Liver transplantation using University of Wisconsin or Celsior preserving solutions in the portal vein and Euro-Collins in the aorta. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:429-434. [PMID: 20304157 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.035]

Compared efficacy of preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantation: Meta-analysis

AIM

To compare the effects of the four most commonly used preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantations.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases up to January 31st, 2017. The inclusion criteria were comparative, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for deceased donor liver (DDL) allografts with adult and pediatric donors using the gold standard University of Wisconsin (UW) solution or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK), Celsior (CS) and Institut Georges Lopez (IGL-1) solutions. Fifteen RCTs (1830 livers) were included; the primary outcomes were primary non-function (PNF) and one-year post-transplant graft survival (OGS-1).

RESULTS

All trials were homogenous with respect to donor and recipient characteristics. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of PNF with the use of UW, HTK, CS and IGL-1 (RR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.01-0.03, P = 0.356). Comparing OGS-1 also failed to reveal any difference between UW, HTK, CS and IGL-1 (RR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.80-0.80, P = 0.369). Two trials demonstrated higher PNF levels for UW in comparison with the HTK group, and individual studies described higher rates of biliary complications where HTK and CS were used compared to the UW and IGL-1 solutions. However, the meta-analysis of the data did not prove a statistically significant difference: the UW, CS, HTK and IGL-1 solutions were associated with nearly equivalent outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Alternative solutions for UW yield the same degree of safety and effectiveness for the preservation of DDLs, but further well-designed clinical trials are warranted.

Sleep Quality Assessment and Daytime Sleepiness of Liver Transplantation Candidates

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the sleep quality and daytime sleepiness of patients eligible for liver transplants.

METHODS

A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted on liver transplant candidates from a transplant center in the interior of São Paulo State. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaires were applied to obtain demographic and clinical characteristics and to assess sleep quality and daytime sleepiness.

RESULTS

The mean (±SD) score on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale of the 45 liver transplantation candidates was 7.00 ± 2.83 points, with 28.89% having scores >10 points, indicating excessive daytime sleepiness. The mean score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was 6.64 ± 4.95 points, with 60% of the subjects showing impaired sleep quality, with scores >5 points. The average sleep duration was 07:16 h. Regarding sleep quality self-classification, 31.11% reported poor or very poor quality. It is noteworthy that 73.33% of patients had to go to the bathroom, 53.33% woke up in the middle of the night, and 40.00% reported pain related to sleeping difficulties. Comparison of subjects with good and poor sleep quality revealed a significant difference in time to sleep (P = .0002), sleep hours (P = .0003), and sleep quality self-classification (P = .000072).

CONCLUSION

Liver transplant candidates have a compromised quality of sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness. In clinical practice, we recommend the evaluation and implementation of interventions aimed at improving the sleep and wakefulness cycle, contributing to a better quality of life.

Preservation solutions used during abdominal transplantation: Current status and outcomes

Organ preservation remains an important contributing factor to graft and patient outcomes. During donor organ procurement and transportation, cellular injury is mitigated through the use of preservation solutions in conjunction with hypothermia. Various preservation solutions and protocols exist with widespread variability among transplant centers. In this review of abdominal organ preservation solutions, evolution of transplantation and graft preservation are discussed followed by classification of preservation solutions according to the composition of electrolytes, impermeants, buffers, antioxidants, and energy precursors. Lastly, pertinent clinical studies in the setting of hepatic, renal, pancreas, and intestinal transplantation are reviewed for patient and graft survival as well as financial considerations. In liver transplants there may be some benefit with the use of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) over University of Wisconsin solution in terms of biliary complications and potential cost savings. Renal grafts may experience increased initial graft dysfunction with the use of Euro-Collins thereby dissuading its use in support of HTK which can lead to substantial cost savings. University of Wisconsin solution and Celsior are favored in pancreas transplants given the concern for pancreatitis and graft thrombosis associated with HTK. No difference was observed with preservation solutions with respect to graft and patient survival in liver, renal, and pancreas transplants. Studies involving intestinal transplants are sparse but University of Wisconsin solution infused intraluminally in combination with an intra-vascular washout is a reasonable option until further evidence can be generated. Available literature can be used to ameliorate extensive variation across centers while potentially minimizing graft dysfunction and improving associated costs.

Liver preservation with SCOT 15 solution decreases posttransplantation cholestasis compared with University of Wisconsin solution: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

SCOT 15 is a new solution to preserve abdominal organs for transplantation. Its principal characteristic is the use of polyethylene glycol. Herein We report our experience using SCOT 15 compared with the reference University of Wisconsin (UW) solution for hepatic transplantation.

METHODS

We compared 2 groups: SCOT 15 (n = 33; 2009-2010) versus UW (n = 34; 2008-2010), which were paired for cold and warm ischemic times, donor ages, and graft weights. Endpoints were biologic tests in the first 2 months after the operation. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate longitudinal changes and influences of each solution.

RESULTS

No primary failure was observed. At postoperative day 0, transaminase values were higher in the SCOT 15 than in the UW group: aspartate transaminase: 2,435 ± 399 vs 589 ± 83 IU/L (P < .01); alanine transaminase: ALT: 1,207 ± 191 vs 484 ± 64 IU/L (P < .05), then returned to low levels in both groups. From day 0 to 8, coagulation factors reached normal values; there was no difference between the 2 groups. Total bilirubin decreased similarly in the 2 groups. However, from the second postoperative week (W1) to W8, the SCOT 15 group showed a slow decrease in the mean values of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (gGT) from 233 ± 125 to 130 ± 161 IU/L, which were significantly lower than those in the UW group, where the gGT remained around 300 IU/L (P < .01). The End-Stage Liver Disease, Child-Pugh, or United Network for Organ Sharing scores, primary liver diseases, hepatitic C virus status, arterial or biliary complications, and male/female ratio, which was different in the 2 groups, did not statistically influence these results.

CONCLUSIONS

The main effect of cold storage of human liver using SCOT 15 compared with UW solution was to decrease cholestasis following transplantation.

Preservation solutions for static cold storage of abdominal allografts: which is best?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update the reader on the recent literature in liver, kidney, pancreas, and intestine static cold preservation, and to identify which solutions are most advantageous for each organ.

RECENT FINDINGS

The comparison of randomized trials of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK), Celsior, and University of Wisconsin solutions has shown equivalent risk of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation. Similar outcomes have been observed after pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin, HTK, and Celsior solution. In live-donor liver transplantation, University of Wisconsin and HTK solution have shown equivalent results, whereas in the recent trials of deceased-donor liver transplantation, University of Wisconsin, HTK, and Celsior solutions have shown equivalence. Contrary to the most clinical trials, national registry data in kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation demonstrate more detrimental effects and earlier graft loss after preservation with HTK versus University of Wisconsin solution. Early outcomes after intestinal transplantation with University of Wisconsin or HTK solution have shown no significant difference and animal studies indicate intraluminal preservation may be beneficial.

SUMMARY

The University of Wisconsin solution is the standard criterion static cold preservation for the procurement of liver, kidney, pancreas, and intestine. University of Wisconsin, HTK, and Celsior solutions all provide similar allograft outcomes in most clinical trials, but subtle differences have become more apparent in the recent studies and registry reports.