Superior Efficacy of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate vs Mycophenolate Mofetil in De Novo Transplant Recipients: Pooled Analysis

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of rheumatic disease-related interstitial lung disease: a narrative review

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an antimetabolite with a potent inhibitory effect on proliferation of T and B lymphocytes used since the early 1990s for the prevention of acute allograft rejection after organ transplant. MMF is also widely used for the treatment of a variety of rheumatic diseases (RDs) and their pulmonary involvement. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of progressive fibrotic diseases of the lung, which is often secondary to RD and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality. MMF is considered the main alternative to cyclophosphamide as a first-line agent to treat RD-related ILD or as possible maintenance therapy after cyclophosphamide, with a lower rate of side-effects. However, as for other immunosuppressive agents, the use of MMF in RD-ILD is supported by poor scientific evidence. In this narrative review, we describe the available data and recent advances on the effectiveness and safety of MMF for the treatment of ILD related to RD, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, primary Sjögren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, undifferentiated connective tissue disease, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.

Cyclosporine Sparing Effect of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in De Novo Kidney Transplantation

PURPOSE

The increased tolerability of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), compared to mycophenolate mofetil, among kidney transplant recipients has the potential to facilitate cyclosporine (CsA) minimization. Therefore, a prospective trial to determine the optimum EC-MPS dose in CsA-based immunosuppression regimens is necessary.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comparative, parallel, randomized, open-label study was performed for 140 patients from four centers to compare the efficacy and tolerability of low dose CsA with standard dose EC-MPS (the investigational group) versus standard dose CsA with low dose EC-MPS (the control group) for six months in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Graft function, the incidence of efficacy failure [biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR), death, graft loss, loss to follow-up], and adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of the investigational group at six months post-transplantation was non-inferior to that of the control group (confidence interval between 57.3 mL/min/1.73m² and 67.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p<0.001). One graft loss was reported in the control group, and no patient deaths were reported in either group. The incidence of BCAR of the investigational group was 8.7%, compared to 18.8% in the control group (p=0.137), during the study period. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in the incidence of discontinuations and serious adverse events (SAE) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

CsA minimization using a standard dose of EC-MPS kept the incidence of acute rejection and additional risks as low as conventional immunosuppression and provided therapeutic equivalence in terms of renal graft function and safety issues.

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium containing GvHD prophylaxis reduces GvHD rate after allogeneic HSCT

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether cyclosporine A (CsA)-based Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD) prophylaxis with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) instead of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or methotrexate (MTX) reduces the GvHD incidence and lowers gastrointestinal (GI-) toxicities.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of 102 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients, incidences of overall and severe aGvHD (>II°), cGvHD as well as overall and severe (CTC >II°) GI-toxicities were compared between GvHD prophylaxis containing EC-MPS vs. MMF or MTX (control group).

RESULTS

The overall aGvHD rate was significantly lower in the EC-MPS group compared to the control (47% vs. 72%, P = 0.022) with lower rates of severe aGvHD (10% vs. 25%, P = 0.088) and cGvHD (20% vs. 39%, P = 0.065). Prophylaxis with EC-MPS remained significantly associated with a lower aGvHD rate in a multiple logistic regression model. GI-toxicities did not differ between both groups except for severe abdominal pain for which the incidence was increased in the EC-MPS group (17% vs. 3%, P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

This data support the hypothesis that replacement of MMF or MTX by EC-MPS reduces GvHD rates after HSCT. This appears not to be due to a reduced GI-toxicity of EC-MPS.

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium given in combination with tacrolimus has a lower incidence of serious infections in Asian renal-transplant recipients compared with mycophenolate mofetil

AIMS

To compare the characteristics of the enteric-coated formulation of mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept) given in combination with tacrolimus in Asian renal-transplant recipients.

METHODS

In a 24-month, single-centre, randomized, open-label, prospective study, 101 live-donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to the EC-MPS (n = 50) or MMF (n = 51) group. The incidence of infection, therapeutic effect and adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

The incidences of infection were 40% and 49% for the EC-MPS and MMF groups, respectively (p = 0.362). However, serious infection was only observed in the MMF group (11.8%; p = 0.027). The incidences of gastro-intestinal adverse events (GI AEs) were 24% and 41.2% for EC-MPS and MMF, respectively (p = 0.066). However, serious diarrhoea only occurred in the MMF group (9.8%; p = 0.056). The trough level of FK 506 at the time of diarrhoea (13.22 ± 3.66 ng/ml) was significantly higher than the level within 1 month before (9.18 ± 1.12 ng/ml; p < 0.05) and 1 month after diarrhoea (9.13 ± 0.85 ng/ml; p < 0.05). The infection rate of patients with diarrhoea was significantly higher than those without diarrhoea (68%, 39%, p = 0.024). The serum creatinine level was 698 ± 60 μmol/l for EC-MPS and 673 ± 68 μmol/l for MMF from baseline (p > 0.05), and it decreased to 66 ± 6 μmol/l for EC-MPS and 69 ± 8 μmol/l for MMF at 24 months (p > 0.05). The incidences of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) were 20% and 25.5% for EC-MPS and MMF, respectively (p = 0.511).

CONCLUSIONS

Enteric-coated formulation of mycophenolate sodium, given in combination with tacrolimus, has a lower incidence of serious infection in Asian renal-transplant recipients compared with MMF, and the therapeutic effect of EC-MPS is similar to MMF. The clinical trial registration number is ChiCTR-IPR-14005509. The registry name is 'Effect of Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium on posttransplant infection rate after renal transplantation compared with Mycophenolate mofetil'.