C4d deposits in acute "cell-mediated" rejection: a marker for renal prognosis?

C4d immunoreactivity of intraoperative zero-hour biopsy in renal allograft

C4d deposition in the peritubular capillaries is known to be correlated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in renal allografts. An intraoperative zero-hour biopsy during transplantation is considered an indicator to indirectly determine the status of the donor kidney. In this study, we investigated the relationship between C4d immunoreactivity of intraoperative zero-hour biopsy in renal allograft, thought to be due to donor condition, and acute rejection episodes during follow-up. We collected 147 renal transplantation cases examining intraoperative zero-hour biopsy with C4d immunohistochemical staining. All cases were from the Seoul National University Hospital between 2010 and 2011. Of the 147 cases, 24 (16.3%) showed strong C4d staining in the glomeruli, 38 (25.9%) showed weak staining, and the remainder (57.8%) showed negative staining. Nine cases (6.1%) showed positive C4d staining in the arterioles, and the remainder (93.9%) were negative. There were no significant differences between acute T-cell-mediated rejection and acute AMR episodes in the renal allograft specimens during follow-up according to the glomerular or arteriolar C4d immunoreactivity of the intraoperative zero-hour biopsy specimens.

Positive C4d in kidney transplantation biopsy: clinical impact

BACKGROUND

Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries of renal graft is normally associated with the presence of antibody-mediated rejection. The clinical impact of its presence in patients with renal transplant in Colombia is uncertain, as well as the association in acute rejection and the response to the management and survival of the graft. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of having positive C4d in biopsies of patients with episodes of acute cellular rejection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 226 biopsies of kidney transplantation, all of them with acute rejection and histopathological findings classified according to Banff criteria 2009 and performed between January 2005 and December 2012 for graft dysfunction. C4d staining was performed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

C4d staining was positive in 25 of 226 biopsies. Rejection time in patients with positive C4d was 15 months in average vs 8 months with negative C4d.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of a multivariate analysis, we found that the unique risk for C4d in our population was the positive panel reactive antibodies and elapsed time between transplant and the rejection (odds ratio: 2.12, P = .034) and that the other variables analyzed are not related to the expression of C4d.