Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Asian Kidney Transplant Patients

Effect of conversion from ciclosporin to tacrolimus on endothelial progenitor cells in stable long-term kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) counts are proposed surrogate markers for vascular function and cardiovascular risk. The effect of tacrolimus (TAC) on EPC is unknown.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, we assigned 148 stable long-term kidney transplant recipients (KTR) to maintaining ciclosporin (CSA) or to commencing TAC-based immunosuppression at a 2:1 ratio. EPC counts (CD34/KDR) after 24 months were defined as primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat analysis included 141 KTR (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 46.7 [40.1-61.8] mL/min per 1.73 m). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) EPC counts at baseline and month 24 were 6 (2-9) and 3 (1-9) cells and 4 (2-8) and 2 (0-5) cells per 5×10 mononuclear cells in CSA and TAC, respectively. Median (IQR) circulating angiogenic cells at baseline and month 24 were 28 (10.7-57) and 44.33 (14.6-59.8) cells and 22 (10.8-41) and 21 (9.7-49.5) cells per high-power field in CSA and TAC, respectively. Median (IQR) endothelial cell colony-forming units count per well at baseline and month 24 were 10.5 (3.3-34.3) and 4.38 (1.7-26.5) in CSA and significantly declined from 9.31 (1.8-29.3) to 4.13 (1.1-9.5) in TAC (P=0.003). There were no cardiovascular events in either group.

CONCLUSION

Although late conversion from CSA to TAC appears safe in KTR, conversion to TAC has no favorable effect on EPC. Low EPC levels are associated with a higher risk of subsequent cardiovascular events and are therefore of prognostic value. Their trend to decline over time deserves further examination.

The renin–angiotensin system, bone marrow and progenitor cells

Modulation of the RAS (renin–angiotensin system), in particular of the function of the hormones AngII (angiotensin II) and Ang-(1–7) [angiotensin-(1–7)], is an important target for pharmacotherapy in the cardiovascular system. In the classical view, such modulation affects cardiovascular cells to decrease hypertrophy, fibrosis and endothelial dysfunction, and improves diuresis. In this view, excessive stimulation of AT1 receptors (AngII type 1 receptors) fulfils a detrimental role, as it promotes cardiovascular pathogenesis, and this is opposed by stimulation of the AT2 receptor (angiotensin II type 2 receptor) and the Ang-(1–7) receptor encoded by the Mas proto-oncogene. In recent years, this view has been broadened with the observation that the RAS regulates bone marrow stromal cells and stem cells, thus involving haematopoiesis and tissue regeneration by progenitor cells. This change of paradigm has enlarged the field of perspectives for therapeutic application of existing as well as newly developed medicines that alter angiotensin signalling, which now stretches beyond cardiovascular therapy. In the present article, we review the role of AngII and Ang-(1–7) and their respective receptors in haematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells, and discuss possible pharmacotherapeutical implications.

Effects of the renin angiotensin system on vasculogenesis-related progenitor cells

The current concept is that there are both cells that integrate into the vasculature, true endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), and cells with hematopoietic markers that support neovascularisation. As identification of the EPC is controversial and studies refer cells that might fall into either pools, we will use the term, vasculogenesis-related progenitor cells (VRPC), for this review. VRPC are considered to be an important target for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Angiotensin II is known to be an important player in neovascularisation and the modulation of renin angiotensin system (RAS) is one of the major pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of CVD. We will review the effects of different components of the RAS on such VRPC under physiological conditions and in CVD. The reviewed research strongly supports a critical role of the RAS in vasculogenesis and vascular regeneration. Therefore, pharmacological intervention on the components of the RAS does not only target directly end-organ remodelling and blood pressure but also influence tissue healing and/or regeneration by influencing specific progenitor cells. Thus, the interrogation of RAS effects on VRPC will be important in the optimisation of RAS intervention or regenerative therapy.