Orthotopic Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: One Center's Experience in the Northeast of Brazil

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN HEPATITIS DELTA: SOUTH AMERICA EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND

The Amazon region is one of the main endemic areas of hepatitis delta in the world and the only one related to the presence of genotype 3 of the delta virus.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the profile, mortality and survival of cirrhotic patients submitted to liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis delta virus and compare with those transplanted by hepatitis B virus monoinfection.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational and descriptive study. From May 2002 to December 2011, 629 liver transplants were performed at the Walter Cantídio University Hospital, of which 29 patients were transplanted due to cirrhosis caused by chronic delta virus infection and 40 by hepatitis B chronic monoinfection. The variables analyzed were: age, sex, MELD score, Child-Pugh score, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence before the transplantation, perioperative platelet count, mortality and survival.

RESULTS

The Delta Group was younger and all came from the Brazilian Amazon Region. Group B presented a higher proportion of male patients (92.5%) compared to Group D (58.6%). The occurrence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding before transplantation, MELD score, and Child-Pugh score did not show statistical differences between groups. The occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality were higher in the hepatitis B Group. The survival in 4 years was 95% in the Delta Group and 75% in the B Group, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.034). Patients with hepatitis delta presented more evident thrombocytopenia in the pre-transplantation and in the immediate postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

The hepatitis by delta virus patients who underwent liver transplantation were predominantly male, coming from the Brazilian Amazon region and with similar liver function to the hepatitis B virus patients. They had a lower incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, more marked perioperative thrombocytopenia levels and frequent episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients with hepatitis by delta virus had lower mortality and higher survival than patients with hepatitis B virus.

Ten-year experience with liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in a Federal University Hospital in the Northeast of Brazil

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent and important primary liver tumor, with annual worldwide incidence of over 1 million cases, accounting for at least 500,000 deaths per year. The majority of cases of HCC occur in the setting of liver cirrhosis. In this retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study, between May 2002 and April 2012, 664 liver transplantations (LT) were conducted at a Federal University Hospital in the Northeast of Brazil, among which 140 LT were performed in patients with HCC. The tumor was more frequent in men with an average age of 56 years and infected with hepatitis C virus, many with a history of alcohol abuse. Alpha-fetoprotein was not useful in the diagnosis, and imaging methods have failed to diagnose the nodules in 19 patients (13.6%). Transarterial chemoembolization was the most-used bridging therapy to inhibit tumor growth for patients with HCC eligible for transplantation. The implementation of the Model for End Stage Liver Disease score in 2006 brought benefits to these patients. The rate of HCC recurrence after LT was 8.57% and occurred more often in the first 2 years after transplantation, with the liver graft being the most common site. Significant risk factors for recurrence were a long time on the LT waiting list, number of liver nodules over 3.5, and the presence of vascular invasion. In conclusion, LT for HCC leads to excellent long-term survival, with relatively few patients dying from tumor recurrence.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors worldwide and liver transplantation (LT) is considered as the best therapeutic option for patients with HCC combined with cirrhosis. However, tumor recurrence after LT for HCC remains the major obstacle for long-term survival. The present study was to evaluate the efficacy and necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HCC who had undergone LT.

DATA SOURCES

Several databases were searched to identify comparative studies fulfilling the predefined selection criteria before October 2014. Suitable studies were chosen and data extracted for meta-analysis. Three authors independently evaluated the bias of each study according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Intervention. Stata 12 was used for statistical analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) was considered as a summary statistic for overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Three prospective studies and 5 retrospective studies including 360 patients (166 in the adjuvant chemotherapy group, and 194 in the control group) were included. Compared with the control group, post-LT adjuvant chemotherapy conferred significant benefit for overall survival (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.22-0.52; P=0.000). Meanwhile, the results showed an improvement for disease-free survival on favoring adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.95; P=0.004). However, no significant difference in HCC recurrence rate was observed between the two groups (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.40-4.00; P=0.696). Descriptions of adverse events were of anecdotal nature and did not allow meta-analytic calculations.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy after LT for HCC can significantly prolong patient's survival and delay the recurrence of HCC. For advanced HCC with poor differentiation, patients may perhaps benefit from the early implantation of adjuvant chemotherapy after LT.

Epidemiology of HCC in Brazil: incidence and risk factors in a ten-year cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The lack of information about hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Brazil weakens health policy in preventing deaths from the illness. The aim of this study was to establish the cumulative incidence and the risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients under a surveillance program.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

884 patients with compensated cirrhosis were prospectively followed up for at least five years, from August 1998 until August 2008, with at least one annual ultrasonography liver examination and serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) measurement.

RESULTS

Among 884 patients, 72 (8.1%) developed a tumor with a median follow up of 21.4 months. In the hepatocellular carcinoma group, hepatitis C virus infection was the major etiological factor (65.3%), 56.9% (41/72) were male and the mean average age was 57 ± 10 years. The annual incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma was 2.9%. 79.2% (57/72) of HCCs were detected within Milan Criteria, and the mean survival time was 52.3 months, significantly higher than for those outside Milan, with a mean time of 40.6 months (p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

The annual incidence of HCC among this large series of Brazilian cirrhotic patients was around 2.9% with a detection rate of 8.1%, or a cumulative incidence rate over five years of 14.3%. The three variables related to HCC risk were low serum albumin [HR: 0.518 (0.46-0.78)], high AFP > 20 ng/mL [HR: 3.16 (1.86-5.38)], and ethnicity (Brazilian-East Asian descendants vs. other mixed Brazilian ethnicities) [HR: 2.86 (1.48-5.53)].

Systematic review: the prognostic role of alpha-fetoprotein following liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) offers a possible cure for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies report that preoperative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a prognostic indicator that can predict survival and recurrence in these patients.

AIM

To undertake a systematic review of available literature on preoperative AFP as a predictor of survival and recurrence following LT for HCC.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Google scholar databases to identify studies reporting AFP as a prognostic marker in LT for HCC. Primary outcomes of interest were overall survival and recurrence. Secondary outcomes were correlation of pre-LT AFP with vascular invasion and grade of tumour differentiation.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria (12,159 patients). The majority were male (9603, 78.9%). All were observational studies and only one prospective. Methodological quality was rated as poor for all studies, with selection and observer bias apparent for most cohorts. Reported survival rates and recurrence rates varied widely between the studies although overall demonstrated better outcomes for those with lower (<1000 ng/mL) pre-LT AFP levels. Similarly, rates of vascular invasion and poor tumour differentiation were higher in those with high pre-LT AFP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

A quantity of AFP >1000 ng/mL is associated with poorer outcomes from liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. The quality of studies was generally poor and precluded valid statistical meta-analysis. There is a need to improve the performance and reporting of primary prognostic studies to facilitate high quality systematic review and meta-analysis.

Combination adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary open-label study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX regimen on the outcome after LT for HCC patients who did not meet the Milan criteria. Ninety-five consecutive HCC patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing LT were enrolled. Fifty-eight who did not meet the Milan criteria were randomized to open-label treatment with or without adjuvant chemotherapy after LT (n = 29/group). The FOLFOX chemotherapy protocol comprised 3-week cycles of oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, leucovorin (calcium folinate, CF) 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by 3-day, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2000 mg/m(2) as a 48-h continuous infusion, for up to six courses in the 1st year after transplantation. Median survival was extended by 4.57 months by combination chemotherapy. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 89.7% and 79.3% with chemotherapy versus 69.0% and 62.1% without chemotherapy. The cumulative 1-year survival was significantly increased by chemotherapy (log-rank test, P = 0.043). The 6-month tumor-free survival rate was 24.1% higher with chemotherapy than without. The recurrence rate after LT was significantly different between the two groups at 6 months (P = 0.036), but not at 3 years (P = 0.102). The chemotherapy regimen was generally well tolerated. Post-LT adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin/5-FU/CF could not prevent tumor recurrence post-LT but may contribute to improve the survival of HCC patients who do not meet the Milan criteria. These results should be verified in a larger sample with a longer follow-up period.

Clinical outcome of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinomas≤2 cm

BACKGROUND

The treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs)≤2 cm (HCC2-) is still controversial. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data for HCC2- and HCCs>2 cm (HCC2+) to establish the treatment strategy for HCC2-.

METHODS

Between April 2000 and December 2008, 206 patients with single HCC, who underwent hepatectomy for the first time, and whose outcomes could be tracked, were included in the study. There were 46 HCC2- and 160 HCC2+ patients. Survival and disease-free survival rates were compared between the two groups, in relation to various clinicopathological data.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100%, 92.6%, and 72.8% for HCC2- and 93.3%, 72.4%, and 57% for HCC2+, respectively (P=0.0098). The 1, 3, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 86%, 42.6%, and 31% for HCC2-, and 64.7%, 35.9%, and 12.5% for HCC2+, respectively (P=0.0642). Survival rates were better for HCC2- than for HCC2+ in terms of abnormal serum des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin, Child-Pugh Class A, single infection with HBV or HCV, and operative method used for anatomical resection, irrespective of ICG R15. Disease-free survival rates were better for HCC2- than for HCC2+ in terms of Child-Pugh Class A, and operative method used for anatomical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

HCC2- has a better clinical outcome than HCC2+ after hepatic resection. Especially, HCC2- with an abnormal DCP value, Child-Pugh Class A, single infection with HBV or HCV, and anatomical resection, yields better outcomes. Even for HCC2- in patients with good liver function, anatomical resection is recommended.

Liver transplantation results for hepatocellular carcinoma in Chile

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the liver. Liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC; it improves survival, cures cirrhosis, and abolishes local recurrence. We describe the outcomes of patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation in two liver transplantation centers in Chile.

METHODS

This study is a clinical series elaborated from the liver transplantation database of Pontificia Universidad Católica and Clínica Alemana between 1993 and 2009. The survival of patients was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The significant alpha level was defined as <.05.

RESULTS

From 250 liver transplantations performed in this period, 29 were due to HCC. At the end of the study, 25 patients (86%) were alive. The mean recurrence-free survival was 30 months (range 5 months to 8 years). The 5-year survival for patients transplanted for HCC was >80%; however, the 5-year overall survival of patients who exceeded the Milan criteria in the explants was 66%. There was no difference in overall survival between patients transplanted for HCC versus other diagnosis (P = .548).

CONCLUSION

This series confirmed that liver transplantation is a good treatment for patients with HCC within the Milan criteria.

Management of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of transplantation, resection, and ablation

PURPOSE AND DESIGN

The management of patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma has become increasingly complex. The most appropriate therapy largely depends on the functional status of the underlying liver. Here we review the modalities of transplantation, resection, and ablation in this patient population.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In patients with cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension, and disease extent within the Milan criteria, liver transplantation is clearly the best option. This modality not only provides therapy for the cancer but also treats the underlying hepatic parenchymal disease. In patients with well-preserved hepatic function, on the other hand, liver resection remains the most appropriate and effective treatment. Hepatic resection is not constrained by the same variables of tumor extent and location that limit the applicability of transplantation and ablative therapies. In addition, patients whose disease recurs after resection are often still eligible for transplantation. Ablative therapies, particularly percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and transarterial embolization/chemoembolization, have been used primarily to treat patients with low-volume unresectable tumors. The question has increasingly been raised regarding whether ablation of small tumors (<3 cm) provides long-term disease control that is comparable to resection. Ablative therapies has also been used as a means of controlling disease in patients who are on transplantation waiting lists, although improved posttransplantation outcome using these techniques has yet to be proven prospectively. The major problem with assessing the efficacy of various treatment modalities in these patients is the heterogeneity of disease presentation, which often precludes the use of certain therapies and therefore makes the conduct of randomized control trial difficult.

Management of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of transplantation, resection, and ablation

PURPOSE AND DESIGN

The management of patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma has become increasingly complex. The most appropriate therapy largely depends on the functional status of the underlying liver. Here we review the modalities of transplantation, resection, and ablation in this patient population.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In patients with cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension, and disease extent within the Milan criteria, liver transplantation is clearly the best option. This modality not only provides therapy for the cancer but also treats the underlying hepatic parenchymal disease. In patients with well-preserved hepatic function, on the other hand, liver resection remains the most appropriate and effective treatment. Hepatic resection is not constrained by the same variables of tumor extent and location that limit the applicability of transplantation and ablative therapies. In addition, patients whose disease recurs after resection are often still eligible for transplantation. Ablative therapies, particularly percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and transarterial embolization/chemoembolization, have been used primarily to treat patients with low-volume unresectable tumors. The question has increasingly been raised regarding whether ablation of small tumors (<3 cm) provides long-term disease control that is comparable to resection. Ablative therapies has also been used as a means of controlling disease in patients who are on transplantation waiting lists, although improved posttransplantation outcome using these techniques has yet to be proven prospectively. The major problem with assessing the efficacy of various treatment modalities in these patients is the heterogeneity of disease presentation, which often precludes the use of certain therapies and therefore makes the conduct of randomized control trial difficult.