Biliary Tract Complications after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Still the “Achilles Heel”?

Do We Need to Use a Stent in Biliary Reconstruction to Decrease the Incidence of Biliary Complications in Liver Transplantation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Biliary complications are a significant cause of morbidity post-transplantation, and the routine use of biliary stents in liver transplantation to reduce these complications remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of biliary complications with and without the use of trans anastomotic biliary stent in liver transplantation.

METHOD

PubMed, Scopes, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched for eligible studies from inception to February 2022, and a systematic review and meta-analysis were done to compare the incidence of biliary complications in the two groups.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies with a total of 2623 patients were included. The pooled results from the included studies showed an equal rate of biliary complications (i.e., strictures, leaks and cholangitis) in stented and non-stented patients after liver transplantation. However, the cost and biliary intervention rates are higher in stented patients. In addition to that, our sub-group analysis showed no significant decrease in the incidence of biliary complications after using trans anastomotic biliary stent in living donor liver transplant (LDLT), deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT), Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ), and duct-to-duct anastomosis, pediatric, and adult liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

No added benefit on the routine use of endobiliary stent in liver transplantation. However, stented patients are at higher risk of needing multiple ERCPs.

The role of T-tubes and abdominal drains on short-term outcomes in liver transplantation - A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and expert panel recommendation aims to answer the question regarding the routine use of T-tubes or abdominal drains to better manage complications and thereby improve outcomes after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel to assess the potential risks and benefits of T-tubes and intra-abdominal drainage in liver transplantation (CRD42021243036).

RESULTS

Of the 2996 screened records, 33 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 29 (six RCTs) assessed the use of T-tubes and four regarding surgical drains. Although some studies reported less strictures when using a T-tube, there was a trend toward more biliary complications with T-tubes, mainly related to biliary leakage. Due to the small number of studies, there was a paucity of evidence on the effect of abdominal drains with no clear benefit for or against the use of drainage. However, one study investigating the open vs. closed circuit drains found a significantly higher incidence of intra-abdominal infections when open-circuit drains were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the potential risk of biliary leakage and infections, the routine intraoperative insertion of T-tubes is not recommended (Level of Evidence moderate - very low; grade of recommendation strong). However, a T-tube can be considered in cases at risk for biliary stenosis. Due to the scant evidence on abdominal drainage, no change in clinical practice in individual centers is recommended. (Level of Evidence very low; weak recommendation).

Increased Surgical Complications but Improved Overall Survival with Adult Living Donor Compared to Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) provides an alternative to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for patients with end-stage liver disease in the circumstance of scarcity of deceased grafts. However, the outcomes of LDLT remain controversial.

Method

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LDLT with DDLT. Twelve outcomes were assessed.

Results

Thirty-nine studies involving 38563 patients were included. LDLT was comparable in red blood cell transfusion, perioperative mortality, length of hospital stay, retransplantation rate, hepatitis C virus recurrence rate, and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate with DDLT. Cold ischemia time was shorter and duration of recipient operation was longer in LDLT. Postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding rate occurred less frequently in LDLT recipients (odds ratio (OR) = 0.64, 95%confidence interval (CI) = 0.46 − 0.88, P = 0.006), but this did not decrease the perioperative mortality. LDLT was associated with significantly higher biliary (OR = 2.23, 95%CI = 1.59 − 3.13, P < 0.00001) and vascular (OR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.31 − 3.07, P = 0.001) complication rates and better overall survival (OS) (1 year: OR = 1.32, 95%CI = 1.01 − 1.72, P = 0.04; 3 years: OR = 1.39, 95%CI = 1.14 − 1.69, P = 0.0010; and 5 years: OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.04 − 1.70, P = 0.02). According to subgroup analysis, biliary complication rate and OS improved dramatically as experience increased, while vascular complication rate could not be improved because it was mainly caused by the difference of the donor type itself.

Conclusions

LDLT remains a valuable option for patients in need of liver transplantation for it provides an excellent alternative to DDLT without compromising recipient outcomes. Further refinement in biliary and vascular reconstruction techniques and the accumulation of liver transplantation centers' experience are the key factors in expanding the application of LDLT.

Incidence of and risk factors for bile duct stones after living donor liver transplantation: An analysis of 100 patients

AIM

Although bile duct stone (BDS) is one of the biliary complications of liver transplantation, analytical studies, particularly on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) cases, are rare. This study aimed to clarify the incidence of and risk factors for BDS following LDLT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 100 patients who underwent LDLT at our institute from August 2000 to May 2012, and analyzed their clinical characteristics and risk factors for BDS.

RESULTS

Of these, 10 patients (10.0%) developed BDS during the observation period. The median follow-up period to BDS diagnosis was 45.5 months (range, 5-84) after LDLT. Univariate analysis revealed male sex, right lobe graft and bile duct strictures as factors that significantly correlated with BDS formation. Multivariate analysis revealed bile duct strictures (odds ratio, 7.17; P = 0.011) and right lobe graft (odds ratio, 10.20; P = 0.040) to be independent risk factors for BDS formation. One patient with BDS and biliary strictures succumbed to sepsis from cholangitis.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, right lobe graft and bile duct strictures are independent risk factors for BDS formation after LDLT. More careful observation and monitoring are required in the patients with high-risk factors.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation

Biliary complications (BCs) remain one of the most outstanding factors influencing long-term results after orthotopic liver transplantation. The authors carried out a systematic overview of 1720 papers since 2008, and focused on 45 relevant ones. Among 14,411 transplanted patients the incidence of BCs was 23%. Biliary leakage occurred in 8.5%, biliary stricture in 14.7%, mortality rate was 1-3%.

RISK FACTORS

preoperative sodium level; p = 0.037, model of end-stage liver disease score >25; p = 0.048, primary sclerosing cholangitis; p = 0.001, malignancy; p = 0.026, donor age >60, macrovesicular graft steatosis; p = 0.001, duct-to-duct anastomosis; p = 0.004, long anhepatic phase; p = 0.04, cold ischemic time >12 h; p = 0.043, use of T-tube; p = 0.032, insufficient flush of bile ducts; p = 0.001, acute rejection; p = 0.003, cytomegalovirus infection; p = 0.004 and hepatic artery thrombosis; p = 0.001. The management was surgical in case of biliary leakage, and interventional radiology or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in case of biliary stricture. Mapping of miRNA profile is a new field of research. Nemes-Doros score is a useful tool in the estimation of hepatic artery thrombosis. Management of BCs requires a multidisciplinary expert team.

The influence of a contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization protocol on biliary complications after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

We sought to compare the impact of sequential and contemporaneous revascularizations of portal vein and hepatic artery on biliary complications in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

METHODS

We reviewed 184 patients who underwent liver transplantation in our center, and categorized them into different groups based on the duration of time between the portal venous and hepatic arterial reperfusion: >10 minutes in the sequential portal and hepatic artery revascularization group (SPA; n = 56), and within 1 minute in the contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization group (CPA; n = 121).The other patients with an interval from 1-10 minutes (n = 7) were excluded. This study then compared the outcomes between the SPA and CPA groups.

RESULTS

Cold ischemic time (mean ± standard deviation) for the SPA and CPA groups were 561 ± 150 vs 577 ± 187 minutes, respectively (P = .53). The incidence of biliary complications for the SPA and CPA groups were 14/56 and 11/121, respectively (25% vs 9%; P = .005). By the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications, the biliary complications in SPA group tended to be more severe compared with the CPA group (grade I, 0% vs 0%; II, 14% vs 36%; IIIa, 71% vs 64%; IIIb, 7% vs 0%; IV, 7% vs 0%; P = .10). Among biliary complications, the incidence of nonanatomic strictures was greater in the SPA group (9% vs 2%; P = .03), whereas the difference was not significant for anastomotic strictures (P = .054). Except for a lower serum albumin level in the SPA group 1 day after liver transplantation (P < .001), there are no differences in post-transplant liver function or renal function at 1, 7, and 30 days after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

The CPA protocol can decrease the incidence of biliary complications substantially after liver transplantation and should replace the SPA protocol used by some centers in liver transplantation.

Intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion and its association with the incidence of biliary complications after liver transplantation--a retrospective cohort study

Background

Cryoprecipitate is largely used for acquired hypofibrinogenemia in the setting of massive hemorrhage in liver transplantation (LT). However, the influence of intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion on biliary complications (BC) after LT has not been studied in detail.

Study Design and Methods

In a series of 356 adult patients who received their first LT, the causes of BC were retrospectively studied by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The clinical relationship between intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion and BC occurrence was studied through a retrospective cohort study in patients. All patients received follow-ups for one year, and, during the follow-up period, the time of BC occurrence and liver biopsies were recorded.

Results

Intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion (RR = 3.46, 95% CI [1.72–6.97], P<0.001), cold ischemia time >8 h (RR = 4.24, 95% CI [2.28–7.92], P<0.01), and high-level Child-Pugh ( RR = 1.71, 95% CI [1.11–2.63], P = 0.014) are independent risk factors to predict BC after LT according to time-to-event analysis. One year BC-free survival probability of patients received intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusions was significantly lower when compared to the group that received no cryoprecipitate(P<0.001). Moreover, BC patients in the cryoprecipitate transfusion group owned different liver pathological feature, pathological micro-thrombus formation and cholestasis were seen more often (41.4% vs 0%, 62.1% vs 12.5%, respectively) than no cryoprecipitate transfusion group.

Conclusion

These findings suggested that intraoperative cryoprecipitate transfusion was associated with BC after LT. The mechanism of BC occurrence might involve micro-thrombus formation and immune rejection.

Advantages of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of post-liver transplant bile leakage

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of magnetic resonance cholangiography with gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) where there is a suspicion of bile leakage in the post-liver transplant patient.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight patients who had undergone a liver transplant underwent 14 MR cholangiograms, five of whom presented bile leakage while the other three had no biliary system complications. The results were compared to conventional bile duct opacification (by endoscopy or t-tube cholangiogram). The analysis covered whether there was opacification of the common bile duct and intrahepatic bile ducts on T1-weighted sequences after an injection of Gd-BOPTA on delayed biliary excretion phase sequences that were carried out on average 74 min after the injection. Enhancing perihepatic collections were also taken into account.

RESULTS

Opacification of the bile ducts on delayed-phase MR cholangiogram sequences was always seen in the absence of bile leakage, and was never found when leakage was present. Enhancing perihepatic collections pointed to bile leakage every time.

CONCLUSION

Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR cholangiography is a simple and non-invasive technique for detecting bile leakage in the post-liver transplant patient.

Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: a 5-year experience

INTRODUCTION

Biliary complications, particularly bile duct stenosis or leak, remain the "Achilles' heel" of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), significantly increasing the risk of graft loss and recipient death. The aim of the study was to retrospectively analyze biliary complications over a 5-year experience seeking to identify risk factors for these complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-seven OLT performed in 84 recipients were included in the analysis. In all cases but one, we performed an end-to-end hepatic duct anastomosis with a 7-0 running suture under 2.5× magnification.

RESULTS

Biliary complications developed after 17.2% OLT: anastomosis site stenosis (10.3%), multiple stenoses (5.7%), or bile duct necrosis (1.1%). A bile leak was not observed. Two recipients died from biliary sepsis. Among the patients with biliary complications, there was an higher rate of hepatic artery problems (33.3% vs 2.7%; P<.01), and a longer anhepatic phase (85 vs 72 minutes; P<.01). We performed endoscopic treatment in 73% and percutaneous drainage in 6.6% of recipients. Good treatment results were achieved in 36.4% of cases with biliary complications whereas they were satisfactory in 27.3%. Five patients with biliary complications required re-transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

A bile duct anastomosis performed end-to-end with a running suture under magnification decreased the risk of bile leakage after OLT. A prolonged anhepatic phase or an hepatic artery thrombosis or stenosis increased the risk of biliary complications after OLT.

Outcomes of patients with benign liver diseases undergoing living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The number of people undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has increased rapidly in many transplant centres. Patients considering LDLT need to know whether LDLT is riskier than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing LDLT versus DDLT.

METHODS

A total of 349 patients with benign liver diseases were recruited from 2005 to 2011 for this study. LDLT was performed in 128 patients, and DDLT was performed in 221 patients. Pre- and intra-operative variables for the two groups were compared. Statistically analysed post-operative outcomes include the postoperative incidence of complication, biliary and vascular complication, hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence, long-term survival rate and outcomes of emergency transplantation.

RESULTS

The waiting times were 22.10±15.31 days for the patients undergoing LDLT versus 35.81±29.18 days for the patients undergoing DDLT. The cold ischemia time (CIT) was 119.34±19.75 minutes for the LDLT group and 346±154.18 for DDLT group. LDLT group had higher intraoperative blood loss, but red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was not different. Similar ≥ Clavien III complications, vascular complications, hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence and long-term survival rates were noted. LDLT patients suffered a higher incidence of biliary complications in the early postoperative days. However, during the long-term follow-up period, biliary complication rates were similar between the two groups. The long-term survival rate of patients undergoing emergency transplantation was lower than of patients undergoing elective transplantation. However, no significant difference was observed between emergency LDLT and emergency DDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing LDLT achieved similar outcomes to patients undergoing DDLT. Although LDLT patients may suffer a higher incidence of early biliary complications, the total biliary complication rate was similar during the long-term follow-up period.