1
|
Abstract
The old-for-old allocation policy used for kidney transplantation (KT) has confirmed the survival benefit compared to remaining listed on dialysis. Shortage of standard donors has stimulated the development of strategies aimed to expand acceptance criteria, particularly of kidneys from elderly donors. We have systematically reviewed the literature on those different strategies. In addition to the review of outcomes of expanded criteria donor or advanced age kidneys, we assessed the value of the Kidney Donor Profile Index policy, preimplantation biopsy, dual KT, machine perfusion and special immunosuppressive protocols. Survival and functional outcomes achieved with expanded criteria donor, high Kidney Donor Profile Index or advanced age kidneys are poorer than those with standard ones. Outcomes using advanced age brain-dead or cardiac-dead donor kidneys are similar. Preimplantation biopsies and related scores have been useful to predict function, but their applicability to transplant or refuse a kidney graft has probably been overestimated. Machine perfusion techniques have decreased delayed graft function and could improve graft survival. Investing 2 kidneys in 1 recipient does not make sense when a single KT would be enough, particularly in elderly recipients. Tailored immunosuppression when transplanting an old kidney may be useful, but no formal trials are available.Old donors constitute an enormous source of useful kidneys, but their retrieval in many countries is infrequent. The assumption of limited but precious functional expectancy for an old kidney and substantial reduction of discard rates should be generalized to mitigate these limitations.
Collapse
|
2
|
Grifasi C, D'Alessandro V, D'Armiento M, Campione S, Scotti A, Pelosio L, Renda A. Can only histological evaluation determine the allocation of ECD kidneys? BMC Nephrol 2014; 15:207. [PMID: 25540026 PMCID: PMC4383215 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a recent debate on the "transplantability" of ECD (Expanded Criteria Donors) kidneys and the selection criteria used to allocate them to single or double transplantation. Remuzzi et al. have defined a protocol incorporating pre-transplant donor biopsy to guide the use of older donor organs. They allocated organs as single or double transplants on the basis of histological findings. We aim to show the pros and cons of the only histological evaluation in the allocation of ECD kidneys, to compare the different experiences in United States and Europe and thus to discuss whether this tool should be used alone or included in a comprehensive clinical and histopathological evaluation. DISCUSSION In the United States many Authors stated that the biopsy actually increases the percentage of kidney discarded and they raised questions about the importance of the biopsy in evaluating ECD kidneys for transplantation. On the other hand, the experiences of the majority of european transplant centers showed that allocating kidneys as single or dual transplant based on biopsy findings may achieve good graft and patient outcomes. Moreover, the experience of some centers as ours showed that kidneys allocated as DKT (Dual Kidney Transplant) on the basis of Remuzzi's score could have been suitable for single transplantation suggesting the need of an adjustment of the Remuzzi Score System. Many Authors, who are in favor of histological evaluation, actually believe that a comprehensive clinical and histopathological assessment before transplantation remains necessary. We lack precise national- or international-based selection criteria to guide clinicians. An adjustment of the Remuzzi Score System could be taken into consideration such as narrowing the indication for DKT from those ECD kidneys with higher scores and including the histological evaluation in a multifactor score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Grifasi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università "Federico II", via Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo D'Alessandro
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Maria D'Armiento
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Severo Campione
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Scotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Luigi Pelosio
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Andrea Renda
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
- Interdepartmental Center for Kidney Transplantation, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|