Experience of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with hepatitis C virus in kidney transplant recipients

Twelve-month kidney and liver outcomes of kidney transplantation from Hepatitis C Viremic deceased donors to aviremic recipients

INTRODUCTION

Utilization of hepatitis C viremic (HCV+) deceased donor kidneys (DDKT) for aviremic recipients increases opportunities for transplantation with excellent short-term outcomes. Our primary aim was to understand longer-term outcomes, specifically assessing kidney and liver function in the first year posttransplant.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study of adult DDKT recipients of HCV+ kidneys (cases) matched 1:1 to recipients of HCV- kidneys (comparators). Between-group outcomes were analyzed using comparisons of means and proportions, survival analysis methods, and multivariable mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Sixty-five cases and 65 comparators had statistically comparable demographic and clinical characteristics. There were no between-group differences in serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 12 (p = .662) or in their trajectories over months 1-12 (p > .292). Within the first 60 days, rates of liver function values >3 times upper limit of normal among cases were comparable to comparators for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (14% vs. 6%, p = .242) and higher for alanine transaminase (ALT) (23% vs. 6%, p = .011). AST declined during the first 8 weeks (p = .005) and stabilized for both groups (p = .406) during the following 10 months. ALT declined during the first 8 weeks (p < .001), continued to decline over months 3-12 (p = .016), and the trajectory was unrelated to antiviral therapy initiation among cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Aviremic recipients of HCV+ kidneys had comparable kidney outcomes to matched recipients of HCV- kidneys. Despite more HCV+ recipients having an elevation in ALT within the first 60 days, ALT values normalized with no identified liver complications attributed to HCV.

Recurrence Rate of Early Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Renal Transplantation Following Successful Treatment of Patients on Dialysis With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents

OBJECTIVES

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus after organ transplant has dreadful complications. An excellent response has been shown with direct-acting antiviral agents in transplant recipients. Although a sustained virological response is considered as the virological cure, it requires patients to be on dialysis for 3 months more before undergoing renal transplant, thus increasing the risk of hepatitis C virus reinfection and associated complications. We aimed to determine hepatitis C virus recurrence in renal transplant recipients who had achieved endof-treatment response before transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Per our institutional dialysis protocol, patients who do not achieve rapid virological response are treated with 6 months of direct-acting antiviral agents. All patients who achieve end-of-treatment response are then referred for renal transplant. Our study included kidney transplant recipients who were treated with directacting antiviral agents and had a hepatitis C virus polymerase chain reaction test 3 months after renal transplant. We obtained demographic and clinical data of patients and used SPSS version 20.0 for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Our study included 48 transplant recipients; most were males (81.1%) with mean age of 28.7 ± 9.4 years. All patients received sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and ribavirin combination before transplant. Most patients (70%) received treatment for 3 months. The polymerase chain reaction test for hepatitis C virus was conducted after a mean of 8.3 ± 3.3 months posttransplant. Laboratory parameters showed total bilirubin of 3.6 ± 17.5 mg/day, alanine aminotransferase of 51.5 ± 80.2 IU/L, and gammaglutamyltransferase of 133.9 ± 220 IU/L. Two recipients (4.2%) had posttransplant recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this study is the first to document excellent response of direct-acting antivirals in renal transplant recipients who had been referred early for transplant. Thus, dialysis patients can undergo transplant after achieving end-oftreatment response.

Transplantation of kidneys from hepatitis C-infected donors to hepatitis C-negative recipients: Single center experience

Our aim was to evaluate the safety of transplanting kidneys from HCV-infected donors in HCV-uninfected recipients. Data collected from 53 recipients in a single center, observational study included donor and recipient characteristics, liver and kidney graft function, new infections and de novo donor-specific antibodies and renal histology. Treatment with a direct-acting antiviral regimen was initiated when HCV RNA was detected. The mean ± SD age of recipients was 53 ± 11 years, 34% were female, 19% and 79% of recipients were white and African American, respectively. The median and interquartile range (IQR) time between transplant and treatment initiation was 76 (IQR: 68-88) days. All 53 recipients became viremic (genotype: 1a [N = 34], 1b [N = 1], 2 [N = 3], and 3 [N = 15]). The majority (81%) of recipients did not experience clinically significant increases (>3 times higher than upper limit of the normal value) in aminotransferase levels and their HCV RNA levels were in the 5 to 6 log range. One patient developed fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with complete resolution. All recipients completed antiviral treatment and 100% were HCV RNA-negative and achieved 12-week sustained virologic response. The estimated GFRs at end of treatment and 12-week posttreatment were 67 ± 21 mL/min/1.73 m² and 67 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m² , respectively. Four recipients developed acute rejection. Kidney transplantation from HCV-infected donors to HCV-negative recipients should be considered in all eligible patients.

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in a kidney transplant recipient with hepatitis C virus

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is a fatal disorder that presents as a progressive deterioration of liver function over a period of several weeks to several months. It is caused by the direct cytotoxic effect of the over-expression of viral antigens on hepatocytes in immunosuppressed patients. Our patient was a 59-year-old man with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of genotype 2a who had suffered from end-stage renal disease due to diabetic nephropathy and underwent kidney transplantation. His serum total bilirubin levels gradually increased to 20 mg/dl and liver atrophy progressed during several weeks after kidney transplantation, which was initially difficult to distinguish from drug-induced liver injury. We diagnosed the condition as FCH on the basis of pathological findings and increased HCV viral load, and treated the patient with Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir. However, the patient died of refractory hemorrhagic gastric ulcer and liver failure. Currently, it is possible to treat infections of all genotypes of HCV, even with end-stage renal disease, with direct acting antivirals. Furthermore, it is preferable to treat HCV before kidney transplantation considering the risk of FCH due to immunosuppressive therapy.

Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin for Eradicating Hepatitis C Virus in Renal Transplant Recipients in Pakistan: Where Resources Are Scarce

OBJECTIVES

Although direct-acting antiviral agents have revolutionized hepatitis C virus treatment, these novel agents are not widely available in the developing world. Further, no treatment recommendation for renal transplant recipients includes these agents. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of sofosbuvir and ribavirin, the only direct-acting antiviral agents available in Pakistan, in renal transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All renal transplant recipients receiving sofosbuvir and ribavirin from August 2015 to March 2016 were enrolled in the study. Patients' demographics and baseline laboratory parameters were collected. Rapid virologic response, early virologic response, end-of-treatment response, and sustained virologic response at 12 and 24 weeks were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 20.0.

RESULTS

Of the 37 renal transplant recipients, the mean age was 37.2 ± 10.7 years and the majority (33 [89.2% ]) were men. Twenty-five patients were treatment naive; of the remaining 12 patients, 10 were responders, 2 were nonresponders, and 5 were relapsers to pretransplant hepatitis C treatment. The genotype most commonly seen posttransplant was genotype 1 (56.8%). Rapid virologic response was achieved in 33 patients (89.2%). Early virologic response, end-oftreatment response, and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks were achieved in all 37 patients (100%). Until the time of data collection, 14 patients had achieved a sustained virologic response at 24 weeks. No complications were noted during therapy. In 2 of 4 patients who developed decompensated cirrhosis, treatment led to the resolution of ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

Sofosbuvir and ribavirin are well tolerated and effective in renal transplant recipients for eradicating hepatitis C virus. Their effectiveness is not limited to renal transplant recipients with genotypes 1, 2, 3, and 4 but also extends to those with mixed genotype (in this study, genotypes 1 and 3).

Living-Donor Liver Transplant Follow-Up: A SingleCenter Experience

OBJECTIVES

Liver transplant is a definite treatment of decompensated liver disease. Because of the shortage of livers from deceased donors, living-donor liver transplant is becoming more common. Here, we analyzed our clinical experience in the follow-up care of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Liver transplant recipients seen at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (Karachi, Pakistan) were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics and follow-up events were recorded.

RESULTS

Our study population included 76 liver transplant patients registered at our clinic. Median age was 42 years, with 62 patients (81.6%) being males. The most common indication of transplant was hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis (42 patients; 55%), followed by hepatitis B-hepatitis D virus coinfection (8 patients; 10.5%). Anastomotic biliary stricture developed in 16 patients (21.1%),which required biliary stenting. Biliary leak developed in 5 patients (6.6%), and renal cell carcinoma developed in 1 patient. Two recipients died due to hepatitis C virus-related fibrosing cholestasis hepatitis and pulmonary com plications. Posttransplant diabetes mellitus developed in 36 (47.1%), hypertension in 17 (38.6%), and dyslipidemia in 19 patients (25%). Of 42 patients with hepatitis C virus infection, 26 were treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, of which 65.3% achieved sustained virologic response at 24 weeks. The other 16 patients received sofosbuvir com - bined with ribavirin for 24 weeks. A sustained virologic response at 12 weeks was achieved in 5 patients, with not yet determined results in the remaining patients. Seven patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis C-related cirrhosis was the most common indication for liver transplant, and infection recurrence was observed in our patients. Biliary anastomotic stricture formation was the most prevalent complication after transplant. As liver transplants are becoming more widely available for Pakistani patients at home and abroad, gastroenterologists and trainees in our country should be sensitized, educated, and skilled in the posttransplant care of these patients.

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease: a review

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, mainly in those on hemodialysis (HD). The seroprevalence of HCV in developing countries ranges between 7% and 40%. Risk factors for this infection in the CKD population include the number of blood transfusions, duration of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and prevalence of HCV in HD. Chronic HCV infection in patients with ESRD is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality in the pre and post kidney transplant periods. The increase in mortality is directly associated with liver complications and an elevated cardiovascular risk in HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis. Antiviral treatment may improve the prognosis of patients with HCV, and standard interferon remains the cornerstone of treatment. Treatment of HCV in patients with CKD is complex, but achieving a sustained viral response may decrease the frequency of complications after transplantation. It appears that HCV-infected patients who remain on maintenance dialysis are at increased risk of death compared with HCV patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Management of patients with hepatitis C infection and renal disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with more rapid liver disease progression and reduced renal graft and patients' survival following kidney transplantation. Evaluations and management of HCV in patients with renal disease are challenging. The pharmacokinetics of interferons (IFN), ribavirin (RBV) and some direct acting antiviral (DAA), such as sofosbuvir, are altered in patients with ESRD. With dose adjustment and careful monitoring, treatment of HCV in patients with ESRD can be associated with sustained virological response (SVR) rates nearly comparable to that of patients with normal renal function. DAA-based regimens, especially the IFN-free and RBV-free regimens, are theoretically preferred for patients with ESRD and KT in order to increase SVR rates and to reduce treatment side effects. However, based on the data for pharmacokinetics, dosing safety and efficacy of DAA for patients with severe renal impairment are lacking. This review will be focused on the evaluations, available pharmacologic data, and management of HCV in patients with severe renal impairment, patients who underwent KT, and those who suffered from HCV-related renal disease, according to the available treatment options, including DAA.

Management of hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent among chronic kidney disease (CKD) subjects under hemodialysis and in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients, being an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. The vast majority of HCV chronic infections in the hemodialysis setting are currently attributable to nosocomial transmission. Acute and chronic hepatitis C exhibits distinct clinical and laboratorial features, which can impact on management and treatment decisions. In hemodialysis subjects, acute infections are usually asymptomatic and anicteric; since spontaneous viral clearance is very uncommon in this context, acute infections should be treated as soon as possible. In KT recipients, the occurrence of acute hepatitis C can have a more severe course, with a rapid progression of liver fibrosis. In these patients, it is recommended to use pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) in combination with ribavirin, with doses adjusted according to estimated glomerular filtration rate. There is no evidence suggesting that chronic hepatitis C exhibits a more aggressive course in CKD subjects under conservative management. In these subjects, indication of treatment with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin relies on the CKD stage, rate of progression of renal dysfunction and the possibility of a preemptive transplant. HCV infection has been associated with both liver disease-related deaths and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients. Among those individuals, low HCV viral loads and the phenomenon of intermittent HCV viremia are often observed, and sequential HCV RNA monitoring is needed. Despite the poor tolerability and suboptimal efficacy of antiviral therapy in CKD patients, many patients can achieve sustained virological response, which improve patient and graft outcomes. Hepatitis C eradication before KT theoretically improves survival and reduces the occurrence of chronic graft nephropathy, de novo glomerulonephritis and post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

Interferon-based anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection after renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent in renal transplant (RT) recipients. Currently, interferon-based (IFN-based) antiviral therapies are the standard approach to control HCV infection. In a post-transplantation setting, however, IFN-based therapies appear to have limited efficacy and their use remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IFN-based therapies for HCV infection post RT.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and The Cochrane Library (1997-2013) for clinical trials in which transplant patients were given Interferon (IFN), pegylated interferon (PEG), interferon plus ribavirin (IFN-RIB), or pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-RIB). The Sustained Virological Response (SVR) and/or drop-out rates were the primary outcomes. Summary estimates were calculated using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 12 clinical trials (140 patients in total). The summary estimate for SVR rate, drop-out rate and graft rejection rate was 26.6% (95%CI, 15.0-38.1%), 21.1% (95% CI, 10.9-31.2%) and 4% (95%CI: 0.8%-7.1%), respectively. The overall SVR rate in PEG-based and standard IFN-based therapy was 40.6% (24/59) and 20.9% (17/81), respectively. The most frequent side-effect requiring discontinuation of treatment was graft dysfunction (14 cases, 45.1%). Meta-regression analysis showed the covariates included contribute to the heterogeneity in the SVR logit rate, but not in the drop-out logit rate. The sensitivity analyses by the random model yielded very similar results to the fixed-effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

IFN-based therapy for HCV infection post RT has poor efficacy and limited safety. PEG-based therapy is a more effective approach for treating HCV infection post-RT than standard IFN-based therapy. Future research is required to develop novel strategies to improve therapeutic efficacy and tolerability, and reduce the liver-related morbidity and mortality in this important patient population.

Hepatitis C and renal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the new insights of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and renal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

HCV is its most frequent cause of liver disease after transplantation. In the long run, HCV infection can lead to cirrhosis, hepatocarcinoma and death in some patients. As interferon is generally contraindicated after transplantation, the best way to treat patients is before transplantation. Long-term patient and graft survival rates are lower in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative graft recipients. HCV infection is an independent risk factor for death and graft loss. Mortality is higher, mainly as a result of cardiovascular complications, liver disease and infections but is lower than in HCV-positive patients on the transplant waiting list. New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), and HCV-related glomerulonephritis, together with chronic rejection and notably transplant glomerulopathy can contribute to graft failure. Despite this factor, transplantation is the best option for the HCV-positive patient on dialysis. Renal transplantation with kidneys from donors with positive anti-HCV antibodies into HCV RNA-positive recipients seems to be safe in the long term.

SUMMARY

Renal transplantation is the therapy of choice for dialysis patients with HCV infection. To improve the results, a careful follow-up in the outpatient clinic for early detection of HCV-related complications is mandatory.