Improved Kidney Graft Function After Conversion From Twice Daily Tacrolimus to a Once Daily Prolonged-Release Formulation

Conventional and Novel Approaches to Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation

Most therapeutic advances in immunosuppression have occurred over the past few decades. Although modern strategies have been effective in reducing acute cellular rejection, excess immunosuppression comes at the price of toxicity, opportunistic infection, and malignancy. As our understanding of the immune system and allograft rejection becomes more nuanced, there is an opportunity to evolve immunosuppression protocols to optimize longer term outcomes while mitigating the deleterious effects of traditional protocols.

Age and sex determine conversion from immediate-release to extended-release tacrolimus in a multi-center cohort of Canadian pediatric renal transplant recipients

ER-Tac, taken once per day, is associated with improved adherence. This study examined the potential patient and clinical factors that influence clinicians to convert pediatric patients from immediate-release to ER-Tac. This prospective multi-center observational study followed Canadian pediatric kidney transplant recipients up to 5 years post-transplant. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression was used to examine the influence of factors on conversion to ER-Tac. Sixty-six participants were included in this analysis. For every additional year of age at the time of transplant, the likelihood of conversion was more than doubled (HR 2.54, CI 1.83, 3.54, P < 0.001). The impact of age reduced by three percent for every month after transplant (HR 0.97, CI 0.95, 0.98, P < 0.001). Girls were more likely to be converted than boys (HR 3.78, CI 1.35, 10.6, P 0.01). Adherence measures (MAM-MM and tacrolimus trough variability), individual barriers to adherence, renal function, HLA mismatch, and rejection were not significant predictors of conversion in the final regression model. ER-Tac was preferentially prescribed to older age and female patients. Female sex and adolescence are both associated with worse graft outcomes, but we found no link between individualized markers of adherence/graft risk and conversion. Clinicians appeared to be using demographic features to distinguish patients at perceived higher risk and converted accordingly, without a case-by-case evaluation of who is more susceptible to poor outcomes.

A Comparative Analysis of Once-daily and Twice-daily Formulation of Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Objectives:

We aimed to compare the once-daily and twice-daily formulation of tacrolimus concerning the efficiency and effects on graft function in de novo kidney transplant patients.

Methods:

Twenty once-daily (TAC-OD) and twenty twice-daily (TAC-BID) tacrolimus administrated de novo kidney recipients who had received initial immunosuppressive therapy according to protocols at our institution (0.2 mg/kg of tacrolimus combined with 1000 milligrams of steroid taper plus 720 mg of mycophenolate and with 2.5mg/kg anti-thymocyte globulin) assessed concerning demographics, drug doses and blood concentration, and graft function.

Results:

The mean tacrolimus blood concentration measurements were higher in the TAC-OD group in the first sixty days after transplantation, and the TAC-OD group showed more blood concentration overshoots/fluctuations in the first 30 days of the treatment. The initial drug dose was significantly higher in the TAC-OD group than the TAC-BID group (p=0.04). There was no meaningful difference among groups according to graft function (creatinine measurements) (p>0.05).

Conclusion:

Between de novo kidney recipients, the new TAC-OD formulation presents a similar short-term efficacy profile as TAC-BID. However, a higher daily dosage of TAC-OD is needed to achieve similar blood concentrations in the early postoperative period.

Renal Function and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients Following Conversion From Twice-Daily Immediate-Release Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus: A 12-Month Observational Study in Routine Clinical Practice in Germany (ADAGIO)

INTRODUCTION

This 12-month, noninterventional study on routine clinical practice in Germany evaluated renal function in stable kidney transplant recipients converted from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) to prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T).

METHODS

Renal function was assessed in 183 patients by estimated glomerular filtration rate using the modification of diet in renal disease-4 formula. Self-reported gastrointestinal health-related quality of life, adherence, satisfaction with PR-T, suspected rejection episodes, and safety were also assessed at conversion and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Conversion from IR-T to PR-T resulted in stable kidney function over 12 months, with a difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate between the first and final visits of 0.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% confidence interval, -1.6, 1.8). Eight patients experienced an acute rejection episode (4.4%). At each assessment, gastrointestinal health-related quality of life was low and adherence was high. Most patients reported that they were very satisfied (69.8%) or satisfied (28.1%) with PR-T at the final visit. Among patients reporting a preference, 78.4% preferred PR-T, 2.2% preferred IR-T, and 19.4% reported no preference. The safety profile of PR-T was consistent with that previously described.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from IR-T to PR-T provided stable kidney and graft function over 12 months (Verband Forschender Arzneimittelhersteller--registered study: NIS ADV-02).

The Effect of Maintenance Treatment with Twice-Daily or Prolonged Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation on Visual Evoked Potentials in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), uraemia-induced central nervous system damage partly subsides, while the long-lasting exposure to tacrolimus may cause pathologic visual evoked potentials (VEP) findings, which have not been investigated yet. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the effect of tacrolimus maintenance treatment on bioelectrical function of optic nerves in stable KTRs. Sixty-five stable KTRs were enrolled, including 30 patients treated with twice-daily (Prograf) and 35 patients treated with prolonged once-daily (Advagraf) tacrolimus formulation. In all patients, pattern and flash VEP measurements were performed. Tacrolimus dosing and exposure were also analyzed. Overall, 129 eyes were analyzed. In pattern VEP, both (1°) and (15') latencies of P100 waves were significantly longer, whereas (1°) and (15') amplitudes were lower in the Advagraf group as compared with the Prograf group. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the use of Advagraf (vs. Prograf) was independently associated with longer (1°) and (15') P100 latencies and lower corresponding amplitudes, whereas log tacrolimus daily dose was only related to amplitudes in a whole study group. In flash VEP, log tacrolimus trough level was associated with negative changes in P2 wave amplitude irrespective of tacrolimus formulation, whereas its association with P2 latency was observed only in the Prograf group. Both the type of tacrolimus formulation and drug exposure influenced the VEP parameters in stable KTRs.

Expected and Observed Glomerular Filtration Rates in Kidney Transplant Patients Converted to Once Daily Tacrolimus: 10 Years of Follow-up

The decline of allograft kidney function in the long term remains a significant issue in renal transplantation, with drug nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular complications as important risk factors. Our study aimed to evaluate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trend and metabolic cardiovascular risk factors over 10 years in a cohort of kidney transplant (KT) recipients converted from twice-daily (TD) tacrolimus (Tac) to once-daily (OD)-Tac. We enrolled 55 consecutive KT recipients who had been at the outpatient clinic between 2009 and 2011. Thirty-seven reached the 10-year follow-up. We compared the observed eGFR with the expected eGFR trend described in KT-recipients and monitored blood pressure and metabolic cardiovascular risk factors. The observed eGFR remained stable throughout the complete follow-up (P = .188). The observed decline of eGFR was significantly lower compared with the expected decline for KT patients (P < .001). The blood pressure was maintained within target values. The monitoring of plasma glucose levels demonstrated the stability of median values (P = .686), as well as cholesterol level (P = .250), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (P = .294), and triglycerides (P = .592) throughout the follow-up. The monitoring of tacrolimus plasma level demonstrated that median trough levels remained constant (median values 4.4-5.5 ng/mL) throughout the entire follow-up period (P = .149). We suggest that the reasonable control of metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease over long-term follow-up may significantly contribute to the preservation of eGFR compared with the decline expected in KT recipients.

Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, Convertibility, and Tacrolimus Trough Levels of Twice-Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf) to Once-Daily Tacrolimus (Advagraf) Among Standard-Risk Kidney Transplant Patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute

BACKGROUND

Recently, a once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf) was released in the Philippines. Studies have shown that these 2 formulations are bioequivalent at a 1:1 conversion. This study aims to determine the efficacy, safety, convertibility, and tacrolimus trough level of once-daily tacrolimus at the end of 6 months post transplant.

METHODS

This is a randomized study among standard-risk primary kidney transplant patients performed at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Philippines. A total of 40 patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Patients in Group A who failed to meet the criteria for conversion to once-daily tacrolimus were considered to have reached the end of the study, while patients who satisfied the conversion criteria will be followed up for an additional 6 months.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The area under the curve, maximum concentration, time to achieve the maximum concentration, and the coefficient of variation were similar. The twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) group patients had significantly higher mean tacrolimus trough levels than the Group B once-daily tacrolimus patients. An increase of a once-daily tacrolimus mean dose of 8% was required to achieve a therapeutic drug level post conversion. The graft and patient survival were 100%. There was no biopsy-proven acute rejection noted either both group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant in both de novo and converted patients after KT is safe, ensuring greater stability of drug blood concentrations than the standard form. The results also suggest an 8% increase when converting stable KT patients from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus.

Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

For patients who have received a kidney transplant, studies have shown that once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (TAC) has similar efficacy and safety to standard twice-daily dosing. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of daily TAC (TAC qd) versus standard twice-daily TAC (TAC bid) administration in liver transplantation (LT).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We systematically searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing outcomes of LT patients who received TAC qd versus TAC bid.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Six studies, which included 5179 LT recipients (TAC qd = 951; TAC bid = 4228) were included in the analysis. The TAC qd group had a low 1-year graft loss rate (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.54-0.91], P = 0.008) and lower rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 90 days (OR 0.46 [95% CI 0.24-0.89], P = 0.02) compared with the TAC bid group. There was no significant difference in 1-year mortality or the incidence of adverse events after LT between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that TAC qd is safe and effective for LT patients during the first year after transplantation. Longer-term follow-up studies are necessary to determine if TAC qd is safe and effective beyond the first year after LT.

A non-randomized trial of conversion from ciclosporin and tacrolimus to tacrolimus MR4 in stable long-term kidney transplant recipients: Graft function and influences of ABCB1 genotypes

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PEP Study: Ethics committee N° 393/2004, EudraCT 2004-004209-98. PEP-X Study: Ethics committee amendment application N° 154/01/2008. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03751332.

Early Versus Late Conversion From Immediate to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus After Renal Transplantation: Clinical Effects and Treatment Costs

Introduction

Prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-TAC) was associated with improved renal function after transplantation when compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) although evidence is still scarce. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and treatment costs in patients who converted from IR-TAC to PR-TAC during the first year after renal transplantation (RT) (early converters [EC]) or after that period (late converters [LC]).

Methods

We performed a retrospective study including 79 patients (EC, 39; LC, 41) which were followed up over 60 months. A mixed-effects approach was used to investigate the differences between both groups regarding renal and metabolic outcomes as well as treatment costs.

Results

The median time from RT to conversion was 3 months for EC and 25 months for LC. For both EC and LC, a significant increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed after conversion (5.2 and 4.9 mL/min per 1.73 m², respectively). During the first year after RT, EC presented a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and inferior tacrolimus trough levels when compared to LC, with higher mean treatment costs associated. However, thereafter, these outcomes were similar between groups over the remaining time. At the end of follow-up, no significant differences were found regarding allograft acute rejection (2.6% and 2.4%), new-onset diabetes (15.7% vs 12.2%) or cardiovascular events (5.2% vs 7.3%).

Conclusions

There was a significant benefit on renal function after conversion from IR-TAC to PR-TAC. During the first year after RT, EC presented improved renal function, but higher treatment costs. None of these differences persisted at the end of follow-up.

Switch From Twice-daily Tacrolimus to Once-daily, Prolonged-release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: Long-term Outcome

BACKGROUND

One daily dose of tacrolimus (QDT) improves adherence in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. A switch from twice-daily tacrolimus (BDT) to QDT showed similar efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The aim of our study was to demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of switching from BDT to QDT in KT recipients. Preliminary results have already been published. Forty-one patients (34 men and 7 women), mean age at KT of 43.9 ± 12.7 years, underwent a 1:1 dose switch from BDT to QDT; the mean time from KT to switch was 36.6 ± 16.1 months. In our study population, 4 patients received a living donor KT and 2 received a second allograft.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 86.8 ± 13 months from the switch and 126.2 ± 22.3 months from KT. Graft and patient survival rates were 90.2% and 95.1%, respectively. All patients maintained stable renal function during follow-up. During the first 3 months after the switch we observed a significant decrease in tacrolimus blood level (P = .0001). No significant differences were observed regarding tacrolimus dose before and after QDT introduction (P = not significant [NS]). Fourteen patients who stopped steroids under BDT treatment and 16 patients who stopped steroids after the switch are currently steroid-free.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed safety and efficacy in switching from BDT to QDT. After early (<1 year) dose adjustment, tacrolimus blood levels remained stable throughout follow-up. Moreover, QDT represented a valid alternative for patients showing steroid side effects.

Clinical Evaluation of Modified Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations

The science of drug delivery has evolved considerably and has led to the development of multiple sustained release formulations. Each of these formulations can present particular challenges in terms of clinical evaluation and necessitate careful study to identify their optimal use in practice. Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that is widely used in organ transplant recipients. However, it is poorly soluble, has an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile subject to important genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions, and has a narrow therapeutic index. For these reasons, it represents an agent that could benefit from modified release formulations to overcome these limitations. The objective of this review is to discuss the clinical evaluation of immediate and modified release tacrolimus formulations in renal transplant recipients. Clinical trials from early development of immediate release tacrolimus to formulation-specific post-marketing trials of modified release tacrolimus formulations are reviewed with an emphasis on key elements relating to trial design end endpoint assessment. Particular elements that can be addressed with formulation alterations, such as pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics, and toxicity and corresponding clinical evaluations are discussed. In addition, current knowledge gaps in the clinical evaluation of immediate and modified release tacrolimus formulations are discussed to highlight potential avenues for the future development of different tacrolimus formulations with outcomes relevant to the regulators, the transplant community, and to transplant recipients. This review shows that new formulations may alter tacrolimus bioavailability, alleviate certain adverse events while potentially enhancing patient convenience.

Factors relevant to medication non-adherence in kidney transplant: a systematic review

Background Medication non-adherence is a major issue after transplant that can lead to misdiagnosis, rejection, poor health affecting quality of life, graft loss or death. Several estimations of adherence and related factors have previously been described but conclusions leave doubt as to the most accurate assessment method. Aim of the review To identify the factors most relevant to medication non-adherence in kidney transplant in current clinical practice. Method This systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO data base and follows the Prisma checklist. Articles in English in three databases from January 2009 to December 2014 were analysed. A synthesis was made to target adherence assessment methods, their prevalence and significance. Results Thirty-seven studies were analysed rates of non-adherence fluctuating from 1.6 to 96%. Assessment methods varied from one study to another, although self-reports were mainly used. It appears that youth (≤50 years old), male, low social support, unemployment, low education, ≥3 months post graft, living donor, ≥6 comorbidities, ≥5 drugs/d, ≥2 intakes/d, negative beliefs, negative behavior, depression and anxiety were the factors significantly related to non-adherence. Conclusion As there are no established guidelines, consideration should be given to more than one approach to identify medication non-adherence although self-reports should remain the cornerstone of adherence assessment.

A Steady-State Head-to-Head Pharmacokinetic Comparison of All FK-506 (Tacrolimus) Formulations (ASTCOFF): An Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized, Two-Arm, Three-Period Crossover Study

This two-sequence, three-period crossover study is the first pharmacokinetic (PK) study to compare all three innovator formulations of tacrolimus (twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus capsules [IR-Tac]; once-daily extended-release tacrolimus capsules [ER-Tac]; novel once-daily tacrolimus tablets [LCPT]). Stable renal transplant patients were dosed with each drug for 7 days, and blood samples were obtained over 24 h. Thirty subjects were included in the PK analysis set. A conversion factor of 1:1:0.80 for IR-Tac:ER-Tac:LCPT was used; no dose adjustments were permitted during the study. The median (interquartile range) total daily dose was 6.0 (4.0-8.0) mg for IR-Tac and ER-Tac and 4.8 (3.3-6.3) for LCPT. Significantly higher exposure on a per milligram basis, lower intraday fluctuation and prolonged time (Tmax ) to peak concentration (Cmax ) were found for LCPT versus IR-Tac or ER-Tac. ER-Tac showed no differences versus IR-Tac in exposure, Cmax , Tmax or fluctuation. The observed exposure of IR-Tac was used to normalize exposure for LCPT and ER-Tac, resulting in the following recommended total daily dose conversion rates: IR-Tac:ER-Tac, +8%; IR-Tac:LCPT, -30%; ER-Tac:LCPT, -36%. After exposure normalization, Cmax was ~17% lower for LCPT than for IR-Tac or ER-Tac; Cmin was ~6% lower for LCPT compared with IR-Tac and 3% higher compared with ER-Tac.

Advagraf(®) , a once-daily prolonged release tacrolimus formulation, in kidney transplantation: literature review and guidelines from a panel of experts

The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus twice-a-day (BID) and once-a-day (QD) formulations are similar. However, the available information regarding the initiation and management of tacrolimus QD is sparse and practical information is lacking. A panel of French experts extensively reviewed the available literature on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety in kidney transplantation and, based on their own day-to-day experience, provided the practitioners with practical guidelines for the daily use and management of tacrolimus QD in de novo initiation or early conversion.

Medium-Term Renal Function in a Large Cohort of Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

There is some evidence pointing toward better renal function in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) treated with once-daily tacrolimus (QD-TAC) vs. twice-daily tacrolimus (BID-TAC).

METHODS

This is an extension study of a 1-year, single arm prospective study of stable KTR who were converted from BID-TAC to QD-TAC (4.9 ± 4.0 years after transplantation) in Spanish routine clinical practice. Patient and graft survival, renal function, acute rejection episodes, and other analytic parameters were assessed at 24 and 36 months after conversion.

RESULTS

A total of 1798 KTR were included in the extension study. Tacrolimus doses at 36 months were significantly lower compared to those at time of conversion (-0.2 mg/day; P = 0.023). Blood levels were lower than baseline during all the study (P < 0.001). Graft and patient survival at 3 years after conversion were 93.9% and 95.1%, respectively. Compared with baseline, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained very stable at all timepoints (56.7 ± 19.8 vs 58.1 ± 24.6 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) at month 36; P = 0.623). Even when patients reinitiating dialysis were counted as eGFR = 0, the mean eGFR was very stable. In fact, a small but significant increase was observed at 36 months versus baseline (+0.1 mL/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.025). An increase in proteinuria was observed at 36 months versus baseline (+0.11 g/24 h; P < 0.001). Acute rejection rates were low during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from BID-TAC to QD-TAC in a large cohort of stable KTR was safe and associated with a very stable renal function after 3 years. Comparative studies are warranted to assess the feasibility of such conversion.

Advantageous effects of immunosuppression with tacrolimus in comparison with cyclosporine A regarding renal function in patients after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Nephrotoxicity is a serious adverse effect of calcineurin inhibitor therapy in patients after heart transplantation (HTX).

AIM

In this retrospective registry study, renal function within the first 2 years after HTX in patients receiving de novo calcineurin inhibitor treatment, that is, cyclosporine A (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC), was analyzed. In a consecutive subgroup analysis, renal function in patients receiving conventional tacrolimus (CTAC) was compared with that of patients receiving extended-release tacrolimus (ETAC).

METHODS

Data from 150 HTX patients at Heidelberg Heart Transplantation Center were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were continuously receiving the primarily applied calcineurin inhibitor during the first 2 years after HTX and received follow-up care according to center practice.

RESULTS

Within the first 2 years after HTX, serum creatinine increased significantly in patients receiving CSA (P<0.0001), whereas in patients receiving TAC, change of serum creatinine was not statistically significant (P=not statistically significant [ns]). McNemar's test detected a significant accumulation of patients with deterioration of renal function in the first half year after HTX among patients receiving CSA (P=0.0004). In patients receiving TAC, no significant accumulation of patients with deterioration of renal function during the first 2 years after HTX was detectable (all P=ns). Direct comparison of patients receiving CTAC versus those receiving ETAC detected no significant differences regarding renal function between patients primarily receiving CTAC or ETAC treatment during study period (all P=ns).

CONCLUSION

CSA is associated with a more pronounced deterioration of renal function, especially in the first 6 months after HTX, in comparison with patients receiving TAC as baseline immunosuppressive therapy.

A randomized cross-over comparison of short-term exposure of once-daily extended release tacrolimus and twice-daily tacrolimus on renal function in healthy volunteers

Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity remains an issue for transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetic profile (PK) of the once-daily tacrolimus extended release (Tac-ER) includes equivalent exposure [AUC(0-24 h) ] but lower Cmax versus twice-daily tacrolimus immediate release (Tac-IR). We hypothesized that the unique PK profiles would result in pharmacodynamic differences in renal function. Nineteen healthy male subjects were allocated to once-daily Tac-ER and twice-daily Tac-IR in a prospective, randomized, two period, cross-over study. Tacrolimus was titrated to achieve trough levels of 8-12 ng/ml. Twenty four hours ERPF and GFR estimated by para-aminohippurate and sinistrin clearance were performed at baseline and at the end of each 10-day dosing period. Mean Tac C0 was 11.0 ± 2.2 and 11.3 ± 1.8 ng/ml for Tac-ER and Tac-IR, respectively. The mean Effective 24 h renal plasma flow (ERPF) was significantly higher with Tac-ER compared with Tac-IR (658 ± 127 vs. 610 ± 93 ml/min/1.73 m(2) , P = 0.046). There was a trend to a greater mean GFR over 24 h for Tac-ER at 114.5 ± 13.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2) compared with 108.9 ± 9.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for Tac-IR, P = 0.116. Under controlled physiological conditions, ERPF was significantly improved with Tac-ER compared with Tac-IR, likely owing to the differing PKs of these tacrolimus preparations (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01681134).

A prospective cohort conversion study of twice-daily to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus: role of ethnicity

Background

Tacrolimus is a widely used calcineurin inhibitor in kidney transplantation. It is available as twice-daily Prograf® (Tac-BID) and once-daily Advagraf® (Tac-OD). Although therapeutically equivalent, some patients require dose adjustments to achieve similar trough concentrations [C₀] after conversion. Tacrolimus exposure is affected by ethnicity in the de novo setting but the role of ethnicity in determining dose requirements and adjustments after conversion is unknown.

Methods

In this study, 496 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) were prospectively converted from Tac-BID to Tac-OD, with dose adjustments targeted to achieve similar [C₀] at 12 months post-conversion. Renal function, acute rejection and Tac dose adjustments by ethnicity were analyzed.

Results

There were similar numbers of recipients from living and deceased donors. The mean transplant duration was 7 years. Of the RTRs, 60% were Caucasian and 40% were identified as belonging to an ethnic minority. There was no change in estimated renal function (eGFR) post-conversion to Tac-OD. At 12 months, 35/488 (7%) RTRs were receiving a reduced dose, 101/488 (21%) required a dose increase of which 77 (16%) were receiving at least a 30% increase in dose over baseline. The percentage of those in ethnic groups requiring a dose increase of >30% varied from 8.0% for South Asians to 27.5% for East Asians (P = 0.03), despite East Asians having a similar baseline dose of Tac-BID (3.59 mg/day) compared to the entire cohort (3.53 mg/day).

Conclusions

Ethnicity may play an important role in dosing requirements when converting from Tac-BID to Tac-OD, unrelated to baseline dose. Further investigation is required to determine the reasons for ethnic variability when patients are converted between tacrolimus preparations.

One-year follow-up of treatment with once-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant

OBJECTIVES

The once-daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus (tacrolimus QD) is expected to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and safety to the twice-daily formulation (tacrolimus BID). We reviewed the 1-year outcomes of tacrolimus QD in de novo renal transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 50 de novo renal transplant patients assigned in a nonrandomized fashion to either tacrolimus QD (n=23, historic control group) or tacrolimus BID (n=27). Other immunosuppressive drugs used in both groups included mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, and steroids. We evaluated trough levels, required dosages, renal function, rejection rates, and episodes of infection within 1 year after transplant.

RESULTS

Trough levels of both drugs varied during the perioperative periods, but subsequently stabilized in both groups. There was a tendency toward a slow elevation and a higher dosage requirement in the tacrolimus QD group, compared with the tacrolimus BID group in the early stages, though the required dosages decreased steadily. The rejection rate in the tacrolimus QD group was low, and only 1 patient experienced subclinical rejection. No severe infectious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients taking tacrolimus QD tended to have lower trough levels and require higher dosages than those taking tacrolimus BID during the early posttransplant period, though the differences decreased with increasing time after transplant. Tacrolimus QD can be administered with excellent efficacy and safety in de novo renal transplant recipients.

A comparison of the extended-release and standard-release formulations of tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients: a 12-month outcome study

Background

Limited comparative data are available on the outcomes between extended-release and standard-release tacrolimus when used de novo in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Methods

We identified KTRs transplanted at our institution during 2009–10 routinely prescribed extended-release tacrolimus and compared them with those transplanted during 2008–09 prescribed standard-release tacrolimus. Graft function (eGFR by MDRD-7 equation) at 12 months post-transplant (primary outcome); new-onset diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors, BK viremia incidence, acute rejection, and graft survival to 12 months (secondary outcomes) were compared by intent-to-treat analysis. Time-to-steady-state concentration and number of dose adjustments required to attain steady state were recorded.

Results

There were no important demographic differences between the extended-release (N = 106) and standard-release (N = 95) cohorts. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months was similar (58.8 ± 17 versus 59.2 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m², P = 0.307). There was no difference in new-onset diabetes (17 versus 20%, P = 0.581), BK viremia (10 versus 7%, P = 0.450), acute rejection (7 versus 16%, P = 0.067) or graft survival (97 versus 95%, P = 0.301). Time-to-steady state was similar (9.2 ± 1.1 versus 8.1 ± 4.7 days, P = 0.490) although extended-release patients required fewer adjustments to attain steady state (1.2 ± 1.7 [0–8] versus 1.7 ± 1.5 [0–7], P = 0.030) but a similar dose (7.2 ± 2.4 [2–17] versus 7 ± 2.7 [2–16] mg/day, P = 0.697).

Conclusion

De novo KTRs prescribed extended-release or standard-release tacrolimus demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes.