors of CMV disease.

CONCLUSION

CMV seroprevalence was high in Chinese thoracic organ transplant donors and recipients. The low adherence rate to the postdischarge CMV prophylaxis therapy in Chinese patients is still an unresolved issue.

Current perspective of immunomodulators for lung transplant

Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for selected patients suffering from end-stage lung disease. More intensive immunosuppression is enforced after lung transplants owing to a greater risk of rejection than after any other solid organ transplants. The commencing of lung transplantation in the modern era was in 1983 when the Toronto Lung Transplant Group executed the first successful lung transplant. A total of 43,785 lung transplants and 1365 heart-lung transplants have been performed from 1 Jan 1988 until 31 Jan 2021. The aim of this review article is to discuss the existing immunosuppressive strategies and emerging agents to prevent acute and chronic rejection in lung transplantation.

Basiliximab vs. Antithymocyte Globulin as Initial Induction Therapy for Lung Transplantation: A National Two Years Review

Basiliximab (BAS) is an interleukin-2 monoclonal antibody initially used as induction therapy after liver and kidney transplantation. BAS use after lung transplantation (LTx) has supplanted antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as the main induction immunosuppression over the years, but few studies have compared them. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between BAS and ATG in LTx. We performed a retrospective analysis of all LTx done in Portugal between January 2016 and December 2019. Three groups were made according to the initial induction status: BAS, ATG or no induction (NI). The occurrences of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, pneumonia, side effects, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), acute rejection, chronic allograft disfunction (CLAD) and death episodes were assessed during two years after LTx. A total of 124 patients were divided in 3 groups: 61 (49.2%) BAS; 43 (34.7%) ATG; 20 (16.1%) NI. The incidences of pneumonia and CMV were similar between induction groups. Additionally, there was no difference between the induction groups in PGD, acute rejection, CLAD, deaths and two-year survival. Side effects were reported only in ATG group (n = 20; 46.5%). In our study, BAS had a better safety profile than ATG in LTx with a similar efficacy.

Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation is an area devoid of robust clinical data. This chapter will review the history of immunosuppression in lung transplantation. Additionally, it will evaluate the three classes of induction, maintenance, and rescue immunosuppression in detail. Induction immunosuppression in lung transplantation aims to decrease incidence of lung allograft rejection, however infectious risk must be considered when determining if induction is appropriate and which agent is most favorable. Similar to other solid organ transplant patient populations, a multi-drug approach is commonly prescribed for maintenance immunosuppression to minimize single agent drug toxicities. Emphasis of this review is placed on key medication considerations including dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Clinical considerations will be reviewed per drug class given available literature. Finally, acute cellular, antibody mediated, and chronic rejection are reviewed.

Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies

The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.

Fungal Infections Potentiated by Biologics

Biologic therapies including monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and other agents represent a notable expansion in the pharmacotherapy armamentarium in treatment of a variety of diseases. Many of these therapies possess direct or indirect immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects, which have been associated with bacterial, viral, and fungal opportunistic infections. Careful screening of baseline risk factors before initiation, targeted preventive measures, and vigilant monitoring while on active biologic therapy mitigate these risks as use of biologics becomes more commonplace. This review compiles reported evidence of fungal infections associated with these agents with a focus on the tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor class.

Immunosuppressive strategies in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a viable option for those with end-stage lung disease which is evidenced by the continued increase in the number of lung transplantations worldwide. However, patients and clinicians are constantly faced with acute and chronic rejection, infectious complications, drug toxicities, and malignancies throughout the lifetime of the lung transplant recipient. Conventional maintenance immunosuppression therapy consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), anti-metabolite, and corticosteroids have become the standard regimen but newer agents and modalities continue to be developed. Here we will review induction agents, maintenance immunosuppressives, adjunctive therapies and other strategies to improve long-term outcomes.

Immunosuppressive Treatment and Its Effect on the Occurrence of Pneumocystis jiroveci, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pnemoniae, and Legionella pneumophila Infections/Colonizations Among Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of infections caused by Pneumocystis jiroveci, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae among lung transplant recipients in the context of immunosuppression.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 94 patients (37 women and 57 men; mean age 42.03 years) transplanted between 2009 and 2016 at the Silesia Center for Heart Diseases (SCCS). Immunosuppressive treatment (induction and maintenance therapy) was assessed. The immunofluorescence methods were used to detect the P. jiroveci, L. pneumophila, C. pneumoniae, and M. pneumoniae antigens in samples obtained from the respiratory tract.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of 94 graft recipients developed atypical or opportunistic infection. The median time of its occurrence was 178 days after transplantation. P. jiroveci was responsible for 84.38% of first infections. Five patients developed infection with P. jiroveci and C. pneumoniae. None of the infections occurred during induction of immunosuppression. An opportunistic or atypical infection developed in 19.35% of the patients treated with a tacrolimus-based regimen, and in 43.33% of patients on a cyclosporine-based regimen.

CONCLUSION

Infection with P. jiroveci is a recognized problem after lung transplantation and should be monitored. The percentage of infected patients is higher in patients treated with a cyclosporine-based regimen in comparison to those treated with tacrolimus.

The effect of different immunoprophylaxis regimens on post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The effects of different immunoprophylaxis regimens on cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) have not been compared.

METHODS

In a cohort, we studied 343 CMV-seropositive recipient (R+) and 83 seronegative donor/recipient (D-/R-) consecutive LTRs from 2004 to 2007. Immunoprophylaxis regimens included steroid-only, steroids plus rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG), and steroids plus basiliximab. Logistic regression analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and log-rank test were performed for multivariate analysis as appropriate.

RESULTS

In total, 164 (39%), 69 (16%), and 193 (45%) patients received steroid-only, basiliximab, and rATG immunoprophylaxis, respectively. CMV infection rates were 15.7% (54/343) in CMV R+ LTRs and 2.4% (2/83) in CMV R- LTRs. Among CMV R+ LTRs who received rATG, the use of at least 6 weeks of CMV prophylaxis reduced the rate of CMV infection from 24.4% (19/78) to 11.7% (9/77). In multivariate analysis, CMV R+ vs D-/R- (odds ratio [OR]=13.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-97.2), rATG >3 mg/kg vs steroid-only induction (OR=1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.3), and CMV prophylaxis <6 weeks vs ≥6 weeks (OR=2.7, 95% CI: 1.2-6.4) were independently associated with CMV infection. Subgroup analysis in CMV D-/R+ group who received rATG showed that ≥6 weeks of CMV prophylaxis significantly decreased the risk of CMV infection (OR=1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.9; P=.03).

CONCLUSION

The use of rATG immunoprophylaxis increases the risk of CMV infection in CMV-seropositive LTRs, specifically in the CMV D-/R+ group. Prophylaxis with valganciclovir in this group for at least 6 weeks decreases the risk of CMV infection.

Risks and Epidemiology of Infections After Lung or Heart–Lung Transplantation

Nowadays, lung transplantation is an established treatment option of end-stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. Post-transplant infections are a significant contributor to overall morbidity and mortality in the lung transplant recipient that, in turn, are higher than in other solid organ transplant recipients. This is likely due to several specific factors such as the constant exposure to the outside environment and the colonized native airway, and the disruption of usual mechanisms of defense including the cough reflex, bronchial circulation, and lymphatic drainage. This chapter will review the common infections that develop in the lung or heart–lung transplant recipient, including the general risk factors for infection in this population, and specific features of prophylaxis and treatment for the most frequent bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. The effects of infection on lung transplant rejection will also be discussed.

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation can be a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage lung diseases. Unfortunately, long term graft and patient survival are limited by both acute and chronic allograft rejection, with a median survival of just over 6 years. Immunosuppressive regimens are employed to reduce the rate of rejection, and while protocols vary from center to center, conventional maintenance therapy consists of triple drug therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), antiproliferative agents [azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate, sirolimus (srl), everolimus (evl)], and corticosteroids (CS). Roughly 50% of lung transplant centers also utilize induction therapy, with polyclonal antibody preparations [equine or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)], interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) (daclizumab or basiliximab), or alemtuzumab. This review summarizes these agents and the data surrounding their use in lung transplantation, as well as additional common and novel therapies in lung transplantation. Despite the progression of the management of lung transplant recipients, they continue to be at high risk of treatment-related complications, and poor graft and patient survival. Randomized clinical trials are needed to allow for the development of better agents, regimens and techniques to address above mentioned issues and reduce morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients.

Aktueller Stand der Lungentransplantation

Die Lungentransplantation ist eine akzeptierte Behandlungsmethode für ausgewählte Patienten mit Lungenerkrankungen im Endstadium. Durch die Transplantation können die Überlebenszeit und die Lebensqualität der Betroffenen verbessert werden. Sowohl pulmonale als auch nichtpulmonale Komplikationen beeinträchtigen die Kurz- und die Langzeitergebnisse. Entscheidend bei der Therapie dieser Komplikationen sind das frühzeitige Erkennen und die schnelle Behandlung zur Verhinderung von sekundären Folgekomplikationen. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die häufigsten Probleme der Lungentransplantation, die im peri- und postoperativen Verlauf auftreten können.

Lung transplant infection

Lung transplantation has become an accepted therapeutic procedure for the treatment of end‐stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. Despite improved survival rates over the decades, lung transplant recipients have lower survival rates than other solid organ transplant recipients. The morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation is largely due to infection‐ and rejection‐related complications. This article will review the common infections that develop in the lung transplant recipient, including the general risk factors for infection in this population, and the most frequent bacterial, viral, fungal and other less frequent opportunistic infections. The epidemiology, diagnosis, prophylaxis, treatment and outcomes for the different microbial pathogens will be reviewed. The effects of infection on lung transplant rejection will also be discussed.