Usefulness of sirolimus as rescue therapy in heart transplant recipients with renal failure: analysis of the Spanish Multicenter Observational Study (RAPACOR)

Drug levels after sirolimus initiation and short-term outcomes in ambulatory heart transplantation recipients

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the effect of relative changes in combined tacrolimus and sirolimus (drug) levels, following sirolimus initiation, on outcomes in ambulatory heart transplantation (HTx) recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of HTx recipients who received tacrolimus, followed by sirolimus initiation, any time after HTx. We calculated the relative change in combined drug levels 1-month post-sirolimus initiation, relative to tacrolimus levels pre-initiation, and categorized patients into decreased (≥15% decrease), stable (<15% decrease to <15% increase), or increased (≥15% increase) groups. We compared, across the three groups, changes in post-initiation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using one-way ANOVA and Šidák's post-hoc analysis, as well as the individual and composite outcomes of new donor specific antibodies (DSA), acute cellular rejection (ACR), and all-cause mortality using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Amongst 99 HTx recipients included, the median age was 53 years, time to sirolimus initiation was 1.5 years post-HTx, and pre-sirolimus eGFR was 52 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Nine patients had decreased, 15 stable, and 75 increased, relative combined drug levels. Relative change in eGFR was significantly higher in patients with decreased levels compared to patients with increased levels at 6 months post-initiation (P < .05), but this was not sustained at 12 months. There were no differences in LVEF change or in individual and composite risks for developing DSA, ACR, and all-cause mortality at 12 months across the groups.

CONCLUSION

Post-sirolimus initiation, a relative decrease in combined drug levels, compared to increased levels, was associated with temporarily improved renal function.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of oral lesions in heart transplant patients induced by sirolimus and everolimus: a systematic review and meta-analysis on a global scale

OBJECTIVE

Sirolimus (SRL) and everolimus (EVL) are increasingly included in immunosuppressive protocols after heart transplantation. They present some side effects, including the appearance of painful lesions in the oral cavity. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to verify the global prevalence and clinical characteristics of oral lesions induced by SRL and EVL in heart transplant patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review was performed using 5 main electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science, and LILACS), in addition to the gray literature. Studies were independently assessed by 2 reviewers based on established eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated through GRADE assessment.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (860 patients) were included in the qualitative analysis. Of these, 11 studies were pooled in a meta-analysis of prevalence. The worldwide prevalence of oral lesions induced by SRL and EVL in heart transplant patients was 10.0%, and most lesions were described as ulcers >1.0 cm, related to significant pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral lesions induced by SRL and/or EVL, although not very prevalent, have a relevant impact on patient's lives and the continuity of treatment.

Molecular and therapeutic insights of rapamycin: a multi-faceted drug from Streptomyces hygroscopicus

The advancement in pharmaceutical research has led to the discovery and development of new combinatorial life-saving drugs. Rapamycin is a macrolide compound produced from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Rapamycin and its derivatives are one of the promising sources of drug with broad spectrum applications in the medical field. In recent times, rapamycin has gained significant attention as of its activity against cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients. Rapamycin and its derivatives have more potency when compared to other prevailing drugs. Initially, it has been used exclusively as an anti-fungal drug. Currently rapamycin has been widely used as an immunosuppressant. Rapamycin is a multifaceted drug; it has anti-cancer, anti-viral and anti-aging potentials. Rapamycin has its specific action on mTOR signaling pathway. mTOR has been identified as a key regulator of different pathways. There will be an increased demand for rapamycin, because it has lesser adverse effects when compared to steroids. Currently researchers are focused on the production of effective rapamycin derivatives to combat the growing demand of this wonder drug. The main focus of the current review is to explore the origin, development, molecular mechanistic action, and the current therapeutic aspects of rapamycin. Also, this review article revealed the potential of rapamycin and the progress of rapamycin research. This helps in understanding the exact potency of the drug and could facilitate further studies that could fill in the existing knowledge gaps. The study also gathers significant data pertaining to the gene clusters and biosynthetic pathways involved in the synthesis and production of this multi-faceted drug. In addition, an insight into the mechanism of action of the drug and important derivatives of rapamycin has been expounded. The fillings of the current review, aids in understanding the underlying molecular mechanism, strain improvement, optimization and production of rapamycin derivatives.

Calcineurin inhibitor- and corticosteroid-free immunosuppression in pediatric heart transplant patients

Pediatric heart transplant patients at our institution are immunosuppressed with a CNI and another immune-modulating agent without utilizing corticosteroids. Patients whose renal function worsened and who did not respond to CNI minimization had their CNI discontinued. The clinical history of 35 pediatric heart transplant patients with significant renal insufficiency whose CNI was discontinued was retrospectively analyzed. Data including serum creatinine and weight were collected before, at time of, and every 3-6 months after CNI discontinuation. This was used to calculate an eGFR. Cardiac allograft rejection and mortality data were also collected. CNI discontinuation occurred 39 times in 35 patients. The median eGFR significantly increased by 14 mL/min 3 months after CNI discontinuation and the increase continued to be significant (P≤.05) at 5 years. Freedom from rejection analysis showed no difference between graft rejection 2 years before versus after CNI discontinuation (P=.437). No mortality was associated with CNI discontinuation. Immunosuppression free of CNIs and corticosteroids appears to be a safe alternative in pediatric heart transplant patients with significant renal insufficiency. Furthermore, this strategy can significantly reverse renal insufficiency, even late after transplantation.

Twelve-month efficacy and safety of the conversion to everolimus in maintenance heart transplant recipients

AIM: To determine the clinical reasons for conversion to everolimus (EVL) and long-term outcomes in heart transplant (HT) recipients.

METHODS: A retrospective 12-mo study has been carried out in 14 Spanish centres to assess the efficacy and safety of conversion to EVL in maintenance HT recipients.

RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients were included (mean age: 53 ± 10.5 years; mean time from HT: 8.1 ± 4.5 years). The most common reasons for conversion were nephrotoxicity (30%), chronic allograft vasculopathy (20%) and neoplasms (17%). The doses and mean levels of EVL at baseline (conversion to EVL) and after one year were 1.3 ± 0.3 and 1.2 ± 0.6 mg/d and 6.4 ± 3.4 and 5.6 ± 2.5 ng/mL, respectively. The percentage of patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) at baseline and on the final visit was 95% and 65%, respectively. The doses and mean levels of CNIs decreased between baseline and month 12 from 142.2 ± 51.6 to 98.0 ± 39.4 mg/d (P < 0.001) and from 126.1 ± 50.9 to 89.2 ± 47.7 ng/mL (P < 0.001), respectively, for cyclosporine, and from 2.9 ± 1.8 to 2.6 ± 1.9 mg/d and from 8.3 ± 4.0 to 6.5 ± 2.7 ng/mL (P = 0.011) for tacrolimus. In the subgroup of patients converted because of nephrotoxicity, creatinine clearance increased from 34.9 ± 10.1 to 40.4 ± 14.4 mL/min (P < 0.001). There were 37 episodes of acute rejection in 24 patients (11%). The most frequent adverse events were oedemas (12%), infections (9%) and gastrointestinal problems (6%). EVL was suspended in 44 patients (20%). Since the database was closed at the end of the study, no further follow-up data is available.

CONCLUSION: Conversion to EVL in maintenance HT recipients allowed minimisation or suspension of the CNIs, with improved kidney function in the patients with nephrotoxicity, after 12 mo.

Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients: risk factors and management options

Renal dysfunction after heart transplantation is a frequently observed complication, in some cases resulting in significant limitation of quality of life and reduced survival. Since the pathophysiology of renal failure (RF) is multifactorial, the current etiologic paradigm for chronic kidney disease after heart transplantation relies on the concept of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity acting on a predisposed recipient. Until recently, the management of RF has been restricted to the minimization of CNI dosage and general avoidance of classic nephrotoxic risk factors, with somewhat limited success. The recent introduction of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) (sirolimus and everolimus), a new class of immunosuppressive drugs lacking intrinsic nephrotoxicity, has provided a completely new alternative in this clinical setting. As clinical experience with these new drugs increases, new renal-sparing strategies are becoming available. PSIs can be used in combination with reduced doses of CNIs and even in complete CNI-free protocols. Different strategies have been devised, including de novo use to avoid acute renal toxicity in high-risk patients immediately after transplantation, or more delayed introduction in those patients developing chronic RF after prolonged CNI exposure. In this review, the main information on the clinical relevance and pathophysiology of RF after heart transplantation, as well as the currently available experience with renal-sparing immunosuppressive regimens, particularly focused on the use of PSIs, is reviewed and summarized, including the key practical points for their appropriate clinical usage.

Sirolimus conversion after heart transplant: risk factors for acute rejection and predictors of renal function response

In a randomized, comparative study of cardiac transplant patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency, conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to sirolimus improved renal function at 1 year versus continuing CNIs, with an attendant risk of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR). Post hoc analyses were conducted to identify predictors of BCAR and GFR improvement associated with conversion. Patients with proteinuria >500 mg/day were excluded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses tested 13 parameters for BCAR and six for GFR improvement. In 57 sirolimus-treated patients, mean daily mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dose was lower in those with versus without BCAR (1000 vs. 1420 mg; p = 0.014). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified MMF dose ≤1000 mg/day as the optimal cutoff to predict BCAR. Multivariate analysis confirmed low MMF dose (odds ratio: 9.94; p = 0.007) and non-white race (odds ratio: 15.3; p = 0.06) were independently associated with BCAR. GFR improvement was evaluated in intent-to-treat patients (n = 116). Significant interaction was detected between treatment effect and preexisting diabetes status (univariate p = 0.077; multivariate p = 0.022), indicating greater beneficial effect of sirolimus in those without preexisting diabetes. These findings suggest that sirolimus is more effective in improving GFR in patients without preexisting diabetes, and adequate MMF doses are needed for sirolimus conversion.

Sirolimus Immunoprophylaxis and Renal Histological Changes in Long-Term Cardiac Transplant Recipients

Background: The effects of sirolimus (SIR), as a substitution for calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) immunoprophylaxis, on renal function in very-long-term cardiac transplant recipients have been a matter of controversy. Objective: To assess the impacts of SIR as a substitution for CNI on renal function up to 24 months in long-term cardiac recipients as well as the renal histological changes in patients with suspected CNI-induced nephrotoxicity. Methods: A total of 23 cardiac transplant recipients aged 57.7 ± 11.2 years, 91 months post–cardiac transplantation were recruited; 15 patients were randomized to CNI-free immune suppression with SIR, and 8 patients were allocated to continue their CNI regimens. Serum creatinine and calculated serum creatinine clearance were measured at prespecified time points up to 24 months. Renal structure and function were assessed by renal biopsies, renal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging at baseline. Results: There were no significant changes in creatinine clearance during the course of the study in patients treated with SIR. However, SIR-treated patients exhibited a significant decrease in 24-hours and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Typical findings of significant hypertensive renal disease were detected in 9 of the 11 (82%) patients. Features of chronic CNI toxicity were detected in 6 (55%) patients. Conclusions: There is a very high rate of hypertensive renal disease concomitantly with some degree of CNI toxicity in long-term cardiac transplant recipients with renal dysfunction. This very high rate of hypertension-related disease may limit the impact of SIR on improving renal function long term following cardiac transplantation.

Use of mTOR inhibitors in chronic heart transplant recipients with renal failure: calcineurin-inhibitors conversion or minimization?

BACKGROUND

In the last decade, mTOR inhibitors (mTOR-is) have become the cornerstone of the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-reduced/free regimens aimed to the preservation of post-transplant renal function. We compared utility and safety of the total replacement of calcineurin inhibitors with a mTOR-i with a strategy based on calcineurin inhibitor minimization and concomitant use of m-TOR-i.

METHODS

In a retrospective multi-center cohort of 394 maintenance cardiac recipients with renal failure (GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), we compared 235 patients in whom CNI was replaced with a mTOR-i (sirolimus or everolimus) with 159 patients in whom mTOR-is were used to minimize CNIs. A propensity score analysis was carried out to balance between group differences.

RESULTS

Overall, after a median time of 2 years from mTOR-i initiation, between group differences for the evolution of renal function were not observed. In a multivariate adjusted model, improvement of renal function was limited to patients with mTOR-i usage within 5years after transplantation, particularly with the conversion strategy, and in those patients who could maintain mTOR-i therapy. Significant differences between strategies were not found for mortality, infection and mTOR-i withdrawal due to drug-related adverse events. However, conversion group tended to have a higher acute rejection incidence than the minimization group (p=0.07).

CONCLUSION

In terms of renal benefits, our results support an earlier use of mTOR-is, irrespective of the strategy. The selection of either a conversion or a CNI minimization protocol should be based on the clinical characteristics of the patients, particularly their rejection risk.

Rejection after conversion to a proliferation signal inhibitor in chronic heart transplantation

We sought to determine the incidence, risk factors, and consequences of acute rejection (AR) after conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to a proliferation signal inhibitor (PSI) in maintenance heart transplantation. Relevant clinical data were retrospectively obtained for 284 long-term heart transplant recipients from nine centers in whom CNIs were replaced with a PSI (sirolimus or everolimus) between October 2001 and March 2009. The rejection rate at one yr was 8.3%, stabilizing to 2% per year thereafter. The incidence rate after conversion (4.9 per 100 patient-years) was significantly higher than that observed on CNI therapy in the pre-conversion period (2.2 per 100 patient-years). By multivariate analysis, rejection risk was associated with a history of late AR prior to PSI conversion, early conversion (<5 yr) after transplantation and age <50 yr at the time of conversion. Use of mycophenolate mofetil was a protective factor. Post-conversion rejection did not significantly influence the evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function, or mortality during further follow-up. Conversion to a CNI-free immunosuppression based on a PSI results in an increased risk of AR. Awareness of the clinical determinants of post-conversion rejection could help to refine the current PSI conversion strategies.