Attitude of Health Professionals Toward Cadaveric Tissue Donation

Family refusal of skin donation for transplantation: trends and associated factors

OBJECTIVES

to analyze the trends and factors associated with family refusal of skin donation for transplantation.

METHODS

this cross-sectional study was conducted in the State of São Paulo, with family authorization terms collected from 2001 to 2020. The variables analyzed included year, age, gender, cause of death, and type of institution. Data were analyzed using linear and multiple logistic regression, with the Odds Ratio estimated at p<0.05 for statistical significance.

RESULTS

1,355 individuals refused skin donation. The trend of refusals decreased between 2001 and 2009 in the age groups of 0-11 years and 12-19 years, but increased in the group aged ≥60 years. This trend continued to decrease in the 0-11 years group from 2010 to 2020, and increased in the 20-40 years group. Males and the age groups of 20-40 years, 41-59 years, and ≥60 years exhibited 27%, 34%, 47%, and 53% lower chances of refusal, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

there is an urgent need for measures to mitigate the high number of refusals associated with skin donation.

The role of motivational and legal contexts in understanding support for tissue donation across 27 European countries

BACKGROUND

There is a mismatch between attitudinal support for tissue donation and its translation into behavioural action (i.e. become registered donor). The legal and motivational context around tissue donation may contribute to better understanding of this mismatch.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Eurobarometer 82.2 survey (2014). Data included socio-demographic characteristics, motivations underlying attitudes to tissue donation and the legal context within which donation was considered (opt-in and opt-out consent). The sample was partitioned based on contextual information and seemingly unrelated bivariate probit regressions were used to explore the relationship between passive and active support for tissue donation.

RESULTS

Approximately 56% of 25 879 respondents stated a willingness to donate tissue after death (passive support) and 9.1% reported that they were a registered donor (active support). We found evidence of unobserved heterogeneity between active and passive support across contexts. Our findings suggest that contexts in which altruistic motives can be supported by self-interest may increase the probability of converting passive to active support. Factors associated with increased support for tissue donation included: higher levels of education; good knowledge of the healthcare system; confidence in the safety of tissue donation; readiness to be a tissue recipient and knowing a recipient of donated tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate the value of examining active and passive support for tissue donation together within specific contexts. This more nuanced approach affords clearer insights that may help to guide policy makers confronted with apparently conflicting evidence around strategies intended to promote organ and tissue donation.

[Attitude towards organ and tissue donation in Europe : Prerequisite for osteochondral allograft treatment]

BACKGROUND

The biggest obstacle to overcome for routine treatment of various pathologies with fresh osteochondral allograft is the availability of tissue for transplantation. Large fresh osteochondral allografts are usually harvested from organ donors, but in contrast to organs, tissues can be procured after cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE

Medical staff as well the general public are much less aware of the possibilities and requirements of tissue donation compared to organ donation. This review aims to highlight the current situation of organ and tissue donation in Europe and to raise this much needed awareness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this research, PubMed database was scanned using the terms "tissue/organ donation", "bone donation/transplantation", "cartilage transplantation/allografts" and "osteochrondral allografts".

RESULTS

Relatives of potential donors are often not approached because physicians and nurses do not feel sufficiently prepared for this task and, thus, are reluctant to address this topic. Different options could alleviate the pressure medical staff is feeling. Furthermore, there are different factors influencing consent that can be addressed to increase donation rates.

CONCLUSION

Currently, a lot of potential concerning musculoskeletal tissue grafts remains unused. Most importantly, families should be encouraged to speak about their potenzial will to donate and educational programs should be established to increase trust in organ and tissue donation and the allocation system and to increase knowledge about the importance of transplantation medicine. But joined efforts of different parts of the medical systems and different organizations involved in tissue transplantation should improve the situation for patients waiting for much needed transplants.

Fresh osteochondral allografts-procurement and tissue donation in Europe

Fresh osteochondral allografts are a well-established treatment for large, full-thickness cartilage defects. The clinical outcome for carefully selected patients is very favorable, especially for the young and active and graft survival up to 25 years has been described in the literature. Furthermore, a high patient satisfaction rate has been reported, but the biggest obstacle to overcome is the availability of tissue for transplantation. Large fresh bone allografts for cartilage damage repair only can be harvested from organ donors following organ removal or cadaveric donors, preferably in the setting of an operation room to minimize possible contamination of the tissue. Apart from the logistic challenges this entails, an experienced recovery team is needed. Furthermore, the public as well as medical staff is much less aware of the possibility and requirements of tissue donation than organ donation and families of deceased are rarely approached for bone and cartilage donation. This review aims to highlight the current situation of organ and tissue donation in Europe with special focus on the processing of bones and possible safety and quality concerns. We analyze what may prevent consent and what might be done to improve the situation of tissue donation.

Are all tissue donors recognised? A cohort study in three Dutch hospitals

Nowadays, the demand for tissue transplantation has significantly increased. To optimize donor recruitment, the potential availability of tissue donors has to be evaluated. In 2011 we conducted a cohort study in three Dutch hospitals in the Netherlands. The potential amount of eligible tissue donors found, based on medical records in these hospitals is compared to the physician's donation form report. In total 1,342 patient records were analysed. From these records, the donation officers considered 484 patients as a potential tissue donor (36.1 %). Despite the absence of contra-indication, the physician did not recognise 25 % (n = 123/484) of potential tissue donors. Physicians' lack of sufficient knowledge of tissue donation was the main cause of adequately identifying tissue donors. A higher percentage of tissue donors in these Dutch hospitals should be feasible through creating awareness and education regarding tissue donation.

Knowledge and behavior among health professionals in relation to cadaveric organ donation and transplantation: a questionnaire-based analysis in Portuguese hospitals

OBJECTIVE

To assess knowledge and behavior relative to cadaveric organ donation and transplantation among physicians and nurses working at nine Portuguese hospitals.

METHODS

This prospective study between May and October 2009 included 495 questionnaires that were returned among 840 that were delivered, a 59% response rate. The transplant questionnaire comprised three main sections: section 1, sociodemographic-professional variables of the participants with nine questions; section 2, generic questions on organ donation and transplantation with 12 questions; and section 3 evaluated knowledge with 20 specific questions on organ donation and transplantation.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of the participants were females, with 40% of the overall cohort between 31 and 40 years old; 62% married; 63% working in the emergency department; and 78% nurses. Although 78% of the participants stated that they had undergone specific training on organ donation and transplantation, 62% felt that they needed more training. The reasons evoked for the low rate of donation included difficulties in initiating the process of organ donation, in diagnosing cerebral death and in obtaining necessary human resources. There were no significant differences in knowledge between physicians and nurses concerning specific organ donation and transplantation issues. Having had specific training on organ donation and transplantation was significantly associated with correct answers to several questions, including those pertaining to knowledge of the national legislation on organ donation and transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed a lack of specific knowledge and training on organ donation and transplantation issue. It also suggested that for hospital staff to successfully act as initiators of the organ procurement process, more information and education are necessary. This effort could significantly increase the rate of organ donation and transplantation in Portugal.