1
|
Salvadori M, Tsalouchos A. Current protocols and outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2020; 10:191-205. [PMID: 32844095 PMCID: PMC7416363 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i7.191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the principal obstacles in transplantation from living donors is that approximately 30% are immunologically incompatible because of the presence in the recipient of antibodies directed against the human leukocyte antigen system of the donor or because of the incompatibility of the ABO system. The aim of this review is to describe the more recent data from the literature on the different protocols used and the clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. Two different strategies are used to overcome these barriers: desensitization of the recipient to remove the antibodies and to prevent their rebound after transplantation and the exchange of organs between two or more pairs. The largest part of this review is dedicated to describing the techniques of desensitization. Even if the first reports of successful renal transplantation between ABO-incompatible pairs have been published by 1980, the number of ABO-incompatible transplants increased substantially in this century because of our improved knowledge of the immune system and the availability of new drugs. Rituximab has substantially replaced splenectomy. The technique of apheresis has improved and more recently a tailored desensitization proved to be the more efficient strategy avoiding an excess of immunosuppression with the related side effects. Recent reports document outcomes for such transplantation similar to the outcomes of standard transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Salvadori
- Department of Transplantation Renal Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence 50139, Italy
| | - Aris Tsalouchos
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Saints Cosmas and Damian Hospital, Pescia 51017, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uchida J, Kosoku A, Naganuma T, Tanaka T, Nakatani T. Latest insights on ABO-incompatible living-donor renal transplantation. Int J Urol 2019; 27:30-38. [PMID: 31522462 PMCID: PMC7004137 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This review summarizes the latest insights on ABO‐incompatible living‐donor renal transplantation. Desensitization protocols and clinical outcomes were investigated, and a comparison was made with kidney‐paired donation, which is not permitted in Japan for ethical reasons. Although renal transplantation is greatly beneficial for most patients with end‐stage kidney disease, many of these patients must remain on dialysis therapy for extended periods due to the scarcity of organs from deceased donors. ABO blood type incompatibility was once believed to be a contraindication to renal transplantation due to the increased risk for antibody‐mediated rejection and early graft loss attributable to isoagglutinins. Recently, pretransplant desensitization strategies, such as removal of isoagglutinins and antibody‐producing cells, have achieved successful outcomes, although it remains unclear whether graft survival and patient morbidity are equivalent to those for ABO‐compatible renal transplantation. The present review suggested that ABO‐incompatible living‐donor renal transplantation might be a favorable radical renal replacement therapy for patients with end‐stage kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junji Uchida
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kosoku
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshihide Naganuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Nakatani
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gan Kim Soon P, Lim SK, Rampal S, Su TT. A qualitative examination of barriers and solutions to renal transplantation in Malaysia: Key-informants' perspective. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220411. [PMID: 31404075 PMCID: PMC6690507 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing globally, and renal transplantation (RT) is the preferred renal replacement therapy to treat ESRD. Internationally, there are only a few countries with RT rates above 50 per million population (pmp), while most of the countries have RT rates between 30-40 pmp. The low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) makes up the majority for the RT rates below 20 pmp in which Malaysia belongs to despite its increasing ESRD rates. There is a need to explore the barriers to access RT with targeted solutions to improve the RT rates and service in LMIC. Thus, a qualitative study was undertaken in Malaysia to address this issue. METHOD A qualitative methodological approach was performed between March-May 2018. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore current RT policy and service availability. Key-informants were identified from a detailed stakeholder analysis of RT system in Malaysia. Interviews were digitally audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded with ATLAS.ti software and underwent thematic analysis thoroughly. RESULTS Eight key-informants participated in the study. Barriers and related solutions were classified using the socio-ecological model (SEM). As reported, the barriers and solutions of RT in Malaysia are the results of a complex interplay of personal, cultural, and environmental factors. Key barriers are linked to public's attitude and perception towards RT and the unaccommodating practices in the healthcare fraternity for RT. Key-informants provided a systematic solution that shed light on how RT could be improved at each SEM level via effective communication, education and inter-agency collaboration. CONCLUSION The SEM provided a framework to foster a better understanding of current practice, barriers, and solutions to RT in Malaysia. This study is the first to explore the barriers and related solutions to RT comprehensively as a whole. Implications of these findings could prompt a policy change for a better RT service delivery model not just for Malaysia but also for other LMIC. Further stakeholder engagement and evaluation of the systems are required to provide insight into best practices that will help to improve the RT rates and service in Malaysia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Gan Kim Soon
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Soo Kun Lim
- Nephrology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sanjay Rampal
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Tin Tin Su
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Jeffery Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kidney Paired Donation and the "Valuable Consideration" Problem: The Experiences of Australia, Canada, and the United States. Transplantation 2018; 101:1996-2002. [PMID: 29633981 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
As organ donation rates remain unable to meet the needs of individuals waiting for transplants, it is necessary to identify reasons for this shortage and develop solutions to address it. The introduction of kidney paired donation (KPD) programs represents one such innovation that has become a valuable tool in donation systems around the world. Although KPD has been successful in increasing kidney donation and transplantation, there are lingering questions about its legality. Donation through KPD is done in exchange for-and with the expectation of-a reciprocal kidney donation and transplantation. It is this reciprocity that has caused concern about whether KPD complies with existing law. Organ donation systems around the world are almost universally structured to legally prohibit the commercial exchange of organs. Australia, Canada, and the United States have accomplished this goal by prohibiting the exchange of an organ for "valuable consideration," which is a legal term that has not historically been limited to monetary exchange. Whether or not KPD programs violate this legislative prohibition will depend on the specific legislative provision being considered, and the legal system and case law of the particular jurisdiction in question. This article compares the experiences of Australia, Canada, and the United States in determining the legality of KPD and highlights the need for legal clarity and flexibility as donation and transplantation systems continue to evolve.
Collapse
|
5
|
Tenenbaum EM. Swaps and Chains and Vouchers, Oh My!: Evaluating How Saving More Lives Impacts the Equitable Allocation of Live Donor Kidneys. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 2018; 44:67-118. [PMID: 29764323 DOI: 10.1177/0098858818763812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Live kidney donation involves a delicate balance between saving the most lives possible and maintaining a transplant system that is fair to the many thousands of patients on the transplant waiting list. Federal law and regulations require that kidney allocation be equitable, but the pressure to save patients subject to ever-lengthening waiting times for a transplant has been swinging the balance toward optimizing utility at the expense of justice. This article traces the progression of innovations created to make optimum use of a patient's own live donors. It starts with the simplest - direct donation by family members - and ends with voucher donations, a very recent and unique innovation because the donor can donate 20 or more years before the intended recipient is expected to need a kidney. In return for the donation, the intended recipient receives a voucher that can be redeemed for a live kidney when it is needed. Other innovations that are discussed include kidney exchanges and list paired donation, which are used to facilitate donor swaps when donor/recipient pairs have incompatible blood types. The discussion of each new innovation shows how the equity issues build on each other and how, with each new innovation, it becomes progressively harder to find an acceptable balance between utility and justice. The article culminates with an analysis of two recent allocation methods that have the potential to save many additional lives, but also affirmatively harm some patients on the deceased donor waiting list by increasing their waiting time for a life-saving kidney. The article concludes that saving additional lives does not justify harming patients on the waiting list unless that harm can be minimized. It also proposes solutions to minimize the harm so these new innovations can equitably perform their intended function of stimulating additional transplants and extending the lives of many transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn M Tenenbaum
- Professor of Law, Albany Law School and Professor of Bioethics, Albany Medical College. Special thanks to Darren O'Connor, David Conti, Timothy Lytton, Nadia Sawicki, Jed Adam Gross, and Bridget Cuccia for their editing suggestions and invaluable comments. I owe everlasting gratitude to my fantastic research assistants Erin Kilmer, Emily Phillips, and Alexandra Newcomb for their tireless research assistance and enormous help in getting this article out the door. This article is dedicated to my sister Judy Tenenbaum, the strongest person I know, to thank her for her consistent support, wonderful sense of humor, and unique ability to give me perspective
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tafulo S, Malheiro J, Dias L, Mendes C, Osório E, Martins LS, Santos J, Pedroso S, Almeida M, Castro-Henriques A. Low transplantability of 0 blood group and highly sensitized candidates in the Portuguese kidney allocation algorithm: quantifying an old problem in search of new solutions. HLA 2016; 88:232-238. [DOI: 10.1111/tan.12895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Tafulo
- Oporto Blood and Transplantation Center; Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantacão; Porto Portugal
| | - J. Malheiro
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - L. Dias
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - C. Mendes
- Oporto Blood and Transplantation Center; Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantacão; Porto Portugal
| | - E. Osório
- Oporto Blood and Transplantation Center; Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantacão; Porto Portugal
| | - L. S. Martins
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - J. Santos
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - S. Pedroso
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - M. Almeida
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - A. Castro-Henriques
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Naciri Bennani H, Abdulrahman Z, Allal A, Sallusto F, Delarche A, Game X, Esposito L, Doumerc N, Debiol B, Kamar N, Rostaing L. Early post-transplant complications following ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. J Nephropathol 2015; 5:19-27. [PMID: 27047806 PMCID: PMC4790183 DOI: 10.15171/jnp.2016.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Living-kidney transplantation is increasing because of the scarcity of kidneys from deceased donors and the increasing numbers of patients on waiting lists for a kidney transplant. Living-kidney transplantation is now associated with increased long-term patient- and allograft-survival rates.
Objectives: The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify, in a cohort of 44 ABO-incompatible (ABOi) live-kidney transplant patients, the main complications that occurred within 6 months post-transplantation, and to compare these findings with those from 44 matched ABO-compatible (ABOc) live-kidney transplant patients who were also from our center.
Patients and Methods: This single-center retrospective study assessed post-transplantation complications in 44 ABO-i versus 44 matched ABO-c patients. All patients were comparable at baseline except that ABO-i patients had greater immunological risks.
Results: During the 6-month post-transplant period, more ABO-i patients presented with postoperative bleeds, thus requiring significantly more blood transfusions. Bleeds were associated with significantly lower values of fibrinogen, platelets, prothrombin time, and hemoglobin levels. Surgical complications, patient- and graft-survival rates, and kidney-function statuses were similar between both groups at 6 months post-transplantation.
Conclusions: We conclude that impairment of hemostatic factors at pre-transplant explained the increased risk of a post-transplant bleed in ABO-i patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Naciri Bennani
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Zhyiar Abdulrahman
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Asma Allal
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Federico Sallusto
- Department of Urology, Andrology, and Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Antoine Delarche
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Xavier Game
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France ; Department of Urology, Andrology, and Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Esposito
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Nicolas Doumerc
- Department of Urology, Andrology, and Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Bénédicte Debiol
- Etablissement Français du Sang de Midi-Pyrénées, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France ; INSERM U563, IFR-BMT, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France ; Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France ; INSERM U563, IFR-BMT, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France ; Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jha PK, Sethi S, Bansal SB, Jain M, Sharma R, Phanish MK, Duggal R, Ahlawat R, Kher V. Paired kidney exchange transplantation: Maximizing the donor pool. Indian J Nephrol 2015; 25:349-54. [PMID: 26664210 PMCID: PMC4663772 DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.150721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, paired kidney exchange (PKE) transplantation has gained popularity worldwide as a viable alternative for end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who have incompatible or sensitized donors. This study presents our experience with PKE transplantation and compares outcome between PKE and non-PKE renal transplant recipients. Between February 2010 and November 2013, 742 transplants were performed, of which 26 (3.5%) were PKE transplantations. All were two-way exchanges. PKE recipients were significantly older than non-PKE (46.73 ± 9.71 vs. 40.08 ± 13.36 years; P = 0.012) while donor ages were comparable. PKE patients had significantly higher number of HLA mismatches (5.03 ± 1.14 vs. 3.49 ± 1.57; P < 0.0001). After a median follow-up of 20 months (range: 3–47 months), there was no significant difference in patient survival (PKE 96.16% vs. non-PKE 96.65%; P = 0.596) and death censored graft survival (PKE 96.16% vs. non-PKE 96.37%; P = 1). Mean serum creatinine at 1 month and at last follow-up was lower in PKE versus non-PKE group (0.98 ± 0.33 vs. 1.3 ± 0.61 mg/dl; P = 0.008 and 0.96 ± 0.30 vs. 1.27 ± 0.57 mg/dl, P = 0.006, respectively). Biopsy proven acute rejection rate was 11.5% in PKE group and 16.89% in non-PKE patients (P = 0.6). To conclude, paired kidney donation is an excellent way of increasing the donor pool and needs to be promoted to overcome the shortage of suitable kidney in our country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P K Jha
- Department of Nephrology, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - S Sethi
- Department of Nephrology, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - S B Bansal
- Department of Nephrology, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - M Jain
- Department of Nephrology, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - R Sharma
- Department of Nephrology, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - M K Phanish
- Department of Nephrology, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - R Duggal
- Department of Lab Medicine, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - R Ahlawat
- Department of Urology, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - V Kher
- Department of Nephrology, Medanta Institute of Kidney and Urology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Translational research in kidney transplantation and the role of patient engagement. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2015; 2:42. [PMID: 26543564 PMCID: PMC4634742 DOI: 10.1186/s40697-015-0077-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Accepted: 09/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Translational research is an evolving discipline that is intended to bridge the gaps between basic science research, clinical research, and implementation in clinical practice. It is a fluid, multidirectional process that requires strong interdisciplinary collaboration to produce research that is relevant to end-users. Purpose of this review This review summarizes current perspectives on translational research and outlines its relevance and importance to kidney transplantation research. Sources of information Sources of information used for this review include published reports, articles, and research funding websites. Findings Tissue typing is used as an in-depth example of how translational research has been applied in the field of kidney transplant medicine, and how it has resulted in successful implementation of diagnostic and management options for sensitized individuals undergoing kidney transplantation. The value of actively involving kidney transplant stakeholders (patients, caregivers, and clinicians) in setting research priorities and determining relevant outcomes for future investigation is also discussed. Limitations This is a narrative review of the literature which has been partly influenced by the perspectives and experiences of its authors. Implications Translational and patient-oriented research practices should be incorporated into future research endeavours in the field of kidney transplantation in order to create beneficial change in clinical practice and improve patient outcomes. What was known before Translational research which engages patients in the investigative process can enhance the likelihood that medical discoveries will have a meaningful impact at the bedside. What this adds This article applies current perspectives on translational research and patient engagement to the field of kidney transplantation, illustrating how these approaches have led to significant advancements in the field. It provides further justification for deliberate, targeted efforts to cross-collaborate and incorporate the patient voice into kidney transplant research.
Collapse
|
10
|
Trasplante renal de donante vivo: “una mirada global”. UROLOGÍA COLOMBIANA 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0120-789x(14)50058-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
11
|
Assessing the efficacy of kidney paired donation--performance of an integrated three-site program. Transplantation 2014; 98:300-5. [PMID: 24699400 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney paired donation (KPD) has emerged as a viable option for renal transplant candidates with incompatible living donors. The aim of this study was to assess the "performance" of a three-site KPD program that allowed screening of multiple donors per recipient. METHODS We reviewed retrospectively the activity of our KPD program involving three centers under the same institutional umbrella. The primary goal was to achieve a transplant that was both ABO compatible and had a negative or low-positive flow cytometric crossmatch (+XM). RESULTS During the 40-month study period, 114 kidney transplant candidates were enrolled-57% resulting from a +XM and 39% resulting from ABO incompatible (ABOi) donors. Important outcomes were as follows: (1) 81 (71%) candidates received a transplant and 33 (29%) were still waiting; (2) 368 donors were evaluated, including 10 nondirected donors; (3) 82% (37/45) of ABOi candidates underwent transplantation; (4) 56% (36/65) of +XM candidates underwent transplantation (however, all but four of these had a cPRA less than 95%); (5) at the end of the study period, 97% (28/29) of +XM candidates still waiting had a cPRA greater than 95%. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest evaluating large numbers of donors increases the chances of KPD. Patients with a cPRA greater than 95% are unlikely to receive a negative or low-positive +XM, suggesting the need for desensitization protocols in KPD.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Renal transplantation in childhood is a well established procedure with excellent short-term outcomes. However, waiting times for transplantation are still relatively long if living donation cannot be performed, and long-term outcomes after transplantation have not significantly improved during the last decade. RECENT FINDINGS This review describes alternative modalities to improve donation rates such as en bloc kidney transplantation from young donors, ABO-incompatible transplantation and kidney paired donation. This review also deals with long-term post-transplant morbidities, such as follows: first, medication side-effects (metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease) and with the benefits of steroid and calcineurin inhibitor drug minimization; second, the deleterious impact of viral infections and their management and third, chronic antibody-mediated rejection, its therapeutic and prevention possibilities. SUMMARY Donor shortage and long-term morbidities, after transplantation, are still relevant issues in paediatric renal transplantation medicine. Significant research and efforts have been made to advance the field and create novel approaches for improvement of transplantation rates and post-transplant graft or patient survival. These modalities are to be established in the routine setting.
Collapse
|
13
|
The evolving approach to ethical issues in living donor kidney transplantation: A review based on illustrative case vignettes. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2014; 28:134-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2014.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2013] [Revised: 03/31/2014] [Accepted: 04/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
14
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Humoral sensitization to antigens of the human leukocyte antigen and ABO systems remains one of the largest barriers to further expansion in renal transplantation. This barrier translates into prolonged waiting time and a greater likelihood of death. The number of highly sensitized patients on the renal transplant waiting list continues to increase. This review focuses on the options available to these patients and speculates on future directions for incompatible transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS Desensitization protocols (to remove antibodies), kidney-paired donation (to circumvent antibodies) or a hybrid technique involving a combination of both have broadened the access to transplantation for patients disadvantaged by immunologic barriers. However, the risk of antibody-mediated rejection may be increased and warrants caution. Technical advances in antibody characterization using sensitive bead immunoassays and the C1q assay and therapeutic modalities such as complement inhibitors and proteasome inhibitors have been used to avoid or confront these antibody incompatibilities. SUMMARY A growing body of knowledge and literature indicates that these diagnostic and therapeutic modalities can facilitate a safer and more successful treatment course for these difficult-to-treat patients. Rigorous investigations into newer interventions will help in broadening the options for these patients and also expand the living donor pool.
Collapse
|
15
|
Outcome of kidney paired donation transplantation to increase donor pool and to prevent commercial transplantation: a single-center experience from a developing country. Int Urol Nephrol 2012; 45:1171-8. [PMID: 23136032 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-012-0323-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2012] [Accepted: 10/24/2012] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Economic constraints in operating an effective maintenance dialysis program leaves renal transplantation as the only viable option for end-stage renal disease patients in India. Kidney paired donation (KPD) is a rapidly growing modality for facilitating living donor (LD) transplantation for patients who are incompatible with their healthy, willing LD. MATERIALS AND METHODS The aim of our study was to report a single-center feasibilities and outcomes of KPD transplantation between 2000 and 2012. We performed KPD transplants in 70 recipients to avoid blood group incompatibility (n = 56) or to avoid a positive crossmatch (n = 14). RESULTS Over a mean follow-up of 2.72 ± 2.96 years, one-, five- and ten-year patient survival were 94.6, 81, 81 %, and death-censored graft survival was 96.4, 90.2, 90.2 %, respectively. Ten percent of patients were lost, mainly due to infections (n = 4). There was 14.2 % biopsy-proven acute rejection, and 5.7 % interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy eventually leading to graft loss. CONCLUSION The incidences of acute rejection, patient/graft survival rates were acceptable in our KPD program and, therefore, we believe it should be encouraged. These findings are valuable for encouraging participation of KPD pairs and transplant centers in national KPD program. It should be promoted in centers with low-deceased donor transplantation. Our study findings are relevant in the context of Indian government amending the Transplantation of Human Organs Act to encourage national KPD program. To our knowledge, it is largest single-center report from India.
Collapse
|