Paired Exchange Kidney Transplantation Experience of Turkey

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Paired Donation Transplantation: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the kidney paired donation (KPD) program recipients with the traditional living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients regarding patient and graft survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 141 recipients of the KPD program and 141 classic LDKT recipients that we matched for age and sex as controls between July 2005 and June 2019. We compared the 2 transplant groups for patient and kidney survival using the Kaplan-Maier test. We also performed Cox Regression analysis to examine factors affecting patient survival, including transplant type.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 96.17 ± 44.22 months. Of the 282 patients, 88 died in the follow-up period. There was no statistically significant difference in graft and patient survival between the KPD and LDKT groups. In the Cox regression model, including the transplant type, only the serum creatinine level measured in the first month after discharge was a significant factor in predicting patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate that the KPD program is an effective and reliable method to increase LDKT. Country-wide multicentric studies should confirm the results of this study. In countries where cadaver transplantation is insufficient, efforts should be made to expand the KPD program.

Implementation of a User-Friendly, Flexible Expert System for Selecting Optimal Set of Kidney Exchange Combinations of Patients in a Transplantation Center

INTRODUCTION

For end-stage renal disease patients, kidney transplantation is the only long-term solution. The number of deceased donors is limited. Living kidney donation is subject to strict regulations, limiting possible donors only to the extended family of the patient for preventing the organ trade. There may be incompatibilities between the patients and their related donors, such as ABO blood type incompatibility, positive cross-match, and so on.

METHODS

Pairwise exchanges between donors and recipients increase both the quality and the quantity of feasible transplantations. The maximum benefit in kidney exchanges could only be yielded by developing a central kidney exchange program supported by a nation wide living donor pool database. In the absence of a central kidney exchange program, each transplantation center arranges the kidney allocations using spreadsheets manually. Selecting best possible combination of exchanges simultaneously is a difficult task when performed manually. It is a proven NP-Hard combinatorial optimization problem. However, using mixed integer programming methods the best combination can be found in seconds.

RESULTS

We developed a user-friendly decision support system that can be used in transplantation centers, facilitating their operations.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision support system can be modified for according to the matching preferences of transplantation centers and it can be used as a simulation tool for analyzing different allocation methods.

Allocation and matching in kidney exchange programs

Living donor kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients suffering from end-stage renal disease. To alleviate the shortage of kidney donors, many advances have been made to improve the utilization of living donors deemed incompatible with their intended recipient. The most prominent of these advances is kidney paired donation (KPD), which matches incompatible patient-donor pairs to facilitate a kidney exchange. This review discusses the various approaches to matching and allocation in KPD. In particular, it focuses on the underlying principles of matching and allocation approaches, the combination of KPD with other strategies such as ABO incompatible transplantation, the organization of KPD, and important future challenges. As the transplant community strives to balance quantity and equity of transplants to achieve the best possible outcomes, determining the right long-term allocation strategy becomes increasingly important. In this light, challenges include making full use of the various modalities that are now available through integrated and optimized matching software, encouragement of transplant centers to fully participate, improving transplant rates by focusing on the expected long-run number of transplants, and selecting uniform allocation criteria to facilitate international pools.